Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How important ethics in society
Debate of animal testing
Animal Testing: A Debate Different
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How important ethics in society
Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss.
When talking about ethics we have to take in account that it is based on the socially standardized concept of some things being good and some things being bad. Therefore what might be seen as socially unethical arts for some people, in another society or in another time, it probably won’t be so. The same is true for the natural sciences. And even if we take our western society as a base, there are some aspects of ethics and some specific topics of which people do not have a standardized opinion. The idea of it being ethical or not depends on thebeliefs of every individual.
In this essay I am going to focus on the fact that some people carry out unethical investigations (in arts), experiments ( in the natural sciences) or processes ( in both), knowing that the people will not accept it. This is because they think that the unethical methods will lead them to an end that is of a greater good, or that will cause more good than bad. Therefore, the question is wether it is worth it to use unethical methods to achieve a goal that might or might not do a lot of good.
There are two clear points of view, the one from the people that think that the end justifies the means and the one from the people who decide to follow the socially established ethical rules. First I will give an example of an unethical way to obtain knowledge in the natural sciences and I will show two points of view, then I will give an example of ethical limits in the production of knowledge in the arts and I will give two points of view.
Animal testing is a good example of the problem of compromising ethics to achieve something good...
... middle of paper ...
...it the methods that we use to obtain knowledge in the natural sciences and arts but those judgements do not always stop the people from using unethical methods. As long as the person carrying out the experiment or the performance believes that what they are doing ir right or rational, they will not stop doing it willingly. It is better to keep a balance between emotion and reason when deciding about if something is ethical or not and about weather something is worth to be done. The problem with this is that most humans are selfish by nature and they will probaly always choose what is best for them, what is more reasonable to them, not even caring about wether it is ethical or not.
Works Cited
http://www.peta.org/action/
http://visualmaniac.com/visualmag/videos/yolanda-dominguez-art-activism-on-9-vide
http://condignart.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/vic.jpg
A disturbing thought about man’s ethical barometer is that most of the theories, categories and principles emanate from the point of man’s reason. There is a cause to shudder at the thought of man as the absolute authority of what is right and wrong; what is ethical and what is not. Born into a sinful nature, man will ultimately make decisions that will lead to a moral philosophy that is shaky at best. Even philosophers with the best of intentions fall short to God’s model for the order, organization, and meting out of ethical actions. Because of man’s finite vision of what should be done to improve the present situation, mankind will always be found lacking in making the best ethical decisions; not being able to see the long term outcome and the impact those decisions and actions would have on others in the world.
Ethics is an important proponent when considering any decision. Knowing the difference between right and wrong is something everyone should know. However, the importance of ethics gets minimized when a decision that seems wrong actually has benefits. In the efforts of improving society, often ethics is violated. Sometimes in order for society to be better off as a whole, there has to be little sacrificing of ethical practices along the way to do so.
Through his article, the author builds his credibility with a considerable ethical appeal. Indeed, due to his background in education, including more than twenty years of teaching and his current pro-fessional status in higher
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss.
Mary Shelley expresses various ethical issues by creating a mythical monster called Frankenstein. There is some controversy on how Mary Shelley defines human nature in the novel, there are many features of the way humans react in situations. Shelley uses a relationship between morality and science, she brings the two subjects together when writing Frankenstein, and she shows the amount of controversy with the advancement of science. There are said to be some limits to the scientific inquiry that could have restrained the quantity of scientific implications that Mary Shelley was able to make, along with the types of scientific restraints. Mary Shelley wrote this classic novel in such a way that it depicted some amounts foreshadowing of the world today. This paper will concentrate on the definition of human nature, the controversy of morality and science, the limits to scientific inquiry and how this novel ties in with today’s world.
However, those that are consulted can also have poor intentions, or end goals that disregard the means of getting there, allowing corruption to bypass into the experiment. Dr. Frankenstein did not use the process of cloning, but the idea of creating life in an artificial manner translates quite clearly. Cloning is considered an artificial method of reproduction. The intentions behind cloning are often very sincere and righteous, providing breakthroughs in pathology and disease research. The question of ethics arises with the question: Do the ends justify the means?
For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products, it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no reason. Animal testing is wrong for so many reasons, but overall the biggest reason is that it is immoral and unethical.
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Unethical is the lacking of moral principles. Many laws were given to defend people who give consent to be experimented on. It is essential that the human subject gives consent to the experiment, and is given full knowledge of what is going to be about. The experiment should give results for the good of the society and must not be or unnecessary; it also needs to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. That’s what makes a good ethical experiment.
In the natural sciences there are always ethical norms that limit how knowledge can be produced. In the natural sciences, experimentation is an important method of producing knowledge but ethical judgments can limit the use of this method. There are areas that are considered unethical ...
...neral approach to ethics will consider creating the greatest good and the least harm. Although subject to change in different cultures, the societal norm of placing an ethical code helps us to set the “right” amount of boundaries on areas of knowledge including the arts and the natural sciences. Like I said before, there are many complications to this as both scientists and artists are put in situations where they must face the fine line between having a scientific/artistic role or ethical role in creating opportunities for knowledge.
This paper will examine this ethical dilemma further, including why it is an important issue...
Santa Clara University states that, “Ethics is two things. First, ethics refers to well-founded standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues.The idea of ethics controls how a person acts and lives their in life,on a daily basis. Secondly, ethics refers to the study and development of one's ethical standards.”“According to A Sequence For Academic Writing”;Ethics is not; the same as feelings, religion,following the law, following cultural norms, or an idea involving science.(Behrens and Rosen 292)Whether a person behaves in a certain manner thinking that something is wrong or right depends on their ethics. Each person has their own ethical values, or their own ethical code in which they follow, in their life, as their own interpretation. No matter what a person’s definition of ethics is they, will always be put in some situation that ethical decision making will take place in. A possible scenario where ethics might be tested is with the idea of cheating. Imagine a student, is in the process of getting ready to take a test. The teacher has just finished the review for what will be on the test, and class is dismissed. The student stays back to, ask the teacher a question,”sorry, I have to go make a quick phone call, I’ll be right back the teacher
Natural sciences are sciences whose methodology is based on the observation of the physical world. Unlike ethics it is a highly empirical discipline. The basic and perhaps only way used to produce knowledge in the scientific world is through inductive reasoning, as the methodology that is usually followed by scientists involves conducting several experiments and making observations, based on which they make logical conclusions. Ethical judgements hinder the methods of acquiring knowledge through scientific development. Several methods require the interaction with animals, which could end up being harmful for them. Moral codes and values oppose to such situations and therefore encourage us to raise concerns every time there is a potential for scientific research involving animal experimentation. As I learned in my IB Biology course, Xenotransplantation, the transplantation of organs from animals,...