Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
Theories and principles of ethics
Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
Parents often think they are feeding their children healthier options, but what they do not realize is that the flavoring in foods is often made from highly refined chemicals and the sweetness they taste is actually sugar. Many of the pre-packaged foods, such as muffin mixes, contain chemicals designed to taste like the real thing, and have no nutritional value. Often, flavored drinks are high in these chemicals and sugars to make them taste good. The other common misconception that parents make, is that products are made from healthy ingredients because the label says it contains it on the package. The major problem with this is the amount of the healthy ingredients are minimal and gives no nutritional value.
Food manufacturers have started
…show more content…
First, we will view it from the manufactures perspective; the Deontology theory. According to Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach, "Deontology maintains there are certain standards of human decency and respect for the worth of others that rule out treating them in certain ways" (Wicks, Freeman, Werhane, Martin, 2010, p.6).
The manufacturers justify their actions because their goal is to sell their product, no matter what the effects of it are on the consumers who purchase the product. Because actions are viewed as having essentially good and bad qualities, we need to understand where the manufacturer’s styles of thinking come from. The manufactures intent or action is to market their product in order to make a profit. Deontologist view their rights or wrongs based on the action not the outcome of the action. So, unless they are breaking the law, the manufacturer does not see anything wrong with their marketing
…show more content…
According to Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach, “consequentialism focuses on the moral importance of the ends we seek, or the goals we set, and the need to achieve them through our actions” (Wicks, et al., 2010, p. 7). The manufactures have a goal of marketing their products in order to obtain customers who will purchase their product. The actions the manufactures choose are benefiting their business in order to achieve the goals they desire. Consequentialist believe that if their “actions create more good than bad in terms of realizing their goals or purpose” (Wicks, et al., 2010, p. 7). It does not matter to the manufacture if the consumer has an allergy to an ingredient that may be in their product, but they have listed it under another name.
Consumer’s believe they have the right to know what they are putting into their body’s and that the label on the product will inform them of that information. When they find out the truth about food label misconceptions it breaks their trust for those manufactures. view of
Adverts often mask foods that are unhealthy by emphasising its positive nutritional features – such as dietary fibre and protein. While at the same time ignoring its negative features – including the high amounts of saturated fat and sugar contents. In some cases, even products that mention any alleged health benefits are usually are outweighed by the health risks associated with consuming the product, that they just fail to
Restaurants have a greater possibility of getting more money if they have "special" nutritional labels. Many people dislike the food label, yet some people are for them. Labels would not benefit anyone because they are not always right, and they sometimes just want the state to give them As for their grade, yet it sometimes if negative to have new foods on the menu. A food has to be evaluated before put on the menu, therefore it would be even more complicated. The author proclaims, "But for the restaurant, it is a nuisance and a potential threat to their business. It means that before a new item goes on the menu, it has to be evaluated." This statement explains that before a new item goes on the menu trouble is beginning. Labels are no help they just bring in more money because prices get higher from healthy
...t be in business very long. But, for instance, what if RGIS was offered the chance to perform one “test” inventory for a company that had many stores and the inventory went extremely well because of the customer service levels provided? RGIS would have the opportunity to service this customer’s other stores not because of the data, but because of the service they received. This human factor played huge role in garnering business for the RGIS and yet their employees have no chance in earning any more compensation than they would have for simply putting data into a machine. Let’s look at other ethics principles and see where an example like the one above would fit in.
Companies nowadays are using different and strong methods in marketing their food products. The Companies are very competitive, and the results can affect the people. When we think about this job field, it is convincing that those producers should use cleverly ways to gain their own living. In the other side they shouldn’t use misleading ways that could harm the people. Food companies should be straightforward with every marketing method they use. People have the right to know what they are consuming and also to know the effects of these products on them, whether it is harmful, useful, or even neutral.
Just like the kid that buys a sugary cereal just because it has Spongebob Squarepants on it, or like the person that goes to Disneyland to have fun but at end of that day, they can buy a churro. Parents also need to take a action in this too, just because you kid gives you a temper tantrum doesn’t mean that you need to buy them the candy they want in order for them to stop crying, and parents should also be informed of the things that their kids are consuming at their schools. Food companies should market or promote the TINY WORDS on the back of their product that informs all of the substances they used to make the product, to the consumer. Just like they would promote their food products to get consumers. Think about these following questions: What will you do to be informed of the chemicals used on the products you and your family consumes? Is it worth buying just because it has your favorite characters, movie, or games on
In 1975, Acme Markets, Inc., a large national food chain and its CEO, John R. Park, were convicted of keeping food sold in interstate commerce in a rodent-infested company’s warehouse, in violation of federal regulations . According to the responsible corporate officer doctrine, the court found Park severely liable for the unsanitary circumstances of this corporation, as this offense involves protecting the public health and welfare of patent dangers. Park was charged guilty of violating 301(k) of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act (FDCA), which protect consumers against adulterated and misbranded foods and drugs.
Due to false advertising, I feel that certain food companies are being careless in trying to make people buy their products in order to make money in the quickest way possible. My only suggestions for this situation are either the companies to tell the truth about their products, or stop advertising completely. If the companies could spend more time researching the effects of their products, then they could make improvements to their foods or maybe find alternatives to the ingredients. That way people can make the right decisions in buying what is best for them and their children. Thank you for your time.
In her book Marion Nestle examines many aspects of the food industry that call for regulation and closer examination. Nestle was a member of the Food Advisory Committee to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the 1990’s and therefore helps deem herself as a credible source of information to the audience. (Nestle 2003). Yet, with her wealth of knowledge and experience she narrates from a very candid and logical perspective, but her delivery of this knowled...
Knowledge is power, the more the consumer knows about the food they are eating the healthier choices they’ll make. For instance, in McDonald’s Grilled Honey Mustard Snack Wrap and a small French fry, from McDonald’s is around $6.00 and contains 420 calories 24g of fat (6.0g saturated).If you were to compare that to a Big Mac meals that comes with medium size fries and coke soda would be about 980 calories the Snack Wrap would be a healthier alternative and it would be about the same price $6.00. When fast food chains put labels on their food like McDonald’s consumers can’t
Pomeranz, Jennifer L. "A Comprehensive Strategy To Overhaul FDA Authority For Misleading Food Labels." American Journal Of Law & Medicine 39.4 (2013): 617-647. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
While conducting my research, I found it pretty alarming that allergy labeling on products wasn’t mandated by the government until ten years ago. If allergens were not required to be clearly labeled on the products we consume, people with nut or gluten allergies for example, would have extreme difficulty in purchasing food products. Studies show that around 30,000 people require emergency room care in the United States due to allergy related incidents and around 150 deaths occur as a result of allergic reactions to food, in addition, approximately 2% of adults in the US and 5% of children have food allergies. Judging by these allergy demographics, it’s safe to assume that if allergen labeling was not mandated for consumer products, we’d see a tremendous amount of hospital treatment and deaths in the US and all over the world.
Corporations are neither as perfect or put together as portrayed by some, nor as evil as portrayed by others. They are simply the economic units in our society that are necessary to supply the goods and services we need. We don’t want to go back to walking down the road hoping, someone had cheap good in their cart do we? No better means to serve this purpose has yet been found. While corporations obviously would prefer to market safe products rather than unsafe ones, they feel justified in asking why they should voluntarily increase the safety of a product if the result is that sales suffer. The provision of safety belts in autos is a good example.
More and More people are becoming concerned about what they eat, especially if they consume food products that are manufactured in food industries. However, it is hard to know what exactly you are consuming if food industries provide false nutrition content and mislead consumers by placing false advertisements on the packaging. When a company produces a product that contains misleading label, consumers are not receiving complete information about the food they are eating which could lead to health issues including allergies and problems with diabetes.
Food claims seemed to be marketing for a manufacturer, but now it is a warning to a consumer's health. Some examples of claims are "low-fat", "lite", "light", "reduced", "%fat free" and "No added". The food industry is very keen to make health claims on food labels, and the ANZFA has considered lifting the ban that stops them from doing so. Many disagreeable claims are made regarding the ability of nutrients to prevent certain diseases. Food manufacturers are now only allowed to make the following well-established claims concerning relationships between diet and disease:
Daily, millions of people are perusing the grocery store, buying food for their families, completely unaware of what they are purchasing. A study on consumer research regarding food labels by the FDA found only a small percentage of people actually read the food labels and understand what they mean apart from only the calories and fat; ingredients are another story. “According to a study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, about 61.5 percent reported using the nutrition facts panel when deciding to purchase food. Fewer people paid attention to the list of ingredients” (CNN Health). The FDA is aware that labeling could help reverse the acceleration we are seeing in heart diseases and obesity, but labeling does not help people to read the ingredients if they do not understand pseudonyms, and vitamins. “The surveys also revealed frequent misunderstanding of the meaning of the daily/value column that shows how each nutrient fits into a healthy diet, “(American journal Nutrition, WEB). Many different harmful ingredients are secretly hidden in labels and people skimming ov...