Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organ donation ethics and morals
Importance of organ donation
Ethical Dilemma Case Study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organ donation ethics and morals
In the United States, there is a three percent chance that a woman will bear a child with a birth defect. Mothers face difficult questions after conceiving a child with special needs. Jodi Picoult addresses the ethical decisions faced when trying to save a child with leukemia. However, this precarious situation is magnified when Sarah Fitzgerald chooses to procreate a child for skeptical reasons. Ultimately, it is immoral to conceive one child for the sole purpose of acting as an organ donor for another child; consequently, some parents take desperate acts to save their children.
My Sisters Keeper takes place in Rhode Island over a time period of fourteen years. It is about a family with three children, and their oldest child is suffering from leukemia. Mr. and Mrs. Fitzgerald face many difficulties with their sick child Kate, who is in critical condition, and if does not receive a kidney transplant she is bound to die. Kate’s parents volunteer themselves in order to save their child, but neither of them are a perfect match. The doctor hints to Kate’s parents that they can conceive a child to be a perfect match to save Kate from dying. Mr. and Mrs. Fitzgerald struggle with this decision, but finally agree that this is the right thing to do to save their dying child, although this might be ethically wrong.
Similarly to the novel, there are many recent sibling organ transplant cases that also struggle with whether or not it is a moral decision to conceive a child for the benefit of another. In the case of Elizabeth and Michael Hartmann, Elizabeth was ten years old dying from Fanconi anemia, when her little baby brother was created to save her. She received a bone marrow transplant from her perfectly genetically selected brother, whi...
... middle of paper ...
...en that reason better exist. Because once it’s gone, so are you” (Picoult 8). Anna knows that the only reason that she was born was to save Kate from dying, which makes her feel sad and unwanted. Although Anna was conceived for the sole purpose of helping Kate, she struggles with the idea that she will never be independent as long as her sister is alive. The position Anna’s parents were put in when deciding whether or not to create a genetic match for Kate was challenging, however, it was not necessarily right for them to make a child who would then be put in a difficult situation herself. Often times, people who are faced with the decision of whether or not they should create a child in order to save another child, they forget to look at the immoral and unethical aspects of the situation that will ultimately impact the younger child for the rest of his or her life.
In “Jennifer and Rachel,” Lee M. Silver argues that reproductive cloning is permissible to those who encourage it, as opposed to those who reject it and don’t want to run the risk of how they’ll look in the eyes of society. Jennifer, an independent, career driven woman, believes that the best way to have a baby of her own at her age is by cloning. Silver’s description of the cloning procedure is done by retrieving cells from the willing adult; preparing the cells for merging into unfertilized eggs, and then the embryos that develop successfully will be introduced to the uterus of the willing adult. Jennifer partakes in the cloning procedure and it was successful. Nine months later, on March 15, 2050, Rachel was born.
The definition of gender has become way more revolutionary and expressive compared to the twentieth century. Gender used to be similar to sex where someone would be identified as a male or female based on their biological genitals however, this day in age it is way more complex. Someone can be born a male but mentally they feel like a male. In “Sisterhood is complicated” Ruth Padawer explains the journey of different transgender males and the obstacles they face while attending Wellesley college. Wellesley is a women’s college that has been around for a very long time and is in the process of the battling the conflict of whether they should admit transgender students. Ariel Levy author of “Female Chauvinist Pigs” tackles the stereotypes and
Is Gender the same thing as Sex? This topic is complicated because many people confuse these two as the same thing but they are very two different things. There are several Cultural Myths about Gender and Sex. Gary Colombo, who wrote: “Thinking Critically, Challenging Cultural Myths” who explains that a cultural myth is a shared set of customs, values, ideas, and beliefs, as well as a common language. In “Sisterhood is Complicated” by Ruth Padawer who is a contributing writer at The New York Times Magazine, focusing on gender and social issues in “Sisterhood is Complicated” she shows many of the Stereotypes about Gender and Sex and how they are unmistakably just cultural myths. It also has how there are positives being trans at an all women
Recent high profile cases, films and books all around the world including the UK, Australia and the United States have brought to the public’s attention a new type of IVF. ‘Embryo Selection’ meaning ‘Embryos are fertilised outside the body and only those with certain genes are selected and implanted in the womb.’ Henceforth meaning that doctors are now able to select specific embryo’s and implant them into the mother of who may have another sick child in order to gain genetic material such as bone marrow which will match the ill-fated child and therefore hopefully be able to save their life. Creating a ‘saviour sibling’. ‘A child conceived through selective in vitro fertilization as a potential source of donor organs or cells for an existing brother or sister with a life-threatening medical condition’ a definition given by Oxford Dictionaries (1.0). Cases of this are happening all around the globe and many are highly documented about. The most famous case could be noted as in the fictional book of ‘My Sisters Keeper’ By Jodi Picoult. I will further discuss this throughout my dissertation and how books and films can affect the view on certain ethical subjects. Furthermore, I am also going to discuss a range of factors such as certain religious beliefs and the physical creation of saviour siblings compared to the creation of designer babies. Strong views are held by many both for and against the creation of saviour siblings.
The fight against diseases, especially these serious diseases causing untold suffering for many people, must be continuous and heroic. Fetal tissue use has a promising hope for people in their old age to be and live more sustainable. Even though fetal research does not hold the certainty but only a possibility of cures for such diseases, such possibilities should be realized if one has the resources and there is no moral impediment to doing so. But that remains the question. Is there a moral impediment to such research? ...
For this paper I read the novel The Memory Keeper’s Daughter by Kim Edwards, this novel is told in the span of 25 years, it is told by two characters David and Caroline, who have different lives but are connect through one past decision. The story starts in 1964, when a blizzard happens causing the main character, Dr. David Henry to deliver his own twins. During the delivery the son named Paul is fine but the daughter named Phoebe has something wrong with her. The doctor realizes that the daughter has Down syndrome, he is shocked and age remembers his own childhood when his sister was always sick, her dyeing at an early and how that effected his mother. He didn’t want that to happen to his wife, so David told the nurse to bring Phoebe to an institution, so that his wife wouldn’t suffer. The nurse, Caroline didn’t think this was right, but brings Phoebe to the institution anyways. Once Caroline sees the institution in an awful state she leaves with the baby and
Our culture has a stringent belief that creating new life if a beautiful process which should be cherished. Most often, the birth process is without complications and the results are a healthy active child. In retrospect, many individuals feel that there are circumstances that make it morally wrong to bring a child into the world. This is most often the case when reproduction results in the existence of another human being with a considerably reduced chance at a quality life. To delve even further into the topic, there are individuals that feel they have been morally wronged by the conception in itself. Wrongful conception is a topic of debate among many who question the ethical principles involved with the sanctity of human life. This paper will analyze the ethical dilemmas of human dignity, compassion, non-malfeasance, and social justice, as well the legal issues associated with wrongful conception.
The addition of a child into a family’s home is a happy occasion. Unfortunately, some families are unable to have a child due to unforeseen problems, and they must pursue other means than natural pregnancy. Some couples adopt and other couples follow a different path; they utilize in vitro fertilization or surrogate motherhood. The process is complicated, unreliable, but ultimately can give the parents the gift of a child they otherwise could not have had. At the same time, as the process becomes more and more advanced and scientists are able to predict the outcome of the technique, the choice of what child is born is placed in the hands of the parents. Instead of waiting to see if the child had the mother’s eyes, the father’s hair or Grandma’s heart problem, the parents and doctors can select the best eggs and the best sperm to create the perfect child. Many see the rise of in vitro fertilization as the second coming of the Eugenics movement of the 19th and early 20th century. A process that is able to bring joy to so many parents is also seen as deciding who is able to reproduce and what child is worthy of birthing.
Parker, Michael. "The Best Possible Child." Journal of Medical Ethics 33.5 (2007): 279-283. Web. 1 Apr 2011. .
When viewing organ donation from a moral standpoint we come across many different views depending on the ethical theory. The controversy lies between what is the underlying value and what act is right or wrong. Deciding what is best for both parties and acting out of virtue and not selfishness is another debatable belief. Viewing Kant and Utilitarianism theories we can determine what they would have thought on organ donation. Although it seems judicious, there are professionals who seek the attention to be famous and the first to accomplish something. Although we are responsible for ourselves and our children, the motives of a professional can seem genuine when we are in desperate times which in fact are the opposite. When faced with a decision about our or our children’s life and well being we may be a little naïve. The decisions the patients who were essentially guinea pigs for the first transplants and organ donation saw no other options since they were dying anyways. Although these doctors saw this as an opportunity to be the first one to do this and be famous they also helped further our medical technology. The debate is if they did it with all good ethical reasoning. Of course they had to do it on someone and preying upon the sick and dying was their only choice. Therefore we are responsible for our own health but when it is compromised the decisions we make can also be compromised.
I believe that parents are not morally justified in having a child merely to provide life saving medical treatment to another child or family member, but that this does not mean that the creation of savior siblings is morally impermissible. By having a child solely to provide life saving medical treatment, you are treating this child merely as a means rather than an end to the individual child. By having the child solely as a means to save another, you are violating this savior sibling in that you are treating them as a source of spare parts that can be used by the sickly child in order to solely promote the prolonged life of the currently sick child. This view that having a child merely as a way to provide medical treatment does not consider the multitude of other avenues that this newborn child can take, and presupposes that the child will only be used for the single purpose of providing life saving medical treatment through use of stems cells or organ donation. What this view fails to consider is that these savior siblings are valued by families for so much more than just as a human bag of good cells and organs that can be used to save the life of the original child. Instead, these savior siblings can be valued as normal children themselves, in that they can be valued in the same way that any other child who is born is valued, yet at the same time they will also be able to provide life-saving treatment to their sibling. My view runs parallel to the view held by Claudia Mills who argues that it is acceptable to have a savior sibling, yet at the same time we can not have a child for purely instrumental motives, and instead should more so value the child for the intrinsic worth that they have. Mills presents her argument by puttin...
This report will outline the ethics of conceiving a child for the purpose of using cells, tissues or even organs to treat an existing child with a fatal disease. In outlining the ethics of saviour siblings, the question of whether it is ethical to conceive a child for the purpose of becoming a saviour will be explored.
As the movie starts, Anna explains how she came into being, how she was not an accident. She was planned to be on this Earth to save her sister’s life. Sara and Brian are left with a tough decision when the doctor tells them that there is no donor for their daughter Kate. The doctor then mentions that there is always the option of genetically producing a child that would be a genetic match donor for Kate. Sara and Brian decide to follow through and make a “designer baby,” Anna. In the weeks following Anna's birth, she was used to serve Kate’s medical needs. Whenever Kate needed a donor, her parents did not hesitate to use Anna’s body. The ethical issue seen here is the underlying reason why Anna was brought into this world and the decision made by her parents to do so. The decisions made by Sara and Brain to genetically make a baby were ethically wrong in the sense that they were solely making a baby to cater Kate’s needs. It is understandable that they were doing everything...
Gestational surrogacy, especially when it involves commercial surrogates, challenges the status quo in the ethical theory of reproduction, because with this technology the process of producing a child can no longer remain a private matter. Now a public contract exists between two parties, the couple and the surrogate ...
When Sara and Brian Fitzgerald found out their eldest daughter, Kate, had acute promyelocytic leukemia they were devastated, as most parents would be. They vowed to do anything and everything to help their daughter survive cancer. When the issue came to who could donate to Kate, they found out no one in the family was a match. Running out of options, they decided to listen to their doctor when he mentioned off the record that having another child specially made so that she could donate to Kate was an option; a savor baby. A savor baby is a child that is born to help heal an already existing sick child.