Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between society and nature
Note on importance of technology
The importance of technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between society and nature
Exploring Why Some Hazards Are Easier to Predict Than Others
For my essay I will looking at different case studies and reasons why
it appears that some hazards are easier to predict then others. There
were 497 reported natural hazards that took a significant human toll -
between 1974 and 1978. The last five years have seen 1,897 of them, a
nearly three fold increase. Between 1974 and 1978, 195 million people
were killed by such disasters or needed emergency aid; there were 1.5
billion such victims in the past five years.
Natural hazards are happening more often, and having an ever more
dramatic impact on the world in terms of both their human and economic
costs.
While the number of lives lost has declined in the past 20 years -
800,000 people died from natural disasters in the 1990s, compared with
2 million in the 1970s - the number of people affected has risen. Over
the past decade, the total affected by natural hazards has tripled to
2 billion.
According to wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn a hazard is: - a source
of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune.
Predict is defined as:-The skill of explaining new events based on
observations or information. According to: -
www.dpi.state.wi.us/standards/sciglos.html
When looking at the different types of hazards to injure or kill
people, or costing the most economic price, we consider such hazards
as tsunamis and earthquakes. Recently, In December’s tsunami in the
Indian Ocean, an estimated 250,000-300,000 people were killed or are
still missing, while millions of lives have been upturned, socially
and economically, by its impact. A main reason for the huge...
... middle of paper ...
...s not high.
Hazards in LEDC countries such as the flooding in Bangladesh although
can be predicted quite well due to seasonal rainfall and a build up of
pressure can not be researched fully due to Bangladeshis poor economic
status. As no money is available to them for research and prediction,
none can be obtained, meaning that the problem will constantly
persist.
In conclusion I would say that, yes some hazards are easier to predict
then others, due to substantial research being done in some areas,
such as hurricanes. Other hazards such as volcanoes can be seen prior
to the event, so can also easily be predicted that an eruption will be
eminent. As yet prediction is not good enough to predict some
hazards such as earthquakes, making them hard to predict, perhaps only
giving moments warning, if any at all.
Drea Knufken’s thesis statement is that “As a society, we’ve acquired an immunity to crisis” (510-512). This means that humans in general, or citizens of the world, have become completely desensitized to disasters, we think of them as just another headline, without any understanding of their impact upon fellow
Volcanic forecasts are more accurate then earthquake predictions. These predictions are generally forecast in the same way as an earthquake (temperature increases in geothermic waters gaseous concentrations, changes in elevation of land and water etc… Because we generally know where Volcanoes are, we can predict when an eruption may take place.
The world has seen numerous engineering disasters and from each one, has gained insight to better prepare for future calamities. However, it is very difficult to fully foresee how an accident might occur just by looking back to past disasters. In addition, it is even harder to prepare for something that hasn’t even happened before. The Chernobyl accident is a prime example of an event that couldn’t be fully prevented just by looking to past disasters or even predicting this exact accident. Psychological biases, as well as other contributing factors such as human factors, and design flaws made the Chernobyl accident a catastrophe that no one could have anticipated.
Hazards pose risk to everyone. Our acceptance of the risks associated with hazards dictates where and how we live. As humans, we accept a certain amount of risk when choosing to live our daily lives. From time to time, a hazard becomes an emergent situation. Tornadoes in the Midwest, hurricanes along the Gulf Coast or earthquakes in California are all hazards that residents in those regions accept and live with. This paper will examine one hazard that caused a disaster requiring a response from emergency management personnel. Specifically, the hazard more closely examined here is an earthquake. With the recent twenty year anniversary covered by many media outlets, the January 17, 1994, Northridge, California earthquake to date is the most expensive earthquake in American history.
In his essay Occupational Hazards: Why Military Operations Succeed or Fail, David Edelstein makes the case that though there is no perfect recipe for occupation, three factors do increase the likelihood of success. These are ensuring a necessity of occupation, having a commonly perceived threat and establishing credible guarantees, factors that all lend to cooperation from the occupied population, and thus ensure a more agreeable occupation. Thus, recent successful occupations are predominantly found in the post World War II, at the start of the Cold War, era, for at this time both a necessity of occupation was present (the occupied populations maintained hope that the occupying states would help them rebuild their territories) as well as a commonly perceived threat, that being the Soviet Union. However, since the end of the Cold War and the United States’ rise to being the sole great power, successful occupations have been scarce to come by. Edelstein notes that occupying powers need to make more of an effort to...
It is important for children and young people to develop their own strategies to protect themselves
This paper discusses three risk analysis methodologies, specifically, MSRAM, OCTAVE, and CRAMM and provides a detailed description of each and how they incorporate risk into a platform for decision makers to use in their endeavors to prevent, protect, mitigate, respond, and in recovery measures as part of the risk assessment and management processes.
Hazard mitigation planning is an approach aimed at ascertaining ways to reduce the effects, deaths and damage to property that might result in the occurrence of a natural of man-made hazard.
Natural Hazards and Their Effect on Rich and Poor Countries 'Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich
Obviously, natural hazards only turn into natural disasters where amassing population numbers reside in areas of enhanced natural hazards risks. Besides the theoretical possibility to abandon such zones, the goal – not just for Japan, but for other regions as well – should be to predict, forecast or at least warn from imminent risks.
To minimize the chances of such disasters, humans engage in risk assessment. We calculate the chances of each choice resulting in an unfavorable outcome, rank the choices from lest to most likely to end in disaster and pick the top result. This process is performed countless times throughout one’s life, but hardly ever consists of an actual mathematical equation. However, there are some who do quantify risk numerically. Actuaries use the ideas of probability and game theory to objectively assess the risk in a variety of chances. They may calculate the risk of one’s house being flooded, or of one falling ill. They may calculate the risk of an investment losing money, or of a plane crashing. Actuaries implement the ideas of applied mathematics for those who cannot do so themselves, and eventually figure the means by which a client can minimize the risks facing them. Yes, actuaries do figure insurance rates, but they also do so much more. As I researched the field of actuarial science, I decided that actuary should be synonymous with mathematical risk manager, for actuaries are responsible for figuring risk, minimizing risk, and minimizing the impacts of disasters that have already occurred. They complete these tasks objectively and with the power of my favorite subject, mathematics.
While the early warning saved thousands of people, the Japan’s Meteorological Agency underestimated this earthquake as the subduction zone of Japan should not produce the magnitude 9.0 quake (Oskin, 2013a). The Tohoku Earthquake and its tsunami approximately killed 16 thousand people, injured 6 thousand people and around 3 thousand people were missing. Most people died from drowning. Around 300 thousand buildings, 4000 roads, 78 bridges, and many more were affected by the earthquake, tsunami, and fires from leaking oils and gas. Electricity, telecommunication, and railways were severely damaged. The debris of 25 million tons was generated and carried out to the sea by water (BBC News, 2012). The country’s authorities estimated more than 309 billion US dollars of damages. Landslides occurred in Miyagi and liquefaction in Chiba, Tokyo, Odaiba, and Urayasu (USGS, 2013). Furthermore, the tsunami destroyed protective tsunami seawalls. Approximately 217 square miles of Japan covered in water (Oskin,
Any educational plain or public campaign designed should be considerate to the fact that our new hazards come with an increased uncertainty. Unlike a traditional threat our new hazard is implemented by a person with the ability to learn and take advantage of our mistakes. We should also be concerned with implanting an idea in the mind of a person that hopes to cause harm but just does not know how or what would achieve the greatest destruction. A challenge for any instructor will be avoiding our weakness while highlighting the strengths of the new hazards. Because the public is the focus of this education plain, I would focus the information provided in this program to information the public will need prior to, during and immediately after an attack related to the five new hazards, their targets and potential terrorists.
The first thing I would like to do is explain the current process that we use to attempt to predict these natural disasters. The act of predicting an earthquake is normally described as “as the specification of the time, location, and magnitude of a future earthquake within stated limits.” (Earthquake Prediction) Now this is also a completely different process than earthquake forecasting which is more so distinguished as the general assessment of the hazards that an earthquake presents within a given area, including the magnitude and frequency that is associated with that earthquake. We have in place, in a lot of countries, and early warning system, but this can also be distinguished from predicting earthquakes because of the fact that these systems only give about a couple of seconds of warning compared to what we would like it to be. When we speak about the prediction of ...
A common cause of death these days are made by natural calamities. It may either be storms, thunderstorms, earthquakes, landslides and so much more. All of them may cause a great impact on someone’s life. One aspect that these calamities share in common is that they come in the most fear-provoking and unforeseen way ever imagined. Most of the time, news patrols would tell the people about updates of an incoming storm; its kilometers per hour, the gustiness of its wind and even the areas that it would greatly affect but sometimes, news are not enough to make us well-prepared. One example fit for this is the Typhoon Haiyan which brought destruc...