Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of electronic voting machines
Pros for electronic voting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of electronic voting machines
I strongly agree with the use of (EVMs) due to the cost of printing paper for paper ballots, also (EVMs) are more officiant and organized, and they also vey fast and easy for elderly.
(EVMs) should be used in all states because they save way more moeny than printing seperate paper ballots. Do u know how many trees we have to cut down just for 1 paper ballot? Vs having a machine that has all the information and tools you would need to cast your vote. I forgot to mention the paper ballots they have a much thicker feeling than a ordinary piece of paper. Which can be costly for some states more than others. With (EVMs) and the modern day technology we have they could be ran off solar power that can save your state money, from powering those heavy duty mchines.
…show more content…
Most of the elderly voters already have problems seeing the small font on the paper ballots. So why not make it easier for them and make the font size a option on the (EVMs)? (EVMs) also are not difficult to use they have them set in a standerd mode just for elderly voters. Also if u make a mistake and touch something you did not intend to (EVMs) have a back and continue button, to make sure the machine is not moving faster than the person voting.(EVMs) are also wireless for your privacy and comfort so u can either stand or sit.
The last point I want to provide aout (EVMs) is that they are so neat and organized. So instead of putting paper ballots in those big lock box type containers. Ever voter who uses a (EVM) there vote is already sent to straight to there information center. With (EVMs) you dont have to worry about stacks of paper or papers flying or getting lost. (EVMs) sends everybodys vote straight in no trucks coming to pick up paper ballots. No worry's about properly disposing the paper, no worry's about getting papers mixed up. Everything is safe and sent straight to the information center safe and sound with
For different states there have been different court decisions on these laws. States that have laws with voter-ID laws in place include Texas and Wisconsin. North Carolina, Kansas and North Dakota have overturned voter-ID, along with a few other restrictive laws on voting. I find myself on the fence about the situation. Both sides of the issue do state several points that impact the argument such lack of voter-ID increasing fraud or decreasing the range of
Why should more than a million-and-a-half California supporters of George W. Bush see all 54 of the state's electoral votes go to Al Gore? In short, what is wrong with apportioning each state's electoral votes in accordance with the way the state's electorate votes? A better question, no doubt, is why not ditch the electoral college system altogether and go to direct elections? Politicians as different as Franklin D. Roosevelt and Richard Nixon backed a constitutional amendment to have all the states go to a proportional system. Obviously, nothing came of the proposals.
Since the turn of the twenty first century, in Canada voter turnout has made a significant and consecutive decline. In the last five federal elections on average only sixty-one per cent of eligible voters voted. If each eligible citizen voted in an election the government would be on par with the primary interests of the people. The easiest way to achieve this objective is by implementing a compulsory voting system. Mandatory voting systems are appealing because all citizens are affected by decisions made by the government, so it makes sense to have all those affected apart of the election process. As a result, the voting results would be more representative of the country and that would lead to an increase of stability and legitimacy. It would also be beneficial to Canadians because would cause political parties to address and focus on the needs of every socio-economic level. However, one of biggest problems that accompanies mandatory voting laws is that the choice to exercise the right to vote is taken away. Another primary concern about compulsory voting is that a large number of uninterested and uninformed voters are brought to the polls. Conversely, uninformed voters will become familiar with and learn the polling procedures and electoral system over time and uninterested voters are not forced to mark a name on the ballot. Compulsory voting laws would only make registration and attendance at the polls mandatory, not voting itself. Therefore the freedom to exercise the right to vote or not is still intact. A greater emphasis on alternate voting practices may be established such as electronic or online voting. Positive changes would not only be evident in the policies of political parties but also in the voting procedure. Th...
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
Many proponents of the Electoral College argue that it protects smaller states in the Union and it forces presidential candidates to pay attention to smaller states. This is plainly wrong, considering that most presidential visits during the 2012 election were to Ohio, Florida, Virginia and Pennsylvania, the smallest of which (Virginia) is ranked 12th in population out of the 50 states and territories in the U.S. Furthermore, the electors for each state are not required to vote according to their citizen 's wishes, which means with the Electoral College, a vote really doesn 't count. Instead of this, we should use the outrageous idea of having a person 's vote count directly to a candidate (the popular vote or "direct democracy"). We need to get rid of the Electoral College soon, because according to history, a mistake is bound to happen again with American elections.
The author argues that without the use of an Electoral College that every vote by an American citizen would still create a big outcome in the election for a candidate. Instead of telling electors who citizens wished to cast their vote for, citizens would be able to really vote for the candidate in which they feel will be most effective for the country. The author believes that the Electoral College has soiled our elections and that we should make a better way in which we can make the elections more efficient and equal for each and every citizen in
...lso speaks of the instances where the system had failed to accurately represent the national popular will’s vote and goes into depth about each instance. Obviously this article is against the Electoral College and it gives many points in support of the anti-electoral college supporters. In conclusion of his article he does mention that this voting system has worked well throughout the years, but believes that it is not necessary because of the reasons that the Electoral College was established is no longer an issue in today’s world. So therefore the voting system is outdated. My use for this article in my research regarding the Electoral College debate will strengthen my argument against the Electoral College. It will be useful because of the in-depth explanations of each instance in which the current voting system failed to represent the national popular will.
The single-member district election system is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member district systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the individual receiving the most votes winning election. This method of electing representatives is better than any alternative solution in various ways. Four compelling reasons to support the single-member district election system include the fact that single-member districts give each voter a single, easily identifiable district member; the way single-member district voting helps protect against overreaching party influence; that single-member districts ensure geographic representation; and finally, that single-member districts are the best way to maximize representatives’ accountability.
...lity of the votes (Shugart 632). Each states would be important under such a system, as candidates would be forced to address as many voters as possible, not just "voting blocs" that could swing a plurality in the state and, therefore, the entire state. More people would participate in elections because they would know that every vote did indeed count.
Every year millions of Americans go out to vote in the United State’s presidential election. Although, as many do not understand, the American government still use a system of electoral college which focuses on representation based on location and not majority choice. In this New York Times editorial written by The Editorial Board, the author worked to persuade American voters to change the current voting system. They appealed to a great variety of ethos and logos that gave good supporting evidence to strengthen the argument throughout.
...d I believe that proportional representation would be the most effective system to further the goals of democracy. If we use the single member plurality system we automatically ignore and exclude the voice of the people who didn’t win the election in a first past the post method. On the other hand in the proportional system rather than all seats being given to the party with the most votes every party gets the seats equal to the amount of votes they were able to obtain. This would allow all the people who voted to have their ‘”voice” represented in the government even though the party they voted for did not end up winning the election. This would encourage and engage many citizens to become involved in the political process; who otherwise would be discourage to vote at the fact that even if they vote, if their party loses their vote would be useless.
The idea for electrographic vote-recorder was for a device that was connected to a central clerk's desk. At the desk, the names of the legislators were embedded in metal type in two columns, "yes" and "no." Legislators would move a switch on a voting device at their desk to point to the "yes" or "no," sending an electric current to the device at the clerk's desk. The system allowed officials voting on a bill to cast their decision to a central recorder that calculated the counts automatically. Edison dreamed the invention would “save several hours of public time every day in the
Identify the potential risks which affect the company and manage these risks within its risk appetite;
I mean it doesn’t really matter how many times you yell BEAM ME UP SCOTTY! I doesn’t work. BUT our alien overlords as Amanda Jordan calls them, seem to have thought of pretty much everything because they’re created an absentee ballot. So if you are unable to get to the polls for any number of reasons, like maybe you’re going to be away on vacation, or perhaps you’re just taking a holiday in your head, an absentee ballot still allows you to vote. There are four main types of absentee voting, Voting At A Different Polling Station, Postal Voting, Proxy Voting, and Internet Voting. Voting At A Different Polling Station is exactly what it sounds like, it’s where you are allowed to go to a different polling station and cast your vote. Postal Voting is where you can request a ballot and return it to the post office along with a certificate signed by a witness and their signature proving their identity. Proxy Voting is where you appoint someone you trust to cast your vote in your place. Although this is a legitimate way of voting it is better to vote in person because this method can be considered unreliable because votes remain anonymous so you have no way of knowing that your proxy voted for the candidates you wanted. But if you can’t get to the polls voting by proxy is better than not voting at all. The same applies to Internet Voting, it can be considered unreliable
Voting is the easiest and simplest way of public participation, as well as making the voters feel like they are directly involved in the process. Certain aspects, such as the Electoral College, eliminate this feeling of involvement. The best way for elections to work would be a nationwide popular vote. This would bring a meaning to the term “true democracy” and will get the people, as a whole, the chance to participate in electing the highest officials.