Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles theory in literature
Gender roles theory in literature
18th century education in britain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles theory in literature
Social Position Reflected in Roxana and Emma
There were severe conflicts between the City party and the Country party in 18th century Britain. The Country party, mainly composed of gentry, was based on landed interest and the City party made money through trade and was based on moneyed interest. The Country party passed the Landed Property Qualification Act to maintain their power. However, this act merely encouraged more men of wealth to buy country estate, in many cases displacing old landed families who truly represented the ¡°landed interest.¡±[1][1] We can see this changing of power through these two works, Roxana and Emma. Daniel Defoe was born in London, so he naturally engaged in City party. Roxana¡¯s background is mainly city while that of Emma is the little country society called Highbury. As we can see the difference of the background of two works, we can also find some different attitude toward City and Country in these two works. I will write about these differences in point of the conception of gentleman, rank and different attitude to City lives.
Defoe indicates that younger sons who have careers in law and trade are the backbone of the English Nation. The uneducated eldest son is an insult to the word gentleman: he is a man of no use to himself or to others.[2][2] He thinks that trade is more important than land. We can find this attitude in Roxana. Roxana says, ¡°a true bred Merchant is the best Gentleman in the Nation; that in Knowledge, in Manners, in Judgement of things, the Merchant out-did many of the Nobility¡± (Roxana 170, The page numbers of further references from Roxana will be put in parentheses in the text). She also says ¡°That an Estate is a Pond; but that a Trade was a Spring¡±(170). The Dutch merchant also says that ¡°the Tradesmen in London, speaking of the better sort of Trades, cou¡¯d spend more Money in their Families, and yet give better Fortunes to their Children, than, generally speaking, the Gentry of England from a 1000 l¡±(170). We can know that Roxana has a very positive view to a merchant from this. She thinks that a merchant is better than gentry.
However, it is viewed differently, as shown in Emma. When Emma talks about the father of Mrs. Elton, she says like this : ¡° a Bristol ? merchant, of course, he must be called; but, as the whole of the profits of his mercantile life appeared so very moderate, it was not unfair to guess the dignity of his live of trade had been very moderate also¡±(Emma, 164).
...e reinforces this through the examples provided above, also by discussing how displeased he is to see foreign nobles. Not only does this source provide insight into the minds of the British gentry of their opinions on France, but also insight into the social hierarchy of the eighteenth century. By the way Walpole expresses himself to the Earl of Strafford he composes himself as a servant of his and willing to perform any duties called upon him during his trip. This gives valuable comprehension of the lifestyle of those lower than their acquaintances in the hierarchy by showing how they are willing to help those in the aristocracy to better themselves and hopefully increase their standing in the future. Written from friend to friend Walpole clearly shows his admiration and loyalty to the Earl and gives wonderful understanding into the eighteenth century of England.
Emma Woodhouse of the Jane Austen novel Emma, is part of the rich, upscale society of a well off village in nineteenth century England, while Cher Horowitz the main character of the movie version Clueless, lives in the upscale Beverly Hills of California. The Woodhouse family is very highly looked upon in Highbury, and Cher and her father are also viewed as the cultural elite. The abuse of power and wealth, arrogance, and a lack of acceptance all prove that the class status of these families plays a significant role in the shaping of both the novel and the video.
Hamlet and Laertes share a different but deep love and concern for Ophelia. Laertes advises her to retain from seeing and being involved with Hamlet because of his social status. He didn’t want her to get her heart broken by Hamlet, since he believed that his marriage would be arranged to someone of his social status, and that he would only use and hurt Ophelia. Hamlet on the other hand, was madly in love with Ophelia but it languishes after she rejects him. Ophelia’s death caused distress in both Hamlet and Laertes and it also made Laertes more hostile towards Hamlet.
In the play “Hamlet”, Shakespeare uses two characters, Hamlet and Laertes, to develop a recurring theme of revenge. These two characters experience similar emotional suffering, as both of their fathers were murdered. One idea that made the readers question the mentality of these two characters was their motives. Hamlet was hesitant throughout the entire interval of the play to get revenge; which created confusion because Hamlet craved nothing more than revenge, yet he continued putting it off. In contrast to Hamlet’s tentativeness, Laertes, a man who initially did not know who killed his father, was willing to take his anger out on nearly anyone. Throughout the play, Laertes is seen as one who is eager to get to action, a quality often found in heroes, whereas Hamlet, the actual hero of the play, lacks this quality and hesitates to get revenge. In an attempt to portray the difficulty of revenge, Shakespeare uses the different ways Hamlet and Laertes see to their problems.
Hunt, Margaret R. The Middling Sort: Commerce, Gender, and Family in England, 1680-1780. London: University of California Press, 1996
However, while both Fortinbras and Hamlet waited a bit, Laertes was on his way over the moment he heard in order to avenge his father. Claudius had to tread carefully when dealing with Hamlet and Laertes as the crowds loved both. When Laertes demanded why Claudius refused to have Hamlet tried for treason, Claudius states that there is a “great love the general gender bear him” (IV, vii, 20). Similarly, the crowd, just a little while earlier had been shouting “Chose we, Laertes shall be king!” (IV, v, 116). Claudius saw an opportunity to use Laertes’ impulsive behavior to bring the downfall of Hamlet. Hamlet even said that “I’ll be your foil, Laertes.” (V, ii, 2). While Hamlet was not as hotheaded as Laertes, both were extremely competitive and (on Hamlet’s part, finally) bent on revenge. Both their desire for revenge and their competitive nature eventually lead to their
Early on in the play, Hamlet Sr. was already murdered by his despising uncle and crowned king. In the middle of the events, Polonius ends up murdered inadvertently by none other than Hamlet, who mistook him for Claudius. At this point, it’s more evident that Hamlet and Laertes are definite foils of each other not just for the loss of their father, but also for the emotions and actions they plan to plot for justice. When Hamlet Sr. deceased, Hamlet would describe his emotions in a soliloquy such as “O that this too too sallied flesh would melt” (1.2.129). Hamlet became devastated and depressed at his father’s sudden death. He felt as if his emotions and world was melting. Hamlet wanted to melt away from these problems permanently by committing suicide, but instead decides to fight for his father’s name. After taking time to grieve, Hamlet then changes his disparity into envy as he knows that Claudius isn’t the rightful king. Similarly, Laertes becomes stunned and sorrow over his father’s murder. He publically displays anger by immediately barging inside the castle and barking for some answers; while in reality, it’s the pretext to conceal his sadness. He exclaims “Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d mostly thoroughly for my father” (4.5.136-137). In these lines, Laertes’ emotions are speaking volume as he fears nothing and desires revenge against the man who committed such actions. Hamlet also reflects the same traits as Laertes excepts when he promises revenge, he claims “haste me know’t, that I with wings as swift. As meditation through love, may sweep to my revenge” (1.5.29-30). Hamlet asserts the sooner he finds out the details of the fallout, the quicker he will be able to avenge his father’s death. Ironically, he promises that it will be quicker than instant love when in reality, Laertes acts quicker than Hamlet for revenge.
Men of the time were held to the standard of being active in society. They were expected to be active in politics and social activities outside of the home. Expectations for men were also for them to be respectful and proper, especially when women were present. The character, Jack Worthing, in The Importance of Being Earnest, is the representation of the perfect Victorian gentleman. For example, Jack says to Algernon in Act I, “...My dear fellow, the truth isn’t quite the sort of thing one tells to a nice, sweet, refined girl. What extraordinary ideas you have about the way to behave to a woman!” (Wilde 1.2.236). In this simple quote, Jack describes the high standards and expectations that Victorian gentlemen were held to. But not only men were held to high standards, women were expected to hold themselves in the most proper way as well. The point of a Victorian woman’s life was to marry and domestically support her family. Women had little rights and in fact, prior to the Married Women’s Property Acts of 1870, women were forced to give up all property that they held to their husbands upon marriage. (Appell 1). Within the play, Lady Bracknell, Gwendolen 's mother, is provided as a tool to explain the oppression put upon women of the time.
Charlotte Brontë’s novel, Jane Eyre, is set in a Victorian England, where social class is a huge factor in life. Brontë is very critical of Victorian England’s strict hierarchy. the main character, Jane, is a governess. Her social position is very complicated in which she has to be sophisticated, educated, intelligent, and soft spoken but she is then talked down to as she is of a lower class. The job of a governess is to teach children, whether it be art, writing or reading english literature. Victorian society is very corrupt and in the novel Brontë truly captures and illustrates the challenges that Jane has to face as a governess. The novel also emphasizes the social gap between individuals and how big it really is. In Victorian society, the rich get the most out of life and life for the poor gets harder. No individual should judge or belittle another due to the very minor factor of social status, but it seems to be very important in Jane’s society. The message that Brontë expresses in the novel is that social class is a meaningless catalyst in the progression of relationships, creating giant gaps between individuals.
In spite of the fact that Hamlet and Laertes both want the same thing, Laertes is more engrossed in the fact of taking action, while Hamlet carefully strategizes his course of action in order to perform his plan triumphly. Both Hamlet and Laertes’s demise is found out at the end when they both end up dead by one another’s hand. Laertes and Hamlet both end up being successful because they each avenged the murder of their
who had been told that they had it all - nice houses, lovely children, responsible
As a child London lived in poverty while his main character, Buck, “had lived the life of an aristocrat” in his young life (London 2). This demonstrates that
Revenge results to negative effect on the victim as well as on the perpetrator. Most Authors centre their texts to the negative outcome of revenge. Authors send message to readers that revenge is best avoided rather than indulging in it. Like every other Author Williams Shakespeare, a well known and creative novelist sends a message to his readers in Hamlet. Hamlet is amongst the most powerful and influential tragedies in English literature. The relevance of the play in today’s modern text is evidently shown. Hamlet is one of those distinctive plays that depicts tragicomedy. In Hamlet, Shakespeare argues that the consequences of revenge are dangerous. In particular, this theme is developed in Act1, when the ghost wants revenge for his death, In Act 3, when Hamlet plans to murder Claudius in revenge of his father’s death and in Act 4, when Laertes prepares to murder Hamlet in revenge for his father’s death.
His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius. As described earlier, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, on the other hand, acts quickly and with precision, wasting no time in acquiring his target and formulating a plan. Robert Palfrey Utter, Jr., puts it best, Hamlet and Laertes both come to the same conclusion that murder must be carried out, but Hamlet reaches that conclusion only “after he has had a few minutes to think it over.” (140) Once Laertes finds out that the man who killed his father was Hamlet he is ready to charge in and kill him as soon as possible. He is only stopped by Claudius, who advises him on a more subtle approach. Straight off the bat it is clear how efficient Laertes is compared to Hamlet. Hamlet wastes a large amount of time scheming up complex ideas on how to get a confession out of Claudius and how to kill him. Laertes on the other hand wastes no time in getting a straight and to the point plan that he can execute immediately. After spending more than half the play watching Hamlet squirm around on the stage getting almost nothing accomplished, the audience would be acutely aware of the stark difference between Hamlet and Laertes even though they share the same motivations. Laertes has his speed but he shares in Hamlets lack of critical thinking when he gets hot headed. He is in such a blind rage that he doesn’t think on what he is agreeing to do with Claudius. Just like Hamlet, his brash actions cost those around him his life. In carrying out the plan, the King, the Queen, Hamlet, and he all die to the poison that was used in the duel. Hamlet was slow and reckless while Laertes was quick and reckless. Wilds sums up the relationship between Hamlet and Laertes perfectly, “Laertes and Hamlet have been foils to each other
Firstly, Laertes is built up as a good-hearted, likeable character, only to end up as a cold, untrustworthy, and revengeful murderer. Laertes is seeking approval from Polonius as he enters the scene, and Laertes dismisses Ophelia as he says, “O, fear me not! / I stay too long. But here my father comes. / A double blessing is a double grace; / Occasion smiles upon a second leave.” (Shakespeare, I, iii, 51-54) Laertes admires his family very much and feels as though he requires his father’s permission and acceptance to go off to France. This shows Laertes as a trustworthy character and portrays him rather well. However, the reader later sees that he is the exact opposite, as Polonius sends Reynaldo to spy on him, proving that even his own family cannot rely on him. A second instance during which we see Laertes’ uncertainty is during his fencing match with Hamlet. Laertes comes to a realization that he is not sure if exacting revenge and killing Hamlet is the right thing to do, as he claims, “The foul practice / Hath turn’d itself on me. Lo, here I lie, / Never to rise again. Thy mother’s poison’d. / I can no more. The King, the King’s to blame.” (Shakespeare, V, ii, 313-316) Up until this moment Laertes is furious at Hamlet and will take any actions in order to get vengeance. However, once the Queen falls he realizes the terrible deed that he has conspired to do. Laertes tries to apologize to Hamlet