Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The morality of gambling
The morality of gambling
Ethical dilemma gambling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The morality of gambling
Octaveous Simmons
Ms. Rollins
English III
7 May 2014
The Lottery: The Pros and Cons
Even though many people count on the “lottery” for ethical or unethical reasons, the lottery isn’t the best solution to any problem a lot of people have today. Gambling is basically never the best option to consider. Alot of money and alot of people are used in order to fund this event. Why would people spend all of their hard earned money as to something crazy like the lottery? There is really no guarantee that some random man or woman would win the lottery. Is this event really worth anything you have? To be completely honest, I would not risk it.
The lottery, a scam for fishing out prizes to people who actually think they might have a chance of winning(Gambling: Opposing View pionts). Also, there have been private lotteries in which could result in fraud. This event known as the ‘’lottery’’ is lawful in many countries. Lotteries are regressive, deceptive, and for both children and adults (getting to the idea of being addictive). To add on, states come to depend on the revenues from lottery games as part of their ongoing budgets. Perhaps the worst thing about lotteries is that they put states into the business of gambling, which brings up its own downward spiral of increasing regressivity and deception. Is the lottery where alot of families money is going.
But there may also be a way for the lottery to benefit alot of people. What some people don’t know is that lotteries have a bunch of social status as the means of making money. And also, most of the money used in lotteries have been used to fund education, healthcare, and other worthy causes. But although, most states keep about 40% of all lottery proceeds. I would also p...
... middle of paper ...
...ny people also willingly convince themselves that their financial condition is hopeless, and prudent financial discipline is pointless and the lottery is a valid way of fixing their problems and/or saving for the future. Just think, “Is that money always going to be there”? Because the stakes are some what so high and the chances of winning so minimal, however, is participating in the lottery a waste of cash or simply a high risk investment opportunity that is worth a weekly gamble?
And also, to start another point, many people don’t know that gambling violates biblical principles. As you know, gambling is a problem that has stayed around the globe for years.In spite of the popularity of gambling, public perception has been driven by a number of myths about gambling.( Cooper, Lamar Sr.). When it really comes down to it, there are hidden realities within gambling.
In her first publication, “Against the Odds, and Against the Common Good”, Gloria Jiménez tries to convince the readers that the lottery business is urging people to gamble. The thesis is apparent in the first paragraph: “Still, when all is said and done about lotteries bringing a bit of excitement into the lives of many people and bringing a vast amount of money into the lives of a few, the states should not be in the business of urging people to gamble” (118). The author successfully presents valid arguments to support her opposition to state-run lotteries throughout the essay; whether the evidence will properly convince most readers the way she wants them to, is questionable. Although the valid arguments and evidence Jiménez provides is adequate for the essay, I believe only one argument really stands out to convince her readers the purpose of the essay.
The money the lottery provides is lower than many think.Some people say that they are because all state’s give some money to education.But that is only
A forth argument that defends lotteries is that the funds from lotteries benefit honorable causes like educational and social services. While this is true, there are other means that the government could make up for that money. This leads us into the last of the counterarguments, which is the fear that if the government gets rid lotteries they will have to raise taxes to make up for the lack of funding. Since most lottery tickets are shown to be bought by people with low income, raising taxes is a better option then letting these educational services be funded by mostly the poor people and gambling addicts. Getting rid of state-run lotteries and raising taxes would balance out who is funding these services. While it is legal to smoke, because it is harmful, it is not encouraged, just as it should be with lotteries. The state shouldn’t encourage or even tempt people to waste away their money in hopes of getting lucky and winning big.
“Why We Keep Playing the Lottery”, by freelance journalist Adam Piore takes a very in depth look as to what drives millions of Americans to continually play the lottery when their chances of winning are virtually non-existent. He believes that because the odds of winning the lottery are so small that Americans lose the ability to conceptualize how unlikely it is that they are going to win, and therefore the risk of playing has less to do with the outcome, and more to do with hope that they are feeling when they decide to play. It 's essentially, "a game where reason and logic are rendered obsolete, and hope and dreams are on sale." (Piore 700) He also states that many Americans would rather play the lottery thinking ,"boy, I could win $100 million" (705) as opposed to thinking about all of the money they could lose over time.
Compare and Contrast! Well, you use it on a daily right? The stories “The Lottery” and “The Landlady” are two stories that you can compare and contrast. Some examples of comparisons are that both of the stories use violence, and that they both end with a plot twist no one was expecting. One example of a contrast in both of these stories is that they use their imagery differently. How are these stories alike and how are they different?
The Lottery gains through selling tickets a massive amount of utility (money/pleasure). Much more than one person who buys a lottery
As the lottery is held annually, there is not much apparent concern for the deaths of one lost friend or family member a year. Basically, “The lottery was conducted-as were the square dances, the teen-age club, the Halloween program…” (Jackson 121) To these ignorant people, the tradition is almost a holiday in a sense...
Written by Shirley Jackson and published in 1948, “The Lottery” is a dystopian short fiction about a cruel and barbaric lottery ritual. The plot and characters illustrate that certain traditions ought to be abolished for the betterment of society. At the beginning of the story, the entire village gather around every year on June 27th to attend the lottery, which is mandatory. Once everyone arrived to the center, an old man named Joe brought a black box. Eventually, the heads of each family have to pull a ticket from this box, but they cannot be opened and must remain folded until everyone took their turn. Eventually, after everyone had their turn, everyone has to open up the paper and show it up for everyone to witness. If the head of the family pulled a blank ticket, then the family has nothing to
Typically, when someone thinks of a lottery they think of something positive and exciting but contrary to this idea in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, the connotation has an entirely different meaning. As the story begins, readers lean towards the belief that the town in which Jackson depicts is filled with happiness and joy. “The morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full summer day; the flowers were blossoming profusely and the grass was richly green” (Jackson 247) We soon realize that this notion is far from the truth. As the townspeople gather in the square for the annual lottery, which sole purpose is to stone someone to death by randomly pulling a paper out of a black box with a black dot on it, it is learned
The theme in “The Lottery” is violence and cruelty. Violence and cruelty is a major theme because there is a lot of violence and cruelty in the world. The Lottery has been read as addressing such issues as the public's fascination with salacious and scandalizing journalism, McCarthyism, and the complicity of the general public in the victimization of minority groups, epitomized by the Holocaust of World War II. The Holocaust was very cruel and violent cause other people didn’t like certain people so they just kill them and their children and still now we have violence and cruelty with wars and people that hate each other.
In the year 2012- 2013, though several 3.1 public high school students or 81 percent, graduated on time (Public High School Graduation Rates), how many students in that number truly gain the full education. Nowadays, education is necessary, which becomes a controversial issue between parents and the school. Either Charter or Public school encourages the development or improvement of the educational system to our young, beloved children. There are further charters out there which children can stay home, however, still learn enormous things. “Lottery” documentary film is about the controversy between public and charter schools, which tells the stories of four families who tried to find a better educational
“The Lottery” is a story written by Shirley Jackson. By looking at the title you may think about money prize. In this story takes the readers expectation to another level. By the two words of the title there is no way the reader did not get hook to reading this story. In “The Lottery” Shirley Jackson, uses symbolism, irony, and imagery.
The Lottery is one of the American’s most famous short stories, written by the novelist and nonfiction writer Shirley Jackson (1919–1965), published in June 26th of 1948 by The New Yorker for the first time. This story happens in a small town countryside where social and economic aspects were based on Tradition. Shirley “oversee the human behavior” (Votteler, 248) and its “capacity for evil within a contemporary setting” (Cromie,180), and “the danger of the ritualized behavior” (Cromie,180); therefore, what I believe to be the most important, the need to question our traditions specially when it include “victimization of an individual” (Votteler, 248) for social benefit.
Study Commission showed “ that low and moderate income lottery taxpayers spend more on the lottery than do middle income taxpayers” (Analysis 3,4). In addition, this study revealed that education levels do affect how much a person spends on the lottery. The biggest spenders were
Lottery" was written shortly after World War II, however it is unknown as to when