All around the world, every single individual believes in different things and possesses different ideals. Oftentimes, these beliefs and ideals fall into line with different ideologies, such as feminism, different religions, and patriotism, to name a few. However, what individuals often fail to realize is that our ideologies can possess inconspicuous ill intentions, especially when it comes to the domination over other groups of people. In fact, according to the conflict theorists in sociology, ideologies can legitimize domination, conceal domination, claim unification, involve fragmentation, and use reification. That is, ideologies can be used to portray domination as valid and thus acceptable, portray society as completely equal, portray …show more content…
individuals as part of a false union in order to hide control of others, divide challengers to the domination through the use of false enemies, and use temporary, historical conditions as permanent and indisputable justification for the domination, respectively. Throughout this essay, I will identify an example of each of the five ways ideologies have been used to justify or maintain domination within my life. First, ideologies can often be used to legitimize domination.
For example, when I was growing up, my maternal grandfather was considered the head of our family. Although I wouldn’t describe my grandfather as sexist per se, sexism is the ideology that legitimized my grandfather’s power within our family. This is due to the fact that my grandfather’s role as the head of the family was established during a time when sexism was abound—women were expected to be homemakers and men were expected to be the supporter for the family during the 1950s and 1960s. Due to the fact that my grandfather was both the primary breadwinner and the man of the house, he was thus more worthy of power according to sexism. As a result, although we all knew that my grandfather possessed control over the family, sexism legitimized his power because he was the man and supporter of the …show more content…
house. In addition to legitimizing domination, ideologies can also hide domination. For instance, my mother is the type of person who says and believes things that can undoubtedly be considered as racist. However, my mom’s racism helps to conceal domination through one of her favorite sayings: “I’m not racist, I hate everyone equally.” By claiming that she hates everybody equally, thus asserting that everyone is equal and “worthy” of her hate, she is attempting to conceal the fact that she clearly dislikes and possesses contempt for specific groups of people. That is, by saying that she hates everyone, she is making it seem like her racism does not exist by deeming everyone as “equal” and thus hiding her true beliefs. However, despite her ideology’s attempt to hide it, my mother is the type of individual who feels that specific groups of people are beneath others. Furthermore, ideologies can claim unification that helps to hide domination. For example, my religion is Roman Catholicism, and like any religion, the Roman Catholic Church essentially paints followers as being part of a family united by faith. However, despite this claim that everyone is joined by our faith, women are discreetly treated as insubordinates compared to men. Specifically, there are seven sacraments or religious rites that can be received in the Catholic Church: Baptism, Eucharist, Confirmation, Reconciliation, Matrimony, Anointing of the Sick, and Holy Orders. However, women are barred from receiving the sacrament of Holy Orders, which means that women are not allowed to become bishops, priests, or deacons—only men are. As a result, Roman Catholicism uses the claim of unity under one faith to help hide the fact that women hold a lesser amount of power in the church compared to men—and thus are subjected to being controlled within the church. Additionally, ideologies can also involve fragmentation with the use of false enemies in order to avoid questioning. Perhaps the biggest example of this within my life comes with the political views of my parents and one sister: my parents are Conservatives and my oldest sister, Desiree, is a die-hard Liberal. Whenever any newsworthy, debatable event occurs in this country, my parents and Desiree are pitted against each other as enemies due to their different ideologies. That is, whenever nothing is fixed in our country, the Conservatives always blame the Liberal and vice versa. However, the fact of the matter is that the real enemy on both sides are the politicians who run our country, regardless of what political party they fall into. But rather than have individuals question the politicians—especially their control—who fall into their own political parties, both parties tend to put the blame on the other in order to direct attention away and cause full-blown arguments at the dinner table in my home. Finally, ideologies can also use reification in order to justify domination. For example, when I was in high school, I would talk to a fellow classmate named Warren every so often. However, this did not last too long when I quickly learned that Warren was a sexist who turned to past generations in order to solidify his viewpoint and condemn feminism. That is, Warren thoroughly believed that only men should be in power—whether it be in politics, corporate America, etc.—specifically because men were the dominant sex for so long. Whenever I would argue with him over this topic, Warren would continuously cite the fact that women were the caretakers for both children and the home for so long (while also applauding my choice to go into the culinary arts program versus computer science), and that it would seemingly be unnatural to change that. Consequently, he would constantly belittle the feminist movement, stating that men had power for so long for a reason, and would thus use historical examples to support his sexist beliefs that men deserve dominance over women. Although many who believe in specific ideologies may not realize it, it is easy to identify different examples of how ideologies can legitimize domination, conceal domination, claim unification, involve fragmentation, and use reification.
For example, the fact that my grandfather deserved power because he was a man and the breadwinner is legitimized by sexism and my mother’s claims that she hates everyone equally conceals the fact that her racism is aimed towards specific groups of people. Furthermore, while the Roman Catholic Church claims unification, women hold a lesser amount of power within the church, and political ideologies—such as my parents’ Conservatism and my sister’s Liberalism—tend to identify the enemy as the opposite party when, in fact, politicians in both parties are the reason why little is achieved to better our country. Finally, my old classmate, Warren, often quoted historical references—such as the longstanding practice that women tended to be homemakers and men the breadwinners—in order to justify his sexist belief that men are naturally the dominant sex and women are subordinate. Overall, while completing this paper, I found this theory to be useful to help expose the “dirty little secrets” ideologies have in reference to domination, and although many don’t realize it, our ideologies can have hidden agendas. In fact, domination of groups continues in this world today, so having an understanding of how an ideology specifically works to justify
and/or hide that control is the first step to working to dismantle illegitimate domination.
One of the sociological theories is conflict theory. The conflict theory deals with people's level on wealth, or class. The conflict theory says that social change is beneficial, contrary to focuses on social order. In the story of the woman and her children, the conflict theory plays a big role on the situation. Police of higher class are threatening the homeless woman. The conflict theory is a constant struggle of people of higher class over powering people of lower class, or the weaker. The police are trying to over power the woman by telling her to leave. Even though the woman and her children were doing nothing wrong, the police used their power to tell her to leave. Also the people of the area showed their conflict theory by telling the police officers to come. They must have felt embarrassed to have a woman of such lower class to be around them. They used their power of class to have the woman removed from their community. The woman wants to be there because she has no home and it is a good community to be in, but the people look at it as an embarrassment to them because it makes their area look bad for someone of such lower class to be around them. The conflict theory is unique to all other theories because it separates people into categories determined by their wealth and standards. Their status is the element that categorizes them, weather it is class, race, or gender. The conflict theory do not always use class, race, and gender all at once. In this situation race and gender is not a main issue, although gender could be a reason, but it would fall under the feminist theory. This story is mainly dealing with class. Through all this conflict the woman feels over powered and domina...
According to Brenda Allen in the chapter “Power Matters,” she mentions that there dominant ideologies of identity that “reflect perspectives and experiences of ruling groups, whose members construct and circulate beliefs that will most benefit them.” We live in a country where there are dominant ideologies of organizational hierarchy, which “arranges job positions in a stratified structure, with power flowing from the top down.” This exemplifies the ideology of domination, which is a belief system in America that the “superior should rule over the inferior” (32). This ideology is so embedded into our system that most people believe it is natural. The American society we live in values patriarchy, white supremacy, heteronormativity, and a specific culture of wealth and poverty; any identity that falls outside of these dominant ideologies is marginalized and placed in the lower strata of social power.
The most accepted definition of sexism is a gender based bigotry; women earning only seventy percent the amount of men for the same job, or men serving sixty-three percent longer
For example: even though her youngest child was dying and everyone in the family was hungry, Winston’s mother “was quite ready to give him [Winston] more than his share. She took it for granted that he, ‘the boy’ should have the biggest portion; but however much she gave he invariably demanded more” (pg. 162). Winston’s mother’s mind was so entrenched in systematic sexism that she willingly risked her own child’s health and safety because of the male entitlement of her son. Not only does systematic sexism ruin lives, it is also a tool of The Party to manipulate their subjects. To illustrate, on page 131,
Sexism is the ideology that maintains that one sex is inherently inferior to the other. Sexism or discrimination based on gender has been a social issue for many years; it is the ideology that one sex is superior or inferior to the other. Sexism does not only affect females, but also males. Men are very often victimized by social stereotypes and norms based on gender expectations. Sexism has appears in almost all social institutions including family, the media, religion, sports, the military, politics, and the government. However, although both genders are affected, men have benefited from sexism the most (Thompson 300-301.)
As civilization has evolved, expanded, and changed over the course of human history, there has always been conflict between the proverbial “us and them.” So long as there has been social interactions between groups of humans, there have been differences in features, cultures, religions, and many other aspects that have been used as the justification and fuel for bias and conflict. Since early in our species existence we have relied heavily on violence as a reaction to difference and change, and as we travel through history towards present day, we see that groups have always sought to expand their control over others in a belief that they were dominant or superior. It is only recently that the idea of equality-for-all has gained support and
The basic definition of sexism is when a person of either sex is discriminated against in any way based on their gender. But history has recorded that men, usual in every society in this world, have always been the dominant sex and women have taken a lower role. This has been especially true in the United States throughout its history. Women always seemed to be the one who took care of the children and home as the men went to work and earned a living. Women do not have the choice to give birth to children, but they should have a choice in whether they are the primary care givers to that child. Betty Friedan, a well-known feminist, writes, “We are still very mother-centered. It’s still ‘mother, mother, mother,’ when it really should be ‘mother, father, society.’”1 What she means by this is that society still has not overcome the discriminatory thought that the mother should not work and stay home with the kids.
1) To possess a sociological imagination means the ability to understand the interaction between biography and history, or the interplay of self and the world. My favorite food has to be broccoli. In order for broccoli to had been brought to the United States events had to have happened first. The Industrial Revolution led people to switch from making goods by hand to manufacturing goods, farmers were experimenting with new types of vegetables (broccoli). This historical event is the reason as to why now our current state of farming contains the planting of many different types of vegetables, and the accessibility of food engineering we now have today. Monsanto is an institution that has to function in order for vegetables to be available. Monsanto delivers agricultural products that support farmers all around the world. The meaning this
Observation allows researchers to experience a specific aspect of social life and get a firsthand look at a trend, institution or behaviour. It promotes good communication skills, improves decision making and enhances awareness.
The delicate balance of power unendingly tips between groups, leading to the favoring of one over the other. The magnitude of this power struggle varies from that of the political parties in government to the fight for authority between parents and their children. The faction in power most always resorts to a dictatorial means of maintaining that power: oppression. It is known, however, that the group not in power often manages to metamorphosize and win dominance over the once supreme rulers. The ability of the oppressed to overcome their oppressors lies in the fact that oppression strengthens those who are oppressed, and moves them to take action against their rulers. The strength derived from oppression, however, does not come from mutual support among those oppressed, but rather from an infatuation with the reattainment of power which has been taken from them.
Similar to everyone else in the world, many sociological forces have greatly impacted my life and shaped the person that I am today. Throughout Sociology 110, learning what elements in the population’s lives affect the way they live their lives allowed me to consider what has personally affected my own. The person I am today can attribute the sociological forces such my gender, my not-so close knit family, my family’s low socioeconomic status, and sexism in the family. There are plenty of other sociological factors that have considerably rendered my person, however, I believe that the ones I mentioned are the most important factors that manipulated not only how I live my life, but me as a person as well, into my current self.
...rms of power and source of pride in society. Emphasizing sexism in language and rising the concern with words can be a vital feminist strategy to provoke social change (Weatherall, 2002). Language can produce a false imagination and represents women and men unequally, as if members of one sex were somehow less wholly human, less complex, and has fewer rights than members of the other sex. Sexist language also characterizes serotypes of women and men, sometimes to the disadvantage of both, but more often to the disadvantage of women. (Wareing & Thomas, 2012). As a result, it is necessary that individuals have the right to define, and to redefine as their lives unfold, their own gender identities, without regard to genitalia, assigned birth sex, or initial gender role. Language about women is not a nonaligned or an insignificant issue but profoundly a political one.
Sexism is defined as prejudice or discrimination based on sex . When approached with the topic of sexism and which sex it affects the most, women are generally the first thought that comes to mind. This is because women have faced a certain degree of discrimination all throughout history. Sexism is an issue that covers a wide range of circumstances. For example, it can be something inconsequential, like the outdated idea that women cannot be strong, but it can also be something substantial, like the glass ceiling in the job market. Although modern women are afforded a lot more opportunities and privileges than women in the past, there still exists a certain stigma surrounding women and their capabilities. Sexism in respect to women is a largely
Ideologies are mental systems that organize socially shared attitudes, and these mental systems are social representations that function as “models which control how people act, speak or write or how they understand the social practices of others” (van Dijk, 1995: 2).
The affective element of a gender role ideology is described as one’s attitude or feeling toward an individual based on their sex alone. This outlook is known as sexism. The cognitive component of our view toward gender roles is explained as “our beliefs about the features of the biological or psychological categories of male and female” (Helgeson, 2017, p.10). Finally, the behavioural piece of a gender role ideology is recognized as sex discrimination, which “involves the differential treatment of people based on their biological sex” (Helgeson, 2017, p.