Failure Of Reconstruction Essay

1609 Words4 Pages

Many who witness the maws of change note how shifting cultural tides arise in grass-roots rallies, rebellions, or even retaliation in riots, which either peacefully, or otherwise, influence legislators. However, in America, copious amounts of legislation trickles from Washington to unwilling, immobile populations. In fact, one period in particular endured pushes for transformation unlike any other: the Reconstruction era. Although leadership had no choice, nonetheless the Reconstruction displays Congress’ failure to enforce unsought political and cultural advancement throughout diverse communities. All in all, legislation amid the Reconstruction which intended to support African Americans were considerably unsuccessful policies; despite …show more content…

Withal, the Emancipation Proclamation had not reached far enough; Republicans discerned that their freedom would be trivialized if southern governments foisted social and economic shackles upon blacks, so they forged the Reconstruction Act of 1867 (Bartels). The Reconstruction Act of 1867 replaced southern state governments for imposed military rule until new, anti-discriminatory federal laws could be enforced on the southern population (Bartels). Since many of the southern governments failed to impose Congress’ laws, the military rule considerably abetted African Americans integrate into society. Likewise, The Freedmen's Bureau, officially the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, also desired to guide caucasian and African Americans through transitioning from slavery to freedman eras (Cimbala). Though the Freedmen's Bureau was largely undersupplied by Congress, it held some gravity to southerners with the intentions to mistreat their African American workers (ibid). The Bureau’s task …show more content…

Southern states passed prejudiced mandates known as Black Codes which intended to keep African Americans dependent and socio-economically inferior to caucasians. Black Codes included, though was not limited to, restricting the following: “legal sanction of marriage, granted the right to own property, and allowed Blacks to testify in a court of law” (Bartels). This Black Code belonged to Mississippi and was among the most punitive of its kind. Because lawmakers wanted to keep freedmen as an economic and societal underclass, they forbid the entire populous from owning property, indicating their necessity to labor for a white man, and banned interracial marriages which would mix the classes of black and white, blurring the lines. In fact, most Black Codes are intentionally written in a confusing, vague, maze of semantics intended to swerve loopholes in order to decrease the likelihood of detection (Bartels). Considering integral statutes such as the Fourteenth Amendment targeted Black Codes, southerners obligatory sneaked and hid in language to effectively pass anti-African American, anti-Reconstruction ordinances. One of the most despicable breeds of Black Codes were Vagrancy Laws. Vagrancy Laws further instilled white supremacy over freedmen by limiting blacks to agricultural work; most Vagrancy laws

Open Document