Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eve's apology in defense of women analysis
Eves apology in defense of women analytical essay
Analyzing eves apology in defense of women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eve's apology in defense of women analysis
While on the surface “Eve’s Apology in Defense of Women” seems to be pro-Eve and pro-feminism, but looking deeper it is evident that Lanyer is not necessarily feminist at all. In “Eve’s Apology in Defense of Women,” Lanyer disguises her anti-feminist views by hiding her views in seemingly feminist statements, when in reality, she subtly uses Eve’s weakness as a woman as defense for her “mistake” of eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. While Lanyer portrays Eve in an anti-feminist way, she also paints a picture of how Eve could, in some ways, be considered the first feminist. The first defense, “Our mother Eve, who tasted the tree,/Giving to Adam what she held most dear,/Was simply good, and had no power to see,” (Lanyer, 19-21) …show more content…
It appears the the author is trying to say that Eve’s only problem was the fact that she is hyper-loving to the point that it became detrimental for more than just her and Adam, her womanly, loving nature caused the loss of eternal life for all of humankind. Further, it seemingly explains that she did not do this for herself, she did this for her dear, Adam. The apple from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was Eve’s present to Adam as a way of showing her affection for him. If this were the case, it would again mean that Eve did not necessarily understand the consequences of her actions which is somewhat offensive towards women and encourages the anti-feminist ideas of the author, Lanyer. Again, Eve knew the choice she was making and consciously decided to try the apple. Betraying the word of God and …show more content…
After the serpent coerced and convinced Eve to try it, she handed it to Adam, who also tried the apple. This action helped the author to determine that Adam, “Who being framed by God’s eternal hand/The most perfectest man that ever breathed on earth” (Lanyer 41-42) also messed up, he also chose to disregard “that strait command” (Lanyer, 43) that came straight from their creator. How could God be mad and punish just Eve when his perfect Adam did the same thing, as Lanyer says “(Eve’s) fault though great, yet (Adam) was most to blame,” he was the one directly told not to taste the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, if anything he should have just let Eve try it alone, but he also chose to try the forbidden fruit. In this situation, Adam became submissive and followed Eve’s lead to try the apple. Eve stepped up and not only made her own choice, but she stood by it admitting that she took the fruit off of the tree and gave it to Adam when God questioned them. In this instance, Eve took on a feminist role and took control of her life and situation. Though she did say that the serpent deceived her, she didn’t try to place blame on Adam who, being the man, was supposedly in charge of their
Adam was the first man that God created and was created to be the image of God himself. God planted the beautiful Garden of Eden in which there was no sin and the trees were filled with delicious fruits, everything a person would need to eat. In the middle of the garden was the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” One day, a serpent came into the garden and convinced Eve to eat an apple from the forbidden Tree of Knowledge. The fruit did not make Adam and Eve any better than they already were. Instead, the jealousy, the desire to eat what was forbidden—and then the physical eating of the fruit that was forbidden—allowed sin to enter humanity. God punished Adam and Eve, and all their descendants, by making their lives hard. Likewise, in the novel, peace and innocence left the Devon school and Gene and Finny's friendship, and after the winter session, discipline and hard work began. Eve eating the apple can be paralleled to Gene jostling the limb of the tree while Phineas was standing on the edge of it for in that second, both of their lives ch...
In the debate titled Of the Equal or Unequal Sin of Adam and Eve, two authors; Isotta Nogarola and Ludovico Foscarini, argue about the original sin committed by Adam and Eve. Nogarola first states that Eve lacked a sense and constancy and that she therefore sinned less than Adam did. In her case the serpent thought of Adam as invulnerable due to his constancy. God created Adam to have unchanged opinions and state of mind, in order to avoid falling into the serpent’s persuasion, however Eve’s vulnerability led her to a severe sin. God found Adam guilty for the sin because he esteemed man more highly than woman and led his command towards Adam to not eat the fruit from the tree. Weak and inclined to indulge on the fruit, Nogarola claims, Eve
Now, to the untrained eye, it may be possible to interpret the aforementioned text as having certain "scheisty" tendencies coming from both the serpent and, believe it or not, God himself. As possible as it may seem, the main theme of the passages of Genesis are not trying to show God as being greedy with the knowledge of good and evil. It isn't like God was worried that Adam and Eve would gain knowledge that would empower them and make them as gods. That is almost preposterous to think that God, the almighty creator of heaven and earth, would be worried about two mortals obtaining a little bit of information. In all actuality, that idea is incredibly far from the truth. God gave Adam and Eve the world, literally. This perfect world, a "heaven on earth", was just given to them out of the goodness of his heart. All they had to do was look over God's creations and enjoy true eternal bliss. As a matter of fact, the only rule that God gave to Adam and Eve was to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. All they had to do to live in the eternal paradise, with all the cookies and milk they could stomach, was to follow that one freakin' rule. Acknowledging the fact that the serpent (a.k.a. Satan Incarnate) did do its part in persuading Eve to eat the fruit and to give the fruit to her husband. Even still, Eve should have realized that she was risking eternal happiness for the words of a snake.
In Paradise Lost, one of the differences God is aware of the betrayal his creations unlike Frankenstein. There is a point where Adam desires a companion to share the world with, thus God creates Eve from one of Adam’s ribs. He is in a predicament now, due to there are now two beings to love now, but who deserves the more affection. He “can neither love himself adequately nor love Eve as himself unless have love God adequately – and so make his love for Eve, the unity of their shared self, an expression of that higher love” (Gross 95). This scene displays one of Adam’s limitations of his free will. Thus creating her in being the submissive which eventually became her downfall, Adam’s and the rest of humanity. Eve is flawed, she has the inclination of self-love, a quality she should not be capable of possessing or acting upon. The only love that she should be expressing is her love for Adam in a way also loving God. This becomes their weakness. Satan learns about this weakness and exploits it as his advantage to enact his scheme. He influences a susceptible Eve, by coercing her into eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge. He claims to Eve about the fruit “By the fruit? It gives you life To knowledge by the threat’ner? Look on me, Me, who have touched and tasted; yet both live” (Book 9 l. 686-688). Satan is able to persuade them to consume the fruit that provides them
The last two lines of this speech are very dramatic. Eve has such a great love for Adam that she could endure anything as long as he would be by her side, but she would be nothing without him. However, this creates a paradox. One may ask, if Eve loves Adam as much as she professes to, then why put his life in jeopardy just to make her own suffering more bearable? The answer, of course, goes back to the selfishness that has pervaded her entire speech. These lines stand out because of the spondees at the end of both of them.
Undoubtedly, Stevie Smith's accusations towards the biblical story of Eve show how women have been victims of despair and suffering. She holds it responsible for cruelty towards women. She implies that the values derived from the story of Eve were forced upon women without any choice whatsoever. To conclude, she challenges the authenticity of the religious tale on a whole to further prove that a story as influential as this one, should not continue to reign misery amongst humanity. The blindfold must be uncovered, and the colored human thought must be undone. Women's rights have come a long way since or ancestors, let us continue in the proper direction and hope that all will follow the right course of action.
The serpent even states to Eve that “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (NIV, Gen 3:5). The next few lines are completely different from what is shown by Milton. It says that when Eve saw that the fruit was good and she began to desire wisdom she took some and ate it. Then she game some to Adam who was with her. This is a very large contrast from Milton’s work because this shows that Adam was present the whole time of the serpent and Eve’s discussion. In the poem “Verses for Madonna of humility with the temptation of Eve” Lynn Powell takes a very graphic and almost nostalgic look at the story of Adam and Eve. Her poem states “Eve 's lying at eye level, propped up on an elbow./And never has abyss been so good to pink,/ the void a perfect foil for her foreground flesh./She fits into the black like a woman/ ready to be skewered in a vaudeville act./ You can tell the painter loves her, the way/ You can tell the painter loves her/ he 's touched her every place he can with paint./ And he 's noticed what she 's thinking:/ holding the pear, as Hamlet did the skull,/ while gazing up at someone who 's got everything to lose./ Eve 's about to make the choice Mary has to live with./
In the Hebrew text, the burden of the fall is the responsibility of the first human being, meaning Adam, who alone hears God’s divine rule. If we blame Eve alone it can alter the way we understand Genesis 3:6 and how we form our ideas about what the Bible says about women. One of my biggest arguments for not blaming Eve alone is the phrase ‘akal and how the tenses it is used in, in the Hebrew texts shows how many people are where. This helps the reader see who God was talking to in Genesis 2 and helps us see that more people are present that just Eve when she and the serpent are talking in Genesis 3. Parker states why it is so important to translate the text fully and accurately, “Translators should beware of imposing androcentric biases and should guard against linguistic choices that skew the text against women.” The loss of one word may seem meaningless when it is translated into another language such as English, but the removal of any word can drastically change the message the story is trying to tell, which is what we see in Genesis
Is this an apology or blame? In the beginning, God tells Adam not to eat the forbidden fruit. Adam disobeys God by doing so, but most people put the blame on Eve. In the poem, “Eve’s Apology,” Eve expresses her feelings toward the entire situation and shows how she is not to blame. She blames Adam for the pain we endure today. Eve eats from the forbidden tree out of curiosity. She wants to share it with Adam, so he can feel like she feels. Eve gives the fruit to Adam out of love, but she does not force him to eat it. Adam has control of his mind, so he disobeys God on his own. “Do not the thing that goes against thy heart” (Lanyer 424). Aemilia Lanyer, the author of the poem, “Eve’s Apology,” lived in the mid 1500’s and 1600’s. Living in this time period, had much influence on her writing. She published her landmark book, Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum, the same year that the King James Bible and three of Shakespeare’s plays were published (Wilhelm 424). Lanyer brings out the life of this poem with the poetic devices, irony, and unusual language.
All in all the actions of Eve were neither good nor evil, but instead necessary. Through her actions she brought to light the evils of the world, and as a result man is able to appreciate that which is good. Moreover one cannot blame Eve for what she did because although as we have seen God did instill upon mankind free will, he used his threats as a means of manipulating this gift. Although there were many trees in the Garden of Eden, having the tree of knowledge of good and evil forbidden created mystery for Eve, and therefore drew her to it over the tree of life. And once both Adam and Eve choose with their own free will to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil immortality is no longer an option. Now that man is knowledgeable enough to appreciate immortality, God removes it as an choice. In a way this story shows us the flaws of both man and God. Man in that he is tempted by that which is forbidden and does not always respect the orders of those in a position of authority; And God is shown to be somewhat devious and perhaps even malicious at times.
When wisdom is mixed with disobedience it opens the door for evil to abound. Although Eve was the first to take of the fruit and Adam the second, both shared responsibility in the transgression as Arnold describes it. (62;67,
Even though she claims to be the better of the gender by emphasizing a woman’s empathy and godliness, she describes Adam as “the perfectest man that ever breathed on earth” and uses the idea men are superior and more capable than women because Eve was only grafted from Adam’s rib, and not created directly from the dust (ll. 42). By using pathos to portray the contrasts between what she believes are the good and evil differences between
Throughout the poem she challenges the biblical idea that women are to be blamed. She uses passages from Genesis and the gospel of Matthew to help to prove her point. This poem is written about the tale in the Bible about Adam and Eve. It tells of how Eve was apologizing for the sins she had committed and was also pointing out that it is not solely her fault. Aemilia also says that Eve first gave Adam the apple and that it was Adam’s own decision to consume the apple and that Eve was in no place to stop him from doing so.
The poem presents the idea that Eve is inferior to Adam in order to justify the argument that Adam should receive more blame than Eve. In the first two lines we are told that Adam cannot be excused and that he should have most of the blame “But surely Adam can not be excused, Her fault though great, yet he was most to blame”. Lanyer then tells us that he was the “Lord and King of all the earth”, and that he was the “The perfectest man that ever breathed on earth”. She tells us that because he was King of all Earth, his actions were framed by Gods word, and he was the most perfect man then he should be blamed more than Eve. By telling us that he is perfect and blaming him more she is making Eve inferior because if him being perfect is the reason why he should receive more blame then that
...to this seduction because she wishes for an alternate world, a world where she would understand her identity, shed her naïveté, and gain independence from Adam. God and Adam try to conquer Eve by imposing rules and ownership upon her, but this does not work. The mother of all mankind falls from her state of grace and innocence when she perceives that she will gain from her seduction by Satan and by disobeying God and Adam.