Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alfred Edmond Jr’s Why Asking for a Job Applicant's Facebook Password Is Fair Game
Alfred Edmond Jr’s Why Asking for a Job Applicant's Facebook Password Is Fair Game
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Alfred Edmond Jr’s “Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password Is Fair Game”, Edmond explains his reasoning behind why he thinks that employers should be able to ask for the social media passwords for the applicant’s accounts. Alfred generally makes a strong case that if you post anything to social media that whatever you post is expected to be public and, therefore, should made accessible to the employer, however some of his points fall apart under scrutiny, weakening his argument.
Edmond’s tone was mostly a casual tone, addressing the reading as he would in a sort of business casual setting. It was effective in getting me to sympathize with his points and while still being able to take him seriously. The author mostly used an appeal to emotion, with some appeals to logic. His approach works pretty well, he uses the appeals to emotion to emphasize if you are going to share a post to the world then why not allow your potential employers to see it as well.
Edmond starts off strong by acknowledging that while he would have consenting to giving a company the password to his Facebook profile that he thinks that there are some fields that he believes that asking for the
…show more content…
Facebook password would be acceptable. Edmond states that if he were running a child care business that it would be reasonable for him to ask for the password to his potential employee’s account to see if the employee has a history of inappropriate communications with minors. This example provides the reader with an example of a field that everyone could agree that hiring knowing the applicant’s history would be favorable. Edmond’s argument does seem to suffer a quite a bit, however, because he talks about giving your Facebook password to your employer but it really seems like what he actually seems to mean is to allow your employer to view your social media profile.
Defining exactly what he meant by giving your Facebook password to your employer would help his argument by defining how much access that the employer would have to the employee’s social media account. Mostly he seems to be making the case that the employer should be able to see the public posts on the employee’s social media, but giving the employer the password would give the employer unlimited access to not only see everything that the employee posts, but also unlimited access to private messages, and access to alter their social media
account. For a lot of people defining the amount of access that the employer would have to the worker's social media account is what would make or break this argument. Many people would agree to the prospect of allowing a potential employer see their public social media profile would be worth it for the employment, while other people would consider it a deal breaker for employment at the company. Furthermore, I think that you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who would agree to allow their employers to have full access to their accounts.
Ever since Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook in 2004, millions of people have flocked to the website, resulting in “1.49 billion active users” (Facebook). Facebook allows users to not only reconnect with old friends, but also share whatever the user deems necessary. Facebook has many privacy settings that enable users to prevent anyone from seeing what they post. Even so, skeptics out in the world strongly attest that Facebook, and similar social media websites, aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. In the essay Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password Is Fair Game, Alfred Edmond Jr. addresses the false security Facebook provides to its users, and uses that notion to support his claim that bosses should
attempt to evoke an emotional response from the reader. He does make some good points
Alfred Edmond Jr. wrote the article, Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password is Fair Game. In the article he assessed and argued that you should provide your potential employer with your Facebook password because nothing is ever really private. Edmond effectively persuades the reader to agree with him by uniting his audience and establishing his credibility, providing scenarios that toy with the reader’s emotions, and by making logical appeals. In addition to making these appeals he successfully incorporates an informal tone that further sways the reader to grasp the essence of his argument. These are the elements that make Edmond’s argument valid and persuasive. He is able to convince us that providing a possible employer with something that is private such as our password will ultimately be beneficial for everyone in the situation.
“The standards of what we want to keep private and what we make public are constantly evolving. Over the course of Western history, we’ve developed a desire for more privacy, quite possibly as a status symbol…”(Singer) Technological change leads to new abuses, creating new challenges to security, but society adapts to those challenges. To meet the innate need for privacy, we learn what to reveal and where, and how to keep secret what we don't want to disclose. “Whether Facebook and similar sites are reflecting a change in social norms about privacy or are actually driving that change, that half a billion people are now on Facebook suggests that people believe the benefits of connecting with others, sharing information, networking, self-promoting, flirting, and bragging outweigh breaches of privacy that accompany such behaviours,”(Singer) This is obvious by the continuous and unceasing use of social media platforms, but what needs to be considered is that this information is being provided willingly. “More difficult questions arise when the loss of privacy is not in any sense a choice.”(Singer) When the choice to be anonymous it taken away through social media, the person loses the ability to keep their personal information
Facebook is a discourse community; this community uses a variety of social media to keep people informed about what is going on a daily basis. An individual may write a “post” so that the community can see it or they can post it in another individuals’ “wall”. A wall is a biography of a company or an individual; you may obtain information about this company or individual by simply reading their “wall”. If
For example, Rosen states, “According to a recent survey by Microsoft, seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online,” (Rosen, Para. 3). Most of the time it is a necessity for companies to do online and background research on candidates because of wanting a safe environment to work in. Social media sites are the fastest way to see who a person truly is. But sometimes it can just be a character they posses because that’s what they’re followers want to see rather than their true self. Jokes can be made and other people do not see it that way which leads to your workplace seeing it and thinking that you’re a bad and trouble person. Rosen’s article informs his readers that you don’t want to be that person where one little thing you did on social media defines your whole life and you’re known for it. The new privacy on Facebook made certain parts of a user’s profile public which caused many criticism from users. Rosen also credits four democratic senators, Charles Schumer of New York, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Al Franken of Minnesota, and Mark Begich of Alaska. The four democratic senators were also concerned about the privacy changes Facebook made. They expressed their concern of “instant personalization” feature and new privacy settings to the chief executive of
Facebook is Using You – claims that our information is being tracked and stored in large databases, which eventually are used either for our benefit or mostly for our disadvantage.
Most of his essay was composed of logical appeals because it is a serious more focused topic. Before Edmond explained why he was for sharing passwords with employers, he stated that in Facebook’s terms of rights and responsibilities it forbids used from sharing passwords. This fact helps support why employers should not ask and sets up a good counter argument. Next, he provides reasons for allowing employers to have one’s password. By having the password to access a future employees social media can allow the employer to make the best hire, and protect everyone in the work environment. He goes on to point out how Facebook is not safe even though they provide “privacy tools and special settings”. Finally, he explains that social media is meant for sharing information with the public that can be found in the future. That is why one should never post something personal on their social
When using Facebook, users are able to perform many different tasks while connecting with various individuals. Some of the functions and applications that are available for users include: the ability to create a profile, become friends with individuals, send private messages, post comments on friend’s walls, and share pictures on your profile page. Along with these functions, there must be a level of protection that guards the Facebook account holders. However, according to Facebook’s privacy principles, the network states that “People should have the freedom to share whatever information they want, in any medium or any format, and have ...
Facebook announced that they allowed third- party apps like Cambridge Analytica to receive personal data from many of their customers. This started a scandal that extremely hurt their business. This breach is a business issue because on a business standpoint, this can lead to a loss of customers. This is because customers are going to be afraid of their data getting stolen without their consent. In addition, people do not like to be with companies that do not have their best interest in mind. This also can cause Facebook to lose money. Their customers can decide to deactivate their accounts and every account related to Facebook such as the popular application, Instagram. Also, stockholders may not have appreciated the bad publicity,
Social media creates a host of communications issues that are not easy to counteract. In the case study, Social Benefits of Social Disaster?-Best Buy; there are two glaring examples of how social media creates issues from its communications. The first of which is the risk to security. In this case, an easy to guess password was used by a hacker to misuse a twitter account. Implications were felt not only by the individual that was hacked, but the company suffered financial losses. Further issues could have occurred if the hacker was interested trying out the password on internal Best Buy systems. As a manager, it is critical to stress to employees the importance of communications that contain sensitive information and how to choose a password that provides the highest level of security. (Robbins, Decenzo, & Coulter, 2013)
Social network profiles are the most essential tool to judge job applicants because it reflects a good image of the job applicants. For example, if the company is recruiting a writer, it would be better to choose a person who has a blog web page in a blogging website such as Word-Press that shows and reflects his/her ability in writing. In addition to that, a Human Resources manager can check this person’s Facebook and Twitter in order to see his/her grammar and writing skills. This information provides accurate and complete picture about the candidate. (Fish & Lee, n.d). Moreover, social network profiles can prove the application as it shows applicant’s participation in many fields. For instance, when a recruiter enters person’s blog that includes art and design work, it will show his/her passion to work as a designer in the company. Therefore, it is important to judge applicants based on their social media profiles because it shows a good image of the person.
With more than 500 million active users, the site is a warehouse of personal information. Personal profiles allow users to provide information about their name, age, hometown, relationship status, activities, job, school, and more. They can connect with the others’ profiles and become ”friends”. Combined with a profile picture, you can pretty much learn anything you want to know about somebody over Facebook (should they choose to provide the information). However, what many users fail to realize is that in most cases this information is not only available to their “friends”. Though users can change their privacy settings to limit with whom their profile information is shared, the site gathers and stores more than most of us want to acknowledge. For instance, the Facebook “Like” butto...
This is yet another way of invading privacy. In the past, employers would only know what you told them in your interview. They would assess your skills and determine if you were right for the job, aside from knowing your beliefs or views. However, now with Facebook an employer can see all the personal information, this can negatively influence a candidate’s job. The same goes for those who are currently employed and potential students. “Dr. Nora Barnes, Director for the Center of Marketing Research at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, published a study that showed more than 20% of colleges and universities search social networks for their admissions candidates” (Fodeman). This is becoming a part of the admissions process, but it is unfair. Searching someone’s Facebook to determine his or her admissions eligibility is wrong and a privacy invasion. As long as a student has fulfilled the school’s requirements and done well in school, why should it matter what their personal lives are like? In the time before Facebook, this would be like a school sending someone to secretly follow a potential student and see what he or she does in their
As college students and adults prepare for the real world, people are constantly faced with how to prepare for interviews and the hiring process with jobs. One factor of that is the gray area that is the idea of social media and networking helping to assist with the hiring process. Technology has become a privacy and employment issue that future employees face. When it comes to employment companies a have no boundaries and employers need to realize that social media should be used only for non-bias practices and not employment decisions based on someone’s Facebook post. Topic: How Privacy and Employment Laws effect Social Media changing the Hiring Process.