Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What has changed since 9/11 in homeland security
Impacts of September 11 th
Impacts of September 11 th
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What has changed since 9/11 in homeland security
Security provides comfort and stability to those who experience it, and there is nothing wrong with being too safe. Losing some personal rights for the common good will prove that it was worth it in the end. 9/11 sent the United States into a panic, buildings crashed, moreover, lives were lost. This tragic attack commenced the great debate of whether one should sacrifice their individual rights for the common good. Calamities like 9/11 still happen today; innocent people were just recently killed in Las Vegas, and then Texas a few weeks after. These attacks show beyond doubt, it is time to make some changes in the average everyday life like, going through security checks, or more baggage checks at the airport.
9/11 was the beginning of a new age in America, an age of terrorism. That day, the nation came together and as the patriotism increased, so did the levels of security. The United States of America has several processes that are typically responses to terrorism. Immediate actions taken may involve, taking control of entry points in the US, increasing airport security, and immediately researching any and all information that can be found on suspects. (https://www.nap.edu/read/10570/chapter/5 11-13-17). These are basic steps that continue to provide people with individual
…show more content…
Not to say that regular individuals, don’t have an influence on the final outcome, because that is certainly not the case. As citizens, our opinions matter, but moreso the opinions of the leaders of our nation. As it is now, the fourth amendment shows the balance between individual rights and common good. This was amendment was revised by the government in 1992, when the issues became obvious to the public eye. (https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States_of_America_1992 11-16-17) Government officals will always have the final say in the end, no matter how many people are fighting for better security or more
In her essay “We should relinquish some liberty in exchange for security,” Mona Charen, a columnist and political analyst, speaks on the issue of security in the United States of America. She uses many significant techniques in her essay to persuade her readers of her argument. However, I feel that her essay fails to make a great argument because she relies heavily on assumptions, misses opportunities to appeal to pathos and ethos, and overall uses a degrading tone.
9/11 was a horrific incident. There are no words that can possibly describe how deeply it affected the America that my generation has come to know. This atrocity hurt the economy and made us into an intolerant country; however, this same atrocity also opened our nations eyes. It showed us how vulnerable we were, and as a result our countries security, and the concern for safety of its citizens has grown. While it is important to recognize how terrible 9/11 was, its also important to recognize how much it has helped our great nation. 9/11 and events like it are important. They show us how to better our country and though painful, these events necessary into growing our country.
On September 11, 2001 New York came upon a terrorist attack. The terrorist hijacked four airplanes the morning of the attack. The attack was part of the Al-Qaeda Islamist group, led by Osama Bin Laden. Two planes collided into the World Trade Center; one hit the Pentagon, and the other one crashed in Pennsylvania never reaching its destination. The cause of 9/11 is that Islam saw the United States as a heinous country with different and awful morals so they decided to attack. The consequences were the tensions between Americans and Muslims rose. Numerous hate crimes were committed and there was a massive economic downfall. We could have avoided this incident if the airport security would have been more strict, then the attack would have a less chance of happening (Bantista). “Make no mistake, the United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts. Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward. And freedom will be defended.” –President Bush directly after the 9/11 attacks (Tsimelkas). The government issued extreme changes in the military system and the surveillance ...
In order to prevent another tragedy such as 9/11, I think we should take some action. For examples, securing our borders by whatever means necessary, prosecuting to the fullest extent of the law foreigners who attempt to enter our country illegally, executing with extreme prejudice known terrorists, traitors and their collaborators, training and arming all airline pilots and cockpit crew members, enforcing the immigration laws already on the books instead of dreaming up new repressive measures designed to inconvenience and further terrorize the American people, start planning and building a national civil-defense infrastructure – not just for government officials but for the American people, and encourage Americans to protect themselves and to prepare for emergencies.
The aftermath of the attacks on September 11 demonstrated that this was necessary. The Constitution is not designed to render the nation defenseless against people who have no value for human life, and who will use whatever means necessary to harm others to advance their goals. In conclusion, the Patriot Act gives the government the tools in which are necessary to keep America and its citizens safe.
The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).
It is up to the citizens to decide. If the yearning to be free overcomes the fight to grasp power, then a new wave of democracies will begin overcoming the old authoritarian rule. Everyone has the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
The proper relationship between the individual's interests and the common good is a delicate balancing act that political philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Sophocles have tried to define. For philosophers such as Socrates and Plato, the common good trumps the individual interest when those interests interfere with what they believe is right for society as a whole. For others like Aristotle and Locke, a consensus on what the common good is must be defined within the reality that individual interests exists; meaning, they cannot be completely discarded for the good of society. I believe that in a free society, where the common good to doesn't have to be forced upon its citizens, the common good should impose upon the individual's interest only as much as citizens will allow without feeling such impositions are unreasonable restrictions on their lives.
There are a number of reasons why this freedom needs to be protected. The number one and most important is to keep the individuality of the American people from becoming controlled by the Government.
Of course, a certain level of safety is necessary in order to maintain a livable society. We must abridge total freedom in order to assure a maximum amount. No one can live comfortably in a country with constant terrorist activity. At the same time, however, no one can live comfortably in a country with constant security checkpoints. Somehow, we must find a balance: security measures must be thorough, but restricted; enforced, but monitored; and advantageous, but just. On top of that, laws must be understood and approved by the general public. If a security measure is determined to be helpful and not overly pervasive, and if it reduces crime significantly and in proportion to the infringement of rights, then the security measure should be acceptable.
Just picturing a society without national security is only enough to get many of us feel extremely anxious, especially of the society we are living now, we would be under continuous attack by terrorist and we would have so many outlaws. Without security there wouldn't be any rights. National security serves as our protection and our rights. I believe that national security should be prioritized over liberty. If we consider rights and privacy, it must be compromised
With security being a major part of our country 's problems, the government is cracking down on
Tragedies like 9/11 and domestic terrorism can both be prevented with increased homeland security. To prevent attacks like 9/11 from happening in the future, address issues with domestic terrorism, and the growth of homeland security, the U.S. still needs to be concerned with terrorism. Disasters like 9/11 still need to be prevented in the United States. The U.S. needs to be more involved with terrorism in general to keep domestic attacks from happening. Homeland security needs to be studied and improved in order to prevent terrorism.
Introduction: I do not think it is right to sacrifice your life for a lost cause, because what is the point in it? What does the person, like Archie get from blindly throwing his life away?. It may be believed that throwing their lives away for a lost cause is a good thing for honour and the glory of it all but do they get any of that?. And all of their loved ones are at home hoping that they can come home and when they learn they did not only die but also not really do anything except for fighting for a doomed expedition? Para 1:
In this society, everyone shall follow the constitution. Everyone shall understand that the government is doing what is best for the society and never shall the people question their authority. By following the laws, there will be peace and serenity. Every four years, we the people shall elect those who we see most fit for the position. We shall put our faith and trust in them.