Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Auditor's apparent and acutal independence
Auditor's apparent and acutal independence
The importance of independence for auditors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Auditor's apparent and acutal independence
ABSTRACT: The paper provides a framework that describes how audit evidence combines with auditor (knowledge, traits & training, and specialization) characteristics and external environment (includes client) characteristics (e.g., client complexity, incentives, and accountability to reviewers) to produce judgments that reflect professional skepticism (hereafter PS) in auditing. The framework also describes how, given a judgment that reflects some level of PS, the judgment combines with auditor (independence) characteristics and external environment (includes client) characteristics (e.g., corporate governance, and legal liabilities) to produce actions that reflect relatively more or less PS. The framework highlights that auditors’ and external's pre-existing characteristics all combine (and potentially trade off or interact) to affect the amount of PS in audit judgment and audit actions, and thereby audit outcome (e.g., the quality of auditor's opinion professional judgment and financial reporting).
Keywords: Professional Skepticism; Skeptical Judgment; Skeptical Action; Professional Judgment; Financial Reporting Quality; Going Concern Opinion; Discretionary Accruals.
I. INTRODUCTION
Professional skepticism is considered to be an
…show more content…
This paper makes a distinct and incremental contribution to the literature through building upon the model of Nelson (2009) and the framework of Hurtt et al. (2013). The SF groups the factors of NELSON MODEL (Shown in Figure 1) and combines them with the characteristics of Hurtt et al. FRAMEWORK (Shown in Figure 2) into two main border subcategories: auditor characteristics, and environmental (& client)
Arens, Alvin A., Elder, Randall J., and Beasley, Mark S. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services:
Auditors do not provide audit opinions for different levels of assurance. Therefore, auditors consider providing more or less assurance when modifying evidence for engagement risk to be unnecessary. However, auditors should be professionally responsible to accumulate additional evidence, assign more experienced personnel, and review the audit more thoroughly, particularly when a client poses a higher than normal degree of engagement risk. The auditor should also modify evidence for engagement risk when high legal exposure and other potential actions affecting the auditor
John Cage has always been known as a controversial and new age composer. Some say that his pieces lack the very structure that makeup classic forms. I argue that John Cage’s work Living Room Music, despite instrumentation with no set pitch, has conclusive harmonies and is in the style of a Baroque suite. This is a strange concept for some because pitch has become such a focal point around harmonic analysis when in reality it can be determined simply by ensemble texture and dominate features.
According to the conceptual framework, the potential users of financial statements are investors, creditors, suppliers, employees, customers, governments and agencies, and the general public (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). The primary users are investors, creditors, and those who advise them. It goes on to define the criteria that make up each potential user, as well as, the limitations of financial reporting. The FASB explicitly states that financial reporting is “but one source of information needed by those who make investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions. Users also need to consider pertinent information from other sources, and be aware of the characteristics and limitations of the information in them” (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). With this in mind, it is still particularly difficult to determine whom the financials should be catered towards and what level of prudence is necessary for quality judgment.
The utilization of the concept of materiality in auditing dates many years. Varying definitions of materiality during the preliminary stages of utilization prove that auditors recognized a need for this concept but did not have a standard for defining the term. The recognition by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) of the need for this concept prompted a decision to determine a universally recognized definition of materiality. In the book, Auditing Concepts for a Changing Environment, the FASB defines materiality as, “the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement” (Rittenberg and Schwieger 2001, 92). In essence, the concept helps auditors determine the financial information that...
Blank, D., Wood, A., Wood, C. (2003). A Matter of Ethics. The Internal Auditor. 60(1)
Professional skepticism is an important attitude to have as an auditor and accountant in gathering and evaluating audit evidence. Hurtt developed a scale to measure the auditor’s level of professional skepticism. Hurtt identified six traits of professional skepticism: questioning mind; suspension of judgment; search of knowledge; interpersonal understanding; autonomy; and self-esteem.
Various definitions have been proposed for the audit expectation gap. Humphrey, Moizer and Turley (1992), suggest that the common element in the various definitions of the gap is that auditors are performing in a manner that is at variance with the beliefs and desires of others who are party to or interested in the audit.
In fraud investigations, the need to maintain professional skepticism is in accordance with professional due care. Furthermore, professional skepticism is when an auditor or a forensic accountant begins an investigation with the attitude that fraud is possible despite prior connections with the company. As I proceed through my WorldCom fraud investigation, I need to keep my mind open to the idea that I may find evidence of material misstatements. Any previous dispositions or biases prior to starting the investigation cannot create bias. WorldCom’s integrity and honesty are no longer relevant as I am required to focus on the compelling evidence found during my investigation. “… the auditor should not be satisfied with less-than-persuasive evidence because of a belief that management is honest” (Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit
Judgement is a notion of relevance and reliability in developing and applying accounting policies. It is a requirement of management that they exercise a high degree of professional judgement when selecting appropriate accounting policies in the preparation of financial statements that is relevant to decision-making and assessment needs of users. Management should also consider the applicability of IFRS and AASB in dealing with similar and related issues and then the definitions, recognition criteria in the Conceptual Framework when there is no IFRS standard or interpretation in certain circumstances that are specifically applicable. Management may also consider the most current pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies to the extent that do not conflict with IFRS and AASB in developing accounting standards and accepted industry practices by using a similar conceptual framework.
Mintz, S. M., & Morris, R. E. (2011). Ethical obligations and decision making in accounting. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
The major characters of the tradition audit are all information what is needed by auditors are on the paper and the manual calculators and without high communication technology. Auditors usually were limited by the place in the paper time. When a several people are working on the same auditing project for a client with offices in cities across the country, even worldwide, it takes a lots all time those auditors get the information which they need from the client, even there is risk paper information disappear for many reasons. on the another hand, mail paper information increase the auditing cost. The mistake caused by the manual calculators inevitably, no matter how fixed auditors concentrate on recalculate is, after all auditors are human. The global business become major in the modern business world, some example, several auditors who are in different locations are working a same auditing project, or auditors are in different city even country with the client, when there is issue among these auditors or between auditors and client, they only can communicate with each other by phone or be together and have meeting. Phone call can not make sure information been watched in the same time when the voice is talking about the issue, but having a meeting takes time and money make all people together, it increases auditing cost.
Audit Sampling is very important to auditor to make their audit because easy for auditor fulfill their job with give opinion and make a conclusion from the account balance. It is not practical for auditor to audit 100% of the items in the account balance, that why auditor apply for audit sampling to obtain audit evidence from the account balance. Audit Sampling is testing less than 100% of the item within a population on a company client to obtain and evaluate evidence about some characteristics of that population. Population means that the entire of set of data which sample are selected. The objective auditor apply for audit sampling is to provide a reasonable basis for auditor to draw a conclusion about population from which sample
As per ISA (NZ) 200-A17, this ethical requirement includes the auditors integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality, & professional behaviour. Integrity is an ethical attitude which includes the auditor’s honesty, accuracy, and fair practice. Objectivity is a mental attitude while carrying out the audit wherein the auditor is fair and just with all his/her work. Professional competence is the knowledge and skill of the auditor, gained through education, training and experience, while due care is a degree of care of an auditor on certain situations wherein an he/she must act diligently. Confidentiality is the commitment of the auditor not to disclose any information regarding his/her client, unless required by law. Professional behaviour means the auditor must act in accordance to the law and set of standard as a manifestation of respect to the
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.