Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creation vs evolution argumentitive essay
Creation versus evolution arguments
Creation vs evolution argumentitive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Creation vs evolution argumentitive essay
Does evolution contradict Christianity? Dawkins asserts that if evolution is true, then there would be no need for any form of god because “God” does not control anything (2). Religion has always been a delicate subject matter. Beyond question, the Christian faith is one of much bigotry. Ever since Charles Darwin published his book On The Origin of Species, the prattle between creationists and evolutionists has been exceedingly tempestuous. A majority of persons believe evolution can never coexist with creationism, but this conjecture is far from legitimacy. While the term “Christian Scientist” is considered an oxymoron by some individuals, evolution is far from an atheistic term.
Evolution is chiefly a theory which suggests the universe is the result of a calamitous explosion of matter. The theory of evolution,furthermore, asserts that everything on Earth is composed of genetic material which evolved over centuries. Contrasted with evolution creationism is the belief that God created the Heavens and Earth, and on no account was the evolving of species involved. A major dissimilarity between evolutionists and creationists is the variance of their beliefs of Earth’s true age. Creationists believe the Earth is only a few thousand years old, as opposed to, evolutionists who believe the Earth is a few billion years old. As Evans contends, “Only one side could win, and if it wasn’t ours, the Christian faith would be lost” (1). The National Academy of Sciences advocates the idea of creationism not being able to be proven by science (31). Although creationism cannot be considered a “scientific” theory, evolution provides a great deal of evidence for its assertion.
In court cases, evidence is always a staple. The Creationists vs E...
... middle of paper ...
... .
Evans, Held Rachel. “Christianity and Evolution.” Relevant Magazine 24 Aug. 2010: 1-2
Yahoo.Web. 17 April 2011 features/22636-can-you-believe-in-christ.html>. Klyce, Brig. “Evolution versus Creationism.” Science Insider 1-3 Yahoo. Web. 10 April 2011
.
National Academy of Sciences “Creationism Should Not Be Taught in Science Classrooms.”
Creationism vs Evolution. Ed. Bruno J Leone. San Diego: Greenhaven Press,
“Should the Bible Be Interpreted Literally.” Two Paths 1-4 Google. Web. 27 April
2011.
“Understanding Evolution.” Evolution.Berkeley.edu 1 Yahoo. Web. 19 April
2011.
2002. 26-32.
Zhao, Buyun. "Charles Darwin & Evolution." Charles Darwin & Evolution. Christ's College, 2009. Web. 04 May 2014.
Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron, “Teaching Theories: The Evolution-Creation Controversy,” The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 44, No. 7 (Oct…1982). This article, written by Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. McEachron sheds light on the controversy of evolution vs creationism in schools and the validity of each being called a scientific theory. The work was created to answer the questions, “Which of these theories is truly scientific and which is a religious belief? Which should be taught in schools?” The article concluded in favor of evolution as a valid scientific theory that should be taught rather than creationism, but also mentioned the worth of understanding the latter.
Our Christian worldview emphasizes that God is in full control and the origin story clearly shows this. God as creator shows that he has sovereign control. Whether aspects of evolution exist or not, we accept that God is in full control because of what is included in Genesis 1. The objective of Genesis 1 and the story of the origin of the universe is not meant to satisfy our curiosity about science, it is meant to reveal to us the true nature of God. Science attempts to inform the secular worldview while Scripture is able to inform the Christian worldview.
These days, most of the textbook only presents evolution theory as a fact to interpret the origin of life and the earth. More and more people get to reject creation unconsciously because they had no opportunity to compare and evaluate both worldview in same degree. I interviewed my three close acquaintances and heard a various responses from many people including my interviewees. Some of them had same belief with me, but some people had significantly different opinion with me. As a consequence of evolution theory’s monopoly in education, non-believers and Christians are unconsciously influenced by this secular worldview.
In Chapter 26 of The Grapes of Wrath, Ma Joad tells the store worker, “Learnin’ it all a time, ever’ day. If you’re in trouble, hurt or need help, go to the poor. They’re the only ones that’ll help, the only ones” (Steinbeck 376). She states this after she goes back and forth with the store clerk if she can come back later with her pay slip but take the food at that moment, however, the worker says he would get fired if he did that. With Ma’s persuasion, the worker ends up using his dime for her food, saying she can pay him back personally.
A lot of people, Christians and non-Christians alike often question the accuracy of the theory of evolution. Those who express doubts about the theory are often labelled “unscientific” or “backwards” by some in the pro-evolution camp. At times, the popular perception of evolution seems to be that it has been proven beyond all doubt and there are no scientific obstacles left for it. In fact, there are quite a few scientific flaws in the theory that provide many reasons for it to be doubted. It is true though, none of these questions necessarily disproves evolution, but they do show how the theory is less than settled.
Miller, Kenneth R, and Gould, Stephen Jay. (1984) Science and Creationism. Ed. Ashley Montagu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
After Sir Charles Darwin had introduced his original theory about the origins of species and evolution, humanity’s faith in God that remained undisputed for hundreds of years had reeled. The former unity fractured into the evolutionists, who believed that life as we see it today had developed from smaller and more primitive organisms, and creationists, who kept believing that life in all its diversity was created by a higher entity. Each side introduced substantial arguments to support their claims, but at the same time the counter-arguments of each opponent are also credible. Therefore, the debates between the evolutionists and the creationists seem to be far from ending. And though their arguments are completely opposite, they can co-exist or even complement each other.
In 1859, Charles Darwin published his groundbreaking Origin of Species, which would introduce the seminal theory of evolution to the scientific community. Over 150 years later, the majority of scientists have come to a consensus in agreement with this theory, citing evidence in newer scientific research. In an average high school biology classroom, one may imagine an instructor that has devoted much of his life to science and a predominantly Christian class of about twenty-five students. On the topic of evolution, one of the students might ask, “Why would God have taken the long route by creating us through billion years of evolution?” while another student may claim “The Book of Genesis clearly says that the earth along with all living creatures was created in just six days, and Biblical dating has proven that the earth is only 6000 years old.” Finally a third student interjects with the remark “maybe the Bible really is just a book, and besides, science has basically already proven that evolution happened, and is continuing to happen as we speak.”
A hotly debated topic these past few years centers on the origin of life. Now more than ever, science and religion are butting heads trying to come up with a conclusion, and one that public schools would teach to their students. Alex Rainert, meanwhile, reasons that both “science and religion are engaged in the same project, to discover the origin of life” (141). In short, one could better describe the debate as a crusade between evolutionists and creationists. Both sides have their well-founded arguments, but when one looks at the decisions of the courts, clearly only one side may win the battle when deciding biology curriculum in schools. Despite the overwhelming number of people in favor of teaching creationism in public schools, it may be better to leave science classes free from matters of religious belief.
... The “Doubting Darwin”. Newsweek.com - "The New York Times" 07 Feb 2005. 44. eLibrary.
In a typical American high school, Mr. Doe, the science teacher begins his discussion on the theory of evolution. John, a student opposes the idea the humans came from apes and evolved. John believes that men came from God and that man was created in 6 days. Jane hears this and argues against John, “How could anything possibly be created in 6 days? This sort of project would take millions of years!” By using up all 45 minutes of class time discussing creationism and evolution, this is a metaphor to the eternal debate as to the origin of the human species. The question of how man came into existence is one of the great debates of this century. There is not enough evidence to support creationism, yet there is even less to support evolution.
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three sides create a dilemma for what theory to support among all people, religious and non-religious.
Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms, whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life from a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads to the question of how life began. While creation represents a religious understanding of life, evolution acknowledges a scientific interpretation of the origins of life. The theory is illustrated as the process by which organisms change species over time.
Wiester, John L. 1993. The Real Meaning of Evolution. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 45 (3): 182-86.