Essay On Political Community

997 Words2 Pages

The rational/market community and the political community differ in that the market community is made up of individuals who are only looking out for their own self-interest when it benefits their family, friends or themselves. Individuals try to acquire goods and services for the least possible price while trying to sell their own goods for as much as the market will allow. Competition and productivity are the driving forces for individuals in the market and are key components in the overall economic success of society. In the market, there are defined goals that are based on what best serves the self-interest of the individual in the marketplace.

In contrast, the political community is a group of individuals concerned with the collective needs of the community and its well-being. The goals of the community must be achieved by consensus. In the political community there is a deep concern for public interest and the collective will of the people. They are made up of members whose membership is predetermined by a set of guidelines. These guidelines determine roles of the members and what they can and cannot do. There could be a number of determining factors such as citizenship, political party affiliations and religious affiliations. Within this community, economic, political and social rights are defined.

Public interest in the political community involves putting your own self-interests aside for the common good of the community, unless individual interests are held in common with a majority of the community. These interests could include the need for good schools, a higher standard of living or lower taxes. The political community is concerned with the governance of their communities. There is an emphasis on how important it i...

... middle of paper ...

... environmental crisis, exchanges in the political community have the ability to have harmful effects on those not involved in the exchanges.

The theory of the rationality model is a concept where rational decision making is done by choosing alternatives for achieving one’s goals. In the rational model it is very important for politicians to explicitly have their goals in mind. These goals are used as a guideline for evaluating alternative proposals for policies. The model determines whether the proposals are worthy of implementing by analyzing likely outcomes. The model is more for analysis and for constructing a list of alternatives by using a technique called issue framing. All alternatives identified have an opportunity to be chosen unless the analysis proves otherwise. Ultimately, the desired course of action chosen would have to provide the greatest alternative

Open Document