Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does a utopian society contrast with one that is dystopian
Compare a dystopian world to a utopian world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dr. Seuss’s controversial book Yertle the turtle, provides an accurate example of Marxism. The book involves a struggle for power, where Yertle the turtle has a desire for domination, which involves the unwilling sacrifice of others. In the first few lines, we are transported to the far-away Island of Sala-ma-Sond, where Seuss paints a tranquil society of turtles. The turtles that live there are happy with their life, as long as they have warm water and enough food. “The water was warm. There was plenty to eat. The turtles had everything turtles might need. And they were all happy. Quite happy indeed”. However, Yertle the turtle, “king of the pond”, wanted more.
Yertle is a brutally ambitious turtle who desires to rule much more than the
…show more content…
However, over time his place on the bottom of the pile becomes so uncomfortable that he feels the need to speak up. He says to the Yertle, “I don’t like to complain, But down here below, we are feeling great pain. I know, up on top you are seeing great sights, but down at the bottom we, too, should have rights”. Yertle is un-phased by Mack’s cry for help, for in their society equality does not exist. By Dr. Seuss describing Mack as that “plain little turtle”, he demonstrates how political leaders see their subjects as “little” and easy to manipulate and control. "SILENCE!" the King of the Turtles barked back. "I'm king, and you're only a turtle named Mack”. Yertle continues to build higher and higher creating “a nine-turtle stack”. Ignoring the physical and emotion toll he not only inflicts on Mack, but his people as well. Seuss continues to shows a direct similarity to the bourgeoisie when he displays that Yertle has power over them without even trying to because the turtles believe that this is the way things are supposed to be. “Turtles! More turtles!" he bellowed and brayed. And the turtles 'way down in the pond were afraid. They trembled. They shook. But they came. They obeyed. From all over the pond, they came swimming by dozens. Whole families of turtles, with uncles and cousins And all of them stepped on the head of poor Mack. One after another, they …show more content…
Frustrated and angry, Mack burps, shaking the carefully piled turtles, and Yertle falls into the mud. His rule ends and the turtles have their freedom. “And tosay the great Yertle, that Marvelous he, Is King of the Mud. That is all he can see. And the turtles, of course... all the turtles are free As turtles and, maybe, all creatures should be”. I believe Dr. Seuss created this story to show that ordinary people can overthrow unjust rules if they understand how to use their own power. Simply anyone can make a difference and their action can bring about change. Also, that equality is crucial but we need to create change in order to gain it, and we need to because, we all deserve it. Analyzing this story made me realize that Dr. Seuss would always have deep and profound themes in his stories. On the surface, Yertle the turtle may look like a simple children’s book, but this story has an underlying message that can apply in today’s
The Marxist perspective reveals Huxley’s underlying message that the drawbacks of a ubiquitous class structure outweigh its benefits. Despite the wary tone of the novel, Huxley ultimately acknowledges that the class system brings about
In chapter three, Steinbeck immaculately describes the long, tedious journey of a land turtle across a desolate highway. From the onset of his journey, the turtle encounters many setbacks. Along the way ants, hills, and oak seeds hinder him under his shell. The turtle’s determination to reach his destination is most apparent when a truck driven by a young man swerves to hit the turtle. The turtle's shell is clipped and he goes flying off the highway, but the turtle does not stop. He struggles back to his belly and keeps driving toward his goal, just as the Joads keep driving toward their goal.
The turtle symbolically represents the hardship, fate, and the fear of the unknown within the “oakies.” The turtle’s choice to cross the highway represents the choice that the migrants made to go to a better place. The struggle uphill and the “attack” of the vehicles show that fate tries to stop the turtle. The Joads had their own chance of bad fate by their family splitting up, members dying, and Jim Casey going to jail. Resultantly, the turtle does a very important job for Steinbeck as a “macrocosmic” way to show the plight of the migrant families through a different
Marxism is a method of analysis based around the concepts developed by the two German philosophers Karl Marx and Fredrich Engel, centered around the complexities of social-relations and a class-based society. Together, they collaborated their theories to produce such works as The German Ideology (1846) and The Communist Manifesto (1848), and developed the terms ‘’proletariat’ and ’bourgeois’ to describe the working-class and the wealthy, segmenting the difference between their respective social classes. As a result of the apparent differences, Marxism states that proletariats and bourgeoisie are in constant class struggle, working against each other to amount in a gain for themselves.
Steinbeck dedicates the entire third chapter to illustrate the journey of a turtle crossing a road.A woman drives down the highway swerves around the turtle so she does not hit it. However, unlike the woman a man in a truck heads straight for the turtle as if it had a target on its back. The man does slightly hit the turtle, but only enough to knock the turtle over onto his shell, he struggles to get up, but eventually does and finishes his journey across the highway. The turtle symbolizes the Joad family and the other migrant worker families. Just like the turtle, they overcome someone who has more power than them that tries to ruin their lives. ( Turtle almost gets run over by a truck, farmer families getting kicked off their farms.) Just like the turtle, these people accept the cards they are given in life and use what they have to improve their situation, Even when Tom took the turtle and wrapped it up, the turtle consistently worked towards getting out of that coat to continue in the direction in which it was headed. Similarly, the turtle the migrant families never forgot where they were headed in spite of all their troubles. This use of symbolism causes the reader to root for and become an advocate for the migrant workers not only in the book but in real life. Through the
Socialism as defined by the parameters of the post revolution into the pre industrial period was the nearly universally marked by the race to empower the working class. Yet, within this broad definition of socialism, Karl Marx, Gracchus Babeuf, and Robert Owen differ in their views of a utopian society and how it should be formed. It was to be their difference in tradition that caused their break from it to manifest in different forms. Although they had their differences in procedure and motive, these three thinkers formed a paradigm shift that would ignite class struggle and set in motion historical revolutions into the present. Within their views of a utopian community, these men grappled with the very virtues of humanity: greed versus optimism.
In 2008, Rudra Sabaratnam, the CEO of the City of Angels Medical Center, committed health care fraud when he attempted to extort money from Medicare and Medi-Cal. He was wealthy, yet, his greed for more money led him to cheat the taxpayer-funded healthcare programs of millions of dollars, depriving the people who actually need the help and money. The greed that Sabaratnam had was partly caused by the profit seeking capitalist system. The desire for wealth in capitalist society leads to corruption and causes a divide between the rich and the poor, so perhaps a system that supports equality and fairness is a better choice. The Eastern-European expression,“Capitalism is man exploiting man; communism is just the opposite,” summarizes one of the main ideas in John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck’s aversion to a capitalist society is a motif that appears in several of his literary works, but in The Grapes of Wrath he attacks capitalism constantly and he exposes the poverty, cruelty, and greed found in our capitalist system. By emphasizing the wealthy’s insatiable appetite for profit, which forces the migrants to face hardships, Steinbeck accentuates the inequitable aspects of capitalism, and promotes communism as an alternative.
Karl Marx once stated, “The workers have nothing to lose but their chains.” Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich focuses on the middle class struggles in Russia during the 1800s and how materialism has negative impacts on people in society. Tolstoy uses the novella to demonstrate how Russian society was imperfect in the 1800s and Tolstoy portrayed ideals similar to Marxism in the book. Marxism is the ideology that everyone should be equal in regards to class, education, economics and politics. Marxism was created by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels during the 1840s. Their ideology was to establish a classless society where property and resources are owned by the community and not the individuals themselves. Tolstoy used the novella to contrast his ideals of a classless society and anti-materialism to show how negative the caste system and the materialistic lifestyle of the Russian middle class was.
The Marxist theory “is the belief that the struggle between social classes is a major force in history and that there should eventually be a society in which there are no classes” – Karl Marx In the book “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood there are significant examples of the Marxist theory because of the way social classes are represented, how religion is manipulated in the society, and what values the text reinforces in the reader.
Marxism is a theory of revolution and a rudimentary account of how societies deal with and go through change that is inevitable. Its roots can be traced back
In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relat...
...ajor told to the common animals. Both Major and Marx died before there revolutions both, dreaming of a paradise on earth in which all men/animals are free, equal and can enjoy a sufficient standard of living.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ The Communist Manifesto explores class struggles and their resulting revolutions. They first present their theory of class struggle by explaining that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx 14), meaning that history is a repeated class struggle that only ends with a revolution. Marx and Engels’ message in The Communist Manifesto is that it is inevitable for class struggles to result in revolutions, ultimately these revolutions will result in society’s transition to communism.
Marxism tends to focus more on the rights of the working class as opposed to all of society in the way that pluralism does. After all, the ideas and theories of Karl Marx are most commonly interpreted as a critique of capitalism where the mi...
Born from the revolutions of 1848 throughout Europe, Marxism sought to end the class struggles that were destroying the continent. The solution to the problems of all nations occurred to Marx to be Socialism, a branch that is presently known as Marxism. Under this seemingly “utopian” socioeconomic system, equality was granted to all citizens who were in essence a community of one. “. . . universal free education; arming of the people; a progressive income tax; limitations upon inheritance; state ownership of banks. . .”(Palmer 506). These rights of which constituted Marxism eventually went on to be incorporated in Leninism and modern-day socialism. At least in its beginning, the intent of Marxism and the Communist League were noble towards the goal o...