Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
African Americans in reconstruction
The impact of presidential reconstruction on african americans
Impacts of American reconstruction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many who witness the maws of change note how shifting cultural tides arise in grass-roots rallies, rebellions, or even retaliation in riots, which either peacefully, or otherwise, influence legislators. However, in America, copious amounts of legislation trickles from Washington to unwilling, immobile populations. In fact, one period in particular endured pushes for transformation unlike any other: the Reconstruction era. Although leadership had no choice, nonetheless the Reconstruction displays Congress’ failure to enforce unsought political and cultural advancement throughout diverse communities. All in all, legislation amid the Reconstruction which intended to support African Americans were considerably unsuccessful policies; despite …show more content…
Republican’s best effort and their myriads of ancillary laws, determined southern lawmakers nullified and manufactured remarkable bulks of malicious regulations which partly accounted for disappointing, meager African American representation. Republicans, who served an exceptional majority in Congress, passed countless of laws, policies and acts all backing the Reconstruction’s ideals for African Americans. Bountiful decrees were in actuality amendments directly to the Constitution. Indeed, beginning with the Thirteenth Amendment, passed in January 31, 1865; since Republicans found the necessity to expand the Emancipation Proclamation, they formally criminalized slavery in all states and territories ("The Andrew Johnson Administration"). The Thirteenth Amendment was thoroughly enforced which benefited African Americans throughout the U.S. Next, the Fourteenth Amendment, which redefined, and refined, citizenship in the U.S., ensuring that citizenship could not be denied by arbitrary means such as race; additionally, it overrode the Constitution’s measure of an African American man to be three-fifths of a person ("The Andrew Johnson Administration"). The amendment was a response to the south denying citizenship to African Americans, and although it shut one loophole, Congress would continue to battle misinterpretations and workarounds to laws concerning citizenship and citizen’s rights. Many southerners used loopholes which denied permission for African Americans to vote, prompting Congress to pass the Sixteenth Amendment, which specifically confirmed African American’s right to vote (Spiller). Though the legislation was certainly beneficial to the lives of many African Americans for some time, again, the amendment boiled down to a frivolous attempt to solve a complication which southerners forebode with restrictions such as literacy constraints. Though Congress passed countless amendments to escalate African American’s beatitude, they also passed legions of policies in order to balance power and economic opportunity between whites and blacks. A fundamental, cardinal regulation from the Reconstruction, the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, freed all slaves located in rebelling states from the Civil War ("The African American Odyssey"). The Emancipation Proclamation immensely assisted enslaved African Americans throughout the south; it was also a false beacon, shimmering with hope and promise only found to be a mirage of the future of equality and brotherhood.
Withal, the Emancipation Proclamation had not reached far enough; Republicans discerned that their freedom would be trivialized if southern governments foisted social and economic shackles upon blacks, so they forged the Reconstruction Act of 1867 (Bartels). The Reconstruction Act of 1867 replaced southern state governments for imposed military rule until new, anti-discriminatory federal laws could be enforced on the southern population (Bartels). Since many of the southern governments failed to impose Congress’ laws, the military rule considerably abetted African Americans integrate into society. Likewise, The Freedmen's Bureau, officially the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, also desired to guide caucasian and African Americans through transitioning from slavery to freedman eras (Cimbala). Though the Freedmen's Bureau was largely undersupplied by Congress, it held some gravity to southerners with the intentions to mistreat their African American workers (ibid). The Bureau’s task …show more content…
was so incredibly daunting their efforts only produced small amounts progress. However, numerous African Americans appreciated the service which they were able to provide, therefore proving overall advantageous to freedman and African Americans. For example, The Bureau found fighting local laws tough, and so Congress passed the Civil Rights Bill of 1866, which was aimed at the South’s discriminatory codes ("The Andrew Johnson Administration"). They nullified many inequitable decrees and protects multitudes of rights for blacks, and some of these rights included: the right to make and enforce contracts, the right to sue and be sued, the right to give testimony, and the right to own and sell land ("The Andrew Johnson Administration"). Mainly, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 enforced the Thirteenth Amendment, which improved African Americans’ lives. Even though Congress passed manifold laws during the Reconstruction for African Americans, many were not imposed in areas which they were intended and needed. Though Republicans in Congress were able to pass many pro-Reconstruction laws, southerners either disobeyed or found loopholes within the policies with Black Codes.
Southern states passed prejudiced mandates known as Black Codes which intended to keep African Americans dependent and socio-economically inferior to caucasians. Black Codes included, though was not limited to, restricting the following: “legal sanction of marriage, granted the right to own property, and allowed Blacks to testify in a court of law” (Bartels). This Black Code belonged to Mississippi and was among the most punitive of its kind. Because lawmakers wanted to keep freedmen as an economic and societal underclass, they forbid the entire populous from owning property, indicating their necessity to labor for a white man, and banned interracial marriages which would mix the classes of black and white, blurring the lines. In fact, most Black Codes are intentionally written in a confusing, vague, maze of semantics intended to swerve loopholes in order to decrease the likelihood of detection (Bartels). Considering integral statutes such as the Fourteenth Amendment targeted Black Codes, southerners obligatory sneaked and hid in language to effectively pass anti-African American, anti-Reconstruction ordinances. One of the most despicable breeds of Black Codes were Vagrancy Laws. Vagrancy Laws further instilled white supremacy over freedmen by limiting blacks to agricultural work; most Vagrancy laws
penalized freedmen who were not laboring, enforced extreme taxes on freedmen who were in skilled labor forces ("Black Codes"). Such laws were malicious policies which hurt the Reconstruction’s purpose. Another brand of Vagrancy Laws comprised specific policies designated “Enticement Codes” criminalized employers to offer high wages to laborers who are already engaged ("Black Codes"). Wage caps on African Americans were already banned by the federal government so southern lawmakers discovered a workaround, negatively impacting the Reconstruction’s cause. Despite Congress’ best efforts, reality elucidates that much of the Reconstruction included southerners biasing bylaws against African Africans. Though policy undeniably is an essential measure of success, or rather failure, legislative rights include the right to hold offices and effectively act in local, state, and federal levels, which were largely neglected for African Americans. Across the mainly the south, blacks did run for and hold offices. African Americans in state offices came in droves, “Between 1865 and 1877 about 70 black teachers and over 100 black ministers of religion entered politics, securing seats on state legislatures. Well over 600 blacks would sit on state legislatures” (Spiller). A stunning amount of southern African Americans, over six-hundred, involved themselves in lawmaking and the future of the country. For perspective, as much as “90 percent of black officeholders during Reconstruction came from the South” (Spiller). Considering so many African Americans endured hot summer years as servants, once they obtained their liberty they to elected African Americans representatives. However, many less African Americans were able to serve on a federal level; Hiram Revels and Joseph Rainey were the first two African Americans to serve Congress (Spiller) (“Black Americans in Congress”). Congress continued to brim with extreme majorities of whites, though the fact that freedmen were able to serve so quickly after emancipation was a sign of faith for every hopeful citizen. Although African Americans served in impressive amounts of offices, their positions were close to meaningless due to their absence and inability to inspire power. Despite their passionate orations promoting racial equality, African Americans in states such as South Carolina failed to achieve power held by their caucasian colleagues (“Black Americans in Congress”). The power gap between African Americans and whites was a boundless tragedy to their cause, though remember many celebrated the very fact that they had power in the first place. Others, though, were not so happy; many saw African Americans in power as “ignorant, illiterate, propertyless, and that they lacked education and the economic wherewithal to take part intelligently in government” (Foner). Leadership’s hastey flip-flop for African Americans in leadership failed to animate bigoted caucasians. In fact, the north contracted plenty of prejudice. James S. Pike, a northern journalist who observed South Carolinian government noted, “It is impossible not to recognize the immense proportion of ignorance and vice that permeates this body” (ibid). Citizens and those in power throughout the nation questioned black’s capability to lead. Since many thought that African Americans were unfit to serve in office, whites often forced African Americans to endure elections riddled with violence and fraud (“Black Americans in Congress”). Indeed, legislative power was out of reach for many African Americans aspiring for leadership within the states. So, even though myriads of blacks held office, many had tribulations surviving elections were relatively ineffective in power. Reconstruction did not only discourage minorities of aspiring African American leaders, but widely ostracized the African American and freedmen community as a whole. The Reconstruction predominantly failed to bring wide-spread, enforced legislative rights for African Americans. Remember, not only did African Americans have trouble with legislative rights, but southern Black Codes worked around, ignored, and outright outweighed much of the pro-Reconstruction legislation. An intrinsic lesson from the Reconstruction is that, though at times the green Earth appears a war of tribes, a cosmos of black and white, if we introspectively dive deep all of us can remember our innate beliefs: each one of us are colorful beings of wonder.
Over the course of five chapters, the author uses a number of sources, both primary and secondary, to show how the National Negro Congress employed numerous political strategies, and allying itself with multiple organizations and groups across the country to implement a nationwide grassroots effort for taking down Jim Crow laws. Even though the National Negro Congress was unsuccessful in ending Jim Crow, it was this movement that would aide in eventually leading to its end years later.
The Black Codes were legal statutes and constitutional amendments enacted by the ex Confederate states following the Civil War that sought to restrict the liberties of newly free slaves, to ensure a supply of inexpensive agricultural labor, and maintain a white dominated hierachy. (paragraph 1) In southern states, prior to the Civil War they enacted Slave Codes to regulate the institution of slavery. And northern non-slave holding states enacted laws to limit the black political power and social mobility. (paragraph 2) Black Codes were adopted after the Civil War and borrowed points from the antebellum slave laws as well as laws in the northern states used to regulate free blacks.
The Bureau for Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, more commonly known as the Freedmen’s Bureau, was created with the passage of the Freedmen’s Bureau Act on March 3, 1865 (United States). The bill, which was supported by Abraham Lincoln as well as Radical Republicans in Congress, faced a great deal of opposition from Southern states and passed with only a two vote majority (Dubois). The bill is intentionally vague in order to allow leniency in its implementation. The flexibility provided by refraining from outlining specific programs was intended to benefit the freedmen by allowing the program to mold and fit his needs (Colby).
As stated many historians have begun to describe the Reconstruction Era as a “Splendid Failure”, given the intricate circumstances in the political and economic issues in America following the effects of the Civil War, it is not a complete revelation that the Reconstruction Era was going to face difficult and most challenging obstacles throughout the era. The Reconstruction Era provided success of many different business and began a series of small and large business in which contributed to the Industrialization Era. As new industrial businesses were establishing, advertising came as a vital component. In the chapter, describes the many opportunities that were created through Thomas Edison’s light bulb invention allowing employees to work longer
The Civil War was period of change in American history. Following the warfare, congress established a federal agency named the Freedmen’s Bureau to facilitate the freed people’s transition from slavery to freedom. Southern blacks encountered the worst chaos, displacement, illnesses, poverty and epidemics, which were limiting to the bureaus successes during reconstruction (Finley 2013, 82). During the war, lack of basic needs and medicine hindered the efforts of improving economic social and political freedom. As a result, the Freedmen’s Bureau was designed to help black southerners transition from slavery to freedom. The challenges faced during this transition were enormous, as the civil war had ruined the region completely. The farms faced destruction during the war and huge amounts of capital depleted in the war. When the civil war ended, the social order of the region was chaotic and slave owners as well as their former slaves were forced to interact socially in a different way than before (Finley 2012, 82). The Freedmen’s Bureau was a unique effort by the federal government to improve the social wellbeing of the American nation. Major General Oliver Howard headed the Free...
Reconstruction could be considered one of the largest projects ever undertaken. The mess that was the south, left in the ruins of a bloody war, called for drastic measures. The inquisition that begs to be asked is whether or not this venture was a success. Unfortunately the answer isn't as simple as "yes" or "no". Although many promises were broken, the much-debated goals of Reconstruction are still present in the minds of today's leaders as we continue to rebuild our country.
The social history regarding reconstruction has been of great controversy for the last two decades in America. Several wars that occurred in America made reconstruction efforts to lag behind. Fundamental shortcomings of the reconstruction were based on racism, politics, capitalism and social relations. The philosophy was dominant by the people of South under the leadership of Lincoln. Lincoln plans were projected towards bringing the states from the South together as one nation. However, the efforts of the Activist were faded by the intrusion of the Republicans from the North. Northerners were capitalists and disapproved the ideas that Lincoln attempted to spread in the South (Foner Par 2).
The Reconstruction was undoubtedly a failure . The political and social aim of Reconstruction was to form national unity as well as create civil rights and equality for African Americans. Even though Reconstruction laid the foundation for equal rights in the United States, it did not achieve its primary goals. In the time of Reconstruction, many African Americans still felt the effects of oppression and many were still trapped in an undesirable social and economic class. The Reconstruction was an overall fail despite the fact that it was the shaky groundwork for a fight for equality in the years to come.
During the 1800s, the succeeding era following the American Civil War was sought to be a period of prosperity, privilege and freedom for those affected by the calamitous war and preceding period of oppression. This era of reconstruction made a genuine effort to; Readmit Confederate States to Union, establish and defend the rights to newly-freed African Americans, and integrate them into the United State's social, economic and political operations. However, the reality of this adverse situation was that southern, democratic radicals would institute new laws known as "Black Codes" (OI) which would set a nationwide precedent that they would go as far as they needed to maintain their confederate way of life. Other southern radicals had also created White Supremacy Organizations to combat opposing Republicans and freedmen. The severity of the situation synergized with Confederate hate established the grounds in which the efforts of Reconstruction ultimately failed.
The primary sources I selected to write about have do with the horrible years of the Reconstruction Period, how freedom for former slaves was a huge issue and debate across the whole nation, especially the south because of the views slave holders had. From these primary sources we see what former slave holders had to say about their views on the freedom of slaves, and the views of former slaves as well on freedom and the sacrifices and pain they had to go through to be where they are at today.
After the Civil War, in 1865, the southern plantation owners were left with minimal labor. They were bitter over the outcome of the war and wanted to keep African Americans under their control. Black Codes were unique to the southern states, and each state had their own variation of them. In general, the codes compelled the freedmen to work. Any unemployed black could be arrested and charged with vagrancy. The ones that did work had hours, duties, and types of jobs dictated to them. Codes were also developed to restrict blacks from becoming successful. They discouraged owning and selling property, and raising and selling their own crops. Blacks were often prohibited from entering town without written permission from a white employer. A black found after 10 p.m. without a note could be arrested. Permission was even required from a black’s employer to live in a town! Section 5 of the Mississippi Black Codes states that every second January, blacks must show proof of residence and employment. If they live in town, a note from the mayor must b...
William Mason Grosvenor believes that Reconstruction should be harsh. Grosvenor has two main arguments to support this belief, manifest destiny and the potential for the reoccurrence of a similar event to the war if Reconstruction was carried out in a lenient manner. Grosvenor argues that the country, pre-Civil War, was never truly a single unified country, but rather a group of peoples with vastly different values held together by a constitution which they had outgrown, saying, “[n]o chemical union had ever taken place; for that the white-hot crucible of civil war was found necessary.” Furthermore, Grosvenor believes that the succession of the South demonstrated this divide while simultaneously violating the doctrine of manifest destiny through
The Americans of African and European Ancestry did not have a very good relationship during the Civil war. They were a major cause of the Civil War. But, did they fix or rebuild that relationship after the war from the years 1865 to 1900? My opinion would be no. I do not believe that the Americans of African and European ancestry successfully rebuilt their relationship right after the Civil war. Even though slavery was finally slowly getting abolished, there was still much discrimination against the African Americans. The Jim Crow laws and the black codes discriminated against black people. The Ku Klux Klan in particular discriminated against black people. Even though the United States government tried to put laws into the Constitution to protect black people, the African Americans were discriminated in every aspect of life from housing, working, educating, and even going to public restrooms!
During the reconstruction period, African Americans benefited from the civil rights act of March 1866 and the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment. However, for African Americans in the former confederacy, opportunities were limited as in1865 and 1866 the former confederacy states passed black codes’ a replacement of the former slave codes, which once again forcibly cemented the second-class status of African Americans. The most oppressive of the codes was against vagrancy, ...
William Howard Russell once said, "Little did I conceive of the greatness of the defeat, the magnitude of the disaster which it had entailed upon the United States. So short-lived has been the American Union, that men who saw it rise may live to see it fall.” At one point in History, the United States was not one nation. The Civil War had created many issues for the United States and the country was desperate for a solution. This solution was thought to be reconstruction. Reconstruction was the attempt from the early 60's until the late 70's to resolve the issues of the war after slavery was dismissed and the Confederacy was defeated. Reconstruction also attempted to address how states would again become part of the Union, the status of Confederate leaders, and the status of African Americans across the United States.