The Roles of Forensic Psychologist in Jury Selection Process In the criminal justice system psychologist play several roles, but in the jury selection process they serve as a consultant. This essay will provide three instances of psychological concepts and illustrate how they are applied to the determination of juries. The essay will also address a common ethical obligation confronting psychologist in the areas of corrections, law enforcement, court systems, and academia. Psychologist play numerous roles in the criminal justice system; in the jury selection process they are consultants. The scientists who work as jury selection consultants, conduct community attitude surveys, prepare witnesses to testify, advise lawyers on their presentation …show more content…
(Greene & Heilbrun, 2014) Several months before a trial, consultants start the process of jury selection; random people are chosen and are presented with the lawyer’s intentions. Consultants may utilize the nearby telephone directory and call arbitrary individuals to get some information about their age, race, sex, religion, job, and political perspectives. (Hutson, 2007) Afterwards they conduct focus groups, where they test parts of their case specific contentions, bits of proof, or witnesses and every so often consultants arrange mock trials with the lawyers. The method know as peremptory challenges is when both sides are allowed to exclude an assigned number of planned jurors without a reason expressed, without request, and without being liable to the court's control. The quantity of peremptory challenges assigned to every side varies, depending on the case and charge. (Greene & Heilburn, 2014) Consultants analyze their reactions to see what characteristics are essential in a specific trial, while taking into account these discoveries, consultants create questionnaire’s and procedures to select jurors most proper. (Hutson, …show more content…
("International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology", 2012) According to the International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology “…goal of improving the quality of mental health care for criminal offenders, the IACFP formulated standards for the delivery of mental health services in correctional agencies and facilities.” ("International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology", 2012) One ethical issue that psychologist who work in prison face is; offenders are not detained to receive further punishment once detained, therefore there it's the moral obligation of the psychologist to oppose the pressures of society, staff, and the lack of medical supplies. These pressures can influence the quantity of mental staff in an establishment, the measure of care that a detainee gets, inappropriate evaluations, documentation, medications, and harsh
This requires the prosecutor to contemplate and analyze the thought process and the psychological state of the person during the time of the crime. The conclusions of the motivation behind the accused actions is drawn from the evidence that is collected from the case. It also is a term used to refer to the removal of the stigma between murder and punishment, and the moral character of the accused.
This chapter is mainly devoted to the jury selection process and how it is taken care
Over 80 million Americans alive today have been called to jury duty at some point in their lives (Henley 5). Out of these 80 million individuals, roughly 30% (or 24 million) have been eliminated from the jury selection process due to the use of peremptory challenges (5). According to Black’s Law Dictionary, a peremptory challenge is a challenge that “need not be supported by any reason.” Although these challenges are commonplace in today’s courts, several Supreme Court cases have questioned the constitutionality of their place in the legal system. This paper will explore the history of peremptory challenges, theories behind them, a few pertinent cases, and reform progress.
Smith, William (1997) “Useful or Just Plain Unfair? The Debate Over Peremptories; Lawyers, Judges Spllit Over the Value of Jury Selection Method” The Legal Intelligencer, April 23: pg 1.
... of the juror’s and their sentencing or decision making in our study but further research could be carried out solely into how political attitude could also influence the jury-decision making.
At trial, your life is in the palms of strangers who decide your fate to walk free or be sentenced and charged with a crime. Juries and judges are the main components of trials and differ at both the state and federal level. A respectable citizen selected for jury duty can determine whether the evidence presented was doubtfully valid enough to convict someone without full knowledge of the criminal justice system or the elements of a trial. In this paper, juries and their powers will be analyzed, relevant cases pertaining to jury nullification will be expanded and evaluated, the media’s part on juries discretion, and finally the instructions judges give or may not include for juries in the court. Introduction Juries are a vital object to the legal system and are prioritized as the most democratic element in our society, aside from voting, in our society today.
Costanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2012). Forensic and Legal Psychology: Psychological Science Applied to Law. New York: Worth Publishers.
Jurors opinions can be influenced by an emotional testimony. Deborah W. Denno’s article Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System is the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law’s publication of a panel at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools. The panel had three goals: “examine the interrelationship between neuroscience and substantive criminal law; to incorporate criminal procedure more directly into the examination in a way that past investigations have not done; and to scrutinize cognitive bias in decision-making,” (Denno
Metzner, J. L., & Fellner, J. (2010). Solitary Confinement and Mental Illness in U.S. Prisons: A Challenge for Medical Ethics. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(1), 104-108.
Serving on a jury is a civic duty and an American tradition. However, some people view jury duty as a chore or as an event that negatively interrupts their lives. Some independent studies have shown that even jury duty has a devastating effect on married life. Due to this and other extraneous situations, there are only a few people who actually want to serve on a jury. This may lead to efforts by potential jurors to, in some way get out of their duty in a jury. What we know of as the current jury duty system should be changed so citizens are not forced to serve in this capacity and can still be regarded as a responsible civilian. As per the status quo, a trial jury is a constitutional right, a jury of ones peers or equals. However, ordinary people with little or no formal knowledge of the law should not be allowed to make a decision that would change a person's life.
Stevenson, D 2012, The function of uncertainty within jury systems, George Mason Law Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 513-548, viewed 6 May 2014, .
Criminal Justice officials understand the situation in their prisons regarding mental health but have not taken action to fix it. For example, “According to the Department of Justice, abo...
McGrath, Michael G. "Criminal Profiling: Is There a Role for the Forensic Psychiatrist?." Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28. (2000): 315-324. Web. 13 Apr 2011.
Famous writer Robert Frost stated, “A jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer.” While selecting a competent lawyer is important, in the court of law, the process of jury selection is easily one of the most important factors. While many elements are considered during the process of jury selection, the most valuable is the use of psychology. Psychology is used by lawyers during the process of jury selection to choose the best possible jurors to decide the fate of their client. Psychology can be used in many different ways such as voir dire, persuasion, and research.
Greenfield, D. (2007). Introduction to forensic psychology. issues and controversies in crime and justice. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 35(2), 201-201-204,105-106.