Introduction: In today’s society, there has been a noticeable increase within the global trade industry, allowing business’ the opportunity to compete on a larger scale and have access to greater resources and technology. Over the past few decades China has become one of the largest automotive producers within the market and has the most growth potential worldwide as “car ownership is still remarkably low at 4.78% and is expected to grow significantly” (Huihui, 2012). The Chinese automobile market has started to recognise the importance of strong brand image and reputation. The Geely-Volvo acquisition has provided the Chinese car industry with the ability to expand abroad, gaining access into the international market therefore potentially creating a competitive edge. The acquisition is the biggest international merger taken place by a Chinese company and is intentioned to create a strong force for China as a world economic superpower (Wheelen & Hunger, 2006). According to Li Shufu, Geely’s chairman, the intention behind the acquisition was to gain access to Volvos advanced technology; enhance the Geely brand, to grow the Volvo brand within the Chinese market and to Develop the Chinese automobile industry (Wang, 2011). This essay will provide an insight into weather the Geely-Volvo acquisition can help the Chinese automotive company gain competitive advantages in the global car market. Through analysing the Five Force Model and the Strategic Positioning of the company a conclusion will be determined about the level of competitive advantage created through the acquisition. Five Force Model: Porters Five Force Model is an essential part of analysing the competitive advantage gained through Geely’s acquisition of Volvo. It is an im... ... middle of paper ... ...ill in turn stop the threat of substitutes (Volvo Technology, 2010). Being a reasonably new entrant themselves into the automobile industry, Geely’s existing technology is not quite as refined as Volvo and as such, Volvo’s excellence in vehicle underpinnings, engines and safety technologies will demonstrate to be valuable (Shirouzu). Therefore through the study of Porters Five Force Model, it can be determined that Geely’s strategy to acquire an extremely well established Western automobile manufacturer can help the company to gain competitive advantages in the global car market. Although both Geely and Volvo were formed from reasonably different business environments and cultures, Geely will surly benefit and allow a competitive advantage to be attained, even though the risk is substantially high, the pay off for success is extremely high for both Geely and Volvo.
As strategy consultants of McCormick & Associates, we use Porters Five Forces Model as a framework when making a qualitative evaluation of a firm's strategic position (Appendix 1.2). These five forces determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market. These forces affect the ability of a company to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a company to re-assess the market place.
The 5-Force Industry Analysis first introduced by Michel Porter, Harvard Business School professor, a quarter-century ago. This theory examines the suppliers, buyers, product substitutes, existing firms’ rivalry and new entrants in a firm’s product market.
...not provide the company with opportunities to analyze its internal strengths and weaknesses like that of the SWOT analysis. In short, Porter’s five forces model is related to the threats of the company resulted in the current market scenario.
Porter’s Five Forces Model is a widely used tool by strategists to develop a competitive analysis, from which they will be able to develop strategies (David, 2013). When looking at Delta, it would be beneficial to look at the external forces this will help top management develop strategies to combat external factors, threats from external factors could potentially harm Delta. According to Porter, the nature of competitiveness in a given industry can be viewed as a composite of five forces: 1) Rivalry among competing firms, 2) Potential development of new competitors, 3) Potential development of substitute products, 4) Bargaining power of suppliers, 5) Bargaining power of
The world of technology is ever changing and advancing. With the automotive industry in play technology is constantly surpassing what is available today with what can be done for tomorrow. Technology and the automotive industry go hand in hand with constant improvement to components of cars. Due to technology advancement there is competition within the car industry, especially between American car companies and European car companies. European car companies provide their buyers with innovative variety and revolutionary luxuries. European car technology is superior to American car technology due to their safety, entertainment, and luxury features.
So the discussion on internal and external analysis clearly defines that where the competitive advantage of Ford Motors is and where it is lacking. People who have durability as their first priority will go for Ford but they lack in some of their strategies which the management should consider and work on it. We also came to know that Ford is an innovative company from the very first and also serves local demands with the help of related and supporting industry. But in some points they have taken wrong decisions which compel them to sell some of their brands to others. The good news is they are doing hard job to maintain their performance regarding their star and cash cow products to remain in the competition.
Honda, like other automotive companies, also came to the conclusion of firming a joint venture. At the moment, Honda was already famous for motorcycles in UK, but it was less well known in terms of the automobiles. While Honda’s cars enjoyed reputation for good quality and durability, the import restrictions limited its success it the European market. However, the European market was essential for the company’s global expansion. With the joint venture, Honda could avoid the restrictions on the import quota by assembling cars locally, because these cars would be considered locally produced. Moreover, a local partner could assumedly offer a better insight of the market.
There are two reasons why a firm may perform well in an industry, either 1) the industry is attractive to any firm 2) the firm is better and outperforms it’s rivals. Porter’s theory therefore can be used to discover the markets that are attractive to firms or, in those which aren’t breaking down the five forces so a strategy for success can be developed. In general the firm with be more profitable if each of the forces is low, that is to say there is a low threat of new firms entering, if buyers and suppliers have little power over the firm, if there is a low threat from substitute products and if competitive rivalry is low.
The Porter’s model of competitive advantage of nations is based on four key elements including factor endowments, demand conditions, related and supporting industries and firm strategy, structure and rivalry. This makes it suitable in understanding the competition existing in the soft drinks industry in the Asian markets. The factor conditions identify the natural resources, climate, location, and demographics. Coca cola and Pepsi enjoy the growing population in the Asian markets (Yoffie, 2002). A higher population guarantees the two companies adequate revenues.
This report is about Procter and Gamble Co., which is a consumer goods company headquartered in the US. However this report focuses on P&G’s perfume brands and cosmetics. The company’s brief introduction followed by the market analysis has been explained. Moreover its competitive environment using Porters five forces has also been analysed. Further analysis include the company’s growth strategies using Ansoff’s Matrix and the company’s drivers of internationalization examined using Yips framework.
Case 2 focuses on the Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW) Company. My analysis will define each of the company's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as brought about within the case, as well as through additional research. The history of the Bavarian Motor Works is a history of innovation, dedication and determination. These achievements are reflected in the BMW emblem, symbolizing a rotating airplane propeller from BMW's early years as an aircraft engine manufacturer. Today, the emblem signifies a global company that annually produces hundreds of thousands of engines, motorcycles, and cars.
Porter’s five forces is a framework for analyzing an industry and business strategy development. It looks at forces that determine the competitive intensity of an industry and hence the overall attractiveness of that industry. The configuration of the five forces differs by industry. Understanding the competitive forces and their underlying causes reveals the roots of an industry’s current profitability while providing a framework for anticipating and influencing competition over time.
Because the subject matter of strategic management is so inherently complex and because each one of us brings his own personal biases to the analysis, it was suggested early on that virtually all case material in the field be analyzed from the perspective of more than one methodology. Profit theory and industrial chains were selected as the first of a number of viable approaches to the analytical process. It would have been equally correct to select the Five Competitive Forces analysis refined by Michael Porter, one of the major figures in the field of strategic management. This methodology addresses the same issues but differs only in the language that they use to describe corporate behavior. The five forces are:
In a world of free trade, growing competition and accessibility to foreign markets, the need for methodical market analysis and assumptions is steadily rising in today’s business environment. It is just a normal way of thinking to primarily intent to eliminate the financial before entering a new and foreign market. This suggests that enterprises have to develop an overall strategy for their business in order to gain competitive advantage and consequently market share. With the words of Michael E. Porter, professor at Harvard University and leading authority on competitive strategy, this desirable market success is indirectly linked to the individual structure of a market. The unique structure of a single market influences the strategic behaviour and the development of a competitive strategy within a firm. The competitive strategy finally decides whether a company performs successfully on the market or not. Referring to this interpretation of business success, M. E. Porter established his five forces framework that enables directives to gather useful information about the business environment and the competitive forces in industries.
would be to drop off the car and have a little time to play or put the