Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A conclusionary essay on the life of king leopold of belgium
Imperialism in congo
Imperialism in congo
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
King Leopold II of Belgium is known in history for his quest for African colonies and all of the atrocities he caused. Leopold II came to power in when he became King in 1865. When he became King, he was focused on mainly money and territory. King Leopold viewed the Congo as his own personal property, he first claimed the Congo in 1884 during the Berlin Conference, with the Congo Free State being declared in the following year. This became widely known as the European Scramble for Africa. The atrocities that Leopold caused were first exposed by American and British writers amd campaigners. With this publicity spreading, it eventually caused Leopold to hand over the country. In Adam Hochschild’s book, “King Leopold’s Ghost” reveals Leopold’s …show more content…
evil desire for money and trying to maximize his profits from rubber and ivory. For quite a while, most of the European population falsely believed that King Leopold spent his large fortune on helping develop public works in the Congo and making an effort to stop slavery in East Africa. King Leopold convinced explorers, politicians, as well as newspapers that he planned to help Africans, when actually, his goal was to find imperial territory for himself. In 1876, Leopold held a Geographical Conference in Central Africa, where he invited famous explorers to talk about ending the slave trade in East Africa and try to spread European civilization throughout these territories. At the conference, he tried to persuade the explorers by making his trying to make his idea sound fascinating and challenging, “To open to civilization the only part of our globe which it has not yet penetrated, to pierce the darkness which hangs over entire peoples, is, I dare say, a crusade worthy of this century of progress” (Hochschild 44). Throughout the reign of terror under King Leopold II, the population of COngo was dramatically reduced into half, with as many as 8 million Africans losing their lives. Many were beaten or whipped to death for not reaching their expected resources amount of ivory and rubber. Some of the Africans were even worked to death, being forced into labor that resembled slavery in many ways. Diseases affected many of the Africans, killing a good portion of them, with it spreading throughout the Congo by Europeans. Lastly, many Africans in the Congo died from famine. King Leopold's cruel army would destroy crops and take the villagers’ food, leaving the citizens of these villages with next to nothing. For centuries, African slave dealers had raided Congo, in attempts to sell their citizens to American and European captains who sailed Africa's west coast, as well as to traders who took slaves to the Arab world from the continent's east coast. The European colonization of Africa was can be known as one of the greatest conquests in human history. By 1910 almost entirely of Africa had become European colonies or land, like South Africa, and was controlled by white European settlers. The scramble for Africa started from 1800’s to the start of the First World War in 1914. Before the 19th century, most of the world did not know of the horrid things that were happening in Africa. Leopold was able to colonize Congo for its resources during the Scramble for Africa through forced labor. Africa provided large areas of lands under that were under the control of the Europeans. Colonies were formed and forced labor was enforced to bring land and labor together. The main reason of forced labor was to get raw materials, ivory and rubber, for processing in European industries. Leopold collected public support from citizens at home by publicly announcing his purpose to Christianize and modernize the Congolese population, while at the same time, he was planning on forcing men, women, and children into labor to attain ivory and rubber for business purposes. With what became known as the "rubber terror" spreading throughout the Congolese rainforest, Adam Hochschild states that, entire villages were wiped out with there being hundreds of dead bodies that were left in rivers and lakes. These soldiers kept hands cut off the dead bodies as evidence for white commanders to show how many people had been killed. In 1890, an African-American named George Washington Williams discovered for himself the true nature of Leopold's Congo.
George Washington Williams was a former soldier graduated from Howard University,with a degree in theology. Williams was also was a newspaper writer, as well as a former politician and historian (Hochschild, 102-105). After George Washington Williams was introduced to Henry Shelton Sanford during his lobbying campaign in Washington, Williams became very interested with the Congo and saw an open opportunity for African-Americans (Hochschild, 105). He met with Leopold for an interview, where he was as enthralled by the king and his Godly mission in Africa, just like many others who had met with the King before (Hochschild, 106). While attempting to recruit young, black Americans for work in the Congo, he was faced with questions regarding life …show more content…
there. Edmund Dene Morel was a clerk out of Liverpool. Edmund’s job as a clerk was to supervise the unloading and reloading of the ships that came through Belgium and as he was doing this he came to notice the massive amounts of rubber and ivory that were being taken to Belgium, but there being next to nothing being exchanged for them to Africa. In Hochschild's book he states, “"There is no trade going on here. Little or nothing is being exchanged for the rubber and ivory…with almost no goods being sent to Africa to pay for them, he realizes that there can be only one explanation for their source: slave labor" (Hochschild 2). Once Edmund Dene Morel came to learn this, he decided to act upon it. He began to dedicate his life to try and stop slavery in the Congo. Within in this time he wrote three books on the matter, as well as other informational resources. He would travel all around Britain too, in attempts to spread awareness of the horrid things going on in the Congo. Morel was able to also attain allies to help him and create a larger platform to protest against slavery in the Congo.. Adam Hochschild’s book, “King Leopold’s Ghost” is much more than just all of the atrocities King Leopold caused, but could also be viewed as one of the first Human Rights Movement.
George Washington Williams, the first and perhaps bravest campaigner, initially sounded the alarm, but he was ignored largely because he was African American. Edmund Dene Morel was able to have more success in raising awareness for the Congo when he noticed an imbalance in trade coming in and out of Belgium. As Hochschild shows, not only was Leopold II a monster for what he did in the Congo, but in other areas and with other people of his life (including his wife, his daughters, and virtually everyone he encountered other than, perhaps, his mistress Caroline Lacroix, younger than him by forty-eight years) he was thoroughly amoral and supremely egocentric. He was one of the most reprehensible people of
history.
The book mainly chronicles the efforts of King Leopold II of Belgium which is to make the Congo into a colonial empire. During the period that the European powers were carving up Africa, King Leopold II of Belgium seized for himself the vast and mostly unexplored territory surrounding the Congo River.
While reading An Account of the Life of Mr. David George from Sierra Leone, Africa, Given by Himself, and Memoirs of the Life of Boston King, a Black Preacher, Written by Himself, nothing appeared to be majorly contrasting between the two documents. Both included an enslaved, and deeply religious, African American man who survived the American Revolution and ended up settling in Sierra Leone for the last bit of his life. However, after reading these two documents for the nth time, a few key differences appeared within the information hidden in the titles of the documents and the diction in which each man recounted his journey.
Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing.
King Leopold’s Ghost is a popular history telling the story how Europeans systematically exploited Africa. Special fork of King Leopold upholds colony of Congo which ran from the late 19th century to early 20th century. The Book actually starts story back during the age of exploration were European explore where would land on west coast Africa and try to engage trade and when they figure out when they could trade guns and other things white slaves undermine the stability of a lot of the states that were set up along the Congo river and also on the west coast of the Africa. What you see is a study political
After the Civil War, African Americans encountered great discrimination and suffering. During this era, two influential leaders emerged from different philosophical camps. Brooker T. Washington of Virginia and William Edward Burghardt Dubois of Massachusetts proposed, different means to improve African Americans’ conditions. These men had a common goal: to enrich the black community. However, the methods they advocated to reach these goals significantly differed.
While my opinion is that the book itself was a good read, the context troubles me in that it took so much effort to expose Leopold’s crimes and it was forgotten. The story starts with King Leopold II of Belgium. In the scramble for Africa, many nations rushed to establish colonies, and those who did made a great profit from them. The king himself wanted to compete with them, as well as amass a profit. He traveled to several British colonies and learnt how to establish and manage a colony of his own.
George Washington Williams was a black American. He had come to the Congo over a route that seemed almost as if it took him through several different lives. He was in the U.S. Army, fought battles, attended University`s, and graduated from Newton in 1874. Williams married and became a pastor. He also created a milestone in the literature of human rights and of investigative journalism. This work is titled An Open Letter to His Serne Majesty Leopold 2nd , King of the Belgians and Sovereign of the Independent State of Congo, by Colonel the Honorable Geo.W. Williams, of the Untied States of America(102). As well as submitting a statement to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations urging recognition of the International Association of the Congo. Williams had a plan to go to the Congo to collect material for his book. As Williams traveled up the the great river he had time to take in Africa. When he reached Stanley Falls he could no longer contain what he had felt and saw. He then writes h...
“It should come as no surprise that Washington’s historical conflict culminated as a struggle between him and DuBois” (Gibson III 66). To say the least, both men were very active in the upbringing of African-Americans, but their differences in displaying out the solution was what brought them apart. Washington wanted the education system to enforce industrial teachings that started at lower economic power, while DuBois had more abstract ideas of equality and voting for African-Americans. Washington was conservative in the matter of African-American inclusion into society, hoping that given enough time and progress, people would learn to accept them, rather than fight for social power like what DuBois stood for. Despite Washington’s program that appealed to White-Americans, he was involved in politics and spoke about the disfranchisement of African-Americans.
This Social Darwinism also led to the concept of “White Man’s Burden,” which held the “superior” races responsible for civilizing the “inferior” ones. Martial Henri Merlin also states that “We are entitled to go out to these peoples and occupy their territories; but when we exercise this right, we, at the same moment, are charged with a duty towards these peoples, and this duty we must never for one instant forget.” This view might have occurred due to an exposure to the “White Man’s Burden” concept which had spread throughout Europe. There was also exploitation, which is illustrated by a letter from George Washington Williams, a Baptist minister, lawyer, historian and legislature, sent to King Leopold II of Belgium. According to his account, “There were instances in which Mr. Henry M. Stanley sent one white man.to make treaties with the native chiefs.
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois were very important African American leaders in the United States during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They both felt strongly that African Americans should not be treated unequally in terms of education and civil rights. They had strong beliefs that education was important for the African American community and stressed that educating African Americans would lead them into obtaining government positions, possibly resulting in social change. Although Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois had similar goals to achieve racial equality in the United States, they had strongly opposing approaches in improving the lives of the black population. Washington was a conservative activist who felt that the subordination to white leaders was crucial for African Americans in becoming successful and gaining political power. On the other hand, Du Bois took a radical approach and voiced his opinion through public literature and protest, making it clear that racial discrimination and segregation were intolerable. The opposing ideas of these African American leaders are illustrated in Du Bois’ short story, “Of the Coming of John”, where Du Bois implies his opposition to Washington’s ideas. He shows that the subordination of educated black individuals does not result in gaining respect or equality from the white community. In fact, he suggests that subordination would lead the black community to be further oppressed by whites. However contrasting their views might have been, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois were significant influential black leaders of their time, who changed the role of the black community in America.
During his lifetime, Booker T. Washington was a national leader for the betterment of African Americans in the post-Reconstruction South. He advocated for economic and industrial improvement of Blacks while accommodating Whites on voting rights and social equality. Washington traces his life from being born a slave to being an educator. His writings and speeches, though initially was very influential for his race, later in his life began to be challenged by the new generation of African Americans and died as he did in 1915 with him. In this autobiography of his life, Washington’s generalizations and accommodations of the treatment and disregard for the African American by people of the White race was nonchalant, as though he felt that for some reason it was okay or necessary for African Americans to be treated as second class.
As a political figure, King Leopold of Belgium had minimal power, yet he acknowledged the political and financial advantages of colonization, and acquired the Congo as a private colony whereas Britain snatched up colonies globally, including the “crown jewel” of all colonies, India. Belgium and Britain demonstrated a stark contradiction of two opposing methods of colonization. These two countries methods’ of domination ultimately decide the fates of each party, conqueror and conquered, in the precarious gamble that is imperialism.... ... middle of paper ...
Booker T. Washington was a young black male born into the shackles of Southern slavery. With the Union victory in the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, Washington’s family and blacks in the United States found hope in a new opportunity, freedom. Washington saw this freedom as an opportunity to pursue a practical education. Through perseverance and good fortunes, Washington was able to attain that education at Hampton National Institute. At Hampton, his experiences and beliefs in industrial education contributed to his successful foundation at the Tuskegee Institute. The institute went on to become the beacon of light for African American education in the South. Booker T. Washington was an influential voice in the African American community following the Civil War. In his autobiography, Up from Slavery, Washington outlines his personal accounts of his life, achievements, and struggles. In the autobiography, Washington fails to address the struggle of blacks during Reconstruction to escape the southern stigma of African Americans only being useful for labor. However, Washington argues that blacks should attain an industrial education that enables them to find employment through meeting the economic needs of the South, obtaining moral character and intelligence, and embracing practical labor. His arguments are supported through his personal accounts as a student at Hampton Institute and as an administrator at the Tuskegee Institute. Washington’s autobiography is a great source of insight into the black education debate following Reconstruction.
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
Leopold researched the continent extensively and followed the news of the white explorers through the region. When he found out that an explorer was low on funds, he quickly offered to contribute to the cause. He found a few explorers who had brought back news of Africa and its current state at the time, when Arab slave traders were seen leading caravans of captives to be sold into the slave trade. This news stirred the many Europeans who were looking to abolish the slave trade. Leopold saw this as a way to get into Africa by setting up faux organizati...