Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of higher education essay
The importance of higher education
The importance of higher education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of higher education essay
In his article “A Rational Optimist’s View of American Higher Education”, Dr Lane A. Glenn discusses his vision concerning higher education in America. Inside the article, he explains and also re-futes the principal reasons why today, some people doubt of the importance of higher education such as colleges and universities in America. Glenn is writing to an academic and public audience in order to in-form them about what is happening to the education. His main claim is that receiving a higher education is still valuable. Through his article, the author builds his credibility with a considerable ethical appeal. Indeed, due to his background in education, including more than twenty years of teaching and his current pro-fessional status in higher …show more content…
In fact, he begins the article by stating that according to the opposite side, concerning the American higher education “Cost are soaring, teaching methods are outdated, not enough students are completing de-grees” and then he agreed with some of those complaints “problems do exist” before refuting them and expressing his claim “higher education in this nation is far from being expired”. This is maybe a way for him to show how he got the need of writing this article to express how positive he feels concerning high-er education in America. Besides, expressing the counterargument will prove to the reader that he made some research to find the main complaints” three chief complaints” before arguing against them. It also makes him more persuasive for the reason that he makes his argument stronger by cutting down the op-posing one. He framed his arguments the same way in the completion and competitiveness section by first expressing the bad news representing the opponent’s view which is that more than half of the peo-ple attending college did not graduate” more than 40% of American student…have not earned a degree after six years” and then he gave a good news justifying his optimism “Degree attainment in the united states according to Lumina, is steadily accelerating”. Dr Glenn by stating the bad news and then the good news, seems to be willing to make the audience be as optimist as he is, by showing them that the situation is changing and that Americans care more about earning a college degree. This mean that the reader may see that he is right when he claims that higher education is still
More people are choosing to further their educations, since a larger portion of employers are wanting workers with higher education degrees. Many are questioning whether an online or traditional institution is a better route. While some may say online institutions are essentially better in this day and age, in Johann Neem’s, “Online Higher Education’s Individualist Fallacy” he points out why a traditional college is more often the better route. By implementing an intellectual appeal on an audience that is craving a higher education and looking for the best way to do it, he exceptionally shows that traditional college campuses are not dead in the slightest.
In todays’ society college has become more so a necessity rather than a luxury. With a job market without as many opportunities as in the past, college degrees have become required to gain most well paying jobs. Due to this it is logical to say that college should be an environment that properly prepares the young adult to succeed in the working world. Although there are some who believe that the youth of todays generation are unprepared, and that institutes of higher learning are not doing anything to aid the situation. This is a view shared by Jacob Neusner in his speech “The Speech The Graduates Didn’t Hear” and by Fred Reed in his blog post “On Campus at U.PE: The University Of Practically Everywhere”. The ideas both these men exhibit
The CNN documentary “Ivory Tower”, created by Andrew Rossi, highlights some of the questions surrounding the issues within the higher education system of America. The main question debated throughout the film, is whether or not higher education is worth the continued rise in tuition. In order to make an affective argument that will convince and engage the audience, it is important for Rossi to use different kinds of appeals. The appeals, which include the ethical appeal, the pathetic appeal, and the logical appeal, all add to the effect of persuasion that the piece can have on the audience. After watching “Ivory Tower”, and coming away with a new outlook about the higher education system, this film definitely had moments that included these
Friedman composes strong argumentative points to lend support to the overall thesis of the article. By comparing two types of education, learning in a classroom versus learning through online classes; Friedman has successfully challenged professors to improve their way of teaching. The argument then switches to the acknowledgement of counter arguments stating that many valued experiences come from the residential experience. Doing this Friedman appeals to the two sides of the argument, but in the end still proving the importance of the change of post-secondary education. Friedman uses the counter argument to build his points and make his reasoning more deep and complex. By using various methods of writing the argument, Friedman maintains a constant view on the subject through out the article. This displays an in-depth knowledge of the subject he his writing about. This leads to an overall to a cohesive article that can be read and enjoyed by many
The essays by Mark Edmundson, James W. Loewen, and Gerald Graff are all on education and the ways it has changed. Or in their words, as it seems to be, gotten worse. Of course, there are a number of reasons why things have gotten worse. There are three however, that stand out within the essays. Higher education within private universities and community colleges have been plagued for years by the lack of interaction between students and their professors, the consumerism culture, and misleading information. All of this contributes to students being confined to one way of learning.
One of his first points was that society has been indoctrinated with the belief that college is the best way to guarantee success. He points to the statistics many colleges have shown as points to back this claim. He decides to dig deeper into these statistics, showing something that was not factored in. He looked at the statistics to
...is better, the Monitor’s Editorial Board said three times the amount of A’s are given out than used to be, which makes employers question the student’s education. Maybe the search for schools should not be by ranking; maybe it should be by the months and months of research that way the student knows they are getting the education that is right for them. And more of the education that the Monitor’s Editorial Board and I think students should get, an education that is full of critical thinking and a love for what the student is learning. My ideal education is a hands-on education that will last me not just through my college education, but will last me my entire life.
It is evident that higher education in the United States has gone through a tremendous transformation since its origins in the mid 1600’s. From schools whose only function was the training of ministers to the contemporary university of free and open access, both society and culture have had tremendous effects on the evolution of higher education in America. This paper will explore those transformations as related by the themes woven through the ten generations identified by. It will also offer evidence to support the identified theme of each generation.
In both “Stop Scaring students”, by Devorah Lieberman and “College is a Waste of Time and Money”, by Caroline Bird, the authors consider the value of college education. Due to the long-term investment in higher education, college students should be informed about certain aspects of college, concerning whether college is beneficial or non-beneficial. Both oppositions present themselves with a strong argument, but only by looking at their similarities and differences one can uncover which is the best path for college students.
“Are Too Many People Going to College?” is an article written by Charles Murray in 2008 discussing the necessity and the consequences of people attending college after graduating from high school, particularly liberal education. In this argument, Murray implies he is against people going to college as it’s the notion of college is changing. The primary argument he uses is the social model that pushes people to seek a B.A. as it is the first reason students attend college. Another argument Murray makes is the financial aspect of college education as it is increasingly difficult to afford. He argues that basic liberal education is and should be learned during elementary school
To begin with college used to be known as a sacred place where knowledge was sought out and pursued. Now it has become the norm. Therefore one may think, what’s wrong college becoming the norm? Isn’t that a good thing? However, what most people are blind being that the quality of education has changed dramatically. Author Caroline bird mentions in her narrative
Americans also believe that higher education is very important. This is the way for them step closer to their dreams “rising in the world”. Comprehensive education must go hand in hand with an awareness that America has also needs a highly trained specialist. Therefore, it is understandable when their education system becomes increasingly selective the higher level. America’s universities all set its own admission standards so the best universities are more difficult to enter. Harvard, for example, admitted only 17.2 % qualified applicants in 1991. Because of the importance of higher education, many people who already have a job, still take classes after the work time in order to reinforce the specific knowledge. Not surprising when people say that America’s higher education system is the best in the word.
Studying a university degree is one of the biggest achievements of many individuals around the world. But, according to Mark Edmunson, a diploma in America does not mean necessarily studying and working hard. Getting a diploma in the United States implies managing with external factors that go in the opposite direction with the real purpose of education. The welcome speech that most of us listen to when we started college, is the initial prank used by the author to state the American education system is not converging in a well-shaped society. Relating events in a sarcastic way is the tone that the author uses to explain many of his arguments. Mark Edmunson uses emotional appeals to deliver an essay to the people that have attended College any time in their life or those who have been involved with the American education system.
...phy of education, I have elaborated the aim of education, addressed the role of the teacher and the learner and explained the method of classroom practices. Justification of my personal philosophy has also been provided with reference to four theorists mentioned above. I have also demonstrated that my personal philosophy of education is in contrast to idealism theory advocated by Plato and the Associationism theory advocated by John Locke. One of the main points discussed is that education should produce strong morals and strong characters in the learners. The other main point is that the teacher should the role model who instils and imparts strong morals and strong character in the learner. The other main point is that the method of learning should be participatory. My philosophy of education is therefore practical and important in enriching my teaching career.
Goodlad, J. I., Sirotnik, K. A., & Soder, R. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc. Gushee, M. (1984). The Species of the World Student discipline policies, p. 12. 5.