Explain Why The Government Should Not Be In Charge Of Internet

655 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Government regulation of the internet

"The government should not be in charge of the internet. The reason why that the government should not be in charge of our network is because, if the government would be in charge of our network it would not be fair for some people because the government would say everybody has to pay more money and would have to pay more in taxes. Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. Instead of trying to regulate the Internet, these rules should be repealed in order to promote competition and innovation in the broadband market, which will result in more choices and better products for Americans at lower prices. Example when there is a big family and they use netflix, youtube, and hulu a lot and then there is one person that lives by him/her selves lives and don’t use those websites that much the government would make the one person pay as much as the big family would. Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. Net neutrality has been a problem to people who used net neutrality since 1990. Between 2005 to 2012 …show more content…

You are paying for your internet for a fairly amount of money when the government is in charge, the cost will increase by a lot. It will not be fair for some people because some people use their network a lot they are the ones who should pay more not the people how barly use their network. The government would increase the taxes if they were in charge of the network. Everyone would have to pay the same amount of money which would not be fair for small families who don’t use their network as much as the bigger

Show More
Related

  • Net Neutrality

    1150 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Internet came to be because of the user. Without the user, there is no World Wide Web. It is a set of links and words all created by a group of users, a forum or a community (Weinberger 96). The concept of net neutrality is the affirming concept behind the openness of the net (Vinton Cerf). Vinton Cerf stated, “The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. A lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive” (Vinton Cerf). Moreover, consumers would be protected under a monopolistic market due to network neutrality (Opposing Views). The Open Internet Coalition on Opposing Views.com state that in a perfect world there would be a variable amount of high-speed broadband competitors offering consumers plenty of choices. This would provide a market-based check on violations of Net Neutrality so consumers could pick a provider that respected the open concept. However, the world is imperfect and a mediator is needed to ensure networks remain open and the incentives to innovate and invest will continue to exist (Opposing Views). Lastly, there is an existence of fast and slow lanes without the implementation of network neutrality (Owen 7). This ...

    Read More

  • The Theme Of Freedom In Fahrenheit 451

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Net Neutrality requires to give everyone access to everything on the internet. This means that your internet provider won’t charge you for using specific websites. But with this, companies will have the ability to charge you for using basic things such as email, Spotify and even YouTube. Fast and slow lanes will also be included which may vary depending of what packages you paid for. But that is just the beginning, being that with this they will be able to control what you are able to see and not, ending Freedom of Speech in the

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues Of Net Neutrality

    1891 Words  | 4 Pages

    A recent and hotly debated topic among businesses, politicians, and internet users in the United States is that of net neutrality. With the rise of the internet over the past few decades, laws and regulations have struggled to keep up with the ever changing environment. As such, the problem of whether net neutrality should be enforced, and to what extent, has been a dividing issue. This problem has come into the public’s attention recently due to infringements and controversy surrounding policies by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In the following paragraphs, I plan to first define the concept of net neutrality, related topics which are crucial for an informed ethical discussion of the topic, and also related cases in which net neutrality

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality: The Future of the Internet?

    1925 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...s article “Ma Bell’s Revenge: The battle for Network Neutrality” shows us in a just a few of the hundreds of arguments which have been brought up over the proposal of network neutrality. Network neutrality essentially means that all data gets treated the same by an ISP or service, whether it be an incoming email or a gigantic video file, it’s is based on the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they choose to use on the Internet. The Internet has operated according to this neutrality principle since its earliest days. In other words, net neutrality is about equal access to the Internet in terms of overall speed. Just as telephone companies are not permitted to tell consumers who they can call or what they can say, broadband carriers should not be allowed to use their market power to control activity online.

    Read More

  • The Internet: Is it Helping or Hurting Us

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    The whole world is connected by technology. Over time, technology has advanced from payphones and typewriters to cellphones and computers. The progression from a gray-screened cellular device to an advanced smartphone allows easier accessibility. So the question is whether or not the Internet or online technology is affecting the way we read long texts. In my opinion, I agree with Nicholas Carr, who states that "our hyperactive online habits are damaging the mental faculties we need to process and understand lengthy textual information.”

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, the mechanics of the internet must be understood in order to understand the argument of Net Neutrality. Internet Service Providers (ISPs), are the actual channels of the internet which provide suppliers of content and services (CSPs) to consumers (IUs) (Kramer).

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality In Canada Essay

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States only recently introduced net neutrality legislation. Prior to these regulations, the internet functioned in a healthy and fair manner. The rules put in place in 2015 by the Obama administration were attempting to fix a problem that didn’t exist. These rules have limited consumers options rather than protecting them. The FCC under the Obama administration used legislation from the 1930’s and the 1990’s to regulate modern telecom companies. These rules are outdated and ill fitted to regulating modern telecom companies.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

    502 Words  | 2 Pages

    Net neutrality was the big talk towards the end of 2017. Taking away net neutrality would cause chaos in my opinion. Making schools and other organizations pay to use technology only discourages them from doing so which is a major step backwards in such a technological point in time. The world is constantly creating new ways to implement technology to our everyday lives and charging us to do so is not a step in the right direction. Saying that getting rid of net neutrality will do away with discrimination is absurd. Discrimination was around way before the internet was but instead we once again have one political party trying to undermine the other by playing the victim. I do agree that it isn’t right that such huge corporations such as

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Net Neutrality

    473 Words  | 1 Pages

    The concept of Net Neutrality is one with large amounts of controversy behind it. The idea that the internet would give certain types of traffic priority, such as web page requests over video streaming, is necessary to support network growth while others stake the claim that giving this priority undermines the established internet principles of free speech and non-exclusivity. The Federal Communications Commission has put policies in place to strive to a more neutral internet, one such policy being the Open Internet Order. There is heavy debate over whether the internet should be neutral and around whether or not there should be regulations in place to dictate what contents can travel faster than others can. We will be working for Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) in support of net neutrality. Markey argues that net neutrality law is the “Declaration of Independence for the Internet,” where restrictions set on certain types of content on the internet do not limit freedom of expression.

    Read More

  • Government Intervention On The Internet

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    this mean that the government owns the Internet, or is it no longer a tool

    Read More

  • Essay On Net Neutrality

    1454 Words  | 3 Pages

    The internet as we know it today has grown exponentially since it was first, fully adapted for public use in the mid-1990s. In nearly two decades of growth and development in both content and infrastructure, an understood concept of network neutrality, a concept that was never successfully legislated in the United States, existed and became the guiding principle for self-regulating the internet and minimizing government involvement. Network neutrality, or net neutrality, at its core is simply an idea or principle that all data, every bit of network traffic, should be treated equally. The transmission of illegal content, viruses, etc. are logical exceptions, of course. In December, 2010, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reclassified broadband Internet Service Providers (ISP) as an “information service” under the FCC Open Internet Order 2010, effectively equalizing ISPs with telephone service providers. This order banned both service providers from blocking access to competitors or even websites, such as Netflix or Hulu. In September, 2011, the FCC quickly and firmly followed up with supporting regulations that stated ISPs must be fully transparent in their business practices and cannot deny or discriminate against lawful internet traffic. As recently as April, 2014, that has changed, and now network neutrality may become a thing of the past. A DC Circuit Court decision between Verizon Communications, Inc and the FCC ruled that the FCC has no power to enforce net neutrality rules upon ISPs because they are not classified as “common carriers”. The earlier misclassification of ISPs by the FCC, along with the court’s decision, led to the FCC changing their stance on net neutrality in order to comply with the rul...

    Read More

  • Should Government Be Able To Regulate The Internet

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    " “The government should be able to regulate the internet. The internet is a dangerous place, full of porn, identity thefts, and cyber-bullying. If the government were to regulate the internet, they would be able to close down many sites full of porn and ensure that people's identities are safe from hackers.” (Debate.org) When our founding fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, they had no preconception of the internet and the vast amount of people that can be reached with the push of a button. The Bill of Rights need to be updated to this century whereas some things are still relevant, others need to be revised or deleted. There is no language in the Constitution to rule the internet.

    Read More

  • Regulating the Internet

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?

    Read More

  • Democracy and the Internet

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the times change, so does the latest technology. In the mid-1900's it was the television, before that the radio, and now in the late-20th and 21st century we have the internet. With the coming of every new media outlet audiences and media moguls migrate. Along with the migrations are the politicians who try to use the new form of media to more easily reach the public. It's come to the point where the internet increasingly work with democracy directly; some elections in the United States even going so far as to hold online polling in a general election. "Online voting is increasingly making its way int our political process," writes Vote.com President Dick Morris, "the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary tallied 39,942 online votes," (Morris 1034). However, should the internet really be used to such degrees in the case of democracy? There is an ongoing debate among scholars on the topic. One thing to consider is whether or not the many accusations stating that the internet is an aid to terrorism outweigh the positive effects of how the internet has strengthened democracy and has had a crucial part in turning oppressed nations into less oppressed, democratic states. On the subject of terrorism being aided by the internet, making it easier for terrorist factions leaders to inform their people, could it not be argued that these factions leaders could use other means of communication, maybe only a little less effectively and therefore nullifying the accusation that the internet is the culprit? After extensive research, it's clear that the internet does not harm democracy; on the contrary, the internet strengthens it in a way that no other form of media has done before.

    Read More

  • Government Control of the Internet

    2023 Words  | 5 Pages

    Today, society is affected by the many advances in technology. These advances affect almost every person in the world. One of the prevalent advances in technology was the invention and mass use of the Internet. Today more than ever, people around the world use the Internet to support their personal and business tasks on a daily basis. The Internet is a portal into vast amounts of information concerning almost every aspect of life including education, business, politics, entertainment, social networking, and world security. (idebate.com) Although the Internet has become a key resource in developing the world, the mass use of Internet has highlighted a major problem, privacy and the protection of individual, corporate, and even government security . The argument over whether or not the Internet should be controlled by the government has developed into a controversial issue in almost every country in the world.

    Read More

More about Explain Why The Government Should Not Be In Charge Of Internet

Open Document