In her book, every patient tells a story Lisa Sanders presents a patient that sought medical help due to a medical or a surgical illness, she then described the steps taken to diagnose to patient and subsequently treat them. She goes into details about what both the doctor and the patient were thinking and their reactions to the diagnosis. She also records her different encounters with the other doctors and their opinions over the ever fading physical examinations and the new high technology testing that is often prioritized. But mainly, great emphasis was placed on the declining use of traditional physical examination in favor of high tech medical testing and newer procedures. Lisa Sanders provides several case examples of what can be overlooked when the physician does not spend adequate time listening to the patient and performing a careful physical examination. Lisa Sanders substantiates her stories by citing quite a bit of research in order to support her contention but she also keeps an open mind and she clearly does not dismiss the value of more modern medical testing procedures but rather she highlights the synergy formed by conjoining those with physical exams to provide a comprehensive analysis.
I was able to gather the wealth of knowledge that Lisa Sanders communicates in “Every patient tells a story”. This knowledge I speak about is beyond just “book knowledge” it is wisdom expressed in the words and through the eyes of the medical professionals and their patients. Even though this book had many lessons to offer, the key recurring theme/lesson/concept that is constantly communicated is the importance of a properly executed diagnosis. In the vivid description of the pain and suffering experienced by the patient, Cryst...
... middle of paper ...
... often know their patients well enough to know details of their health status. Sadly however providers are becoming more and more specialized in order to increase efficiency and handle larger volumes of people. This is further fueled by the recent changes in healthcare reform; it’s inevitable that learning and telling a patient’s story has become an insignificant piece of the puzzle. Doctors simply can not scale to keep up with the ever growing number of health epidemics and so the story of a patient is slipping through the cracks and often has to be told and retold over and over. My view of this problem is a basic one and I believe is the root cause of why quality healthcare has become a rare commodity ties back to the lack of quality primary care where the doctor and the patient constantly communicate and the doctor has a good view of the patients health history.
Alexander Stowe is a twin, his brother is Aaron Stowe. Alex is an Unwanted, Aaron is a Wanted, and their parents are Necessaries. Alex is creative in a world where you can’t even see the entire sky, and military is the dream job for everyone and anyone. He should have been eliminated, just like all the unwanteds should have been. He instead comes upon Artimè, where he trains as a magical warrior- after a while. When he was still in basic training, and his friends were not, he got upset, he wants to be the leader, the one everyone looks up to.
After her diagnosis of chronic kidney failure in 2004, psychiatrist Sally Satel lingered in the uncertainty of transplant lists for an entire year, until she finally fell into luck, and received her long-awaited kidney. “Death’s Waiting List”, published on the 5th of May 2006, was the aftermath of Satel’s dreadful experience. The article presents a crucial argument against the current transplant list systems and offers alternative solutions that may or may not be of practicality and reason. Satel’s text handles such a topic at a time where organ availability has never been more demanded, due to the continuous deterioration of the public health. With novel epidemics surfacing everyday, endless carcinogens closing in on our everyday lives, leaving no organ uninflected, and to that, many are suffering, and many more are in desperate request for a new organ, for a renewed chance. Overall, “Death’s Waiting List” follows a slightly bias line of reasoning, with several underlying presumptions that are not necessarily well substantiated.
Sophie's Heart, by Lori Wick, is the story of Sophie, an educated young woman who moves from her homeland, Czechoslovakia, to America where she becomes a housekeeper for a loneyly young widower and his three children. This book takes place mainly in Wisconsin in the 1990's. Sophie moved from Czechoslovakia to American and became employed as a housekeeper for Alec Riley. She grew to love his three children and gradually her love extended to Alec himself, who returned her love with his own. Near the end of this novel, Sophie and Alec get married.
In “Should Doctors Tell the Truth?” Joseph Collins argues for paternalistic deception, declaring that it is permissible for physicians to deceive their patients when it is in their best interests. Collins considers his argument from a “pragmatic” standpoint, rather than a moral one, and uses his experience with the sick to justify paternalistic deception. Collins argues that in his years of practicing, he has encountered four types of patients who want to know the truth: those that want to know so they know how much time they have left, those who do not want to know and may suffer if told the truth, those who are incapable of hearing the truth, and those who do not have a serious diagnosis (605). Collins follows with the assertion that the more serious the condition is, the less likely the patient is to seek information about their health (606).
Any patient harmed by the provision of a healthcare service is informed of the fact and an appropriate remedy offered, regardless of whether a complaint has been made or question asked about it. This is how the term “candour” is defined by Robert Francis in his report (1). GMC defines the professional duty of candour as openness and honesty when things go wrong (2). This is applicable not only to patients but also to colleagues, employers and regulators. In a profession as stressful as medicine where doctors and other healthcare professionals are entrusted with the provision of care to people, it is vital for the care givers to be completely honest with their patients, especially when things wrong. It is not an easy task and doctors hesitate to do so due to a number of reasons such as the fact that doctors see themselves as solely benevolent and do not appreciate that they may be sources
Truth in medicine is a big discussion among many medical professionals about how doctors handle the truth. Truth to a patient can be presented in many ways and different doctors have different ways of handling it. Many often believe that patient’s being fully aware of their health; such as a bad diagnosis, could lead to depression compared to not knowing the diagnosis. In today’s society doctor’s are expected to deliver patient’s the whole truth in order for patients to actively make their own health decisions. Shelly K. Schwartz discusses the truth in her essay, Is It Ever Ok to Lie to Patients?. Schwartz argument is that patients should be told the truth about their health and presented and addressed in a way most comfortable to the patient.
In the vignette, the relationship between the physician and patient was authoritarian, and there was no patient-physician relationship to truly understand the concerns and the impact of his illness on the patient’s life. It almost seems that the physician did not take the patient’s concerns seriously. In addition, as his symptoms were worsening, although he consulted other physicians and he received contradictory answers, thus confusing the patient and decreasing the trust in the physician’s abilities. A patient centered relationship allows patient to build trust in the provider. I think that if the physician were more empathetic to the patient, the patient would not have had to look for answers to his questions in medical texts and other physicians. In fact, if there were open communication, maybe the doctors would have been able to find the injury and provide the necessary treatments, before it was too late.
We have all heard the African proverb that says, “It takes a village to raise a child.” The response given by Emma Donoghue’s novel Room, simply states, “If you’ve got a village. But if you don’t, then maybe it just takes two people” (Donoghue 234). For Jack, Room is where he was born and has been raised for the past five years; it is his home and his world. Jack’s “Ma” on the other hand knows that Room is not a home, in fact, it is a prison. Since Ma’s kidnapping, seven years prior, she has survived in the shed of her capturer’s backyard. This novel contains literary elements that are not only crucial to the story but give significance as well. The Point-of-view brings a powerful perspective for the audience, while the setting and atmosphere not only affect the characters but evokes emotion and gives the reader a mental picture of their lives, and the impacting theme along-side with conflict, both internal and external, are shown throughout the novel.
Everything revolves around the patient: the patient’s safety, the patient’s health, the patient’s comfort, and the patient’s happiness. Therefore, having a narrative solely from a patient’s perspective of how he is dealing with life before, during, and after treatment is important. “Flowers for Algernon” is a great narrative for nurses to look back on for an insight to what a patient may be feeling and also as a reminder to not only focus on how the treatment is affecting the patient physically, but also to notice how the treatment is affecting a person
The ability of a medical practitioner to elicit a sound and thorough chief complaint and history is essential in treating patients. During the first encounter with the patient, medical practitioners should be able to treat based on the information the patient provides. On December 13, 2013, the Physician Associate class of 2015 had the opportunity to interview standardized patients. This encounter was videotaped for self-analysis. I was able to reflect and improve on interviewing skills from watching my own patient interview. My critiques and thoughts are delineated in this essay from which I hope to improve upon.
Improvising Medicine is a must-read ethnography for students interested in bridging the gap between culture, history, and global health and medicine. Julie Livingston weaves real, grueling medical stories of advanced-stage cancer patients from the lone cancer ward in the entire southern African country of Botswana – in Gaborone’s Princess Marina Hospital. In a country where the primary, and more heavily funded, health focus has been HIV/AIDS, increased cancer awareness and the rise of “AIDS-related cancers” have led to a cancer epidemic. She argues that Africans are “living in a carcinogenic time and place,” rooted in a combination of infectious disease, environmental pollutants, and the tobacco industry (Livingston 51).
The patient was noticeably frustrated when she left the room. Dr. Schultz had given her extensive advice and very kindly told her that he would be unable to help with her problem. I was surprised. Not one to shy away from total knee replacement surgery, Dr. Schultz has always been confident, even with patients that are not in the primest physical condition. I realized that Dr. Schultz 's honesty reflected his true care for his patient. Dr. Schultz told me that it was difficult for him to say that he couldn 't operate on her. He said that once I become a physician, I must be able to go through all the training and experiences in my life and still retain the ability to say that I don 't have a good answer, even if it turns me into some sort of
patient to understand at least a general background on the doctor’s diagnosis so that they can also
My father was a physician who treated each of his patients with genuine concern and empathy. I loved listening to his stories. He taught me the importance of treating patients not merely as a set of symptoms but as real people with real emotions. In the words of William Osler “The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease.” These are words I live by.
The TED Talk featuring Dr. Abraham Verghese was very accurate in its depiction of how some of today’s medical professionals do not get the full picture of the patient. The TED Talk was is from 2011, so some changes have been made to this, but not all. During this time and era, most doctors were working under strenuous conditions such as working long hours, seeing numerous patients in a day, and being stretched by having to do many duties due to their title and limited filled positions in their desired career. But, this does not give them the “ok” to deny each and every patient the correct singularity that they deserve. The beginning story he tells of refers to a woman who has advanced stages of breast cancer that has spread to other regions in her body. She had been to numerous doctors before