Essay On Multi Party System

493 Words1 Page

There are extreme differences between a two-party system and a multi-party system. A two-party system, for example America, is a state in which just two parties dominate. Even though many other parties do exist, they have no political importance. Americas obvious two parties are Republicans and Democrats. In this system the electorate gives its votes largely to only the republican or democratic parties and one or the other party can win a majority in the legislature. A rotation of power is also expected in this system. In a multi-party system there are multiple political parties capable of taking charge of the government, the parties tend to be separate and they also tend to represent either different ends of the political spectrum or specific issues relevant to the country in question. The United States of America is better off with a two-party system due to the fact that it is a quicker system, moderates radical views, and presents voters with a simpler choice.
In a multi-party system the government would come up with more ideas per issue, however all these new ideas would take way longer to achieve. Even though a multi-party system is more representative of their citizens due to the vast amount of political …show more content…

As stated earlier, both parties shift over time. This means for the parties to get re-elected they have to pick up on different combinations of current issues, thus follow public opinion. Since the two-party system follows the majority in public opinion, the multi party system inevitably sometimes leads to the minority rule over the majority. Even parties with extremely radical views have a chance to be elected to power. This could result in chaotic and disastrous changes. The approach of a two-party system doesn’t allow this possibility to happen, it moderates political ideologies and protects the “majority from the

Open Document