Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of ethics in auditing
Auditor professionalism
The importance of ethics in auditing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of ethics in auditing
Definition of Audit Professional Scepticism
According to International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) 200, “The auditor shall plan and perform an audit with professional scepticism recognizing that circumstances may exist that cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.” In other words, an auditor must have a questioning mind and be sceptical to any circumstances that may be a sign of possible misstatement due to error and fraud, and critically assess audit evidence. It does not mean that they should assume the management is totally dishonest but instead, they should bear in mind that the management is neither honest nor dishonest.
Professional scepticism is actually a sceptical mind-set that cause auditors to apply a questioning
…show more content…
Therefore, it helps to ensure the audit works performed are of good quality.
Personal behavioural traits such as an auditor’s attitude and ethical values, and his level of competence which is his knowledge do affect his professional scepticism. This means that education, training and experience will influence professional scepticism. Therefore, audit firms are responsible to develop and polish their auditors to have a sceptical mind by planning and enforce policies that stress on the importance of professional scepticism in performing audit works.
Apart from personal behavioural traits, an auditor’s integrity also affects his professional scepticism. The justification will be discussed
…show more content…
If the answer is no, they must perform more audit procedures to gather more audit evidence.
• Reliability of audit evidence
Auditors cannot straight away rely on the information from documents and responses to inquiries received from the clients. They must be sceptical about the reliability of those information before they use them as audit evidence. If they are doubtful about the reliability, for instance, they believe that the clients may have falsified the documents, they must investigate further and maybe modify or add additional audit procedures such as collecting more audit evidence from third parties.
• Risks of material misstatements due to fraud
Sometimes fraud may be created and concealed in a way that is so well-organized that it might be overlooked if auditors fail to perform reasonable care and skills. This always happens in entities that have knowledgeable people in accounting, finance and so on. Therefore, every auditor must maintain a questioning mind throughout the audit and set in his mind that material misstatement due to fraud may exist even though his past experience with the clients shows that the clients are indeed
Overall, the work performed to test the relevant financial statement assertions and the evidence gathered has led our audit team to conclude that the confirmation issues encountered may signify that a potential for material misstatement exists. For example, the existence of a line of credit in one of the Financial institutions indicates that we need to perform further investigation to assess the reliability of the findings.
Auditors do not provide audit opinions for different levels of assurance. Therefore, auditors consider providing more or less assurance when modifying evidence for engagement risk to be unnecessary. However, auditors should be professionally responsible to accumulate additional evidence, assign more experienced personnel, and review the audit more thoroughly, particularly when a client poses a higher than normal degree of engagement risk. The auditor should also modify evidence for engagement risk when high legal exposure and other potential actions affecting the auditor
There can only be so many changes to the audit process to prevent fraud. Regardless of the regulations that one may enforce, the audit process still comes down to human opinion. In a case like Satyam, an auditor performing their job to the highest standard would have most likely caught Satyam eventually. As stated in the case, misstatement of cash is one of the easiest fraudulent activities to catch. Simply requesting bank statements verifies the cash that the company actually owns.
With every business activity come opportunities for fraudulent behavior which leads to a greater demand for auditors with unscathed ethics. Nowadays, auditors are faced with a multitude of ethical issues, and it is even more problematic when the auditors fail to adhere to the standards of professional conducts as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The objective of this paper is to analyze the auditors’ compliance with the code of professional conduct in the way it relates to the effectiveness of their audits.
The first problem poses many deficiencies in the audit process. To start off with, it is not sufficient enough to take a sample size of only four test documents when over 1,100 vendors exist. If an error was able to be detected in only four test documents, than the auditor should have expanded their sample size to ensure that no actual material misstatements existed. The auditors claim that the amount was not material, but because the sample size was so small they could not make an accurate judgement. The second problem occurred when the auditor accepted phone confirmations and internally generated documents such as cash receipts to confirm that the sample material was correct. This evidence should not be accepted, because the reliability of the evidence is flawed. The best type of confirmation that the auditor could have received would have been written confirmations from the external parties. Looking at this situation, the auditor should have made a professional judgement call to determine if the evidence received was persuasive enough for him to make an accurate determination on the accuracy of the Accounts Payable. With such a small sample size, the auditor is taking on too much audit risk, and ...
in arriving at audit opinion. Obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate is one of the most important steps that auditors should make and that is crucial in shaping the overall standard governing audit evidence. Audit evidence should be properly documented to ensure that the objective of the audit was achieved. If the objectives were not achieves, the working papers must contain documentation of failure. Also, the use of experts could be considered as audit evidence and auditors must know when their expertise is exceeded. This study therefore suggested that further empirical work should be done on the impact of evidence on audit
Auditing plays a vital role in business, government and economy. The key value of auditing is its ability to provide an independent assurance on the integrity and fairness of financial information produced by companies and other entities. An auditor is under a statutory duty to report to members on the company’s financial statements for an accounting period and on the accounting records relating to those financial statements (s.308). Auditors are required to provide an auditor’s report to the members (i.e. shareholders with voting rights) of the company concerning the financial statement audit. The auditor must express an opinion on whether the financial statements are in accordance with the Corporations Act, comply with accounting standards (s.296) and give a true and fair view (s. 297).
In general financial statements represent a formal record of an entity’s performance over a certain period of time which contains useful information to shareholders to assist them in making decisions (IFRS, 2014). In recent years, a wide range of users including shareholders and investors are interested in financial statements such as competitors, lenders and so on. Hence the audit report is prepared to provide an independent examination and the expression of opinion on financial statements (Millichamp and Taylor, 2012). However whether the information that auditors faithfully present or the users can totally rely on might still be the big question. Nonetheless under rules and regulations set by accounting boards, audit reports show the external opinion on true and fair view of the company’s financial statements and reduce the “Audit Expectation Gap” (AEG).
Audit is a process to evaluate and review the accounts and financial statement objectively. We can divide it into internal auditors and external auditors. Internal auditors have a inner knowledge of business process. Auditor has access to the much confidential information and all levels of management. But they may lose their judgement and they are not acceptable by the shareholder. “The overall objective of the external auditors is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on the financial statements in acco...
The major characters of the tradition audit are all information what is needed by auditors are on the paper and the manual calculators and without high communication technology. Auditors usually were limited by the place in the paper time. When a several people are working on the same auditing project for a client with offices in cities across the country, even worldwide, it takes a lots all time those auditors get the information which they need from the client, even there is risk paper information disappear for many reasons. on the another hand, mail paper information increase the auditing cost. The mistake caused by the manual calculators inevitably, no matter how fixed auditors concentrate on recalculate is, after all auditors are human. The global business become major in the modern business world, some example, several auditors who are in different locations are working a same auditing project, or auditors are in different city even country with the client, when there is issue among these auditors or between auditors and client, they only can communicate with each other by phone or be together and have meeting. Phone call can not make sure information been watched in the same time when the voice is talking about the issue, but having a meeting takes time and money make all people together, it increases auditing cost.
So the first question that should be asked is why should an audit be done in the first place? According to the Clarified auditing standards on the AccountingWEB website they have determined the following information as critical in defining what an audit is and why it’s important.
...e financial reports and statements are correct. This auditing will be conducted by auditing department of the organization, even may be done by an independent auditor who is not part of the organization, and sometimes public officials are elected. In case of unmatched consequences the organization need to give explanation on the misrepresentation of wrong statements. Auditors purpose is then to ensure that the misrepresentations are corrected, then maintain accurate, reliable financial documents and statements.
Audit Risk is the risk that an auditor has stated an incorrect audit opinion on the financial statements. It may cause the auditors fail to alter the opinion when the financial statements contain material misstatement. The auditor should perform the audit to lower the audit risk to a sufficiently low level. In the auditor’s professional judgement, the auditor should appropriately state a correct opinion on the financial statement
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.