Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Sexual harassment and its effects on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay related gender discrimination in walmart
Walmart Discrimination against women Walmart is a multi-billion dollar retail industry that hires thousands of employees a year. Over the last decade Walmart, there has been some speculation that Walmart discriminates against women. They employ 815,000 women, which is 57 percent of its U.S. workforce (Reed). Over 2,000 women from each of 48 states have filed legal complaints against Walmart and the company is said to have a history of unfair treatment of these female employees by under paid and how there are so many lawsuits against them given few opportunities for advancement (Hines). I selected this topic because after doing some research I discovered some shocking information about how Walmart supposedly treats their female employees and how there are so many lawsuits filed against them. This relates to my field of study because it shows what goes on internally between a company and its employees and how a company’s decision affects their employees. This also relates to my field of study because it an example of what occurs sometimes within a company and that is legal action from employee to the employer. All of these lawsuits started after Betty Dukes, a 54 year old employee of a Walmart who has worked there for six years realized that she wasn’t getting the same opportunities as advancement as her male co-workers (Toobin). A statistic from an article from the New Yorker states that 72% of the workforces are women and a third of them are in management positions( Toobin). After 11 years in court the case was ruled in favor of Walmart because although there were over a million plantiffs it and was decided that they were not discriminated in the same way. Even though this she lossed the case Betty Dukes still continues her fi... ... middle of paper ... ...t women across the world. Even though their are clear cases with sufficient evidence against them, Walmart seems to argue the same thing every time which is that the women who present the case against them have not enough in common. I believe that the argument is invalid because from what I have researched, every woman who went against Walmart all came together for rights that they deemed unfair and unethical. One of their own managers told a female employee that men are supposed to get paid more, that’s just how it is. That statement alone justifies the argument against them. The battle for female workers equality is ongoing and I believe that women will continue to fight until they get what they want. In conclusion, women deserve the same opportunities as men and shouldn’t have to take it to the Supreme Court to get something that that every person should have.
In Deenu Parmar's "Labouring the Wal Mart Way," the author discusses the business practices of Wal Mart, their impact on systemic poverty, and on existing work unions. Their business model forces competition to align with them, or close up shop. Wal Mart hires workers that would usually have a difficult time finding employment. That said, they pay them well below a living wage. Staff are also subject to abuses like overtime without pay. Wal Mart is resolute in their feelings towards unions. Their hiring process designed to cut out union sympathizers. This way, they can prevent any retaliation from staff seeking a better work environment. If anti-union efforts are unsuccessful, they close the store. It also forces existing unions to take pay
“In 1999, women constituted 72% of Wal-Mart’s hourly employees, but only 33% of its managerial employees” (Bhatnagar, 2004). This fact and many others are the reasons many people allege that Wal-Mart has unfair labor practices. The Dukes v. Wal-Mart case challenged the hiring, promotion and pay practices of Wal-Mart. The case was filed in June 2001. When the case reached class certification status it became the largest class action civil rights suit against employment discrimination in American history. The case represented approximately 1.6 million women that had worked for Wal-Mart from 1998 to 2001 who felt that they had been discriminated against because of their gender.
Wal-Mart has branded stores in all 50 states and in over 27 countries. Wal-Mart started with humble roots in 1962 by Sam Walton in the small town of Bentonville, Arkansas. Within thirty years, the small local discount retailer grew to one of the largest retail companies in the United States of America. Now it stands as the largest retailer in the world. As the largest retailer, Wal-Mart has gained many detractors. In "The Case for Wal-Mart," Karen De Coster and Brad Edmonds recognize how people “like to attack bigness” (632). Many believe Wal-Mart offers low wage jobs with few employee benefits, discriminates against women, and among many other issues, doesn’t give back to the community (631). In contrast to the constant barrage negative attacks, Wal-Mart proves beneficial to the community. Wal-Mart prides itself on being an equal opportunity employer to such a degree it has the most diverse group of employees anyone can imagine. Most Wal-Mart stores are the anchor that provides a steady stream of consumers to other much small businesses in the area. Beyond providing quality jobs for the people in and around the store, Wal-Mart brings convenience, lower prices, and help to those in need.
Bianco=s approach in analyzing Wal-Mart is an interesting one. By combining hard facts and arguments with homespun anecdotes, he is able to capture the reader into sympathizing with his vitriolic attacks of the retail giant. In chapter one, Bianco lays out the objective evidence against Wal-Mart as if he were a prosecutor going after a murderer on trial. Chief among Bianco=s arguments is Wal-Mart=s unabashed violations of laws and business ethics. Wal-Mart=s arrogance, Bianco says, is Arooted . . . in its presumption that selling vast quantities of cut-rate merchandise entitles it to represent[]@ the American consumer. (p. 3). Bianco thoroughly notes Wal-Mart=s own figures, government reports and employee Atestimony@ in building his case against Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart=s rap sheet is a mile long when it comes to union busting, child-labor law violations, overtime pay violations, minimum wage issues, gender and racial biases, community crushing, small business pilfering, safety concerns such as locking in employees despite the fact emergency personnel would be locked out, and I=m sure if Bianco were to look close enough he may find an actual murder or two.
Walmart, the world’s largest retailer and private employer, has established a highly profitable business centered on a low-cost strategy that utilizes logistical efficiencies to create a competitive advantage. Yet, to maintain this low-cost strategy, Walmart has engaged in ethically questionable practices, including gender discrimination in promotion and pay. While the Supreme Court recently ruled against class certification of 1.5 million women in the Dukes v. Walmart case due to a lack of proof that Walmart operated under a “general policy of discrimination”, overwhelming evidence demonstrates that gender discrimination is a persistent problem rooted in the culture of Walmart, despite gender-neutral policies (Biskupic, 2011).
Wal-Mart, the multi-billion dollar corporation and the second largest employer in the world, is the most controversial corporation in the world. Wal-Mart stands as a global powerhouse and affects countless individuals around the world. This company is constantly receiving criticism from unions, human rights groups, small towns and small businesses. There are accusations of Wal-Mart treating workers poorly and driving small businesses out of business. However these accusations are false and over exaggerated. Wal-Mart offers families and low income individuals quality products at affordable prices. Their workers are paid competitive wages and are treated with respect. Wal-Mart opens their stores in rural and under developed areas. Wal-Mart improves the lives of the folks who live rural area and improves their lifestyles.
“Up Against Wal-Mart” by Karen Olsson, a senior editor at Texas Monthly and who’s article appeared in Mother Jones, introduces her article through the perspective of a Wal-Mart worker. She focuses on the negatives of Wal-Mart by telling the real life struggles of different Wal-Mart employees. “Progressive Wal-Mart. Really.” by Sebastian Mallaby, a columnist for the Washington Post, focuses his article on what Wal-Mart critics say and attempts to defend Wal-Mart by comparing Wal-Mart to other retailers. Even though Karen Olsson and Sebastian Mallaby both examine the negative effects of Wal-Mart, Olsson berates Wal-Mart’s unfair treatment towards employees and the unlivable wages that the world’s largest retailer provides while Mallaby defends Wal-Mart’s actions with reasonable statistics.
Do you think Wal-Mart is guilty of gender discrimination? Wal-Mart claims to be equal opportunity employer but has their issues. We have all been to Wal-Mart more than a few times in our lives. It's our store right down the road with their famous roll back prices, as well as their old slogan we're all more than familiar with "Always low prices always" now it’s “Save money live better". ( In Sam we Trust) We walk into Wal-Mart were normally greeted by a friendly smile and a simple hello. When we start to look into the negatives of Wal-Mart one out of five comes out to be gender discrimination.
In the case of Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Dukes), the court found that there was a lack of significant proof that Wal-Mart had a general policy of discrimination (Schipani, 2013). The plaintiffs needed commonality to establish uniformed disparity within the Wal-Mart organization, and statistical evidence was deemed unworthy of proving this commonality (Schipani, 2013). The numbers were astounding; seventy-two percent of the hourly workforce of Wal-Mart are women, yet only 10% are store managers, and a mere 4% of female Wal-Mart employees are district managers (Bernardin & Russell, 2013). The numbers seem to reflect a painfully obvious presence of discrimination, and with Wal-Mart’s market power within its industry, it can be frightening to evaluate the impact their practices have on the American employment culture.
From this, it is clear that not everyone is a fan of the company. But where are this perspective coming from? It is just as likely for them to be from a biased outlet as the information they’re presenting being false. However, these perspectives can be easily counteracted by opposing ideas. One of which being the author stating the so-called “investing over $2.7 billion in wages” plan. Which I can confirm is true. In addition, since this plan was introduced in 2015, it has had a positive impact on the companies sales both in stores and online. The 200 training centers opened in 2015 as mentioned by the author, was a positive implementation in order to increase the minimum hourly rate. Before of which, had been a common complaint and issue associated with the company. Not only this, but there were endless complaints made about the company’s employee treatment, but it seems as though Walmart has acknowledged these complaints and in recent times has taken a step in the right direction. The author had not addressed much factual information regarding its suppliers and rather the “goals”
Sure Walmart has laid out plans to combat the low wages, but this in turn reduced hours of many workers. And Walmart seems to be ignoring the fact that their employees receive little to no benefits including healthcare. These problems add up to be roughly $6 billion out of taxpayers’ pockets (O’Connor, “Report: Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 Billion In Public Assistance”). Walmart is a company that is based off of profit and providing customers with low prices, but fails to provide its employees with a living wage. Walmart must find the balance of employee benefits and
One of the most notable cases was discrimination against pregnant workers. Up until 2014, a Wal-Mart in Arkansas had a company-wide policy that denied pregnant women the same accommodations as workers with other disabilities. Wal-Mart has been accused of overworking and firing women who are pregnant and putting them in potentially dangerous situations. Wal-Mart’s female workers have a faced a systemic pattern of sex/gender discrimination. Wal-Mart has been subject to several lawsuits alleging that female employees have been denied equal job assignments, promotions, training and compensation, as well as experiencing sexual harassment and
Walmart is very successful business that sells products for consumers at low prices. It has more than 2000 stores in 14 countries. However, many individuals and labor unions criticized WM because of its employment practices. The unethical employment practice at WM includes gender discrimination, inhumane practices, and undocumented workers. The WM management style can be described as an old-fashioned style that can be seen in its store policies. Many policies involve discrimination to employees especially women. Women workers at WM are not allowed to be in the top management. Moreover, The WM have a very strict employee to employee relationship. Besides that, WM
According to the report from non-partisan, the estimation of collectively profit for Walmart is nearly $7.8 billion dollars per year from government subsidies and tax breaks. Therefore, federal government is definitely an opportunity that Walmart need to work with in order to receive huge benefit from it. Walmart need to analyze the government policies that are related to its business like laws for tax, labor and some other policies that may affect the operation of Walmart. According to the Walmart Analysis article in 2008, Walmart had faced an issue regarding discrimination of its employee by gender. The female employee of Walmart are discriminated by having much less chance to work as supervisor or manger than male employee. This is an example that Walmart violated the labor laws and this could cause government refuse to support
Ledbetter found out she was receiving discriminatory pay, so she files a lawsuit against the company. Since she failed to file it within 180 days the court won 5 to 4. She continued to receive discriminatory pay because her case was filed too late. Judge, Justice Ginsburg was so appalled by the courts decision, she decided to dissent from it. She defended women’s rights, In her own words she said “In our view the court does not comprehend, the insidious way in which women can be victims of pay discrimination”. Congress immediately took action, and in less than two years the House and Senate in 2009 passed the Lilly Ledbetter Act. The Ledbetter Act allows employees to freely ask about pay discrimination. This act is just the beginning of women’s equality.