Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The tragedy of king lear analysis
The tragedy of king lear analysis
Analysis of king lear shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The tragedy of king lear analysis
In his tragedy, King Lear, Shakespeare explores the term “blindness” very meticulously that allows it to unfurl in order to reveal a more specific type of blindness in which he focuses on; a moral and insightful type of blindness. He uses two characters in particular, Lear and Gloucester, in order to express that being morally and insightfully blind to the true reasons behind another’s actions and emotions as well as being blinded to reality itself will only lead to chaos along the road. King Lear was blinded by Cordelia’s love for him and banishes her, thus leaving his entire kingdom under the reign of Regan and Goneril. Similarly, Gloucester was blinded by Edgar’s devotion to him and allowed Edmund to deceive him. However, as the story progressed, …show more content…
While reading Shakespeare’s tragedy, it can be argued that King Lear does undergo a process of change and does receive true sight, despite his madness, when he begins to truly see the world for what it really is beyond his castle walls. A world of poverty, pain, and loneliness. This can be seen during the scene in which Lear is walking through the violent storm on the heath. “‘Poor naked wretches, whereso’er you are, that bide the pelting of this pitiless storm, how shall your houseless heads, and unfed sides, your looped and windowed raggedness, defend you…’” (Lear,3.4.28-36). Lear seems to express almost a sympathetic feeling towards the people who are suffering and even begins taking off his royal garment in order to truly understand and empathize with them. This is a viable contradiction to my claim in which I said that King Lear did not earn true vision and did not receive moral insight. Admittedly, King Lear seems to be leaning towards the right direction in gaining true insight. However, this way of thinking; of tearing off his clothes, is still based on himself; His actions still revolve around his own self suffering and his own circumstance. “‘Didst thou given all to thy two daughter? And art thou come to this?’” (Lear.3.4.46-47). In this case, Edgar appears to the group as a poor, homeless beggar. Lear’s question reflects his own situation. He asks Poor Tom if the reason why he looks and lives so miserably is because his two daughter’s betrayed him as well. He believes that his circumstance is the definition of suffering and that people who suffer must be going through what he is at the moment. In short, Lear is still living in his own world and does not take the time to truly understand others’ suffering like Gloucester had. Ultimately, Lear cannot obtain a sight similar to Gloucester because he refuses to see beyond
Through Lear, Shakespeare expertly portrays the inevitability of human suffering. The “little nothings,” seemingly insignificant choices that Lear makes over the course of the play, inevitably evolve into unstoppable forces that change Lear’s life for the worse. He falls for Goneril’s and Regan’s flattery and his pride turns him away from Cordelia’s unembellished affection. He is constantly advised by Kent and the Fool to avoid such choices, but his stubborn hubris prevents him from seeing the wisdom hidden in the Fool’s words: “Prithee, tell him, so much the rent of his land comes to: he will not believe a fool” (Shakespeare 21). This leads to Lear’s eventual “unburdening,” as foreshadowed in Act I. This unburdening is exacerbated by his failure to recognize and learn from his initial mistakes until it is too late. Lear’s lack of recognition is, in part, explained by his belief in a predestined life controlled completely by the gods: “It is the stars, the stars above us govern our conditions” (Shakespeare 101). The elder characters in King Lear pin their various sufferings on the will of...
Lear becomes blinded by his flaws, leading him to make irrational decisions which ultimately cause him to go mad. After Cordelia is unable to state how much she loves her father and outdo her sisters exaggerated professions of
... Lears blessing, and declared his daughter. Lear also realized that Kents speaking out was for Lear’s best and that he too was abused and banished. What stings Lear even more is that he is now completely dependent upon his two shameless daughters, Goneril and Regan. Plus that he must now beg them when he took care of them like a father when they were once children, to drive Lears further into madness he realizes that as king he was so ignorant and blind with power that he never took care of the homeless and let them suffer. All these realization and the fact that Lear is in his second childhood a tender stage drive him into the peak of madness.
When Lear tells Gloucester “A man may see how this world /goes with no eyes” (4.6.146-47) he displays both of their misfortunes, but it is too late to prevent ultimate tragedy. Shakespeare proposes that their tragic saga is a mere game to the heavens. “As flies to wanton boys, are we to th’ gods,/They kill us for their sport” (4.1.37-38). This line generalizes the overall simplicity behind the tragedy of King Lear. Even though Gloucester and Lear made terrible, fatal errors the reader feels at the end as if it is intended to be their destiny.
Despite its undeniable greatness, throughout the last four centuries King Lear has left audiences, readers and critics alike emotionally exhausted and mentally unsatisfied by its conclusion. Shakespeare seems to have created a world too cruel and unmerciful to be true to life and too filled with horror and unrelieved suffering to be true to the art of tragedy. These divergent impressions arise from the fact that of all Shakespeare's works, King Lear expresses human existence in its most universal aspect and in its profoundest depths. A psychological analysis of the characters such as Bradley undertook cannot by itself resolve or place in proper perspective all the elements which contribute to these impressions because there is much here beyond the normal scope of psychology and the conscious or unconscious motivations in men.
These classic tropes are inverted in King Lear, producing a situation in which those with healthy eyes are ignorant of what is going on around them, and those without vision appear to "see" the clearest. While Lear's "blindness" is one which is metaphorical, the blindness of Gloucester, who carries the parallel plot of the play, is literal. Nevertheless, both characters suffer from an inability to see the true nature of their children, an ability only gained once the two patriarchs have plummeted to the utter depths of depravity. Through a close reading of the text, I will argue that Shakespeare employs the plot of Gloucester to explicate Lear's plot, and, in effect, contextualizes Lear's metaphorical blindness with Gloucester's physical loss of vision.
Lear’s greed begins to show through at the beginning of the play when he attempts to put a value on the invaluable: love. He says, “Which of you shall we say doth love us most, / That we our largest bounty may extend (Shakespeare act 1.1 line 51-52)”. His two older daughters, being greedy themselves, give him extravagant words and flattery to show the “amount” of love they have for their father. However, Cordelia, who truly loves him, says nothing, thinking that her father will understand her love for him through the actions she has done. Not knowing that her father, like a dragon, just wants to hoard the pretty, extravagant words and flattery to make himself feel better. Later in the play, a punishment similar to that of the fourth ring in Inferno comes to pass between these parties. Lear, who wants to hoard things and grow old, is being fought against at every turn by his two daughters who want to spend all of the inheritance they have received. Later in the story, after Lear has essentially lost everything, they are wandering through the storm and come across Tom O’Bedlam. In seeing him naked under the storm Lear realizes that greed is one of the things that cause his lament, saying, “Thou ow’st the worm no silk, the beast no hide, the sheep no wool, the cat no perfume”(Shakespeare act 3.3 line 103-106). Through this, the reader can see Lear making
Once Goneril and Regan took complete control of the kingdom, it was evident that King Lear’s power and authority was tarnished. Goneril and Regan abuse of power lead to the madness and the crisis Lear experienced. For example, while Lear was outside in during the storm, he basically questioned who he was not only as king, but as a man. "Doth any here know me? This is not Lear: Doth Lear walk thus? speak thus? Where are his eyes?" (I..IV.218-222). this quote just shows the depth of Lear’s troubles and blindness. Now that Lear has lost all his power to the evil actions of his two daughters, he’s essentially in an identity crisis, and unable to see who he truly is anymore with the title of “king”, which all play a part in his tragedy and eventual
Lear's vision is also marred by his lack of direction in life, and his poor foresight, his inability to predict the consequences of his actions. He cannot look far enough into the future to see the consequences of his actions. This, in addition to his lack of insight into other people, condemns his relationship with his most beloved daughter, Cordelia. When Lear asks his daughters who loves him most, he already thinks that Cordelia has the most love for him.
The first stage of Lear’s transformation is resentment. At the start of the play it is made quite clear that Lear is a proud, impulsive, hot-tempered old man. He is so self-centered that he simply cannot fathom being criticized. The strength of Lear’s ego becomes evident in the brutal images with which he expresses his anger towards Cordelia: “The barbarous Scythian,/Or he that makes his generation messes/To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom/Be as well neighboured, pitied, and relieved,/As thou may sometime daughter.” (1.1.118-122). The powerful language that Lear uses to describe his intense hatred towards Cordelia is so incommensurable to the cause, that there can be only one explanation: Lear is so passionately wrapped up in his own particular self-image, that he simply cannot comprehend any viewpoint (regarding himself) that differs from his own (no matter how politely framed). It is this anger and resentment that sets Lear’s suffering and ultimate purification in motion.
With such ridiculous transformations Lear is mythologizing the flaw of human nature, the inability to see past appearances.
Lear needs to feel a sense of closure and he is trying to fill a void in him that he thinks Poor Tom can, Lear believes that by having someone who is going through the same type of madness and situation he would not be alone and he would have someone he can relate with. Lear brings Poor Tom with him as his personal Philosopher. Additionally, Lear holds an imaginary court trial against his two daughters Regan and Goneril “I 'll see their trial first. Bring in their evidence.” (3.6.36) Lear tries to restore order and sanity back in his life but does it in an insane way like the imaginary trial. He brings Poor Tom with him and has him play the role of the judge. Lear believes that is it the fault of the two daughter that cause him to go
In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and Gloucester's physical blindness that leads to his trusting tendencies. Each character achieves inner awareness at the end as their surreal blindness is lifted and they realize the truth. Both Lear and Gloucester are characters used by Shakespeare to show the relevance of having a clear vision in life.
This shows Lear’s acceptance of the people around him and rather than not wanting to be surrounded by them, Lear sees them as equal to him even though he held the title of King. This moment may also be seen as a moment of social weakness because the King no longer holds the respect he did before and now does not expect people to be following him so instead he makes himself an equal to the fool and the homeless people accompanying
(CITE THIS FROM BOOK). He beings to see that (O’Driscoll, 2009) ‘power and wealth cover up the fact that everyone is weak and helpless underneath. He is beginning to develop a social conscience. ‘ Upon meeting with poor Tom (Edgar in diskize) he is better able to empathize with him o the extent that he too strips off his clothes. For until this point Lear has never put much thought into the people of his land and he beings to feel great shame in not helping them when he had been