Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advertising of junk food should be banned
Advertising of junk food should be banned
Advertising of junk food should be banned
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advertising of junk food should be banned
Obesity has been a major predicament in the American society. The government has been trying to find ways in reducing the percentage of those who are obese.However many citizens disagree with the involvement of the government in our food diets. Naturally there will still be government codifications on our nutrition although there should not be because those regulations such as posting calories, banning certain foods and drinks and usage of posters is not beneficial.
Posting calories is a government law required but all restaurant chains in the nation. labeling food items to help reduce obesity isn't effective because the preponderance of Americans will not be concerned to reading the information posted on food items."critics of the new law also contend that there is little evidence to show that menu labeling leads people to eat better"(Rosenbloom). Even if the supporters of the legislation say it's the right for us to
…show more content…
know what we are eating there are definitely a million other ways of finding out what we are putting into our mouth's. If the government knows we are going to buy the food whether or not it has posted calories or make us gain weight why bother waste their time? Often most labels on foods are too small and cost the government money and time. All in all, the government should stop the procedure of insertion of calories, it just is not necessary. Another way the government has been aggravating to intrude into our private decision-making of foods we eat to stop the growth of obesity is by banning sugary drinks.
New York City being the first to follow this ridiculous law banned the sale of sugary beverages larger than sixteen ounces. Yet they still allow the purchase of multiple sodas, what is the point! What I do not understand and most likely every other American is the fact the only sugary drinks are being executed as a health issue other than all the other factors causing obesity as well. "and if sugared beverages are being targeted why not take stronger measures against other sources of sugar such as candy and other sweets?" (Park). by saying this author of the article is saying the government isn't taking commodious stands against obesity. If they want to be involved in our diets, the government needs to ban all unhealthy food items and if not then to just stay out of it. People have the ability to make their own decisions based on their diets not have someone else determine
that. Have you ever walked downtown at night or been in a car and saw a poster or sign that caught your eye of obesity? well that is the government's approach to violate our food diets. By making posters the government sees this as a way in reducing obesity nonetheless they are emaciating their time and money. Long graphic used to do so is of an old man saying " I want you... To slim down!" (Pletcher).He points to an overweight man wearing a US obesity shirt and eating an ice cream as large as his stomach. Basically the graphic tries to impose to the fact that even if the government is telling us to do something the citizens will still not listen. Know matter what the jurisdiction tries to do Americans will not have any care to stop obesity so why should the government ? Our society and our food choices do not need to be controlled by the government regulations. The government has always found ways such as labeling food items banning foods and drinks and posters to intervene into our food diets. By making restaurants post calories on retail items they think it'll stop the growth of obesity. besides that they banned sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces because it seems to be the only cause of obesity when there are plenty more. Furthermore the government has made posters to show how we are obese instead of encouraging weight loss. Hopefully in the future we can make a stand against food regulations and be able to eat what we want without the involvement of the big guy.
Radley Balko, The author of the essay “What You Eat is Your Business”, would agree that in order to stop obesity, we must turn this public problem around and make it everyone’s individual responsibility. Instead of inflicting the importance of personal ownership, government officials, politicians and congress make obesity a public problem by prohibiting junk food in school vending machines, federal funding for new bike trails and sidewalks, and restrictive food marketing to children. Overall I agree that this manipulation of food options is not the proper way to fight obesity, however, I think that government should inform people about the food they are eating because then they have no excuses for not taking responsibility of the actions.
The New York Soda Ban is a step in the wrong direction and efforts should be put towards making life better, rather than focusing on a movement that will have little to no effect. Realize that I am not stating the soda should be drank, because even I know that soda is harmful towards the body and is one of the leading causes of obesity. However, I believe that the soda ban will have little effect and that time and money should be applied somewhere where the act would have an effect of making life better. The reason I do not believe this ban will do as much good as stated, is because the ban is flawed. This brings me to my first point, which is, one cup of boysenberry juice has 256 grams of sugar, equaling to 225 calories. One cup of Cola only
Knowledge is power, the more the consumer knows about the food they are eating the healthier choices they’ll make. For instance, in McDonald’s Grilled Honey Mustard Snack Wrap and a small French fry, from McDonald’s is around $6.00 and contains 420 calories 24g of fat (6.0g saturated).If you were to compare that to a Big Mac meals that comes with medium size fries and coke soda would be about 980 calories the Snack Wrap would be a healthier alternative and it would be about the same price $6.00. When fast food chains put labels on their food like McDonald’s consumers can’t
Prepared foods aren’t covered under Food and Drug Administration labeling laws” (Zinczenko, 242). Although true, we do not need warning labels on unhealthy foods. Every single child in America is brought up in elementary school systems that have nutritional based classes. These children know from a young age that fast food is not good for you. They do not need a label to tell them something that they already know. Also, even if a label was to be put on these products, it would not change anything. People go into these places with the intent to eat and one label will not ultimately make them leave and go drive somewhere else since they are already at that
Obesity is a rising problem in the United States. With obesity rates on the rise something must be done to prevent this massive issue. There are ways to help including educating at young ages, improving nutrition facts at restaurants, and providing more space for citizens to get physically active.
Best selling author of Eat This, Not That, David Zinczenko’s article “Don’t Blame the Eater,” blames the fast food industry for the growing rate of obesity in the United States. Zinczenko’s main idea is that fast food companies should have warning labels on all the food they supply. Zinczenko believes that since health labels are put on tobacco and preserved food product, fast food industries should put labels on today’s fast food. Discussions about the availability of fast food compared to healthier alternative were brought up as well. Zinczenko states that when looked at, a salad from a fast food restaurant could add up to half of someone’s daily calories (155). He believes that because of fast food, Americans are having more health risks, which includes an insane rise in diabetes. Some agree with Zinczenko saying fast food companies should be the ones responsible to show people the truth about their foods. On the other hand Radley Balko, a columnist for FoxNews.com, states that fast-food consumption ...
Obesity has continued to grow and affect not only the lives of the individual with obesity and their families but also the society around them. We have learned that from the growth of obesity money problems arise and the price of health care has risen. I believe that because of this problem nutrition labels are an important part of food for consumers. People should be watching what they eat if necessary and nutrition labels should be trustworthy and looked at wisely. Since this is important I feel that the government should have a say to what goes on the labels and making sure that they are informative to the American society. The FDA, which is the US Food and Drug Administration, are part of the US government Department of Food and Health. Their goal and slogan is “Protecting and Promoting Your Health.” The FDA has a very important role in nutrition labels and the protection of helping people become aware of what they are eating. Since their role is important the government should definitely continue to regulate what goes on the labels and how they can continue to help bene...
The government must have a say in our diets. Because the issues of obesity have already reached national scales, because the costs of obesity and related health issues have gone far beyond reasonable limits, and because fighting nutritional issues is impossible without fighting poverty and other social issues, the government should control the range and the amount of available foods. The cost of healthier foods should decrease. The access to harmful foods should be limited. In this way, the government will be able to initiate a major shift in nutritional behaviors and attitudes in society.
For consumers who take their health into consideration when eating, calorie postings on menus will greatly impact their decision when making a food selection. (Diets in Review) The Food and Drug Administration has finalized menu labeling rules that will require calorie information to be listed on menus and menu boards in chain restaurants. The rules can also apply to vending machines and similar retail food establishments. Alarmingly, Americans eat and drink almost one –third of their calories away from their residence. If calorie information is given directly to consumers at restaurants, a huge change could be made in the lives of many Americans, by simply choosing to eat healthier. The menu labeling rule will apply to chain restaurants that
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity now ranks as the 10th most important health problem in the world (“Obesity Seen as a Global Problem”). Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and tripled in adolescents in the past 30 years. Centers for Disease Control and Protection estimates that obesity contributed to the deaths of 112,000 Americans in 2000 (“Obesity in the U.S. Fast”). It is estimated that annual medical care cost of obesity are as high as $147 billion (“Obesity in the U.S. Fast”). Government-provided food stamps are often expended on junk or fast food, because it tends to be less expensive than fresh or cook food. Governments fund producers of meat and dairy products to keep prices low. For now, governments are taking a smarter and more productive approach through regulation, and by working with manufacturers.
Daily, millions of people are perusing the grocery store, buying food for their families, completely unaware of what they are purchasing. A study on consumer research regarding food labels by the FDA found only a small percentage of people actually read the food labels and understand what they mean apart from only the calories and fat; ingredients are another story. “According to a study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, about 61.5 percent reported using the nutrition facts panel when deciding to purchase food. Fewer people paid attention to the list of ingredients” (CNN Health). The FDA is aware that labeling could help reverse the acceleration we are seeing in heart diseases and obesity, but labeling does not help people to read the ingredients if they do not understand pseudonyms, and vitamins. “The surveys also revealed frequent misunderstanding of the meaning of the daily/value column that shows how each nutrient fits into a healthy diet, “(American journal Nutrition, WEB). Many different harmful ingredients are secretly hidden in labels and people skimming ov...
In Read all about it: Calorie counts are everywhere, but do we care? the author, Los Angeles Times and Newsela Staff includes the main idea that being required to include calorie counts on menus in restaurants or other eateries, does not influence customers choices on what they order, as much as the food being served to the consumers. In Calorie counts are everywhere, but do we care?, by Los Angeles Times adapted by Newsela Staff, researchers found in 2012 to 2014 restaurants reduced calorie counts in the food they serve after posting the calorie counts on their own menus because of new laws added. The author states, “The study suggests the help comes from restaurants’ changing what they serve, instead of diners "changing their behavior.” (Los
Is more government regulation needed to stop the epidemic of obesity? The first government recommendation was from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 1917 when they released a pamphlet, How to Select Foods. This pamphlet divided foods into five groups. During 1956 President Dwight D. Eisenhower created the Presidents Council on Youth Fitness due to “concern about the physical fitness of America’s children compared with their European counterparts” (ProQuest Staff). Since the introduction of the pamphlet How to Select Foods the government has adapted the guidelines five times. And has created several regulations including rules requiring manufactures to list transfats on the nutrition facts on packaging and creating the Presidents Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. Since the creation of the first recommendations and regulations the average weight of Americans has increased. Is government regulation working?
It has been around 20 years since the Food and Drug Administration has brought up the idea of making significant changes to our current nutrition labels. Portion sizes have changed and increased over the years and there is now a need to recognize what a typical portion for the average American is, especially with obesity rates increasing. Having the FDA update nutrition labels with a larger calorie content font, and increased serving size number is a change that needs to be made. The updated label differences from current would be, serving size redesign, a more prominent calorie count, calories from fat line removed, information about added sugars, Vitamin C and potassium
Society should consider the physical and emotional problems of obesity in our nation. “Obesity is defined as an excess proportion of total body fat (Mayo Clinic).” American society has become increasingly obese, “characterized by environments that promote increased food intake, unhealthy foods, and physical inactivity (cdcinfo@cdc.gov).” Our nation increasingly has become consumers of a fast food diet. It is so simple to just pick up food on the go and not deal with the hassle of cooking and cleaning up afterwards. What are nation needs to acknowledge is the health risks they will obtain if they do not acquire a healthy life style.