Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of regulatory affairs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of regulatory affairs
Should government prevent major mergers of corporations that could potential control a large percentage of market share within its industry?
A merger is a combination of two corporations, where one corporation is completely absorbed by another corporation. The smaller corporation loses its identity and becomes part of the bigger corporations which retains its identity. Mergers are regulated by federal and state laws, and the regulation is based on the concern that mergers inevitably eliminates competition between the merging firms. The fear that mergers reduces competition has meant that the government scrutinizes proposed mergers. The following paragraphs explain briefly the merits and demerits of merging corporations.
Merger Leads
…show more content…
Also, if there are less firms in the market it may be easier to conspire and increase prices. This will lead to allocative inefficiency because prices will be greater than marginal cost. Other possible disadvantages include firms that make more supernormal profits, may be able to use this for predatory pricing and force new firms or smaller firms out of business. Also, if firms get too big they may suffer from diseconomies of scale leading to more inefficiency. The new firm may be able to use its monopoly power to pay suppliers less and therefore make more profits.
A merger may lead to job losses. If the job losses lead to greater efficiency then the economy will benefit in the long run, and if firms get to big, they may suffer from diseconomies of scale. Diseconomies of scale come about when a business or organization becomes so big, or so inefficient, that the cost-per-unit of its products and services starts to rise. A business can only grow so much before the benefits of growth begin to create additional costs and resources, because any additional output becomes more expensive. Complexities take over and bureaucracies dominate, leading to more
…show more content…
Competition and Market Power: A Primer, July 2005, www.econoclass.com/imperfectcompetition.html.
Renaud, Rob. “Why do companies merge with or acquire other companies?” Investopedia, 30 May 2017, www.investopedia.com/ask/answer/60/mareasons.asp#ixxzz4yoPeJEnB.
Schumpter. “Not the American way.” The Economist, The Economist Newspaper, 14 Aug. 2013, www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/08/government-opposes-big-airline-merger.
Staff, Investopedia. “Merger.” Investopedia, 18 Dec. 2014, www.investopedia.com/terms/m/merger.asp#ixzz4yZIWUfC0.
Tejvan. “Essay: When, if ever should a govt intervene to prevent a merher or takeover? Justify your reasoning. (30).” Economics Help, 2016, www.economicshelp.org/microessays/essays/when-prevent-merger/.
Microeconomics 24th edition by Campbell McConnell Stanley Brue and Sean Flynn,
Such as the case of two major players in the entertainment community of Sirius and XM who both have a majority of the marketplace in the satellite radio business and their talks of consolidating both businesses into one. This article on Ars Technica (Lasar, 2008) expands on the idea that these corporate entities should not be allowed to merge into one corporation, but above that should also be fined for even considering the idea in back rooms and locked boardrooms. Using the model case of the Sherman Anti-Trust act in Standard Oil, the corporation floated around having anywhere between eighty five percent and ninety five percent. With those numbers, XM and Sirius would fall into the numerical category of filling that condition of a monopoly.
When these large companies have too much power, they are able to completely run the market based on their own agendas. Should smaller companies still exist, the larger firms are able to lower prices and absorb the loss from it where the other company would inevitably fail to compete with the low prices of the firm. Firms like Carnegie Steel and Standard Oil rightfully took advantage of the US free market at the time, but once word of their predatory practices became publically known, these companies received penalties from the federal government.
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate clinical and managerial interventions.
Others added that monopolies produce less output and charge a higher price than a purely competitive environment. The monopolist sets the marginal revenue equal to marginal cost and output is therefore smaller. In monopolies, profits can persist indefinitely, because high barriers to entry prevent new firms from taking part in the
It is proper to present a business definition of merger as it found on legal reference with the ultimate goal in the pursuing of an explanation on which this paper intents to present. A merger in accordance with the textbook is legally defined as a contractual and statuary process in which the (surviving corporation) acquires all the assets and liabilities of another corporation (the merged corporation). The definition go even farther to involve and clarify about what happen to shares by explaining the following; “the shareholders of the merged corporation either are paid for their share or receive the shares of the surviving corporation”. But in simple terms is my attempt to define as the product or birth of a corporation on which typically extends its operation by combining with another corporation. So from two on existence corporations in the process it gets absorbed into becomes one entity. The legal definition also implied more than meet the eye. The terms contractual and statuary, it implied a process on which contracts and statuary measures emerge as measures to regulate, standardized, governing or simply at times may complicate whole process. These terms provide an explicit umbrella and it becomes as part of the agreement formulating or promoting a case for contracts to be precedent, enforced or regulated in a now or in the future under a court of law under the Contract Business Law Statue of Practice. As for what happens to the shares of the involved corporations no more explanation is needed as the already actions mentioned clearly stated of the expectations of a merge’s share involvement.
Conglomerate mergers result in joining of firms which compete in different product markets, and which are situated at different production stages of the same or similar products. That is to say, neither the products nor the inputs of these merging firms are the same. Conglomerate mergers result in significant advantages gained by the merging firms since they are the fastest means of entry into different activity fields in the shortest possible time span. Moreover, they reduce the financial risks by “not putting all the eggs in one basket” (Gaughan, 2007). There are three types of conglomerate mergers:
In addition to the pro-competitive economic effect some firms also experience what is known as a post-merger which is basically an incentive for a firm to raise downstream competitor costs by raising upstream market costs. Hence the increased price pressures the previously established downstream prices which cause conflict.
That brings a great challenge to succeed, and lets the leadership work in new and innovative ways to make such a merger successful. McClelland’s theory states, in regards to the need for achievement, that people strive “To excel one’s self.to rival and surpass others. to increase self-regard by the successful exercise of talent” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010, p. 215). By this definition, the merger would motivate leadership to excel in the face of a challenge, and to increase their professional self-regard in their success in doing so. On an individual level, you are asking the performers and employees to recognize both economic and social climates, and to come together in action to save both their careers, as well as their passion for life....
As the business, people put it, to maximize the wealth of shareholders (Peavler, 2016). This could be done by pursuing more of an immediate reason that will realize the shareholders wealth maximization goal. However, this main reason may fail to be realized as most mergers depict negative results.
When two companies decide to combine forces and become one bigger, richer mega company, it is called merging. This process forms a new company, combining the money and ideas of what used to be two different entities into one. This, however, is not the only thing that results from merging two different companies, and since we will be discussing the merging of two companies in the pharmaceutical industry, the impact will be incredible. Of course, the merging of two companies will not only have positive impacts but it will have many negative side effects as well. Furthermore, depending on the size of the merging companies and the goals of the people leading these companies there will always be contradictions according to the long-term goals or short-term goals depending on what both parties’ interests are. Our company, Verduga Inc. is contemplating to merge with Coronado-Salinas Inc., so before we rush into such a merger we must contemplate the positive and negative aspects of such a move. When it comes to mergers there are always many possible positive and negative impacts due to the effects of merging; these effects more widely impact the fields on research and development, on employment and management, stocks and shareholders, monopolization, and ingenuity.
Firms with market power or monopolies are often seen as detrimental for customers and economic welfare. According to the neoclassical theory, the market power of monopolies and oligopolies is potentially higher than that of firms in monopolistic or perfect competition since they have to face very limited competition, if any (Ferguson and Ferguson 1994). In monopolistic or perfect competition can make supernormal profits in the short term but eventually other firms will enter the market and offer alternative products that reduce the demand for the established firm’s products (Sloman et al., 2013 p. 177). Dissimilarly, this is not the case for dominant firms or monopolies; the lack of competition allows them to set prices and make supernormal profits increasing the perception that big companies are “bad” for consumers. As shown by the graphs in Figure 1 and 2, there are substantial differences in the competitive and monopoly markets. In a competitive environment, the equilibrium is reached where demand meets supply. In a monopolistic market, thanks to the establishment of higher prices and the production of lower quantities, monopolies or dominant firms make supernormal profits; additionally, there is a deadweight loss and some consumers who were willing to pay lower prices wil...
Conflict seems inevitable when trying to merge two companies. Conflict is described as the “Process which begins when one party perceives that the other has frustrated or is about to frustrate, some concern of his” (Kumar, 2009). Synergon’s CEO uses a “take no prisoners” approach and would fire most of the management team within 12 months of taking over a company using an approach they call neutron bombing. In cases where both companies are successful, like in the case of Synergon Capital and Beauchamp, you add even more conflict. The managers of Beauchamp are used to operating in a positive way that has produced profits for the company and you add Nick Cunningham a manager of Synergon who is used to restructure management in newly acquired poorly run companies; something has to give to make it successful.
Mergers mean two or more companies combining together to form one business or firm. There are six different types of mergers: Horizontal, Vertical, Conglomerate, Market extension, Product Extension and Diversified activity.
The issue is revealing the coalescing of the industry as major corporations continue to buy one another. Concerned, the US Department of Justice has taken the move block AT&T's Time Warner merger based on anti-trust concerns. The feds did something similar when the wireless carrier attempted to buy T-Mobile several years ago. That proved to be a very expensive misstep on AT&Ts part.
Chaurasiya, K. and Profile, V. 2010. Advantages and disadvantages of acquisition | business management strategy. [online] Available at: http://businessofaccouting.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/advantages-and-disadvantages-of.html [Accessed: 8 Mar 2014].