Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Sexual harassment and its effects on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Walmart Discrimination against women Walmart is a multi-billion dollar retail industry that hires thousands of employees a year. Over the last decade Walmart, there has been some speculation that Walmart discriminates against women. They employ 815,000 women, which is 57 percent of its U.S. workforce (Reed). Over 2,000 women from each of 48 states have filed legal complaints against Walmart and the company is said to have a history of unfair treatment of these female employees by under paid and how there are so many lawsuits against them given few opportunities for advancement (Hines). I selected this topic because after doing some research I discovered some shocking information about how Walmart supposedly treats their female employees and how there are so many lawsuits filed against them. This relates to my field of study because it shows what goes on internally between a company and its employees and how a company’s decision affects their employees. This also relates to my field of study because it an example of what occurs sometimes within a company and that is legal action from employee to the employer. All of these lawsuits started after Betty Dukes, a 54 year old employee of a Walmart who has worked there for six years realized that she wasn’t getting the same opportunities as advancement as her male co-workers (Toobin). A statistic from an article from the New Yorker states that 72% of the workforces are women and a third of them are in management positions( Toobin). After 11 years in court the case was ruled in favor of Walmart because although there were over a million plantiffs it and was decided that they were not discriminated in the same way. Even though this she lossed the case Betty Dukes still continues her fi... ... middle of paper ... ...t women across the world. Even though their are clear cases with sufficient evidence against them, Walmart seems to argue the same thing every time which is that the women who present the case against them have not enough in common. I believe that the argument is invalid because from what I have researched, every woman who went against Walmart all came together for rights that they deemed unfair and unethical. One of their own managers told a female employee that men are supposed to get paid more, that’s just how it is. That statement alone justifies the argument against them. The battle for female workers equality is ongoing and I believe that women will continue to fight until they get what they want. In conclusion, women deserve the same opportunities as men and shouldn’t have to take it to the Supreme Court to get something that that every person should have.
In Deenu Parmar's "Labouring the Wal Mart Way," the author discusses the business practices of Wal Mart, their impact on systemic poverty, and on existing work unions. Their business model forces competition to align with them, or close up shop. Wal Mart hires workers that would usually have a difficult time finding employment. That said, they pay them well below a living wage. Staff are also subject to abuses like overtime without pay. Wal Mart is resolute in their feelings towards unions. Their hiring process designed to cut out union sympathizers. This way, they can prevent any retaliation from staff seeking a better work environment. If anti-union efforts are unsuccessful, they close the store. It also forces existing unions to take pay
Within an excerpt from, “The United States of Wal-Mart,” John Dicker explains that Wal-Mart is a troubling corporation. Dicker begins his article by discussing why the store is so popular within the news in an age of global terrorism, coming to the conclusion that Wal-Mart has a huge scope in the United States and that it has more scandals, lawsuits, and stories than any other supercenter. Continually, he goes on to explain that Wal-Mart outsources jobs and their companies demands makes it hard for employees to have livable wages and good working conditions. Furthermore, Dicker addresses the claim that Wal-Mart provides good jobs, by destroying this perception with statistics showing how employees live in poverty and that their union scene
“In 1999, women constituted 72% of Wal-Mart’s hourly employees, but only 33% of its managerial employees” (Bhatnagar, 2004). This fact and many others are the reasons many people allege that Wal-Mart has unfair labor practices. The Dukes v. Wal-Mart case challenged the hiring, promotion and pay practices of Wal-Mart. The case was filed in June 2001. When the case reached class certification status it became the largest class action civil rights suit against employment discrimination in American history. The case represented approximately 1.6 million women that had worked for Wal-Mart from 1998 to 2001 who felt that they had been discriminated against because of their gender.
Bianco=s approach in analyzing Wal-Mart is an interesting one. By combining hard facts and arguments with homespun anecdotes, he is able to capture the reader into sympathizing with his vitriolic attacks of the retail giant. In chapter one, Bianco lays out the objective evidence against Wal-Mart as if he were a prosecutor going after a murderer on trial. Chief among Bianco=s arguments is Wal-Mart=s unabashed violations of laws and business ethics. Wal-Mart=s arrogance, Bianco says, is Arooted . . . in its presumption that selling vast quantities of cut-rate merchandise entitles it to represent[]@ the American consumer. (p. 3). Bianco thoroughly notes Wal-Mart=s own figures, government reports and employee Atestimony@ in building his case against Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart=s rap sheet is a mile long when it comes to union busting, child-labor law violations, overtime pay violations, minimum wage issues, gender and racial biases, community crushing, small business pilfering, safety concerns such as locking in employees despite the fact emergency personnel would be locked out, and I=m sure if Bianco were to look close enough he may find an actual murder or two.
Walmart, the world’s largest retailer and private employer, has established a highly profitable business centered on a low-cost strategy that utilizes logistical efficiencies to create a competitive advantage. Yet, to maintain this low-cost strategy, Walmart has engaged in ethically questionable practices, including gender discrimination in promotion and pay. While the Supreme Court recently ruled against class certification of 1.5 million women in the Dukes v. Walmart case due to a lack of proof that Walmart operated under a “general policy of discrimination”, overwhelming evidence demonstrates that gender discrimination is a persistent problem rooted in the culture of Walmart, despite gender-neutral policies (Biskupic, 2011).
“Up Against Wal-Mart” by Karen Olsson, a senior editor at Texas Monthly and who’s article appeared in Mother Jones, introduces her article through the perspective of a Wal-Mart worker. She focuses on the negatives of Wal-Mart by telling the real life struggles of different Wal-Mart employees. “Progressive Wal-Mart. Really.” by Sebastian Mallaby, a columnist for the Washington Post, focuses his article on what Wal-Mart critics say and attempts to defend Wal-Mart by comparing Wal-Mart to other retailers. Even though Karen Olsson and Sebastian Mallaby both examine the negative effects of Wal-Mart, Olsson berates Wal-Mart’s unfair treatment towards employees and the unlivable wages that the world’s largest retailer provides while Mallaby defends Wal-Mart’s actions with reasonable statistics.
According to the report from non-partisan, the estimation of collectively profit for Walmart is nearly $7.8 billion dollars per year from government subsidies and tax breaks. Therefore, federal government is definitely an opportunity that Walmart need to work with in order to receive huge benefit from it. Walmart need to analyze the government policies that are related to its business like laws for tax, labor and some other policies that may affect the operation of Walmart. According to the Walmart Analysis article in 2008, Walmart had faced an issue regarding discrimination of its employee by gender. The female employee of Walmart are discriminated by having much less chance to work as supervisor or manger than male employee. This is an example that Walmart violated the labor laws and this could cause government refuse to support
Walmart has had a long-standing presence in America society since the middle of the 20th century, seen as a place to get everything done, Walmart has become a fixation in our society. From grocery shopping, to changing your oil and even filing your annual tax returns, Walmart is always there, everyday. Started by Sam Walton in 1962, it began as a small operation catering to a small Arkansas community. It was started on principles very similar to small local businesses in small towns. Today Walmart has gotten a different, darker reputation. On the surface, Walmart may seem like the solution to everyday issues. Low-income families are attracted to the low prices, and people who work odd hours benefit greatly from the 24 hours a day that many Walmarts are open. Lately, Walmart has also managed to be publicly recognized as a store that sells many of today’s green products, including organic food, environmental conscious cleaning products, as well as, paper products made from recycled paper. However, underneath all this, Walmart has a different side. Exploitation of its workers is widespread amongst Walmarts who do not belong to a union, especially in the United States. Wal...
Gender discrimination is actually more common than you think. When Dukes filed her lawsuit against Wal-Mart in the year of 2001 there were more than 2000 women who stood behind her which she also represented. Wal-Mart has also been accused of multiple discrimination cases against 1.5 million women who have worked for Wal-Mart from 1998 through the present. The discrimination against these women are higher positions for an increased pay. The pay difference as from the women and men are significantly higher. Ranging from $3 to $6000. ( A history of wage earning women) That difference is from store clerks to CEO. Until Ms. Dukes filed her complaint there were no complaints that had been filed or can be ground of this issue. Many people look at Wal-Mart as their main store but after doing some research on this paper. People have actually boycotted against Wal-Mart. (The Wal-Mart effect) These people have implied that they would rather go spend a little bit more to a company who treats their employees more than equal. Since the lawsuit that Dukes filed over a decade ago more women can be seen in higher up positions for the company.
Discrimination continues to run rampant throughout organizations in both the United States and worldwide. The Supreme Court case, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., dealt with 1.5 million current and former female Wal-Mart employees that claim that they had been a victim of gender discrimination. The ensuing pages will discuss the specific issues that the plaintiffs encountered, followed by suggestions from a human resource manager’s stand point in rectifying adverse impact within the Wal-Mart organization.
Walmart is nearly everywhere. It is reported that there over 5,000 stores nationwide (Walmart Corporate). And that means that there are a lot of employees — nearly 1.4 million of them to be exact (Walmart Corporate). They are often seen as being greedy in order to receive a big profit over their competitors. Unfortunately for employees, that could mean problems: Walmart is often under ridicule for their low salaries, less than great benefits, and their lack of career training, and bad treatment. These issues may leave Walmart’s employees struggling with lack of money and lack of training — this may be bad news for America’s taxpayers, too.
One of the most notable cases was discrimination against pregnant workers. Up until 2014, a Wal-Mart in Arkansas had a company-wide policy that denied pregnant women the same accommodations as workers with other disabilities. Wal-Mart has been accused of overworking and firing women who are pregnant and putting them in potentially dangerous situations. Wal-Mart’s female workers have a faced a systemic pattern of sex/gender discrimination. Wal-Mart has been subject to several lawsuits alleging that female employees have been denied equal job assignments, promotions, training and compensation, as well as experiencing sexual harassment and
Walmart is very successful business that sells products for consumers at low prices. It has more than 2000 stores in 14 countries. However, many individuals and labor unions criticized WM because of its employment practices. The unethical employment practice at WM includes gender discrimination, inhumane practices, and undocumented workers. The WM management style can be described as an old-fashioned style that can be seen in its store policies. Many policies involve discrimination to employees especially women. Women workers at WM are not allowed to be in the top management. Moreover, The WM have a very strict employee to employee relationship. Besides that, WM
Ledbetter found out she was receiving discriminatory pay, so she files a lawsuit against the company. Since she failed to file it within 180 days the court won 5 to 4. She continued to receive discriminatory pay because her case was filed too late. Judge, Justice Ginsburg was so appalled by the courts decision, she decided to dissent from it. She defended women’s rights, In her own words she said “In our view the court does not comprehend, the insidious way in which women can be victims of pay discrimination”. Congress immediately took action, and in less than two years the House and Senate in 2009 passed the Lilly Ledbetter Act. The Ledbetter Act allows employees to freely ask about pay discrimination. This act is just the beginning of women’s equality.
Employee stakeholders have another story. The discrimination lawsuits ranging from female employees not getting equal pay or equal positions, to disabled employees, class-action lawsuits stating that Wal-Mart doctors questionnaires to prevent disabled workers from applying, Wal-Mart does not rank very high with these employees. Lawsuits stemming from Wal-Mart’s failure to monitor labor conditions at oversea factories and hires illegal immigrants add to the rift in relations between the employees and the company. Wal-Mart continues to deny charges...