Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Journalistic ethics
Stephen Glass: “I didn't do anything wrong!” Chuck Lane: “I really wish you would stop saying that!” Shattered Glass was a movie about a journalist named Stephen Glass would fabricate many articles. Glass had written forty-one articles and twenty-seven of them were fabricated. He was beloved at the New Republic for two reasons. He would always provide intriguing stories they wish they were covering and didn’t rub it in that he got the story and they didn’t. These can be considered factors for why he was able to get away with it for so long. His coworkers love his stories so much that they were entertained whenever they listened to them. People would not think to look more into stories because of how intriguing it was, so if something was wrong with a source it would most likely not be found out.
There are some ethical issues in the
…show more content…
Then the piece goes to a second editor, and the writer revises it again. Then it goes through a fact-check, where every fact in the piece...every date, every title,every place or assertion is checked and verified. Then the piece goes to a copy editor, where it is scrutinized once again.Then it goes to lawyers, who apply their own burdens of proof.Marty looks at it too. He's very concerned with any kind of comment the magazine is making. Then Production takes it and lays it out into column inches and type. Then it goes back on paper, then back to the writer, back to the copy editor, back to editor number one,and editor number two, back to the fact-checker, back to the writer, and back to Production again.Throughout, those lawyers are reading and re-reading, looking for red flags, anything that feels uncorroborated. Once they're satisfied, the pages are reprinted and it all happens again. Every editor, the fact-checkers... they all go through it one last
In the Stossel video about media being bias Goldberg talk how the media is filter through group think and how that affect how the news is delivered. Goldberg states that groupthink filters a way of thinking that makes everyone think the same way and therefore bias occurs when the new is delivered to the public.(Dealing With Bias) Bernard Goldberg claim can be trusted because he is the author to the number one seller called Bias A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort The News. Goldberg continues on how the media and most of the people in mainstream media change and show only what they want to to the viewers. The workers and news believe they are informing the public with truths but in reality it has bias in it. When the majority agrees or believes a certain way the rest adapts and starts think the same way as everyone else around them. Therefore bias occurs and the news being more and more bias. Also they talk about in the video how the media is bias not because of conspiracy but because of people thinking a certain way and as a result news deliver bias information. Political and other news like politics are greatly bias due to media wanting to portray a way of thinking and agreeing with the same belief as the majority in the big corporations. Media wants to make the viewer agree with the views on politics and make it seem like bias does not occur in mainstream
In the following case, Luke is involved in a very perplexing conflict, or Ethical dilemma. This situation is an Ethical dilemma, and not just a regular “everyday” problem, because to Luke there might not be an obvious answer. He can also be thinking that both choices, keeping his commitments of confidentiality and telling his brother, Owen, are both correct things to do. If Luke tells his brother about the project, then he might concur with a theory known as Breach of confidentiality. “Breach of confidentiality occurs when someone gives away information that was supposed to be kept private.” (GENB4350 Online Lecture, Ethical Reasoning 1). By Luke breaching information that is supposed to be kept secret, he will betray the trust of his company
Trager, Robert, J. R. (2010). The Law of Journalism & Mass Communication. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
The difficulty I had with this case, was I had multiple sources to turn to for information. I had to choose which source was reliable because I did not want misconduct information. The media sources had about the same variety of information about Gabriel’s case, but added small details that the alternative networks did not include. For example, each news network added more information on how Gabriel was found by the paramedics. The L. A. Times reported that Gabriel had a cracked skull and three broken ribs while the Huffington Post did not include this information. The L.A. times also elaborated more on the story by reporting more facts about who was involved in the investigating. They included names of teachers, and police officials that was involved. The differences between how news network presented the facts in the case proved the different ways we are influenced by the media, and the information we gather depends on where we get our stories
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
Literary journalistic discourse is “perhaps the most intertextual of all texts, referring to other texts” in terms of transforming prior historical stories and restructuring conventional literary and journalistic genres and discourses in an attempt to generate a new one, that is, literary journalism (Mills 65-66). Thus, the journalistic discourse cannot be but dialogic and intertextual because its raw material is a news story that can be manipulated, adapted, and adopted by the literary journalist in order to compete other versions of the story. It “assimilates a variety of discourses” that “always to some extent question and relativize each other’s authority” (Waugh 6). Literary journalists, thus, are actively engaged in interpreting and scrutinizing
The movie “All the President's Men” (1976), is based on the work of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein two Washington Post newspaper writers, who uncovered the cover-up of the White House's involvement in the Democratic Party National headquarters, Watergate, break-in. At first, Bob Woodward discovers what seems to be a minor break-in but is surprised to find that top lawyers were already on the defense case. He also discovers that names and addresses of Republican fund organizers were being accused, which further aroused his suspicions. When he brings this to the attention of the head of the Washington Post, he is prepared to run with the story and assigns Woodward and Carl Bernstein to it. Their findings of this break-in paved a path that lead to the White House, where it was soon learned that President Richard M. Nixon of the USA, was involved and resigned after Woodward and Bernstein’s findings. Conversely, my two significant instances are, Woodward and Bernstein’s actions on their process of contacting the sources that were involved because they worked for the re-election committee. The other instance I chose is that of both Woodward and Bernstein intruding into the house of Mr. Sloan very late at night, a man well interacted with the political figures they were researching on. Woodward and Bernstein didn’t abide by many of the values and ethics theories we’ve learned from our book and in class. It also seemed as if the unethical actions they to...
Stephen Randall Glass was an up and rising journalist who graduated from Penn in 1995 to later on join The New Republic as an editorial assistant. During his stay there, he was known for his remarkable articles throughout his career such as the “Hack Heaven” which was published in 1998. However, as his career as a journalist began to skyrocket, the articles he was putting out were fabricated and invented. With thorough investigation from Adam Penenberg, a reporter with Forbes magazine, he was able to point out the flaws and false sources from the remarkable article, “Hack Heaven”. Unfortunately, The New Republic were going to be heavily affected for releasing fictional news. To resolve the situation, Lane, the editor at The New Republic, had
The last issue regarding the question of humanism in the film relates to Harrison Ford’s character as Deckard. In it he is the one who hunts the androids in order to destroy them, because they are not meant to be here on Earth. However there is an overwhelming, and intentional, amount of evidence to suggest that Deckard himself is an android. The first being a scene where Rachael asks whether he has taken the android test, to which he doesn’t reply. There is another instance where Deckard falls asleep and dreams of a unicorn, and at the end of the movie he sees a small origami unicorn on a police officer’s desk. This hints that the memory could have been implanted therefore making him a replicant. If the character is in fact a replicant it
Ethics refers to the “right and wrong conduct of individuals and institutions of which they are apart” (Ingram et al., 42). With this being said, ethical blunders were made by both Kelly Myers and Janet Williams. Bids and bidders are supposed to be private. However, Kelly’s boss wanted to know exactly who they were. According to Ingram et al., withholding information is viewed as unethical behavior (43). Thus, Kelly engaged in a deceptive practice as she did not tell the seller that she saw the bids of the other parties prior to submitting hers. Moreover, Janet engaged in unethical behavior when looked over the bidders in the presence of Kelly. She did not verbally tell Kelly the information, however, she neglected to secure the folder with
At the beginning of the movie, Stephen Glass, who is the narrator throughout the movie, speaks about how important it is that a journalist knows who he is writing for and what he is good at. This explains to an extent why he crossed the boundaries to write false articles simply because he knew what subjects would be able to engross the readers and he was good at doing that. Despite the fact that Stephen deliberately applied that perception in the wrong way, he was able to capture the minds of many readers at large with creative and funny stories and this capped his career. I must say I was impressed with how guileful Stephen Glass was in carrying out this act but was disappointed in the end when his excuses were extremely cynical. He should have been prepared to prove the accusations false knowing he wrote a couple of false articles. It was not quite sensible of him to write an article about a software company that exists without having sources to back it up. Although, he was skillful he was at writing lies, h...
Writers have the ability to influence the world, to change people’s views, and to inform those reading of events. As writers of CNN, Wesley Bruer and Evan Perez have the job of informing the public of current events that affect our lives. They also have the ability to influence the way their readers perceive that situation. Upon writing the article “Officials: Hackers breach election system in Illinois, Arizona”, these two authors ignored the fact that these hackers may have had the intention of affecting the elections.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act
... through them. By doing this the newspapers have more factual information, whilst gaining comment from a useful elite source.
Campbell, Joel. “States Revisiting Reporter’s Privilege Laws.” Quill Dec. 2005; 36-37. Literary Reference Center. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.