Hamlet Essay
“When you are faced with a decision, make that decision as wisely as possible, then forget it. The moment of absolute certainty never arises.” (Anonymous) William Shakespeare’s, “Hamlet” is a play following the story of the Prince of Denmark and his task of avenging his father’s murder by the hand of his uncle. The overall theme of uncertainty all throughout “Hamlet”, as seen through Ophelia, Laertes, and Hamlet, is the main component leading to the play’s tragic resolution.
One character that displays doubtfulness throughout the play is Ophelia, who creates both internal and external uncertainty through her love for Hamlet and her death. Firstly, as Ophelia speaks to Polonius about Hamlet and their relationship, Ophelia says,
…show more content…
“He hath, my lord, of late made many tenders/ Of his affection to me,” (Shakespeare, Act I, Scene iii, Lines 99-100) and later says, “I do not know, my lord, what I should think.” (Shakespeare, I, iii, 104) This is a clear example of uncertainty, as Ophelia does not know whether Hamlet’s love for her is true, nor does she know if she truly loves Hamlet. Polonius repeats Laertes’ previous advice and tells Ophelia to break off all ties with Hamlet, as he believes he is mad with love and that his vows cannot be trusted. Ophelia is torn between continuing a relationship that is based on uncertainty and being faithful to her father’s command, not seeing Hamlet ever again. This doubtfulness is a driving plot point in Ophelia’s character and leads directly to her death as she hears about her father passing away. Secondly, Ophelia’s death is very controversial, as her plunge into the river can be seen as either accidental or suicidal. Soon after Ophelia is told about her father’s tragic death she is seen walking along a riverbank singing songs and ends up falling into and drowning in the waters below. The reader learns about her death as Gertrude enters the scene bearing sad news, as she states, “There on the pendant boughs her crownet weeds / Clambering to hang, an envious sliver broke, / When down her weedy trophies and herself / Fell in the weeping brook.” (Shakespeare, IV, vii, 169-172) This quote shows that Ophelia’s death may have been an accident, as it says that she fell from a broken branch into the river. Shakespeare personifies the branch, portraying the branch as envious, which gives insight into Ophelia’s death because it shows that it was indeed the branches fault that she fell, making her death an accident. Shakespeare also uses rhyme scheme effectively here, as he uses the words broke and brook to clearly sum up Gertrude’s message of Ophelia’s passing. Although this displays Ophelia’s drowning as accidental, it is also seen as suicidal as one of the gravediggers asks, “Will you ha' the truth on't? If this had not been / a gentlewoman, she should have been buried out o' / Christian burial.” (Shakespeare, V, i, 21-23) As seen through this passage, had it not been for Ophelia’s high rank and status she would not be given a Christian burial, hinting that her death was a result of suicide. Ophelia’s death is a very tragic moment and it is a key element leading to the final scene, in which many characters are killed. Laertes is saddened by the death of Polonius, and is completely distraught by Ophelia’s death, resulting in Laertes taking revenge on Hamlet and killing him. Overall, Ophelia’s uncertainty of her love for Hamlet along with the uncertainty of her death are both crucial points leading to a very tragic ending. A second character that exemplifies uncertainty at many instances is Laertes.
Firstly, Laertes is built up as a good-hearted, likeable character, only to end up as a cold, untrustworthy, and revengeful murderer. Laertes is seeking approval from Polonius as he enters the scene, and Laertes dismisses Ophelia as he says, “O, fear me not! / I stay too long. But here my father comes. / A double blessing is a double grace; / Occasion smiles upon a second leave.” (Shakespeare, I, iii, 51-54) Laertes admires his family very much and feels as though he requires his father’s permission and acceptance to go off to France. This shows Laertes as a trustworthy character and portrays him rather well. However, the reader later sees that he is the exact opposite, as Polonius sends Reynaldo to spy on him, proving that even his own family cannot rely on him. A second instance during which we see Laertes’ uncertainty is during his fencing match with Hamlet. Laertes comes to a realization that he is not sure if exacting revenge and killing Hamlet is the right thing to do, as he claims, “The foul practice / Hath turn’d itself on me. Lo, here I lie, / Never to rise again. Thy mother’s poison’d. / I can no more. The King, the King’s to blame.” (Shakespeare, V, ii, 313-316) Up until this moment Laertes is furious at Hamlet and will take any actions in order to get vengeance. However, once the Queen falls he realizes the terrible deed that he has conspired to do. Laertes tries to apologize to Hamlet …show more content…
and tries to gain forgiveness from him, claiming that the king is to blame for every tragedy that has occurred. He is extremely unsure of his own moral compass, if it is ethical to kill someone even if they have harmed those close to him. Laertes’ uncertainty about killing Hamlet causes the deaths of both Claudius and Gertrude because his hesitance allowed Hamlet the opportunity to both deny the poisoned drink that killed Gertrude and stab the King. All in all, Laertes’ character development, as well as his uncertainty of his own morality, contributes greatly to the concluding tragedy. Lastly, Hamlet is faced with many tough uncertainties, so much so that he contemplates death.
Hamlet is emotional and worried about the play he is to put on, as well as his overall situation, as he comments, “The spirit that I have seen / May be the devil: and the devil hath power / To assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps / Out of my weakness and my melancholy, / As he is very potent with such spirits, / Abuses me to damn me.” (Shakespeare, II, ii, 560-565) Hamlet is in a troublesome situation, as he still has doubts that Claudius killed his father, and moreover he doubts that killing him is the solution. Hamlet’s motives stem from a ghost representing his father that tells him to take revenge on Claudius. However, in this quote Hamlet seeks more evidence than the word of a ghost and considers the idea that the ghost may be the devil, taking advantage of him in his time of weakness. This conveys the theme of appearance versus reality, as the ghost appears to be a positive sign but might be the devil luring him in while he is frail. This uncertainty leads to such a tragic ending, for if Hamlet had faith in the evidence he had gathered he would have murdered Claudius but instead he duels Laertes and many more deaths occur. Second, Hamlet speaks thoughtfully to himself in a soliloquy as he expresses, “To be or not to be: that is the question.” (Shakespeare, III, i, 57) Hamlet is in a state where he is unsure if wants to keep living in his present situation. He is
doubtful of if he should kill Claudius but he also cannot live with himself if he does not avenge his father’s murder. The only concern stopping Hamlet from ending his life is the uncertainty of the afterlife. The afterlife represents a complete unknown and Hamlet is unwilling to take the risk of falling into a more distressing life. Hamlet does not want to kill Claudius but cannot keep living without compensating for his father’s murder. This quote is also a paradox because Hamlet introduces the topic of being or not being, living or dying, which seems to be two opposite elements. However, Hamlet later generalizes the two aspects, supposing that they may be able to exist together. This creates contradiction between the extremes of life and death, and this figurative language is what emphasizes the message and gives the reader a better understanding of Hamlet’s character and internal conflicts. Hamlet’s uncertainty of life or death generates the disastrous ending because only his death or Claudius would resolve his issues, and having taken a neutral stance Hamlet causes catastrophe. Altogether, Hamlet’s significant uncertainties of killing Claudius and living or dying are key components resulting in the deaths of many strong characters. In conclusion, the constant uncertainties of Ophelia, Laertes, and Hamlet are pivotal factors that contribute to the tragic ending, in which many characters undeservingly pass away. In reality, being doubtful of yourself and your situation can only cause harm. Although it may be the wrong choice, a poor decision is better than none at all.
Throughout the play, Laertes is as an extremely caring member of his family. His strong emotions for family have an opposing side to it, a shadow that has repressed feelings of anger which cause him to add to the disaster in Denmark. An example that depicts this is when Laertes attempts to request more rites for Ophelia’s funeral. After he is denied, he starts a commotion by calling the priest “churlish”, explaining that Ophelia will be “A ministering angel” while the priest will “liest howling”(5.1.217-218). His compliments to Ophelia shows how much he loved her, while his nasty insults to the priest show his repressed rage. While this is occuring, Hamlet hears Laertes’s mention of Ophelia during the commotion and throws himself into a brawl with Laertes. It is the conflict built up from there that causes Claudius to target Laertes as his next weapon to kill Hamlet with. Laertes’s deep anger for Hamlet makes himself the best candidate for Claudius’s manipulation. Once Laertes’s sides with Claudius, he shows his dark intent by requesting Claudius to not “o'errule me to a peace”(4.7.58). On the day of the duel, Laertes undergoes a confrontation of his shadow while he clashes with Hamlet. His realization of his shadow comes too late into the duel when both Hamlet and Laertes are struck by poison, as this happens he declares that he is “ justly killed with mine own treachery (5.2.337).” In the moments that he is still alive, he dismisses his shadow and ends the circle of murder by announcing the true nature of Claudius. Laertes’s repressed anger guides the play into the duel where many deaths occur including Hamlet’s.
As presented in the movie, Laertes is a sore loser. The text version of the play has Laertes simply say "No" after Hamlet scores his first hit. In the movie, Laertes shows much more emotion. His anger at Hamlet is obvious, and his frustration at being hit is evident, as he screams in protest to the mediator's call. Then, to show what a poor sport he is, he lunges at Hamlet when Hamlet turns his back to Laertes. Laertes didn't have enough courage or faith in his own fighting ability to take a fair shot at Hamlet and succeed. After the second hit, Laertes demonstrates much the same emotions, screaming in frustration and anger. In the text of the play, Laertes agrees with Claudius to fight Hamlet and use poison on his blade to kill him. As presented in the text, Laertes killing Hamlet will be enough for his revenge. However, in the movie, it is obvious through his actions and mannerisms that it is not enough for Laertes to merely kill Hamlet, but he has to make Hamlet look like a fool while he is doing it. That is why Laertes becomes so upset in the movie when Hamlet gains a hit; Laertes wanted to discredit Hamlet before he killed him.
Basically Hamlet's character is going through a tough time, he’s upset, disgusted, depressed, moody, and also indecisive.Laertes foils Hamlet’s character. He is the son of Polonius and the brother to Ophelia. He is described as a passionate and a quick of action person. The most important thing about him is that he is a doer not a thinker. Being quick on his feet to problems is what got him killed. Laertes warns his loving sister about Hamlet but also boys in general “ My bags are already on board. Farewell, my sister. Please write often. As for Hamlet, and his attentions to you, Do not take them to seriously. They are like violets in the spring, Fast-blooming and sweet, but not long-lasting” ( Act I, Scene 3). The beginning of the play he leaves Denmark and goes to France. Due to the killing of Ophelia and Polonius he returns back and seeks revenge. Claudius and Laertes team up and plot to kill Hamlet.Hamlet and Laertes has a lot of similarities and differences. They are different because Hamlet gets forced to be sent away while Laertes wanted to get sent away. Hamlet is more of a responsible person while Laertes is more bold and reckless. Laertes provide contrast to Hamlet's character. They are similar in multiple ways starting with the love they had for
Hamlet, the major character in the Shakespeare play of the same name, was faced with a decision upon learning that Claudius murdered his father. Should he believe the ghost, and avenge his father's murder? Or is the ghost evil, trying to coerce him into killing Claudius? Throughout the play, we see Hamlet's struggle with this issue. Many opportunities arise for him to kill Claudius, but he is unable to act because he cannot convince himself to believe the Ghost. Shakespeare uses Laertes and Fortinbras as foils to Hamlet, in order to help us understand why Hamlet acts the way he does.
Self Doubt in Hamlet William Shakespeare is widely known for his ability to tell a sad story, illustrate it with words, and make it a tragedy. Usually, human beings include certain discrepancies in their personalities that can at times find them in undesirable or difficult situations. However, those that are exemplified in Shakespeare’s tragedies include “character flaws” which are so destructive that they eventually cause their downfall. For example, Prince Hamlet, in Shakespeare’s tragedy play “Hamlet,” is seemingly horrified by what the ghost of his father clarifies concerning his death. Yet the actions executed by Hamlet following this revelation do not appear to coincide with the disgust he expresses immediately after the ghost alerts him of the true cause of his death.
The question of why Hamlet delays in taking revenge on Claudius for so long has puzzled readers and audience members alike. Immediately following Hamlet's conversation with the Ghost, he seems determined to fulfill the Ghost's wishes and swears his companions to secrecy about what has occurred. The next appearance of Hamlet in the play reveals that he has not yet revenged his father's murder. In Scene two, act two, Hamlet gives a possible reason for his hesitation. "The spirit that I have seen / May be a devil, and the devil hath power / T' assume a pleasing shape" (2.2.627-629). With this doubt clouding his mind, Hamlet seems completely unable to act. This indecision is somewhat resolved in the form of the play. Hamlet comes up with the idea of the play that is similar to the events recounted by the ghost about his murder to prove Claudius guilty or innocent. Due to the king's reaction to the play, Hamlet attains the belief that the Ghost was telling the truth the night of the apparition.
In Hamlet, William Shakespeare presents the main character Hamlet as a man who is fixated on death. Shakespeare uses this obsession to explore both Hamlet's desire for revenge and his need for assurance. In the process, Shakespeare directs Hamlet to reflect on basic principles such as justice and truth by offering many examples of Hamlet's compulsive behavior; as thoughts of death are never far from his mind. It is apparent that Hamlet is haunted by his father's death. When Hamlet encounters the ghost of his father, their conversation raises all kinds of unthinkable questions, for example murder by a brother, unfaithful mother, that triggers Hamlet's obsession. He feels compelled to determine the reliability of the ghost's statements so that he can determine how he must act. Ultimately, it is his obsession with death that leads to Hamlet avenging the death of his father by killing Claudius.
Laertes is looking to seek revenge on Hamlet for killing his father and eventually his sister later in the play. "I dare damnation. To this point I stand, that both the worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes, only I 'll be reveng 'd Most throughly for my father." (4.5.132-135). Laertes is very different in the way he is going about seeking revenge, he is willing to kill any and everybody with no hesitation to revenge his father’s death unlike Hamlet, who is contemplating throughout the play on if he should or shouldn’t kill the necessary people in order to seek revenge.
Laertes has the ability to perform tasks that may be unpleasant or dangerous. Laertes does not simply try to kill someone by thinking cautiously the whole time, but by directly confronting them and facing them head-on. When Laertes returns home to Denmark he even confronts Claudius about the death of his father. Swearing Laertes says “I dare damnation. To this point I stand,/That both the worlds I give to negligence,/Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d/Most thoroughly for my father.” (IV. v. 133-136). With this declaration Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet and they construct a plan to have Laertes fence with Hamlet and for him to kill him. They instrument a plot of revenge for the death of Polonius, quickly coming up with three ways to kill Hamlet: stabbing him with an unblunted sword, placing poison on the sword, and poisoning Hamlet’s drink (IV. vii.). After they construct this plan they swiftly utilize the plan. Laertes did not wait for the perfect moment, at the perfect time, and at the perfect place. He created the place, time, and moment to carry out the dangerous task. Hamlet, however, waited and waited for what he thought one day would be the perfect moment in which he could kill his uncle. Even when Hamlet had an opportunity to kill Claudius, he talked himself out of it. When compared to Laertes, Hamlet is a coward because of his inability
Considered to be one of the most famous playwrights written in the history of English literature, Hamlet is no doubt a complex play and far from being easy to decipher. The protagonist finds himself entangled within a slew of different predicaments ranging from love, incest, death, murder, and even touches upon the spiritual world when his father’s apparition presents himself with the task of avenging his death. How he goes about handling all of these difficulties has been a debate for decades and continues to baffle even the greatest minds today. However, in order for Hamlet to uncover the truth and fulfill the task he is given, he must put on an act of madness in which the other characters mistake him to have truly lost his mind. While he
Laertes is greatly influenced by revenge for his actions especially when he is seeking revenge for his sister. He shows his brotherly love for Ophelia when he says “For Hamlet, and the trifling of his favor,/Hold it a fashion and a toy in blood,/A violet in the youth of primy nature,/Forward, not permanent, sweet, not
Making decisions is a hard task as any hesitation as well as a lack of commitment can result in unsuccess and disappointing results. In Shakespearean plays, the hero consistently played a major part of the tragedy in which he/she has fallen to their demise. In Hamlet, the protagonist Hamlet is on a mission to seek revenge for his father, King Hamlet and kill his brother King Claudius. Hamlet has displayed his desire for vengeance numerous times throughout the play but it is his uncertainty in his decisions that delays his plan of revenge, which in turn, also contributes to his own death. Revenge also plays a key role in the death of Hamlet as he struggles to simultaneously seek vengeance while satisfying his morals. Hamlet’s indecisiveness
He has the ability to perform tasks that may be unpleasant or dangerous. Laertes does not simply try to kill someone by thinking cautiously the whole time, but by directly confronting them and facing them head-on. When Laertes returns home to Denmark he even confronts Claudius about the death of his father. Swearing Laertes says “I dare damnation. To this point I stand,/That both the worlds I give to negligence,/Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d/Most throughly for my father.” (IV. v. 133-136). With this declaration Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet and they construct a plan to have Laertes fence with Hamlet and for him to kill him. They instrument a plot of revenge for the death of Polonius, quickly coming up with three ways to kill Hamlet: stabbing him with an unblunted sword, placing poison on the sword, and poisoning Hamlet’s drink (IV. vii.). After they construct this plan they swiftly utilize the plan. Laertes did not wait for the perfect moment, at the perfect time, and at the perfect place. He created the place, time, and moment to carry out the dangerous task. Hamlet, however, waited and waited for what he thought one day would be the perfect moment in which he could kill his uncle. Even when Hamlet had an opportunity to kill Claudius, he talked himself out of it. When compared to Laertes, Hamlet is a coward because of his inability to
His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius. As described earlier, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, on the other hand, acts quickly and with precision, wasting no time in acquiring his target and formulating a plan. Robert Palfrey Utter, Jr., puts it best, Hamlet and Laertes both come to the same conclusion that murder must be carried out, but Hamlet reaches that conclusion only “after he has had a few minutes to think it over.” (140) Once Laertes finds out that the man who killed his father was Hamlet he is ready to charge in and kill him as soon as possible. He is only stopped by Claudius, who advises him on a more subtle approach. Straight off the bat it is clear how efficient Laertes is compared to Hamlet. Hamlet wastes a large amount of time scheming up complex ideas on how to get a confession out of Claudius and how to kill him. Laertes on the other hand wastes no time in getting a straight and to the point plan that he can execute immediately. After spending more than half the play watching Hamlet squirm around on the stage getting almost nothing accomplished, the audience would be acutely aware of the stark difference between Hamlet and Laertes even though they share the same motivations. Laertes has his speed but he shares in Hamlets lack of critical thinking when he gets hot headed. He is in such a blind rage that he doesn’t think on what he is agreeing to do with Claudius. Just like Hamlet, his brash actions cost those around him his life. In carrying out the plan, the King, the Queen, Hamlet, and he all die to the poison that was used in the duel. Hamlet was slow and reckless while Laertes was quick and reckless. Wilds sums up the relationship between Hamlet and Laertes perfectly, “Laertes and Hamlet have been foils to each other
The perfection of Hamlet’s character has been called in question - perhaps by those who do not understand it. The character of Hamlet stands by itself. It is not a character marked by strength of will or even of passion, but by refinement of thought and sentiment. Hamlet is as little of the hero as a man can be. He is a young and princely novice, full of high enthusiasm and quick sensibility - the sport of circumstances, questioning with fortune and refining on his own feelings, and forced from his natural disposition by the strangeness of his situation.