Expert Witness And Trial Consultant Essay

960 Words2 Pages

Abstract
When a legal team picks an expert witness or trial consultant, they do so with an eye to the credentials that will authenticate their witness as an expert in the eyes of the judge. The noted reliability of an expert witness and trial consultants in the view of the jury has an essential influence on the result of the case and should be an evenly crucial point in expert choice. Comprehensibility is a major part of the observed credibility of the expert witness and trial consultants. Jurors will not be affected by an expert witness they cannot comprehend.
Keywords: expert witness, trial consultant, credibility
The Impact of Expert Witnesses and Trial Consultants
A few jurors may have a higher comprehension of the topic of a case more so than other jurors. These jurors may think they are the “experts” on the matter. Expert testimony that differs from the expert jurors’ understanding being seen as less conceivable by the juror, and they may be able to express their view to the other jurors. According to Cramer, Brodsky and DeCoster (2009), “Juror individual difference factors may alter perceptions of expert witness credibility.” When …show more content…

Usually, the jurors who utilized attestation-based on the reason for their decision of the experts' witness reliability believed that the experts' witness with great credentials is reliable witnesses. An expert witness with lengthy credentials, but, it's not an unconscious assurance of probability. Perceived incentives can influence jurors. Some jurors try to ascertain the reasons that an expert witness may bring to the witness stand. The jurors in the research concentrated on features that diminished an expert’s reliability, such as an expert’s possible ground for prejudice, the extent of their charges, the repetition by which they testified, and the experts' witness connection to an

Open Document