Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of the GAAP system
Case study of earning management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges of the GAAP system
Earnings Management is the concept where through the use of accounting methods under the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) standard set by FASB, companies are able to skew the results on their financial statements to look more favorable, create a positive view of the company’s financial standing and operation. Paul Rosenfield, a CPA who was the director of the AICPA accounting standards, says that GAAP is a system that has two flaws in regard to earnings management; realization and allocation. The first flaw, realization, is a flaw because under GAAP allows for assets and liabilities such as purchases, payments, sales, etc. to be changed to the advantage of the company. For example a company may change the cost flow assumption …show more content…
External financing such as the use of loans would have a lower interest rate for companies that have a better financial standing and so companies exploiting the flaws would receive better external financing opportunities than if they didn’t exploit the flaws. In a scholarly article written by Dechow, Sloan and Sweeny they found factors that would have firms be tempted to manipulate earnings to reap the benefits. These factors are in which the company is more likely to; have a board of directors be dominated by management, have a CEO that’s also the chairman of the board, have a CEO that was the company’s founder and less likely to have an audit committee and an outside …show more content…
These changes would make the company’s net worth much higher than it actually is which would encourage shareholders to invest more in that company because it seems to be doing very well. The fraud triangle is the motivations of people who commit fraud and these factors are opportunity (when people are in a position which would give them the ability to commit fraud), pressure (when people feel the need to commit fraud due to some sort of internal or external factor like debt) and rationalism (when people commit fraud due to faulty logic such as they need money now but will pay back later). Earnings Management and Fraud both have similar definitions in which they are done to put the company in a more positive view of financial standing. The difference is that earnings management is legal through the flaws under GAAP that allows companies to be able to do so. Fraud is not legal and at times is bluntly changing numbers instead of changing the method of getting the number like it is done in earnings management. But there is a very fine line between these two as a company managing their earnings could easily do a bit more to commit fraud instead of just managing their earnings
Investors are supposed to discount the stream of all future income from the share (using one of a myriad of possible rates - all hotly disputed). Only dividends constitute meaningful income and since few companies engage in the distribution of dividends, theoreticians were forced to deal with "expected" dividends rather than "paid out" ones. The best gauge of expected dividends is earnings. The higher the earnings - the more likely and the higher the dividends. Even retained earnings can be regarded as deferred dividends. Retained earnings are re-invested, the investments generate earnings and, again, the likelihood and expected size of the dividends increase. Thus, earnings - though not yet distributed - were misleadingly translated to a rate of return, a yield - using the earnings yield and other measures. It is as though these earnings WERE distributed and created a RETURN - in other words, an income - to the investor.
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Financial Shenanigans was written by Howard Schilit. The main objective of the book is to show ways companies can alter their financial accounting reports to reflect a much attractive appearance of their company’s health and growth when indeed that company is running into severe trouble. There are different ways the company can accomplish this and the author gives us “Seven Shenanigans” that companies can change the investor’s point of view towards the performance of the company. Basically, he breaks up each chapter to the particular shenanigan and discusses different techniques for achieving each shenanigan. For example, the author used Priceline.com, Cendant/CUC, AOL, and Xerox to illustrate each shenanigan. Chapter 11 and 12 of the book discusses the analyzing of financial reports and how to use financial databases to discover warning signs. Then there is another chapter on finding shenanigans in the company’s annual 10K report and how to find hints for financial shenanigans.
... tempted to falsely inflate earnings is to take away their personal gains, if the company's stocks go up. I believe that when upper level management has too much incentive based on personal financial gain, which is directly based on the performance of the company; it compromises their judgments. I think that upper level management should not be allowed to receive stock options or to even own stock in the company as the financial statements would provide a neutral, bias-free report. Management would have no reason to "cook the books." I also feel that any management who still decides to falsify documents needs to be held more accountable for their actions and receive tougher punishments. I think that these strict guidelines would help the people in the United States and people all over the world feel more confident in investing their money into the stock market.
It is easy to see how it affects the corporation, a misguidance on their balance sheet will eventually catch up to them. If prices of their goods began to fall, they cannot keep changing their inventory system. The company will eventually have to show the higher priced goods as sold. Beyond the corporation it will affect the bank that gives the company the loan. The bank is being misled to believe that the company is grossing a higher net profit, thus the bank is expecting to be repaid the debt, even though the company may not be able to afford it. The stock holders of the corporation would be greatly affected if these numbers were to be published. From an investor standpoint, the company would look like a rapidly growing entity. They would have a decent gross profit, ultimately misleading any investors. The workers at Golf Challenge Corporation are affected. Their jobs and livelihoods are at stake. In the financial statements released while using FIFO the company looks like they can pay their employees, but this may not be the case. Furthermore, the owner is directly affected. It is the owner’s company that is in stake, but beyond that it is the owner who directly sent the financial statements to the bank. The ethical issue in this case lies on his
Management/Preparers of financial statements may have a number of factors that motivate them to manage earnings aggressively. The ultimate motive for earnings management, however, is to aesthetically enhance the performance of a company in the eyes of its stakeholders (Essays, UK,
When applying the fraud triangle to Mr. Luck’s branch of credit union, it is clear that all three conditions are present. The first condition being pressure has been initiated by the managing parties of the credit union corporate office. They have linked, as a large part of Mr. Luck’s salary and bonus, the overall corporate growth goal of 3%. Linking salary to corporate growth goals violates internal controls as it provides the incentive to manipulate financial statements to meet the pressure of such goals and increasing Mr. Luck’s salary in the process (Balsam, Jiang & Lu, 2014). This also leads to rationalization on the part of Mr. Luck as he must meet the goal set forth by the corporate
Towards the end of the 20th century it became apparent that companies were beginning to increasingly use an unconventional way of predicting their future performance in earnings. This alternative measure of anticipated earnings was fundamentally based on assumptions rather than historical evidence, which is why it was viewed as being unconventional when casting a business plan. Pro-forma earnings, is scrutinized as being deceptive because the calculations used to come up with the figures weren't a true reflection of the businesses profitability. The earnings reported by companies to no comply to the strict guidelines of the GAAP and companies can manipulate their data or measure to and report earning that are hypothetical (Epstein 2009; James
Accounting fraud refers to fraud that is committed by a company by maintaining false information about the sales and income in the company books, when overstating the company's assets or profits, when a company is actually undergoing a loss. These fraudulent records are then used to seek investment in the company's bond or security issues. By showing these false entries, the company attempts to apply fraudulent loan applications as a final attempt to save the company by obtaining more money from bankruptcy. Accounting frauds is actually done to hide the company’s actual financial issues.
...nants and performance bonuses. Under positive accounting theory, when a company is in danger of violating a debt covenant, management is more likely to use accounting policies that shift reported earnings to the current period. This can lead to further manipulation of financial information through earnings management, and fair value provides an easy manner in which to do so.
When using the fair value accounting measurement, they can be in a position to reduce the value of their assets. If they applied the historical cost convention, this provision would not be available leading to difficulties in such a period.
This paper examines the impact of earnings management activities on the firms’ profitability. Earnings management has arisen as a very important issue for the firms, investors, analysts and the capital market at large. Investors estimate the businesses on the basis of earnings which indicate the extent of a company’s added value addition and provide crucial information in evaluations and comparisons of companies’ performance because they reflect concrete figures provided by the companies according to reasonable standards. Increased earnings indicate increased value, on the other hand, decreased earnings show value decline. Management remains vigilant about earnings disclosure, earnings growth, and minimization of uncertainty and manages the reports accordingly. Managers use accounting judgment and transactions to manipulate the expectatio...
Again, "fraud is not [just] an accounting problem, it is a social phenomenon," affecting everyone who has a relationship with the respective corporation. It is an epidemic that is spreading more now than ever. Fraud cannot be stopped-only contained, and to contain this disease there is a need for more or better controls because no one is immune to it. There has been change and there still is change in progress, which above everything else is a necessity because "if we do what we've always done, we'll get what we've always gotten." (Wells 2004)
Once you entered the world of accounting there are lots of responsibilities and difficulties you may face and encounter. In this case, there are times where we can't avoid malpractices in accounting which may affect an individual and an organization. The researchers chose this topic because they wanted to know more regarding this topic and being an accounting student they may encounter some related situations in the future. The researchers know that this topic must be considered for the good of the people involves in the field of accounting. If this topic will been studied it can give the people in the business some information that can help them to avoid and prevent accounting malpractices.
The FBI defines corporate fraud as: “The majority of corporate fraud cases pursued by the FBI involve accounting schemes designed to deceive investors, auditors, and analysts about the true financial condition of a corporation or business entity. Through the manipulation of financial data, the share price, or other valuation measurements of a corporation, financial performance may remain artificially inflated based on fictitious performance indicators provided to the investing public” (unknown, FBI, n.d.)