More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of an ethical dilemma
Importance of ethical communication in the workplace
Ethical issues at the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this memo my goal is to answer each of the five questions regarding the ethical connection between Sheila and David. I will explain the ethical considerations and dilemmas, the communication presented by Sheila, what David could have done differently, what I would have done in the same situation, and how communicator intent impacts the ethics in this case. After answering each question, I will provide a conclusive summary of my answers.
First, the ethical considerations and dilemmas were displayed throughout the situation as Sheila betrayed David by taking credit for his ideas. Sheila should have considered how David felt about her lack of response to his email. David made the right choice by contacting his partner regarding their project. Sheila’s decision not to reply shows lack of
…show more content…
She intended to look better than David in the meeting, which tempted her to select the wrong decision. She made it clear by accepting her manager’s praise that she meant to do what she did thus impacting David’s decision making. He could have decided to make the situation right, however, he chose not to because he could tell by how she acted that she was intending to take credit for his ideas. If a person knows that another person is doing something wrong intentionally, it can change their decision making. If she would have given David praise for the ideas, he would have known she wasn’t intending to leave him out of the presentation. Given that she did the opposite, his feeling of betrayal distracted him from being able to clearly come to a decision to right the situation. In addition, Sheila, as an experienced employee, set a negative example of what is right to do in the workplace and what isn’t. This situation could come across to David as being how you’re supposed to conduct yourself. It could encourage him to believe that people of more experience are the ones who lead the
So, over all, this helps you get a better understanding that ethical dilemmas happen for all people, in all walks of life, in many different situations. It shows us we must pay attention to our actions and the actions of others around us. As long as we follow the rules, and ask for a little direction when we don’t know what to do, we will all be better off in our careers as helpers.
Early on, Uncle Axel discovered that David and Rosalind were communicating telepathically and decided to be understanding. “I want you to promise me that you will never, never tell anyone else what you have just told me - never. ” (Wyndham 30). Even though, this act was considered negatively in their society he embraced the idea wholeheartedly. This magnifies the friendly and trustworthy bond between them. He decides to accept David for the way that he is, gives him advice and consolation like a best friend. Whereas, Joseph Strorm does not provide any affection to his son. This allows David to assemble other telepaths and establish a group to keep their special abilities a secret. Thus, it has implemented some fears in David and influenced him to take action for corporate self-preservation as a means of survival. Another life lesson is when Uncle Axel lectured David of society’s misconceptions and explained that the definition of man does not exist. “What makes man man is mind; it’s not a thing, it’s a quality, and minds aren’t all the same value; they’re better or worse, and the better they are the more they mean.” (Wyndham 79-80). Wisely, Uncle Axel tries to convince David and justifies that Waknuk’s rules, what he was taught as a child, are wrong. He expresses that a person should be judged by their inner qualities and not their physical appearance. In addition, he explains that it’s okay to question society and develop your own opinions. This taught David to become more educated, see things in new perspectives and make smart decisions. Unlike before, David was confined to his father’s perspective which has gave him a limited understanding. Lastly, Uncle Axel advised David to kill Anne for the sake of his group members and himself. “This isn’t a nice cosy world for anyone - especially not for anyone that’s different...maybe you’re not the kind to survive it, after
These ethical dilemmas were a big part of the story novel and caused most of the conflict that arose in the novel. One of the ethical dilemmas was David telling the nurse to bring his daughter to an Institution. By making that decision to send his daughter away based on his past experience with his sick sister and assumption about how the future will be. This connects to the ethical topic of techniques of neutralization by Joseph Heath. He uses an excuse to prove that his decision wasn’t unethical when it really was. According to the Denial of responsibility technique, he believed that he had no choice in sending Phoebe away, David saw it as the only option because he was so focus on his past experience. He imagined what Phoebe’s life would be like and the likely toll of caring for her would have on the family. Caused him to see Phoebe as a threat, with only one option to solve the
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
Johnannesen, R. L. (1990). Ethics in human communication (3rd ed.) Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
This paper explores the legal, ethical and moral issues of three healthcare colleagues by applying the D-E-C-I-D-E model as a foundation of decision making as found in Thompson, Melia, and Boyd (2006). Issues explored will be those of the actions of registered nurse (RN) John, his fiancé and also registered nurse (RN) Jane and the Director of Nursing (DON) Ms Day. Specific areas for discussion include the five moral frameworks, autonomy, beneficence, Non – maleficence, justice and veracity in relation with each person involved as supported by Arnold and Boggs (2013) and McPherson (2011). An identification and review of the breached code of ethics and the breached code of conduct in reference with the Nursing, Council, and Federation (2008) will be addressed. Lastly a brief discussion on how the three schools of thought deontology, teleology and virtue had effects on each colleague (McPherson, 2011) .
On April 24th, 2014, one simple recording released by TMZ made Donald Sterling, owner of the NBA’s Los Angeles Clippers, the most hated man in America. In this recording, Sterling ranted over the fact how he did not want V. Stiviano, his partner, to be affiliated with any African Americans. As a result of his racist statements, fans, athletes, and sports organizations/members, voiced their opinions on the matter, flourishing social media. Many star players such as LeBron James, Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, and a majority the Clippers players acknowledged that something had to be done, and that the NBA is no place for racism. In the end, after team owners took a vote, NBA commissioner Adam Silver held a press conference enlightening the public
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
She is not causing injury to her client instead she is supporting her although she is still in violation of her profession ethics codes. Prima Facie Duties states “Always do that act in accord with the stronger prima facie duty” (Kraseman, p38). This counselor sat her client down and made her see the situation from a professional level and did not just out right say no that she would not be able to attend, but she provided an explanation of why it would be unethical. A client will respect a person more who can make them understand. Patrice also, knew that she had to continue on a professional level. Another theory that can be applied to the dilemma would be consequentialist. In this dilemma, Patrice thought about what would have been the results if she would have attended her client event. Choosing the option to do what’s best interest the clients is always number one, but when there’s a choice to choose between the client and the job that’s when ethics are involved. Consequences will be the cost of anyone job, so Patrice had to make an ethical decision when she faced the issue of doing what is in the best interest of the client or face the consequences of losing her licensures.
In the case of Joelle, this study will significantly identify the different ethical principles that can be applied in the case. In addition to it, the study will also arrive in one ethical theory that Joelle can be applied in her situation in order for her to effectively determine what she will do and if her decision and action can be considered ethical or the right thing.
“Ethics provide the tools to develop essential ethical decision-making skills” (Icheku, 2011, p. 13). It is defined as “the branch of moral philosophy that determines what is right (ethical) and wrong (unethical)” (Icheku, 2011, p. 20). Social workers are regularly confronted with ethical dilemmas in their practice and are forced to apply ethical principles and theories while engaging in practical decision-making. Ethics, however, do not always provide practical solutions to dilemmas. Albeit, social workers have to routinely consider their ethical standards and framework, values and morals within every situation. As a social worker Ryan (of given scenario) faces an ethical decision as a result of the ethical dilemma to which he is confronted. In certain conditions, ethical dilemmas occur when “an individual, called the “agent,” must make a decision about which course of action is best” (Grobman, 2012). Ryan has to decide whether the children of Sudanese parents should be removed from their ho...
Step 4: Seek a Resolution – What should happen to resolve the ethical issues identified in Step 3? Give reasons or arguments to justify your resolution by using theories or principles of ethics. (250 words or
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act
David’s mother died when he was young, he was raised by his aunt and father in Brooklyn, New York in the 1950’s. One summer during school break, David has a sexual encounter with a boy from school named Joey. The personal guilt and shame that David experienced after this encounter caused him to be hurtful to Joey in school which also led to the end of the friendship they shared prior to the affair. David knew it was not acceptable for a man to be intimate with another man, his enjoyment of this experience contributed to the feelings of shame and guilt that followed.
4. Write out specific statements that will assist you and others in making day-to-day ethical decisions.