Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues in the fashion industry
Importance of fashion today
Importance of fashion today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues in the fashion industry
Ethical Considerations Fashion is considered one of the most significant, yet controversial industries in the world. Report shows that North America spends more than $250 billion on clothing, shoes, and accessories each year; recently, its worth has rapidly reached $1.2 trillion worldwide (K., 2014). Ethics is an unavoidable factor to consider and a growing concern for every fashion’s company and their attorneys (Fordham University School of Law). The nature of the fashion industry is surrounded by hundreds of controversies over various topics, concerning quality and consumption. Our company has no involvement in sourcing, designing or manufacturing process since we play an intermediary role between the suppliers and customers. Nonetheless, we demonstrate the promise of a strong work ethic company by making emphasis on quality, discipline, wages, and human rights. So that our products will at the same time benefit the people, the employees and the company itself. Our company is closely associated with a commitment to products quality, in which we focus our attention on selecting the finest selection of fashion goods for the customers. Instead of picking low-end and poor-quality …show more content…
items to make them affordable for the clients or clothes that manufactured by the sweatshop labors, we make promise to only choose the qualified, yet reasonable costs that match our consumers’ preferences and lifestyles. Many people censure the fashion company for seducing fashion followers to buy fashion items that are not necessary for them. The consumption of customers is healthy and can motivate “a boon to the economy” as long as they can their spending expenditures in check (Xaxx). Several fashion companies take advantage of charitable co-branding to promote their products and services through donation and fundraising. However, if their original purpose can place a positive impact on individuals and society (for example: all the money helps poor children to get educated), there will be no complaints. As a business venture that follows the ethnic principles of Christianity, Style Me has the responsibility to embrace social responsibility, that is fashion-related nonprofits and without intention of maximizing profits. For example, we make announcement in social media about an event of donating unwanted clothes to poor kids in Congo; for every five pieces the participants donate, they will receive one-month free subscription of Style. The Bible says, “You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; you shall not lie to one another (Leviticus 19:11 New International Version). The ethics in business requires the company to become transparent to the consumers. Therefore, it will create trust between the company and consumer, result in more loyal customer in the long run. For misjudgments can be made which can affect the popularity of the organization. Therefore, our company’s standards would be to follow the instructions, and restrictions of the fashion-related laws and morals. Disagreements & Solutions One of the possible disagreements is between the vendor partners and Style Me.
As our start-up business expanding in the future, it need to partnership with vendor such as H&M for both parties to be benefits. As the partnership between two companies is that we will advertise their brand to our customer and we get discount on buying clothes from H&M. There are possible disagreement as H&M decide to copy our service in their own business, which in turn might violate the partnership agreement that there will be a confidential in intellectual property. The solution is that we can make H&M compensate for violate the term in the contract. Or to make to make it ends peacefully, we can make a new contract that requires H&M to make Style Me as the exclusive agency to their fashionable
products.
Berry, Hannah. “The Fashion Industry: Free to Be an Individual.” The Norton Field Guide to
After reading the article, “Why 62,000 Abercrombie & Fitch Employees Are Suing The Company,” there were two different problems that were brought to attention regarding Abercrombie & Fitch’s business ethics. The two problems were the mistreatment of their employees, and how their business marketing strategy is not well developed throughout their company. Abercrombie & Fitch is a company that has always been concerned about their image, which leads us to their, “look policy.” A “look policy” is a policy that relates to a certain look every employee has to follow to be eligible to work there. The company is facing a high-profile lawsuit over its, “look policy” (Greenhouse, 2015). Each employee is forced to purchase the company’s clothes to wear to work, each time a new sales guide comes out (Greenhouse, 2015). This is known as compelled purchases, which is a violation of the state’s labor codes (Greenhouse, 2015). They force the “look policy,” way too strong upon their employees, which developed into a huge problem. The company is facing a high-profile lawsuit
Social responsibility is largely impacting today’s businesses, so this would lead one to believe that ethical issues in the supply chain of companies are no longer prevalent. This, however, is not the case. Even within the last five years, there are still social responsibility issues being reported. One recent example involves Patagonia, the outdoor, clothing and gear store and their supplier, VT Garment. In June of 2015, it was disclosed that Patagonia’s suppliers were involved in “erogenous employment practices, such as debt bondage” about three years ago (O’Connor, July 2015). The Taiwanese mills that supply the textile fabric to the sewing factories for Patagonia are being operated through forced labor. Debt bondage occurs when “brokers charge workers high fees to arrange for their work and promise an inflated salary, but once they start working, workers are paid even less and loan interest piles on” (“Factory Synopsis”). The workers are trapped in these mills attempting to pay off a debt that will never be reduced.
In China, Kelsey Timmerman spent time with a couple who worked at the Teva factory, traveled to the countryside to meet the couple’s son, insert name, who hasn’t seen his parents in three years due to his parents working long hours and it being expensive to take a train ride. In the US, the author visited one of a few clothing factories in the US to talk to the workers about his shorts, and the decrease of American garment factories. Timmerman wants the consumer to be more engaged and more thoughtful when mindlessly buying clothes. By researching how well the brands you want to buy from monitor their factories and what their code of ethics details, you can make a sound decision on if this is where you would want to buy your clothes. The author writes about brands that improve employers lives like SoleRebels, a shoe company who employs workers and gives them health insurance, school funds for their children, and six months of maternity leave. Brands like soleRebels that give workers benefits most factory workers have never even heard of help improve the lives of garment workers and future generations. From reading this book, Timmerman wants us to be more educated about the lives of garment workers, bridge the gap between consumers and manufacturers, and be a more engaged and mindful consumer when purchasing our
Scanning the conforming, ephemeral trendy masses, a large percent of the attire donned by the populace is made by cheap labor under horrible conditions. Many of the stores that fill malls and line streets are stocked with morally tainted products. Various popular brand names and stores use sweat shops as a means of production to maintain a low manufacturing cost, and reap a higher profit. Not only do these socially irresponsible conglomerates exist, they thrive on the blinded, and complacent materialistic society. Outfitting popular sports teams, and celebrities, these businesses have immense control, and take a big part in not only the fashion industry, but foreign affairs, as well. Although providing labor to third world countries may at first seem acceptable, the circumstances under which these sweatshops run are not. There are lists of rules by the United Nations, that outline the requirements a corporation must meet to be a socially responsible company. There are many companies that are popular today, however, that don’t meet the criteria stipulated by the UN, and fall in the “sweatshop” category.
On April 24th, 2014, one simple recording released by TMZ made Donald Sterling, owner of the NBA’s Los Angeles Clippers, the most hated man in America. In this recording, Sterling ranted over the fact how he did not want V. Stiviano, his partner, to be affiliated with any African Americans. As a result of his racist statements, fans, athletes, and sports organizations/members, voiced their opinions on the matter, flourishing social media. Many star players such as LeBron James, Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, and a majority the Clippers players acknowledged that something had to be done, and that the NBA is no place for racism. In the end, after team owners took a vote, NBA commissioner Adam Silver held a press conference enlightening the public
Fashion in the 21st century is a big business, as its production employs millions of people and generates billions of dollars in revenue. Fashion has for the past century been, and is still today, used as an indicator of social change and progress, as it changes with the social norms of the society and the political changes of the world (Finkelstein 3). Works Cited Finkelstein, Joanne. A.S.A. & Co. Fashion: An Introduction to Fashion. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
The business world has always been a very risky business. There is a lot to worry about no matter what position a person fulfills; everyone has some level of responsibility. The Gap Incorporated is a multinational specialty retail company (Gap Inc. 2014). The company was created by a Doris and Don Fisher (Joslin et. al. 2010). Don Fisher and his wife was a very wealthy couple, Don was a real estate developer (Joslin et. al. 2010). They decided to open up a clothing store when Don realized how popular jeans were becoming in the fashion industry. Another reason that Don Fisher wanted to open a clothing store is because he has an extremely difficult time finding jeans that fit him properly in department stores (Joslin et. al. 2010). So in the year of 1969 the Fishers opened the very first Gap store in San Francisco, California (Gap Inc. 2014). In this paper I will explore The Gap Incorporated and discuss the company’s ethical culture and behavior past and present. Based on preliminary information, I hypothesize that The Gap Incorporated is an ethical company.
Fashion is everything to society and the media. The fashion industry has transformed into a necessity in the life of people. Everyone wants to look good, feel fabulous and feel as if we belong with everyone else. The envy and desire to wear certain things and look a certain way all come, from wearing the latest fashion handbags, accessories, dresses, shoes, and the list goes on. But, when is considering fashion into an individual’s life going too far to the extreme? Many do not consider the whereabouts of fashion materials and how the environment is affected by the mere existence of certain garments. Some may believe these objects grow on trees. But that is clearly not the case. Even though it would be nice. The fashion industry as a whole, has been notorious from green issues caused by their lack of sensitivity to the environment, conspicuous and unnecessary consumption of materials, encouraging an “throw-away” society and image issues that support women and young adults to look a certain way to feel “beautiful.” This is an issue that has increased over the past decades. Not just women, but men also feel the uncontrollable need to do whatever it takes to look like the celebrities they see on television and on the runways. The thought that the materials to make those desired items may have caused the life of animals or the destruction of mother nature does not come into mind. Countless people are concerned about conserving planet Earth and keeping it healthy. The fashion world has been targeted for many corruptions.
Counterfeit goods pose a significant challenge to the global economy and international trade; in 2013 alone, sales of counterfeit and pirated goods comprise 2.5% of the total international trade, exceeding $461 billion (Medium, 2017). In such an economic environment where intellectual property rights are being challenged and governments are figuring out ways to control counterfeit goods, Finer Bags came out with a surprising business model – sell fake goods and advertise them as such (Brusseau, 2012). It was a courageous step relying on honesty on part of the company. Operating with an open policy also means that the conflict between the company’s ethical code and employee behavior on the ground has been reduced (Brusseau, 2012). Finally, whether
Finer Bags, at the time of the case study, presented itself and the work it does in a straight forward way without falsifying their business practices. In this way Finer Bags offers themselves honestly, the problem arises once you consider the actual work being done. Finer Bags produces counterfeit bags, a practice which is innately dishonest. Counterfeiting products, is to benefit from the work of others for example, for every luxury bag that is made and sold there is a large workforce employed. From the designers and marketers, to the stichers and material acquisitions department, companies like Louis Vuitton spend a lot of time and resources to ensure their product is of a high quality and their brand provides consumers with confidence and reassurance that the bag they buy is worth the price they pay.
Nowadays, it has been acknowledged that having an ethical business could determine the future business success. According to the 2015 Edelman Trust Barometer, consumers purchase a particular product because of their trust on the company produced it (Edelman Berland, 2015). Therefore, more company has instilled their ethical values to operate their business. Nike’s corporate as one of multinational enterprises (MNEs) has also implemented its code of conduct and code of leadership standard. The purpose of this policy is to ensure the ethical practices in their business. The company has revised these conducts since Herbert’s 1996 (cited in DeTienne & Lewis, p.361) criticized Nike as a giant pyramid which repress its labours. This critique was
A tall, glamorous runway model is every girl’s dream. Long beautiful legs, lean body, and beautiful shiny hair is what an average young woman views as an ideal image for a female. If you don’t resemble the images of those stunning Victoria Secret models and Fashion Week models, you suddenly become ashamed of your own body. It is a great life to have with the high pay, fame, drinking champagne on a yacht with famous celebrities and even being on the Vogue cover page. Fashion Modeling Industry has been the most influential source in our young women’s lives. Young girls and young women are seen eating as little as they can, even starving themselves at times to resemble those models. What they don’t realize is that they are contributing to the 2.7 percentage of 13- 18 year olds suffering from anorexia and bulimia. Susan Albers, a psychologist at the Cleveland Clinic said exposure to thin models is a great trigger in maintaining an eating disorder. When watching America’s Next Top Model or flipping through a Fashion magazine, these young women don’t apprehend that those models are either naturally slim or they are suffering from an eating disorder themselves, in other words, hostages in the dark hell hid behind those runway curtains. The growing number of young anorexia and bulimia patients, and the number of websites such as thinspiration, where girls put up pictures of their thin bodies clearly suggest that the fashion modeling industry do not at all bear any responsibility in providing healthy, realistic physical role models for young women.
By relying on a network of Unions and garment producers the CCC aims to identify and fix problems that exists within the clothing industry worldwide as a result of capital enterprise (Balsiger, 2014). The CCC is committed to addressing inequalities that exist within the garment and shoe producing industry by promoting consumer education, supporting the rights of workers and reducing exploitation. Promoting the support and well-being of workers within the industry, throughout western society and culture (What We Believe in, 2016). This helps to generate a more ethical ideology when we consider how our economy is shaped and operated by our own actions. Gibson-Graham, Cameron and Haely (2013: xix) refer to this as a “community economy, a space for decision making where we recognize and negotiate our interdependence with other humans, other species, and our environment”. The CCC therefore argues that by moving away from a capitalist approach to economic development we can created a more community centered economy. One where all individuals are treated with equal rights assisting with spreading the fruits of development across all individuals helping us to survive together as an equal rights
Sustainable fashion offers various benefits to both the consumer and the entire environment. For instance, it is noted that the entire process of sustainable fashion is worthy for the globe. In most cases, the fashion industry leaves behind a huge environmental imprint ranging from the pesticides in growing cotton to the landfill impact of clothes that wear out and the energy needed to manufacture every piece. Therefore, deciding on organic fibers or sustainable fabrics made from bamboo can also reduce the quantity of carbon emitted and chemicals brought into people`s lives. This shows how sustainable fashion if embraced can bring benefits to the consumer, the producer, and to the environment, which is very vital for future generations. Selecting clothes that contain the label “fair trade act,” during purchase emphasizes on sustainability in numerous ways. The first thing is that, it guarantees that the product was produced under safe working conditions. Further, it signifies that the person who produced it earned a fair wage since it is sweatshop free (Hethorn 123). The act of purchasing clothes considered as “fair trade” confirms that individuals and places mean more than the organization`s fundamental reason for its