Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemmas in genetic engineering
Designer babies negative effects
Designer babies negative effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas in genetic engineering
Introduction
As stated by the Cambridge Dictionary a designer baby is, "a baby whose genes have been chosen by its parents and doctors so that it has particular characteristics." This means that before a child is born its parents could choose its gender, eye color, athletic build, skin tone, and whether it can have certain genetic diseases. As of right now this has yet to become practical, although parents can pre-select embryos before they are implanted. Then, through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), which allows them to see certain genetic traits, can decide which to implant, but they cannot yet choose what features their child will have. The possibility of choosing the appearance of the child has raised the question: is this
…show more content…
Within the past thirty years parents have been able to choose which embryo they prefer after undergoing PGD. Initially this was just used to discover if the embryo had a predisposition to harmful diseases, such as Huntington's disease, allowing for the parents to choose a healthier embryo. This does not typically raise questions on how ethical the process is, because it saves all involved from suffering when the child cannot survive or will be in pain. What then began the discussion on the ethicalness of "designer babies" was in 1996 when the Collins decided to see doctors so that they could choose an embryo for the sole purpose of conceiving a girl, not for medical reasons. This case became publicized leading to questions on designer babies and whether being able to "design" one's baby is ethical. "Designer babies" are ethical when used to prevent genetic disorders and to choose the gender, but become unethical when used to select physical …show more content…
One reason it is not ethical is because the issues it could cause in society. Those able to afford the technology would be able to have offspring that are considered more appealing while the poor would not be able to. This then could lead to a greater gap between the rich and poor and a more prominent rift in society. In addition, this could cause a loss of individuality. "Designer babies" would begin to appear the same as parents would select the same "desirable" traits leading to a loss of individuality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, "designer babies" are unethical when used to select benign traits, but are ethical when used to remove genetic disorders and choosing gender. Though one cannot truly design a baby one can select an embryo with desirable
Once altered, the baby will have no say in how its cells are used, or traits they wish to keep but no longer will have the chance too. Some designer babies are created to help others through transplants. Even though the intention may be decent, it is still taking away the child's chance to have a choice in his body. Certain transplants are painful, such as a bone marrow transplant, and creating the child to be used as a donor could possibly put him through involuntary pain.
Designer babies are just like any other child and will grow up just as any other child will. The only difference between designer and normal babies are that designer babies are genetically modified. The genetic modifications would ideally include immunity to illnesses, choice of sex, physical characteristics, and mental and physical capabilities. The genetic modifications could be as little or as extensive as the parent would like but the doctors in charge would be able to recommend certain modifications in order to combat certain common family diseases. All of this would ultimately lead into more popular genes being passed down to the children and less and less modifications will be needed. This is able to be done because DNA or genes are the basis of all characteristics in organisms. As of yet, humans lack the technology and ...
After the discovery of genetically altering an embryo before implantation, “designer babies” was coined to describe a child genetically altered “to ensure specific intellectual and cosmetic characteristics.” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). This procedure combines genetic engineering and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) to make sure certain characteristics are absent or present in an embryo (Thadani n.p.). The procedure also includes taking an embryo to be pre-implementation genetically diagnosed (PGD), another procedure that doctors use to screen the embryos (Stock n.p.). An embryo’s DNA goes through multiple tests to obtain an analysis of the embryo, which will list all the components of the embryo including genetic disorders and physical traits such as Down syndrome, blue eyes, and brown hair, for instance (Smith 7). Although the use of PGD is widely accepted by the “reproductive medical community” and the modifying of disorders or diseases is to a degree, once the characteristics are no longer health related “72% disapprove of the procedure” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). At this point the parents make decisions that would alter their child’s life forever and this decision is rather controversial in the U...
In recent years, great advancement has been made in medicine and technology. Advanced technologies in reproduction have allowed doctors and parents the ability to screen for genetic disorders (Suter, 2007). Through preimplantation genetic diagnosis, prospective parents undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) can now have their embryo tested for genetic defects and reduce the chance of the child being born with a genetic disorder (Suter, 2007). This type of technology can open the door and possibility to enhance desirable traits and characteristics in their child. Parents can possibly choose the sex, hair color and eyes or stature. This possibility of selecting desirable traits opens a new world of possible designer babies (Mahoney,
Most people agree, in general, that designer babies are taking over and it is it’s a good thing. A designer baby is a human embryo that parents set , to produce desirable traits. According to Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection , Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles offered to let parents select their children’s hair and eye color. Crazy to think you’d be able to build your own baby. The process of creating this designer baby would be embryos modified to predetermine intellect , physical prowess , and beauty. People may question designer babies but “if you think women have the right to control their bodies , then they should be able to make this choice” right? (Citation?) There is a lot of science into creating a designer baby.
What do one think of when they hear the words “Designer Babies”? A couple designing their own baby of course, and it’s become just that. Technology has made it possible for there to be a way for doctors to modify a babies characteristics and its health. Genetically altering human embryos is morally wrong, and can cause a disservice to the parents and the child its effecting.
Scientists are also finding ways to eliminate diseases in babies. “In February, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met to consider conducting clinical trials to test out genetic manipulation techniques to prevent mitochondrial disease from occurring in offspring” (Ghose). With all the advancements science has made, being able to cure and vaccinate against diseases isn’t much of a shock. But when will the ethics come into play? Designing a child is not natural.
Imagine a parent walking into what looks like a conference room. A sheet of paper waits on a table with numerous questions many people wish they had control over. Options such as hair color, skin color, personality traits and other physical appearances are mapped out across the page. When the questions are filled out, a baby appears as he or she was described moments before. The baby is the picture of health, and looks perfect in every way. This scenario seems only to exist in a dream, however, the option to design a child has already become a reality in the near future. Parents may approach a similar scenario every day in the future as if choosing a child’s characteristics were a normal way of life. The use of genetic engineering should not give parents the choice to design their child because of the act of humans belittling and “playing” God, the ethics involved in interfering with human lives, and the dangers of manipulating human genes.
A designer baby is a child who is genetically modified for the purpose of removing any defects that are genetically linked, and/or to select certain genes that appeal to the parents. This process of creating designer babies is called genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is the alteration of DNA by adding and/or removing certain genes. Since the discovery of human genetic modification, scientists have proposed the idea of
Foht, Brendan P. "Three-Parent Embryos Illustrate Ethical Problems with Technologies." Medical Ethics, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,
What if an individual has the chance to create the perfect child? If one is able to choose every trait for their child, would one take advantage of this opportunity? Designer baby, a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to destroy a particular defect, or to guarantee a particular gene is present. Parents are able to determine physical traits such as hair color, eye color, skin tone, and gender. The purpose of designer babies is to eliminate the odds of having a child with genetic disorders. In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, Victor tries to take on the role of God, in hopes of creating the perfect monster. Mary Shelley portrays the monsters continuous rejection from Victor and society to show that taking on the role of God doesn’t always work out in the end. Designer babies may appear to be a great biotechnology innovation; however, unexpected side effects can occur directly to the child. Not only being an unnecessary health risk, designing babies is morally wrong.
The definition to designer baby is “A designer baby is a baby genetically engineered in vitro for specially selected traits, which can vary from lowered disease-risk to gender selection” (Ly,2011).
Surfing the net every day, I sometimes stumble upon new technology that might be interesting to know a little about. One of them is genetic engineering of babies. From the little knowledge of mine, that genetic engineered babies can be modify to be immune to certain unwanted genetic disease or given certain traits that allows them to be more intelligent or taller. The modification of traits could be good or bad, depending on how the scientist want it to be. It could be good in a way to have the baby to be immune to genetic disease and bad if the scientist modify the baby with superhuman powers to turn them into a monster or a weapon. There are also many ethical issue in the religious problems of creating or modifying a human, “playing God”, that it’s the God’s job to create us and how they want us to be.
Wouldn't it be amazing if you could choose what you wanted for you babies? Just like designing your avatar character in a video game Designer Babies are a way for people to choose what they want that suit them. It can gives parents the option of modifying their unborn children, in order to spare offspring from disease or, conceivably, make them tall, well-muscled, intelligent or otherwise blessed with desirable traits.
Creating a "designer baby" is a slippery slope that society and science are going down currently. If people customize their babies, there is a great possibility of losing genetic and physical variation. For example, the number of girls in the world could easily and quickly outnumber the boys in the world, or vice versa. The only thing that a parent can currently choose about a child is gender, but since scientists are trying to allow parents to choose eye and hair color, parents could just make kids look however is popular at the time. We all know that what is popular in society changes rapidly, so we would end up with a group of kids looking that last weeks trend, a group like last months, and a group like last years. Instead of having diverse children, many would look almost the same. Also, what if the process goes wrong? Would the parents still love the child even though they were not what they wanted? Parents are supposed to love their kids no matter what, but would that change if we could pick exactly what kind of kid we wanted? Being able to choose how we want our kids to look is a dangerous path to go down, and science should realize that the cons more than outweigh the