Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of earnings management on profitability
Impact of earnings management on profitability
Impact of earnings management on profitability
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of earnings management on profitability
DIVIDEND POLICY AT FPL GROUP INC
Q.1 DIVIDEND POLICY AT FPL GROUP, INC
In 1994 FPL Group, the parent company of Florida Power and Light Company, announced a reduction in its quarterly dividend from $.62 ($2.48 annual) a share to $.42. This was the first-ever dividend cut for a healthy utility, so the company did its best to explain to investors why it had taken such an unusual step.
Table 1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Dividend Earnings Dividend Dividend Earnings Dividend Dividend
per share per share payout ratio payout (%) per share payout payout (%)
before ratio
extraordi-
nary items
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 2.47 2.30 1.07 107.39 2.76 0.89 89.49
1992 2.43 2.65 0.92 91.70 2.65 0.92 91.70
1991 2.39 1.48 1.61 161.49 2.66 0.90 89.85
1990 2.34 (2.86) (0.82) (81.82) 2.64 0.89 88.64
1989 2.26 3.12 0.72 72.44 2.99 0.76 75.59
1988 2.18 3.42 0.64 63.74 3.12 0.70 69.87
1987 2.10 3.10 0.68 67.74 2.69 0.78 78.07
1986 2.02 2.90 0.70 69.66 2.90 0.70 69.66
1985 1.94 3.11 0.62 62.38 3.11 0.62 62.38
1984 1.77 2.62 0.68 67.56 2.65 0.67 66.79
Mean 68.23 78.20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysing dividend policy of FPL Group we could track some major steps, which leads company to that decision.
From table 1, the number shows that FPL has paid very high dividend comparing to the earnings. Dividend has been increased every year. Furthermore, from the record, this company has a 47 years history of dividend increases.
We can see that in 1990 dividend payout ratio was increased sharply compare to the previous years. Also, we can see that FPL had a loss in 1990, but the company still increased dividend. Furthermore, in 1991 to 1993 dividend payout ratio was significantly high when compare to the historical data. These sharp changes ...
... middle of paper ...
...pected in a rational market, within a month of the announcement, the stock price had more than recovered it's initial loss.
Bibliography:
1. M.H. Miller and K. Rock, "Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information," Journal of Finance, 40:1031-1052 (September 1985).
2. J. Lintner: "Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes," American Economic Review, 46:97-113(May1956).
3. P. Healy and K. Palepu, "Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations
and Omissions," Journal of Financial Economics 21 (1988), pp149-175.
4. R. Comment and G. Jarrell, "The Relative Signaling Power of Dutch-Auction and
Fixed Price Self-Tender Offers and Open Market Share Repurchases," Journal of
Finance 46 (September 1991), pp 1243-1271.
5. S.C. Myers, "The Capital Structure Puzzle," Journal of Finance 39 (July 1984),
pp 581-582.
6. M.H. Miller and F. Modigliani: "Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of
Shares," Journal of Business, 34:411-433 (October 1961).
7. R.A. Brealey and S.C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 6th Edition, Irwin
McGraw-Hill, Chapter 16.
The events that unfolded on September 11th and the days that followed also profoundly effected the stock market. It is the purpose of this paper is to examine what happened to both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the NASDAQ after September 11th and how it is similar to events such as the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the Gulf War in terms of how the stock market experienced a blow and bounced back after a while.
Troy, PhD., Leo. Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios. 32nd edt. (2001) (page 159) Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall.
The attacks of 9/11 resulted in history’s longest stock market shut down since the 1930s. The New York Stock Exchange remained closed for six days after the attacks. Furthermore, Davis (2011) reports that upon reopening, the New York Stock Exchange fell almost seven hundred points, the biggest one day loss in history. Additionally, Jackson (2008) reports a 14% decline in the Dow Jones, a loss the Dow still felt almost a year later. But, it was American Airlines and United Airlines that experienced the greatest loss. Following the reopening of the stock market, American experienced a 39% decline and United experienced a 42% decline (Davis, 2011). However in face of discouraging numbers, Jackson (2008) reports that the U.S. markets rebounded second only to Japan, showing the great economic resilience of the U.S. While the stock markets present a bleak outlook immediately following the attacks, the financial loss is far from reassuring.
Not only were millions of Americans been put out of work due to these manager’s actions, the American financial markets themselves were pushed to the brink of collapse. Despite the fact that the global financial markets, in reality, are not perfectly efficient, there is a corrective mechanism built into the day-to-day trading in the market. When prices are driven down by large sells, either by large investors or a movement in a stock, there are usually new buyers for these stocks at the cheaper price. Managers of...
DuPont is a very big company with a low debt policy designed to maximize financial flexibility and insulate operations from financial constraints. It is one of the few AAA rated manufacturing companies due its investments are primarily financed from internal sources. However, because prices fell in the 1960’s thus DuPont’s net income fell also. The adverse economic conditions in 1970’s escalated inflation: increase in oil prices increased required inventory investments of the company. 1975 recession negatively affected DuPont’s net income by 33% and returns on capital and earnings per share fell. The company cut dividends in 1974 and working capital investment removed. Proportion of debt increased from 7% in 1972 to 27% in 1975 and interest coverage falls from 38 to 4.6. The company perceived increase in debt temporary but moved quickly to reduce its debt ratio by decreasing capital expenditures. Debt proportion dropped to 20%, interest coverage increased to 11.5 by 1979.
The stock price is currently 103.31, down from a recent high of 121.50. The P/E ratio is declining at 28 and beta at .67, which is expected to grow closer to 1.0. A recent earnings surprise last December yielded a 15% difference from the lower expectations and the latest earnings reports late last month also surprised investors. Estimates for the 2000 fiscal year are being raised by a large majority of analyst who believe that earnings per share will increase and the stock price will reach close to 150.
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders’ equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
The economic factors that affect the Company are instability in credit markets, declining consumer and business confidence, fluctuating commodity prices, and volatile exchange rates (Genuine Parts Co. 2013 Annual Report). GPC’s shares appeared to be reasonably priced. It has a covered dividend with a history of increase and is rising to this day and GPC currently pays an annual dividend of $2.15 per share, which it has increased every year for the past 57 years (Saletta). Also, changes in general economic conditions, for example, unemployment, inflation or deflation, high energy costs, competitive product, service and pricing pressures can affect the company (Genuine Parts Co. 2013 Annual Report). Although Genuine Parts does have some factors t...
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
In mid September 2005, Ashley Swenson, the chief financial officer of this large CAD/CAM equipment manufacturer must decide whether to pay out dividends to the firm¡¦s shareholders or repurchase stock. If Swenson chooses to pay out dividends, she must also decide on the magnitude of the payout. A subsidiary question is whether the firm should embark on a campaign of corporate-image advertising and change its corporate name to reflect its new outlook. The case serves a review of the many practical aspects of the dividend and share buyback decisions, including(1) signaling effects, (2) clientele effects, and (3) finance and investment implications of increasing dividend payout and share repurchase decisions.
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
After the announcement of higher- than-expected profit on 31st July 2015, the share price went from 727.5p to
It also indicates that how much cash flow the company is getting for investing each dollar in equity position. From the above table it is indicated that the dividend yield is almost same for both the years i.e. 0.027 and 0.028. It means that for both the years the investors will be equally interested in investing making investment into coca cola. From the above table it is also observed that the dividend yield for coca cola and PepsiCo is almost the same which means that the investors will be equally interested in making investments in both
The article Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy was written in 1968 by Edward I. Altman. The purpose of the article is to address the quality of ratio analysis as an analytical technique. At the time some academicians were moving away from ratio analysis and moving toward statistical analysis. The article attempted to determine if ratio analysis should be continued, eliminated and replaced by statistical analysis or serve together with statistical analysis as cofactors in financial analysis. The example case used by the article was the prediction of corporate bankruptcy.
The basic earnings per ordinary share in 2016 is RM19.14 and RM14.30 in 2015. This shows that the ordinary share had been increased RM4.84 compare to 2016 based on 2015. In the other hand, this company had declared a first interim single-tier dividend of 10 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM22.88 million in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2016. They sold their ordinary shares of RM400,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2016 and RM200,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2015 to their shareholders. It is increased from 2015 to 2016 with 200,000,000 units. The other investments that available for sale is RM1000 same as in 2015 and 2016.