Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflect on the development of own communication skills, noting areas for improvement
Role of effective communication in teamwork
Reflections of improvement in communication skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
This report will examine the progress and improvement of my communication and teamwork skills throughout the semester. This will be investigated through comparing my results of both the Everest simulation tasks, particularly in relation to not only my strengths and weaknesses of these skills in terms of what worked well and what did not work so well, but also how these weaknesses were improved. In addition, this report will not only make use of peer feedback received from my group members to further illustrate my improvement, but will also analyse the effectiveness of the strategies set out in my first management plan and whether they contributed to my improvement and development of these skills. Finally, this report will provide
…show more content…
My poor communication in terms of goal setting and planning can is further seen in Appendix C, which displays how my group members rated me an average of 2.8 in this area. In addition, another disadvantage of group decision making that we experienced was groupthink. In Henningsen’s writing, he discusses the symptoms of groupthink and argues that collective rationalisation and the pressure to conform are two symptoms of groupthink. We experienced these symptoms of groupthink as a result of poor communication and teamwork skills, because as a team we did not make our decisions rationally, we automatically agreed with the decisions put forward by the leader and failed to challenge these decisions by offering other alternatives or options. Moreover, we also felt the pressure to conform to these decisions because we were in the mindset of finishing the simulation and therefore did not want to delay the process any …show more content…
Frances Baum argues that the use of the Devil’s advocate method reduces groupthink as it, “stimulates creativity, controversy, reflects different perspectives, helps ask questions in a different way and introduces new questions to avoid groups arriving at premature solutions.” I found that this strategy achieved just as Baum communicated in her writing, because it stimulated conversation and encouraged communication for not only myself, but also my other team members. However, when implementing this strategy, I referred back to our team contract that we created at the beginning of the semester, which can be found in Appendix C. Although we did not revise this contract as a team in any of the simulations, I thought it was important when implementing this strategy that I refer to the contract to ensure that the questions or statements that I made, fitted within these guidelines. The improvement of my communication skills, due to this change in behaviour, can be seen in Appendix C, which displays the feedback that I received from my group members in the first simulation. These results illustrate how I received a rating of 4 for my communication (speaking) and a 3.8 for my communication (listening); however, Appendix D displays my results for the second simulation and
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
The team is weak. While the makeup of the team is one that fashions an environment conducive for enhanced effectiveness, it has yet to approach the set mandate in a manner that ensures the realization of its goals. Errors can be identified during the initial stages of forming the group. There are five stages of group formation. During three of these phases, the forming, storming and norming, were characterized by significant errors. The forming stage was spread through some meetings. The core rationale for this is the inability of all members to be included in the first
This accredited notion that group work is going to work faster at producing a better solution to a problem is false. The logic behind this idea—more brainpower which would lead to more ideas then leading to better ideas—is fallacious. We, as a society, have entered into an era where we believe that the best work that is going to be done, is done collectively, not individually. In Quiet by Susan Cain, she calls this new idea “New Groupthink” she then defines it as “a phenomenon that has the potential to stifle productivity at work and to deprive schoolchildren of the skills they’ll need to achieve excellence in an increasingly competitive world. New Groupthink elevates teamwork above all else” (Cain 75).
The first chapter of “Working in Groups” focuses on group communication, the first aspect being the key elements of group communication (Engleberg and
Groupthink theory is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines, which could have drastic consequences. This results from group polarization where discussions are enhanced or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group’s decision. Therefore, if a group leans towards a risky situation at the beginning on average they will move toward an even riskier position later. (Marks, 2015). The concept that everyone thinks the same question is anyone really thinking. These drastic consequences come from individuals trying to avoid conflict with one another and being highly cohesive give way to questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). This theory seems to new concept, Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims
There are eight symptoms of groupthink. The first symptom is when all or most of the group view themselves as invincible which causes them to make decisions that may be risky. The group has an enormous amount of confidence and authority in their decisions as well as in themselves. They see themselves collectively better in all ways than any other group and they believe the event will go well not because of what it is, but because they are involved. The second symptom is the belief of the group that they are moral and upstanding, which leads the group to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of the decisions. The group engages in a total overestimation of its morality. There is never any question that the group is not doing the right thing, they just act. The disregarding of information or warnings that may lead to changes in past policy is the third symptom. Even if there is considerable evidence against their standpoint, they see no problems with their plan. Stereotyping of enemy leaders or others as weak or stupid is the fourth symptom. This symptom leads to close-mindedness to other individuals and their opinions. The fifth symptom is the self-censorship of an individual causing him to overlook his doubts. A group member basically keeps his mouth shut so the group can continue in harmony. Symptom number six refers to the illusion of unanimity; going along with the majority, and the assumption that silence signifies consent. Sometimes a group member who questions the rightness of the goals is pressured by others into concurring or agreeing, this is symptom number seven. The last symptom is the members that set themselves up as a buffer to protect the group from adverse information that may destroy their shared contentment regarding the group’s ...
Our team did really well with making sure everyone’s ideas were heard, but conversations with another team, who did not successfully complete the simulation, was because one or two people took the lead, and other group members were hesitant to speak up. Compared to other teams, our team managed group thinks effectively. One other team saved more money than us when they completed the challenge, which confirms the assumption we should not have made in trying to implement as many tasks as we did. Every team had challenges with time constraint which was due to a number of factors such as: brand new teams, unclear instructions, and a drop in team morale when the system gave negative feedback at a wrong task. While the successes and challenges were magnified because we were living the experience, and outside observer would have a difference of
A. Preventing "Groupthink" Psychology Today. 20 Apr. 2011. The. Psychology Today.
The role of the leader in the Everest simulation was to motivate, instruct, resolve conflict and achieve group goals. I, as the team leader, made the point of differentiating myself from a manager, to someone who was extraverted, energetic and driven, within and outside of the simulation. This involved organising location times and communication between members, drawing up the team contract and building relationships between team members beyond the classroom. During the simulation however I chose to adopt a less prominent role to minimise conflict and maximise satisfaction.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
In week 7 our seminar leader allocated us into smaller groups of six to work together, get together and to start preparing for the mock debate in week 9 and the debate in week 10. When we started to get alone with each other, it was seen that it is not going to be easy to achieve our goals, not just because in our group had a strong activist, reflector, theorist and pragmatist, but we also needed to face some solvable difficulties as our first meeting of the week was cancelled by problem like the lack of communication, miscommunication and the ability to listen to another.
From the beginning, where we were unfamiliar with each other and became a team, my team and I had started to learn each other name and getting to know each other. Throughout each meeting, we slowly start to feel more comfortable and open minded with each other. Not only are we getting familiar with each other, each meeting that was held we progress of becoming an effective team member, we learn our strengths and weaknesses of everyone. During the meetings, we learn many concepts from the textbook, “Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices” by Steven A. Beebe and John T. Masterson. We were able to learn different types of concept in the textbook and utilized it as a team to complete certain tasks. The three concepts that impacted my team and I are human
Tarricone, P., & Luca, J. (2002). Successful teamwork: A case study. (pp. 640-646). Milperra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc. DOI: www.herdsa.org.au
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
Working in teams provides an opportunity for individuals to come together and establish a rapport towards others within a group. Teamwork is classified as people with different strengths and skills who work together to achieve a common goal. When a team works well, specific objectives are fulfilled and satisfied. Teamwork plays a crucial role in implementing and fulfilling a common goal in a team project. Each member plays a role and takes on different responsibilities combined together. In different stages of teamwork, conflicts and arguments may occur for as members have different standpoints which need to be harmonized within the team. The key to having an effective teamwork is to explore each member's unique abilities to motivate them.