Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical Universalism
Justice in relation to health and social care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical Universalism
After reading the articles "Fundamental ethical principles in healthcare” and "Ethical Principles for Everyone in Health Care consider the contributions made from different professions in developing a universal statement of the ethical principles that can underpin the provision of healthcare globally. In particular, compare what the following quotation from the Hippocratic Oath, adopted in the early 1900s contributed to the development of a global healthcare ethic with a more modern view expressed through the eyes of different professions in the second article.
To consider dear to me as my parents him who taught me this art; to live in common with him and if necessary to share my goods with him; to look upon his children as my own brothers,
…show more content…
These medical doctors will also pass on the knowledge of medicine to future medical doctors. These doctors will practice their art of medicine by doing no harm to the patient which is beneficence. Medical doctors will be truthful in their medical knowledge and do right by the patient. Medical doctors will not perform procedures out of their scope of practice. Example, a primary care physician will not perform surgery on his patient since that is not his specialty. Medical doctors will treat for the benefit of the patient and not for any personal or financial gains. Medical doctors will only share this knowledge to individuals within the same medical …show more content…
For instance, as the statement states above, medical doctors will only impart the knowledge of medicine to only future medical doctors. The article Fundamental Ethical Principles in Healthcare, discusses three ethical principles to the Hippocratic Oath, beneficence, justice and respect for persons. According Fundamental Ethical Principles in Healthcare, beneficence means, “the duty to do good and avoid doing harm. Justice means, fairness to all or non-discrimination. And respect for persons mean, respect for life and the dignity of the patients” (Thompson, 1987). This aspect of the statement above does not contribute to the development of the Global Healthcare Ethic, because it states that these three principles only medical doctors will only share the knowledge of medicine with each other.
However, the remainder of the statement does contribute to the development of Global Healthcare Ethic. These principles are not only meant for the medical professionals, but also for other professional associated within the medical field of study, such as nursing, biochemist, researchers, etc. The article Ethical Principles for Everyone in Health Care discusses several different principles that govern healthcare amongst different professions. These principles
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, by Tom Beauchamp and James F. Childress, has for many critics in medical ethics exemplified the worse sins of "principlism." From its first edition, the authors have argued for the importance and usefulness of general principles for justifying ethical judgments about policies and cases in medical ethics. The organization of their book reflects this conviction, dividing discussion of particular ethical problems under the rubrics of the key ethical principles which the authors believe should govern our moral judgments: principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice.
The four ethical virtues of health care must be shown, compassion, discernment, integrity and trustworthiness. Respecting a person’s autonomy understanding and acting on the belief the people have the right decision to make decisions and take action based on their beliefs and value systems. The ethical issues that would be encountered will be to treat each person with passion and respect regardless of sex, race, and religious preference. The environment has no human rights violations, sustains nursing ethical
So, how do we who are aspire to be Hippocratic physicians achieve this goal? First we must look at the foundations for our personal ethical frameworks through meta-ethics. Meta-ethics refers to the systems by which we establish morals and ethical principles. Today there are many philosophies of meta-ethics, divided into two basic categories, moral absolutivism and moral relativism (Lawhead, 2000). The difference between these is in the nature of ethical principles, whether subjective or objective. Say something exists objectively, like a vase on a table. The subject’s perception of the vase must conform to the true vase. If, however, the subject is simply thinking about a vase, that vase exists subjectively, and its properties are contingent to the subject’s contemplations. So, how do these differing systems affect the physician in attaining the Hippocratic ideal? Let us first consider relativism.
medical practices are beneficial; they are done to cure people from illness and to save
Healthcare ethics is defined as a system of moral principles that guide healthcare workers in making choices regarding medical care. At its core lies our attitudes regarding our personal rights and obligations we have to others. When an unprecedented situation comes into play, we rely on medical ethics to help determine an outcome that would be the best case scenario for all involved. In order to appropriately review this case study, we must first identify the key stakeholders, the ethical principles, policy implications at the federal, state, and local levels, financial implications, and a viable resolution for the situation.
Hippocratic Oath was earliest code of ethics to govern conduct in medicine. Unlike many modern professional codes, its intent was to describe a moral vision for members of the medical community rather than to protect members of the community from incurring on the law. This oath and AMA medical ethics are similar as the primary goal of both codes of ethics is to give full benefit to the
In this diverse society we are confronted everyday with so many ethical choices in provision of healthcare for individuals. It becomes very difficult to find a guideline that would include a border perspective which might include individual’s beliefs and preference across the world. Due to these controversies, the four principles in biomedical ethic which includes autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice help us understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and acceptable. These principles are not only used to protect the rights of a patient but also the physician from being violated.
Both doctors and patients have their responsibilities in medical treatment. The doctor job is to recommends the best treatment for their patient. As for the patient their duties may either take their advice or seek other
To conclude, bona fide practices by physicians may be both good and bad. However, it still remains that the gift of life is the most valuable thing on earth and physicians should hence consider this first before some other things like money. They are not only the patients alone who benefit anyway, but even the physicians themselves and what they make in future may result from such generous acts that attracted other people. Caution must however be taken as it is not an absolutely good practice having its own hiccups as seen above.
Ethics refers to the values and customs of a community at a particular point in time. At present, the term ethics is guided by the moral principles that guide our everyday actions. These moral principles guide the researcher into deciding what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. The foundation of medical ethics is governed by two philosophical frameworks: deontology, and utilitarianism. However, ultimately, the ethics committees need to balance the risks, and benefits for the participants and the community associated with the particular research proposal.
Sometimes doctors abuse that aspect of their profession and use it to better science. James P. Scanlan uses the argument of finding the valuable truth and scientific knowledge which is morally impossible to obtain (Pg. 55). Ramsey responds by saying, “These are salutary warnings precisely because by them we are driven to make the most searching inquiry concerning more basic ethical principles governing medical practice.” While becoming a doctor, one may feel as if they must constantly better the field of health using science. “Doctors”, Ramsey says, “Need to become moral philosophers” (Pg.55). If the doctors do not think morally, then medical ethics will slowly become scoured till there is nothing left. Granted, there are doctors and medical students who have looked at this situation from a moral perspective, but I believe, as does Ramsey, that doctors will get caught up in the “omnivorous appetite of scientific research.
Introduction: The lives of humans are impacted by many factors, such as culture, religion, upbringing, individual values, and beliefs. These factors have an immense role in shaping the views and decisions of healthcare professionals and patients. And differences in perspectives and opposing actions are often times, the cause of an ethical dilemma. To examine how principles of ethics apply to healthcare professionals in the duties of their profession, Sarah Stow, a nurse, was interviewed.
Garrett, T. M., Baillie, H. W., & Garrett, R. M. (2010). Health care ethics: Principles and problems (5thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
The writer asserts that, although the doctor upholds the dignity of oaths by preventing or terminating any harm towards the patient, equally important is assessing the possible benefits and drawbacks of any treatment. Therefore, it is vital to discuss the principle of beneficence under two subheadings, positive beneficence and the utilitarian principle (Beauchamp, 1989, p.195).
We all are under the wrong impression that doctors are expertise in their domains and have good knowledge of all their solutions. Today, the rat race is so fast and furious that everyone just wants good amount of salary, name and fame but neglect and do not pay any heed to good health. Technology is far ahead and medical science is today doing miracles. But it can't possibly commit to memory all the knowledge they need for every situation, and they probably don't have it all at their fingertips. Even if we have access to the massive amounts of data we still need expert teams to predict analysis in various domains.