Failure To Act Case Study

1211 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Elements of criminal liability

Failure to act in criminal law can result to an unlawful act because the criminal law imposes a duty to act. If a person doesn’t perform that act then they will be liable and guilty.doing nothing will cause actus reus to happen. Sometimes a person will be liable for failing to act. Generally principle remains that a person isn’t guilty for not wanting to do something. There are two types of of liability for omission. The first is the breach of duty to act. The second is the liability for failing to intervene.
There are situations where a person will be liable for failing to act. In many cases the is ni duty to ac but a person will be criminally liabke for an ommisiion because there is a legal duty to act. Examples of when a legal duty to act should take place is neglection of a child and the duty owed by the public officer. “Gibbins & Proctor, Rv (1918) CCA”, a man and his common law wife starved a 7 year old to death. As a parent your duty is to take care of your children regardless whether they are your biological children or not. The defendants will failed to look after the child and therefore liable for murder, even though the child wasn’t hers she was receiving money from the husband for food. This case a clear example as to how a failure in criminal law may amount to an unlawful act.
In comparison to “Smith, Rv (1826)” when a man had a helpless brother , he kept the brother in a dark room with little food and warmth. Even though what the man did to his brother is unlawful, there isn’t any legal obligation on one brother to maintain and look after the other. With this case there isn’t any duty towards another adult.
There are many examples by causing an unlawful act due to failure to abide the criminal law. If a driver fails...

... middle of paper ...

...istakenly reputed part of the woman’s uterus as well as her bladder, as a result of this the woman died. The doctor was convicted of manslaughter. In Mr Young’s case it was necessary to give Bernard medication but as a result of gross negligence he instructed the nurse to give Bernard an overdose of the medication. Mr Young is responsible for Bernard’s death.
Bernard get hit by a bus when he retreated from Albert. Even though it isn’t entirely Albert’s fault, the bus driver did also contribute to the death of Bernard. The mere fact that Albert stabbed as well as him getting run over by a bus does not break the chain of causation. If Bernard escaped from Albert, he probably wouldn’t have gone to seek help or he would have died whilst trying to get to the hospital. Not knowing the exact location could mean Bernard would have died anyway regardless being hit by a bus.

Show More
Related

  • The Model Penal Code Section 2.01

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Model Penal Code, section 2.01 discussed are the requirements of voluntary act; Omission as Basis of Liability; and Possesion as an Act. Mainly focusing on the “Voluntary” and “Involunatary” sections, first, stated is that “A person is not guilty of an offense unless his liability is based on conduct which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act of which he is physically capable. Secondly, stated are acts that are not voluntary wihin the meaning of this section following as, “A reflex or convulsion; a bodily movement during unconsciousness or sleep; conduct during hypnosis or resulting from hypnotic suggestion; and a bodily movement that otherwise is not a product of the effort or determination of the actor, either conscious or habitual.” These requirements correspond with the Latin term “Actus Reus” which is a term used to describe a criminal act. Actus Reus is the wrongful dead that compromises the physical components of a crime. There is a fundamental principle stated in the case textbook that criminal liability always entails an “Actus Reus”, that is, “the commission of some voluntary act that is prohibited by law.”

    Read More

  • Responsibility in The Legal Environment of Business

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...as charged for selling to an police officer while on duty. The clerk had no idea that the police officer was still on duty because the officer had taken off his arm-band. The author stated, the offense of strict liability is not intentionally. Which is true how can someone be held accountable for other people actions if they had no idea what is going on. People are not mind readers and people should be held accountable for their own actions.

    Read More

  • Example Of A Negligence Case Study

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    On Thursday, 11/12/2015, at 17:01 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to a domestic disturbance in progress located at 66 Paper Lane, Murphysboro, IL 62966. It was reported that a 15 year old female juvenile was busting out windows on her mother’s vehicle. Deputy Sergeant Ken Lindsey #2406 and Deputy John Huffman #2903 responded as well.

    Read More

  • The Trolley Problem, by Judith Jarvis Thomson

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    The mother-son case illustrates that there are more factors in play than just the two that Thomson presents in her thesis. Thomson’s conditions by themselves cannot explain every situation. The relationship between the people involved can also affect whether a decision is morally permissible or not. If that relationship entails that one person is emotionally bound and ethically responsible for the security and well-being of the other, the first cannot knowingly contribute to the death of the second. Thomson’s thesis must be modified to include this condition as well.

    Read More

  • Explain The Four Legislative Factors In Sport

    1424 Words  | 3 Pages

    An example of this would be that they don’t follow the law, they will face charges.

    Read More

  • Policy Considerations and Their Impact on Police Force

    1895 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first element to examine is that of possible benefit to society. In Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force , the claimant found information relating to a murder of a police officer. They reported it, but the file of the report given was stolen. The couple received violent threats after this occurred. In this case, a duty was established, it was done so in order to protect future informers, to ensure people will come forward. If no liability had been placed it would be detrimental, as informers would be less likely to come forward. This case is then distinguished into a type of negligence referred to as ‘direct action’ cases . It relates to deterrence, as well since it places this liability in order to protect informers and thereby to make sure this kind of negligence does not occur again from the police. It is a somewhat rare example where a duty of care is established. Another element of practical consideration is that of resources. The other main case for police negligence is Osman v Ferguson . In this case, a 14-year-old boy was being stalked by his schoolteacher. It came so to the point where the schoolteacher came to the claimant’s house and killed his father and injured the boy. The police had been called on several occasions, but failed to act before it went out of control. It had proximity and reasonable foreseeability however; it was

    Read More

  • Hospers and Free Will: An Analysis

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    Author's Thesis: No, individuals should not be held responsible for their action. Nevertheless they must be punished.

    Read More

  • Negligent Discipline

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    In discussing negligent failure to discipline and explaining how Criminal Justice agencies can limit their liability. In order to discuss negligent failure to discipline, you have to understand what negligent failure means. Negligent failure is not taking care of someone or something, the result of which is harm to that person or thing. Negligent is failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action which such a reasonable person would not. Negligence is accidental as distinguished from intentional torts or from crimes, but a crime can also constitute negligence, such as reckless driving.

    Read More

  • Attempted Murder and Criminal Acts

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay, I will describe the elements of a criminal act, address the law of factual impossibility, the law of legal impossibility, and distinguish whether the alleged crime in the scenario is a complete but imperfect attempt or an incomplete attempt. I will address the ethical or moralistic concerns associated with allowing a criminal defendant to avoid criminal responsibility by successfully asserting a legal defense such as impossibility. The court was clearly wrong to dismiss the charge against Jack of attempted murder of Bert.

    Read More

  • Liability for Omissions in Tort Law

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a strict distinction between acts and omissions in tort of negligence. “A person is often not bound to take positive action unless they have agreed to do so, and have been paid for doing so.” (Cane.2009; 73) The rule is a settled one and allows some exceptions only in extreme circumstances. The core idea can be summarized in “why pick on me” argument. This attitude was spectacularly demonstrated in a notoriously known psychological experiment “The Bystander effect” (Latané & Darley. 1968; 377-383). Through practical scenarios, psychologists have found that bystanders are more reluctant to intervene in emergency situations as the size of the group increases. Such acts of omission are hardly justifiable in moral sense, but find some legal support. “A man is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to them.” (L Esher Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 Q.B. 497) Definitely, when there is no sufficient proximity between the parties, a legal duty to take care cannot be lawfully exonerated and imposed, as illustrated in Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] All ER (D) 722). If it could, individuals would have been in the permanent state of over- responsibility for others, neglecting their own needs. Policy considerations in omission cases are not inspired by the parable of Good Samaritan ideas. Judges do favour individualism as it “permits the avoidance of vulnerability and requires self-sufficiency. “ (Hoffmaster.2006; 36)

    Read More

  • Paul's Injustice

    2206 Words  | 5 Pages

    This case found the law had taken a wrong turn and hence removed JEL. This meant liability as an accomplice requires intention to aid or encourage, with foresight merely acting as evidence of this intention. This case also established that recklessness, as raised within Carter v. Richardson , is not sufficient for the mens rea of accomplice liability. Knowledge or foresight of the offence committed is required for liability. Had this case occurred prior to Jogee the judgement in 2016, where JEL was still alive, the outcome of Selma’s secondary liability following Pauls rape of Victoria could be determined differently, although arguably would not be ultimately

    Read More

  • The Fatal Consequences of Drunk Driving

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    is drinking and driving. This incident has taken many innocent lives or caused serious injuries

    Read More

  • Poor Performance Case Study

    1133 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to perform at the highest level, an employee must be motivated and have a strong combination of declarative and procedural knowledge. If an employee significantly lacks any of these performance determinants, the manager must address the issue through the most appropriate performance management approach. In the case presented, Heather’s declarative knowledge has been clearly presented. However, her ability to interact successfully with students both during and after class may indicate a lack of procedural knowledge and the possibility of a motivation problem. With the right behavior approach to performance measurement, Heather’s manager could capitalize on her strong declarative knowledge,

    Read More

  • Locutionary Act Case Study

    2163 Words  | 5 Pages

    Speech act is actions performed via utterances (Yule, 1996: 47). Speech acts are divided into three acts, namely locutionary act, illocutionary act, and perlocutionary act (Austin, 1970). First, locutionary tells about what is said by people. The second, illocutionary act talks about what is the meaning behind an utterance. Illocutionary act is used to explain the real purpose of someone’s utterance. The third, perlocutionary tells about the effect of an utterance to the hearer.

    Read More

  • An Omission

    409 Words  | 1 Pages

    that they did make some attempt to care for Fanny, but the court. decided that they had still failed in caring for somebody they had a duty for. Contracts can also give rise to a duty to act. In the case of R v Pittwood, where a man became immediately criminally liable when he. failed to act under his contract, resulting in a death. The decision in

    Read More

More about Failure To Act Case Study

Open Document