Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference between samurai and knights
Difference between samurai and knights
Difference between samurai and knights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference between samurai and knights
Ninjas and samurais were Japan’s most feared warriors. Samurais and ninjas had different backgrounds and roots, they had their own style of combat and tactics, they used different weapons, they had different customs and rituals, and finally they were considered good or evil. Even thought they were very different they had some similarities because they were both warriors that developed unique fighting techniques to combat against enemies. Both ninjas and samurais are viewed as incredible warriors and everyone knows the basics, but many people don’t know that they are very different.
In ancient Japan a ninja was like todays spies, they were considered mysterious assassins. The ninja was a special agent whose job was to commit assassinations, infiltrate organizations, spy on others, and sabotage enemies. Ninjas are believed to have started around the 15th century as farmers and low class citizens. Eventually they developed a reputation around the Sengoku period for getting things done with stealth and efficiency. Ninjas started out by trying to gain more rights and frustrate powerful and wealthy people in feudal Japan. Ninjas worked for pretty much anyone that was willing to pay them. On the other hand samurais were noble and served the wealthy in feudal Japan. They were considered “elite warriors” (Samurai) that fought for honor and dignity. Around the 15th century all the different parts of Japan were are war with each other, and that is when samurais began to emerge.
Ninjas and samurai developed different styles of fighting even though they were around the same time period and place. Ninjas fought with a style that is now called ninjutsu whereas samurais developed jiu-jitsu. “Ninjutsu is the martial art, strategy, andtactics of ...
... middle of paper ...
...ecause they were involved in espionage, assassinations, and many things that were believed to be immoral. But even though they were perceived as evil, that was their obligation. They did what many people couldn’t and they had good reasons and intentions. Even though they were perceived as vile, ninjas did also contain good characteristics and therefore aren’t regarded as completely evil.
Ninjas and samurais were the two most recognizable and feared warriors in ancient Japan. They each developed different styles of fighting in order to achieve their goals. Ninjas and samurais came from different roots and backgrounds. They had a different arsenal of weapons that they used in combat and they trained and fought differently. They performed different rituals such as kuji-kiri and kanabo for honor or strength. And finally they were both perceived as either good or evil.
Knights and samurai have a lot in common. For example, they both follow a code and protect land. Although they are very similar, there are a lot of things that set them apart. Samurai had a different social status, had different weapons, and expectations. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the knights and this can be seen in their honor code, training, and armor.
The question was, who would win in a battle? A samurai? Or a knight? Of Course they both have their advantages and disadvantages but they also both have things in common that they can't do. A samurai warrior was a member of a powerful japanese military. On the other hand a knight warrior was a man of noble birth who after a couple stages, he would be raised to honorable military rank. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, beliefs, and their training techniques.
In the ancient Japanese culture, one great aspect was on how they emphasized on the intrinsic themes of loyalty and honor. They had fierce warriors known as samurai’s. A samurai was a traditional warrior who would protect and be loyal to their masters no matter what. They were known to be skilled soldiers, benevolent men, self-sacrifice, sense of shame, along with other major characteristics that embodied them as a samurai. While this class of warrior no longer exist today, the remembrance of a samurai is present in the minds of the characters in the novel, The Samurai’s Garden by Gail Tsukiyama. Tsukiyama does a fascinating piece of work by really elaborating and describing the great attributes that Matsu possess of a true samurai. In the
Document C states that trainees did physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline in school. They also studied Kendo, the moral code of the samurai, and Zen Buddhism. At age 14, the trainees officially became samurai in a ceremony called genpuku. On the other hand, knights began at age 4 or 5 with learning to ride a pony. Then, he would be sent to serve as a page to his father’s lord at age 7 or 8. There, he practiced with wooden and blunted swords. They also practiced with riding a horse and religious practice. At age 14, they could become a squire. Squires were obligated to fight other men, and help his master knight. If a squire had approval from the knight, they could become a knight themselves. This shows that knights and samurai had a similar training when they were younger. Document E proves that they had to live a similar lifestyle. Samurai followed bushido, which was the way of the samurai. Bushido said that they had to serve their master, be loyal to their friends, and devoting himself to his duty. Knights were obligated to follow chivalry, which said to do no bad deed, be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those who want it, and to be courteous to women. Therefore, samurai and knights both had similar
As learners of Europe and Japan, the question “ who would win a battle-a samurai or knight” is commonly kept in mind. A samurai and knight are similar in many ways. A samurai would mostly win the battle because they have better weapons, armor, and training. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons, armor, and training.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
...th wore helmets, armor, and worked for their leader, the shoguns or daimyo for the samurai, and for the knights their lord(s). Lastly, they both had peasants. The peasants both had to pay their taxes and had no power. Feudal Japan and Feudal Europe both had a certain social class order for power and how the people lived and worked.
In Japan there is the Yakuza, also known as the 'Japanese Mafia', which consists of up to 2,500 families. The three largest groups in the Yakuza are the Yamaguchi-gumi, Sumiyaoshi-kai, and Inagawa-kai. These three groups together have around 61,100 members, or seventy-three percent of the gangster population in Japan. These organizations have been in existence for about 300 years, and have their roots in the Tokugawa period (1600-1867), when Japan united under a central system of government (Abadinsky, 2010, 2007) . Some suggest that the Yakuza are the true heirs of the samurai, as the samurais formed structured groups of organized crime after the feudalism in Japan ended. T...
The samurai were the feudal warriors of ancient Japan. For thousands of years they upheld the code of bushido, the way of the warrior. Samurai have been around for thousands of years, but when did they disappear? Does the bushido code still exist to this day? Exploring the history of the samurai will give an explanation of what has happened to these formidable warriors.
The Samurai is often confused with the ninja but they are not the same thing. To be a samurai you had to be born into a Samurai family and were trained highly. The Samurai’s job was to serve the shog...
The term “Samurai” means those who serve. These mystical knights served many functions in Japanese society. During time of war, they were the masters of the battlefield. In peace they were the administrators and the aristocrats. As statesmen, soldiers, and businessmen, former samurai took the lead in building modern Japan.
The wielding of the sword was the art of the samurai. The making of a sword was an art equally as skilled and equally as precious, an art performed by the master sword makers of Japan. All samurai sought perfection with the sword, not only in the fighting techniques but in the weapons themselves. The samurai and the sword smith worked together to develop the exquisite, deadly Japanese sword.
These warriors have somethings in common but the differences are way greater than the similarities. In these far off places they have similar system with no similarities of warriors. Almost all of the details of the samurai and knights were complete opposites. If you were a warrior in the 1200’s how would you rather prepare? As a samurai or a
...e respect, honor, and loyalty make this difference for me, but there is something to be said about the comparison. I find that the knights are very efficient, great warriors, and are very similar to samurai’s in a lot of ways. They both wear armor, they both train from a young age, and both are taught about honor, loyalty, and respect; but samurais are taught more effectively in their training, and the Japanese concepts were better. So to answer the essential question of this essay, I would say that there is certainly a large amount of similarities between the two warriors, but if you would consider the samurai’s skills that are better, or enhanced; to be differences, than I would have to conclude with no. The ‘differences’, are far too great in my opinion to say that the similarities are so great that they are almost the same, because they are very different indeed.
There are many historical aspects of the Japanese, but the most interesting is the history of the Samurai. In Japans history war played a large role in the country. Controlling clans fought for parts of the land and overall control of the country. These clans were powerful families that resided in the country and who all wanted power and control of Japan for themselves. The families that would be in control were known as Shoguns. These shoguns would have warriors that fought for them if any of the other clan families would try to attack him in order to overthrow him and take his power from him. The Samurai followed a code that developed from Chinese beliefs when in battle. The Samurais code was known as the Bushido. This code was also known as “The Way of The Warrior” which was the main belief s...