Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Functionalism theory in society
Functionalist explanation of crime
Contribution of emile durkheim to sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Functionalism theory in society
Alex Feltes Professor Leifker SOC100 10 October 2014 Functionalist View of Crime and Deviance The main idea that functionalists have is that society is a complex unit. The founder of the Functionalist view Emile Durkheim believed that deviance is a normal and necessary because it contributes to the social order. He found four different parts of deviance: The affirmation of cultural norms and values which meant that if we saw a person being punished for a deviant act then others will learn that the act is wrong such as public executions back then or any form of public punishment. The clarification of right and wrong somewhat ties in with the affirmation of cultural norms and values as people who witness someone commiting a deviant act be punished
then they will understand that the deviant act is wrong. One example would be a person who is caught shoplifting being arrested in front of other people or a person being drunk and disorderly is banned from a bar. In the unification of others in society, people will band together after a deviant act is committed such as the 9/11 attacks, World War Two after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, or most recently the Michael Brown shooting. People felt united to stand up to the acts and all of them felt united as a community as if the act had affected them all. Deviance can also promote social change, such as Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat to a white person which helped sparked the Civil Rights Movement, and even the American Revolution against the British Empire. Another Functionalist Robert Merton identified five different types of people in a society and how they respond to cultural goals and institutionalized means. He theorized that people will adapt their goals based on what their society provides to them. Conformists accept their goals and institutionalized means society gives to help achieve them. Typically they are people who believe education and hard work will help them get to the “good life” they always wanted. Innovators are people who accept the goals of society but reject the normal means to achieve them. People who achieve their money through deviant means could be considered innovators, such as members of organized crime. Ritualists are people who reject the cultural goals but still accept the means of achieving them. A person who has no desire to gain money, power, or status is a Ritualist. They engage in the same activities every day but have given up home that their efforts will lead to the wanted results. Retreatists reject both cultural goals and the means of achieving them. They have no interest in making money, or advancing in status or power. They tend to not care about hard work or getting an education. The final class are Rebels. Rebels reject both the culturally approved goals and the means to achieve them like Retreatists but they also replace them with their own goals and means. They reject the status quo and seek to replace society with one that would better suit them a few examples could include the communist revolution in Russia but even the American Revolution against the British Empire as both changed society and nearly everyone’s way of life.
morals are acquired, and conformity to a standard of right is attained. In the novel The
A functionalist such as Durkheim (1858–1917) believed that deviance was an essential part of a functional society, and that by using the term deviant we were creating our own moral boundaries. Society’s reaction to an individual that crosses these moral boundaries forces people to come together, sharing the collective view of right from wrong. The consensus of these boundaries promotes self restraint and discipline within society. Durkheim theorised that the basis of social order was the shared belief in norms and values. The absence of social order would result in anomie.
In my view, Erikson delivers the most original and influential application of functionalist view on deviance. He states "Human behavior...
Functionalist state they do not concentrate on conflict or division within society. However, Durkheim does mention society is together by certain parts of the social system sharing values. If any of the above fails to work together, functionalists explain this as a ‘loss of social solidarity, a lack of integration or a loss of equilibrium’ (Jones 2003 p.38) the key conc...
The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominan...
It creates an ideal universal community of rational individuals who can collectively agree on the moral principles for guiding equality and autonomy. This is what forms the basis for contemporary human rights theory, according to Kant. He believes that moral principles are universal, and that all rational human beings are expected to conform to moral reasoning. Therefore, doing the right thing is not driven by the pursuit of individual desires or interests, but by the need to follow a maxim that is acceptable to all rational individuals.... ... middle of paper ... ...
There are two people who where mainly involved in the development of the functionalist perspective, they are Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons. Durkheim contributed to the functionalist perspective when she was studying religion, and how it was responsible for people feeling solidarity and unity in groups. Parsons was a sociologist from Harvard University who was greatly influenced by Durkheim. In return, he influenced Sociology by dominating the field, with his functionalist views, for four decades (Schaefer & Lamm, 1998).
For the past four years I have worked at my family’s company that has been in business now for 47 years. Once my grandfather hit retirement, he had passed on the ownership of the business to my father. I thoroughly enjoy working with my family, but like all jobs - the work has its pros and cons. Being that I am the owner’s daughter, my co-workers have the tendency to cast judgment upon me for receiving perks and benefits or so called “royal treatment”, that is not equally distributed upon all who are employed. For example, I am not reprimanded when arriving late to work, I receive raises in my pay check without asking for it, I don’t need to work full-time if I am not in want or need of more hours, and when it comes to vacation
One of the major sociological perspectives is Functionalism. Functionalism is centered around the work of Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and Robert Merton. Functionalism is described as a system of connected parts that are designed to achieve
Functionalism is the oldest and most commonly used theoretical approach used to understand social issues. Functionalism is a macrosociological perspective that presents the idea that society consists of different components working together to help a society function as one. Sociolog...
Deviance is the violation of cultural norms. Deviance falls into two forms: formal and informal. Formal deviance is the violation of laws in a society, resulting in crime. Informal deviance is the violation of a social norm. This is an action not acceptable by society, but cannot be punishable by law. In order to understand deviance, one must examine why individuals are deviant and what function deviance serves in society. However, there is not a definite answer for either, rather multiple theories.
There are many criticisms of functionalism and their theories: Ø Functionalist ideas almost portray humans as being autonomous and that only socialisation determines our lives. They do not really see humans as the unpredictable creatures they are, not possible to stray away from the predictable ideas that functionalists have of people. Too much stress is placed on harmony and the potential for conflict and its affects are generally ignored. Ø There is no recognition of difference by class, region or ethnic group. The functionalist picture is simply reflective of happy middle-class American families.
This is because he did not follow the positivist rule that states that sociological study should be confined to observable or directly measurable phenomena. Functionalists believe that in order for society to function correctly, there need to be shared values to help maintain social order. Society is viewed as a stable, orderly system. This stable system is in equilibrium and reflects societal consensus where the majority of members share a common set of values, beliefs, and social expectations. Functionalists also believe that society consists of interrelated parts; each part serves a function and contributes to the stability of the society.
Using functionalism to break down a social problem can be useful in trying to see the perspective functionalists use when they are finding the causes of that specific problem. One specific social problem, such as crime in America, can be broken down to see what the causes of this specific problem would be. There is one theoretical perspective that can be helpful in explaining deviance within a society. One of these theoretical ideas is Merton’s strain theory. This theory says that deviance is caused by a discrepancy in cultural goals and the tools that people have to help achieve these goals. Cultural structure is where certain goals are created that people want to meet, and social structure
Since the first day of humanities the right and wrong was and still hard to define. The definition of right and wrong is differentiating from place to another and from one culture to another and even within the same culture. In this paper I will argue that there is not such thing to justify that an act is right if the rest act the same way in similar circumstances.