Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Walmart social responsibility and ethics
Walmart social responsibility and ethics
Walmart ethical issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Walmart social responsibility and ethics
Over the years, Wal-Mart has had several HR issues including the following three: wage law violations and the exploitation of workers, discrimination (gender, age, disability), and poor and unsafe working conditions.
One of several class action lawsuits against Wal-Mart was the case Salvas vs. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (2008). The class action lawsuit accused the retailer of denying workers rest and meal breaks, refusing to pay overtime, and manipulating time cards to lower employees’ pay. Another case in California involved 116,000 Wal-Mart employees against Wal-Mart retailers claiming that they violated a California law requiring employers to provide an unpaid 30-minute lunch break to employees who work at least six hours. According to a study released by Congressional Democrats, Wal-Mart wages are incredibly low, which forces many of its workers to still have to rely on government aid programs and assistance such as food stamps. Not only has Wal-Mart underpaid and exploited its workers in the US, they are also notoriously known for these unethical practices overseas, such as harming workers in Asian factories.
…show more content…
Another prevalent HRM issue that Wal-Mart has faced is discrimination against its workers in terms of gender, age, and disability.
One of the most notable cases was discrimination against pregnant workers. Up until 2014, a Wal-Mart in Arkansas had a company-wide policy that denied pregnant women the same accommodations as workers with other disabilities. Wal-Mart has been accused of overworking and firing women who are pregnant and putting them in potentially dangerous situations. Wal-Mart’s female workers have a faced a systemic pattern of sex/gender discrimination. Wal-Mart has been subject to several lawsuits alleging that female employees have been denied equal job assignments, promotions, training and compensation, as well as experiencing sexual harassment and
discrimination. Lastly, Wal-Mart’s other HR issue is its lack of providing safe work conditions. In 2013, workers from a warehouse in California led a two-day strike and filed a complaint with the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health alleging a number of safety violations such as unclean drinking water; emergency exits blocked by boxes and merchandise; forklift brakes, seatbelts and horns that do not work; lack of ventilation or adequate water amid intense heat, and various other safety violations. Each of these issues has had a substantial financial impact on the Wal-Mart organization. Because of Wal-Mart’s poor business practices, Walmart has paid millions of dollars in class action lawsuits with an estimated 5,000 lawsuits filed against the company each year. With these lawsuits, Walmart has been forced to spend a considerable amount on attorney fees; one case in 2002 cost the company a whopping $33.8 million dollars when a worker sued for unpaid wages, which then became a class action lawsuit. However, Walmart’s HR issues have had little to no impact on consumer demand and stock growth. Large impact on company’s reputation It is evident from the many cases against the company that Walmart’s exploitation of its workers has been a reoccurring issue.
(Cheeseman2013) In the National Labor Relation Board v Shop Rite Foods case some employees of Shop Rite Foods of Texas elected a worker union as a Bargaining agent for a collective bargaining agreement for over 3 months the agreement was still not settled. Then ShopRite began to notice a lot of it merchandise being damaged in the warehouse. They determined that the damage was being intentionally being caused by dissident employees as a pressure tactic to secure concessions from the company in the collective bargaining negotiations.
In Deenu Parmar's "Labouring the Wal Mart Way," the author discusses the business practices of Wal Mart, their impact on systemic poverty, and on existing work unions. Their business model forces competition to align with them, or close up shop. Wal Mart hires workers that would usually have a difficult time finding employment. That said, they pay them well below a living wage. Staff are also subject to abuses like overtime without pay. Wal Mart is resolute in their feelings towards unions. Their hiring process designed to cut out union sympathizers. This way, they can prevent any retaliation from staff seeking a better work environment. If anti-union efforts are unsuccessful, they close the store. It also forces existing unions to take pay
According to the Pam Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. case, one reads that Pam Huber was switched from her current job, as a dry grocery order filler due to the fact that she injured herself at work and therefore was unable to fulfill her requirements. Due to this dilemma at work, Pam Huber was classified under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 and was “sought, as a reasonable accommodation, reassignment to a router position” (Morgan, p.413), which Wal-Mart believes fits the working criteria’s of a disabled person registered under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990. This position that one reads about that Pam Huber was given by Wal-Mart, meets Pam Huber’s work abilities due to her disability registered under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990. One reads in this case also, that Wal-Mart- was fair in the fact that they did not automatically and simply tell Pam Huber to step down from her current position but to however get reevaluated against people that where not disabled and capable of doing the job. I believe that Wal-Mart was absolutely fair in wanting to reevaluate Pam Huber due to her disabilities...
Mallaby admits Wal-Mart can treat their employees and other retailers unfairly, but as a result everyone can share in the 50 billion in savings that American shoppers consume annually. The pay that employees get is the price they must pay for low priced merchandise. Because of the minimal pay to employees, Wal-Mart strengthens its’ consumer buying power. Giving the American shoppers the savings they need, Wal-Mart’s has ultimately been them successful. Wal-Mart has potentially wiped out the middle class as an employer, but the employees can now work and ...
Within an excerpt from, “The United States of Wal-Mart,” John Dicker explains that Wal-Mart is a troubling corporation. Dicker begins his article by discussing why the store is so popular within the news in an age of global terrorism, coming to the conclusion that Wal-Mart has a huge scope in the United States and that it has more scandals, lawsuits, and stories than any other supercenter. Continually, he goes on to explain that Wal-Mart outsources jobs and their companies demands makes it hard for employees to have livable wages and good working conditions. Furthermore, Dicker addresses the claim that Wal-Mart provides good jobs, by destroying this perception with statistics showing how employees live in poverty and that their union scene
...ir employees without their knowledge at all. Because of their prices being low, wage is even lower to make an over decent profit. Wal-Mart is a growing competitor to those who have enough trouble just surviving. It is easier for everyone just to back-off and let them do what they want, but they have taken advantage of that and the people do not like that.
If you have ever heard me talk about Wal-Mart, you may notice I constantly call it a communist regime. It may have nothing related to communism, but communism is bad and so is employment at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart for me was the most biased and unfair treatment of any kind that I have ever felt in my life. Their policies are extremely ridiculous and their managers have very unrealistic goals. Wal-Mart is, in my opinion, one of the most stressful and unfair places to work.
The Wal-Mart Corporation is a multi-billion dollar low-cost retail organization, consisting of 6400 stores and 1.8 million sales associates worldwide. Wal-Mart’s influence on the retail world and the enormity of their corporate size is unparalleled. Wal-Mart can easily report sales of $312.4 billion dollars per fiscal quarter and net profits of $3.8 billion dollars. Wal-Mart promises her customers "Always low prices. Always!" and upholds this motto by providing low prices to her customers and high return on investment to her stockholders. One way that Wal-Mart has managed to maintain a competitive edge over other low cost retail giants and provide low prices is by cutting wages and by not offering too many company benefits to their employees. Full-time employee working at Wal-Mart only make $8 an hour, while only 45% of the workers can afford to be covered by health insurance. Wal-Mart also increase part time employees from 20 percent to 40 percent so that they do not have to cover all of their employees for health insurance . Although Wal-Mart may not provide excellent benefits to her employees, it successfully performs as a legitimate business operating in a capitalistic society. Wal-Mart upholds the primary fiduciary duty to satisfy her stockholder and follows free the market libertarianism model, which states that a business should not interfering with the free market. In a free market Wal-Mart has a direct responsibility to her primary stockholders rather than the employees of a company.
Rule : Unlawful employment practices are defined by Oregon statute 659A.030, which states: “(1) It is an unlawful employment practice: . . . (b) For an employer, because of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status or age. . ., to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment.” Or. Rev. St. 659A.030(b). The statute is intended to provide protection for Ms. Saxon if she experiences workplace discrimination based on her sex. Its goal is to “insure human dignity of all people within this state, and protect their health, safety and morals from the consequences of intergroup hostility, tensions, and practices of discrimination.” Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor, 39 Or. App.
Walmart, the world’s largest retailer and private employer, has established a highly profitable business centered on a low-cost strategy that utilizes logistical efficiencies to create a competitive advantage. Yet, to maintain this low-cost strategy, Walmart has engaged in ethically questionable practices, including gender discrimination in promotion and pay. While the Supreme Court recently ruled against class certification of 1.5 million women in the Dukes v. Walmart case due to a lack of proof that Walmart operated under a “general policy of discrimination”, overwhelming evidence demonstrates that gender discrimination is a persistent problem rooted in the culture of Walmart, despite gender-neutral policies (Biskupic, 2011).
Walmart has had a long-standing presence in America society since the middle of the 20th century, seen as a place to get everything done, Walmart has become a fixation in our society. From grocery shopping, to changing your oil and even filing your annual tax returns, Walmart is always there, everyday. Started by Sam Walton in 1962, it began as a small operation catering to a small Arkansas community. It was started on principles very similar to small local businesses in small towns. Today Walmart has gotten a different, darker reputation. On the surface, Walmart may seem like the solution to everyday issues. Low-income families are attracted to the low prices, and people who work odd hours benefit greatly from the 24 hours a day that many Walmarts are open. Lately, Walmart has also managed to be publicly recognized as a store that sells many of today’s green products, including organic food, environmental conscious cleaning products, as well as, paper products made from recycled paper. However, underneath all this, Walmart has a different side. Exploitation of its workers is widespread amongst Walmarts who do not belong to a union, especially in the United States. Wal...
Discrimination continues to run rampant throughout organizations in both the United States and worldwide. The Supreme Court case, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., dealt with 1.5 million current and former female Wal-Mart employees that claim that they had been a victim of gender discrimination. The ensuing pages will discuss the specific issues that the plaintiffs encountered, followed by suggestions from a human resource manager’s stand point in rectifying adverse impact within the Wal-Mart organization.
Pregnancy discrimination in the work place is alive and well in the 21st Century. There has been an increase in the need for laws protecting the rights of pregnant women. Due to disparate treatment of pregnant women, laws have been established to protect their employment rights. Although laws are in place to prevent such discrimination, it has not eliminated the problem of employers discriminating against pregnant women.
Since the time women were eligible to be an employee of a workplace, they have become victims of discrimination. Discrimination is the practice of treating a person or group of people differently from other people (Webster, 2013). Thousands of women have suffered from discrimination in workplaces because they are pregnant, disabled, or of the opposite sex. It is crazy to think that someone would fire a woman because she became pregnant and needed to have some work adjustments ("pregnancy and parenting"). A woman goes through a lot of giving birth to children, and men will never understand the complications a mother encounters during the pregnancy.
Employee stakeholders have another story. The discrimination lawsuits ranging from female employees not getting equal pay or equal positions, to disabled employees, class-action lawsuits stating that Wal-Mart doctors questionnaires to prevent disabled workers from applying, Wal-Mart does not rank very high with these employees. Lawsuits stemming from Wal-Mart’s failure to monitor labor conditions at oversea factories and hires illegal immigrants add to the rift in relations between the employees and the company. Wal-Mart continues to deny charges...