Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How are knights and samurai different
Differences Between Samurai and Knights
Differences Between Samurai and Knights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How are knights and samurai different
What is your idea of an honorable warrior? Would they be more like the knight or samurai class? In two different places, Europe and Japan, they formed a similar system where warriors get paid land for fighting and protecting Lords and Daimyos. These warriors are called samurai and knights. Historian believed that the two warriors were similar but the truth is the are very different. For the code of honor the samurai believed in what is called bushido while knight believed in chivalry. Both warrior fought with armor of course, however samurai fought in leather wear and knights fought in full plate armor.
For starters, the codes of honor they had to follow were different. In document E by Yamaga Soko it states “Always be courteous and helpful
…show more content…
In document D, by Terry Bennett, it says “ In response, knights began to wear complete suits of plate armor constructed from metal.” This shows that knights had more protection against arrows and swords strikes. However this armor weight up to forty pounds and was very uncomfortable. “Bound into armored plates with with silk and leather cords,” stated Terry Bennett. Samurai armor was not metal but still very strong with the silk and leather cords. The only downfall is if it got wet the armor was ruined.
Critics will say the warriors are more similar than different. Although many people think they are very similar, this is not true though. There are many differences from the armor they wear, the code of honor, to everything they believe in is all different. Of course the both wore armor they both had codes of honor and beliefs; however all these things fell into two different categories when you get into detail.
These warriors have somethings in common but the differences are way greater than the similarities. In these far off places they have similar system with no similarities of warriors. Almost all of the details of the samurai and knights were complete opposites. If you were a warrior in the 1200’s how would you rather prepare? As a samurai or a
Even though knights and samurai have many similarities, they have their differences. Knight’s armor and weapons were different. The knights also had different training. Lastly, they followed different codes. The little differences that set knights and samurai apart give knights an advantage in a one on one
While a lot of the analysis in the aforementioned paragraphs is Athenian based, the honor that is bestowed upon warriors is best seen through the Spartan society. Spartan’s were heavily military based and used all efforts to create warriors that would serve the polis. Absolutely everything in their society was based off this idea. Women were appreciated because they bore the sons that would become warriors, and sons were sent off at seven to begin their warrior training. Men who carried out their duty well were rewarded within the society and held an elevated status. Spartan’s held that ideal that to,“know that it is good for the city-state and the whole people when a man takes his place in the front row of warriors and stands his ground without flinching.” The wanted to create the strongest warrior possible and the only way to incentivize that was through honor. Honor was made an attainable goal for these warriors and something that they had been conditioned to want to strive for. Greek people also honored the gods though as their first and foremost responsibility. They needed to do right by these deities in order to be successful in their lives. Actions such as questioning their existence, or belief were looked down upon and in some cases even punished. The idea of honor was reinforced throughout their policies, lawmaking abilities and how they treated one another. Consequently, this would eventually lead to competing tensions between Athens and Sparta resulting the Peloponnesian War. However, honor is intrinsic to both of their ideals and integral to the values the Greek society
The question was, who would win in a battle? A samurai? Or a knight? Of Course they both have their advantages and disadvantages but they also both have things in common that they can't do. A samurai warrior was a member of a powerful japanese military. On the other hand a knight warrior was a man of noble birth who after a couple stages, he would be raised to honorable military rank. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, beliefs, and their training techniques.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
...n in her book “WEAPONS”, “Gold plating, or gilding, was sometimes used to embellish borders or bands of decorations and, in some cases, entire armors.” By the 15th century, knights were protecting themselves with full suits of plate armor” (Byam 41). His armor usually represented his class or authority. Each knight’s coat of arms had a different personality ranging from different helmets to different metals to different emblems.
The Samurai is often confused with the ninja but they are not the same thing. To be a samurai you had to be born into a Samurai family and were trained highly. The Samurai’s job was to serve the shog...
Samurai and ninjas have long been a part of what has made Japanese culture unique. These two warriors that lived during ancient Japan may seem like the same thing to most people, but in reality there are a number of differences between them such as: weapons, clothing, orgin, jobs, beliefs etc.
Honor was used as evidence or a symbol of distinction in this culture. The people remained the right to preserve their good name. This code that they emphasize in their country is denominated as the bushido. An example of applying this system to their lives is in the manner of how they conform to their classes. Each person received and exalted title or rank. A samurai warrior, for instance, could not surpass the law by marrying "a [mere] peasant girl" without the permission of his daimyo. In contrast, the samurai would ask the parents for her hand in marriage and they would respond with gratitude. The warrior is "a person of too a degree for [them] to consider refusing the honor of [his] request."
The social order and how the societies were structured were very complex compared to the other, but Samurais and Knights description on a social pyramid are practically the same. The social pyramid shown in Document A of “Samurai And Knights: Were the Similarities Greater Than the Differences?”, the description of samurai and knights are “ Samurai: Warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the daimyos for land or regular payment.”, And “ Knights: Warriors who owed loyalty and military service to lord for land.”. This shows a similarity because the quotes tell us that besides the samurai also possibly receiving money as payment, they both serve loyalty to their higher ups and military service for land. Also, on the social pyramid in Document A, both the knight and samurai class are place in the middle of the pyramid. What that means is they shared the same social status between the two countries. This is one main similarity the knight and samurai
In the 13th century, knights were held to a high standard in society; not only because of their military skills and fighting abilities, but because of their gentlemanly behavior and activities in the community. The church created a code of manners (according to Barbara W. Tuchman) that helped put the knights in favor in the church as well as put the knight's prowess with a blade to use. In the excerpt of Barbara W. Tuchman's "A Distant Mirror", she goes in depth about the code of manners and behaviors that the knights of the 13th century had to follow to be held honorable at that time. Knights in the 1300's were given a code of manners that they went by to be the best of a Gentleman, Lovers, Fighters, and to be a great man in total.
The clothes worn with a knight’s suit of armor gave both comfort and protection to the knight. The parts of a medieval knight's suit of armor were a complex series of garments, chain mail and iron plate. The pieces of a knight’s suit of armor covered the most exposed parts of a knight's body. Knights would wear under clothes consisted of a linen under-shirt and linen under-pants, woolen stockings covered the legs. A knight's underclothes were important. It prevented the armor from chafing the knight’s skin. A padded garment known by various names such as aketon, consisted of a quilted coat which was either sewn or stuffed with linen or even grass. This served as padding for additional armor worn over the top.
In both Japan and Europe, women had few rights, however they had more in Japan than in Europe. In Japan, women were expected to be strong like the men because they had to do jobs that men normally would do while the men were fighting. In Europe, the women were seen as needing to be protected. The social structures were similar in that both had a code for the warriors/knights to follow. In Japan, it was called Bushido, but in Europe, it was called Chivalry. The class rankings differed; peasants in Europe were at the bottom of society, but peasants in Japan were above the merchants because the peasant did the actual
Samurai or “Bushi” were the greatest warriors of pre-modern Japan. They became the highest-ranking social class of the Edo period, 1603 – 1867 (Japan-Guide, 2015). Their main forms of weaponry were bows, spears and guns. Their most important and most common was a sword. Samurai lived by the Bushido code meaning they had a great loyalty to their master, the Daimyo. They presented themselves with self-discipline, respect and ethical behaviour. The Bushido code was so strict, that the Samurai were prepared to commit sepuku (suicide) if they broke any of the sacred rules. They are still considered as Historical Heroes and are still a monumental part of Japan’s history and identity.
...e respect, honor, and loyalty make this difference for me, but there is something to be said about the comparison. I find that the knights are very efficient, great warriors, and are very similar to samurai’s in a lot of ways. They both wear armor, they both train from a young age, and both are taught about honor, loyalty, and respect; but samurais are taught more effectively in their training, and the Japanese concepts were better. So to answer the essential question of this essay, I would say that there is certainly a large amount of similarities between the two warriors, but if you would consider the samurai’s skills that are better, or enhanced; to be differences, than I would have to conclude with no. The ‘differences’, are far too great in my opinion to say that the similarities are so great that they are almost the same, because they are very different indeed.