Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Soviet Union under Stalin
Impacts Of Stalin On Russia
Communism in Russia 1900 to 1940 (stalin
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Soviet Union under Stalin
Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, arguably the world’s most powerful, but lethal leader, was Russia’s turning point from agriculture and failed westernization to a world superpower and rapid industrialization. The power struggle and chaos in Russia from 1914 to the 1920’s made it easy for him to win power. In World War I, there was a sharp decrease in every aspect of Russia which led to many riots triggering a revolution in 1917. Nicholas II, the czar of Russia later abdicated and was killed. Alexander Kerensky took over Russia and as turmoil escalated, Vladimir Lenin replaced him by promising three simple things: peace, bread and land. Lenin led the path to communism but died in 1924 of typhus. In 1929, Stalin took absolute power of Russia, later becoming the U.S.S.R or the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin had complete totalitarian control of Russia, making it a world superpower by industrializing fast. Joseph Stalin ultimately did more good in Russia/U.S.S.R than harm because of his economic technique of industrializing the country in a short time and his politically stable control of the U.S.S.R although he murdered many for the expansion of the country. The main strategy that Joseph Stalin used to make the U.S.S.R powerful was by speeding up the industrialization. When Stalin was in control, it was clear that Russia needed to rebuild and catch up on the time that it fell behind. In one speech, Stalin points out Russia’s defeats and blamed all because of their country’s backwardness. “All beat her because of her backwardness, military backwardness, cultural backwardness, political backwardness, industrial backwardness, agricultural backwardness. They beat her because to do so was profitable and could be done with impunity.” (Knigh... ... middle of paper ... ...sident Vladimir Putin signed into law a bill banning the "propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations to minors," thus opening a new, dark chapter in the history of gay rights in Russia.” (Russia’s). Based on the signed bill, the government is limiting rights of gays, lesbians etc. Even though Putin invaded Chechnya and does not support gays and lesbians, he is commended for world peace. A program in Russia that proposes peace, nominated him for the NobelPeace Price because of his nonviolent way to punish Syria for using nuclear weapons. “The nomination came from the International Academy of Spiritual Unity and Cooperation of Peoples of the World, a Russian advocacy group that broadly pursues peace. Putin was nominated in recognition of his efforts in brokering a nonmilitary solution to punish the Syrian government for using chemical weapons.” (Stone).
The Legacy of Russia and the Soviet Union - Authoritarian and Repressive Traditions that Refuse to Die
In conclusion, many soviets citizens appeared to believe that Stalin’s positive contributions to the U.S.S.R. far outweigh his monstrous acts. These crimes have been down played by many of Stalin’s successors as they stress his achievements as collectivizer, industrializer, and war leader. Among those citizens who harbor feelings of nostalgia, Stalin’s strength, authority , and achievement contrast sharply with the pain and suffering of post-revolutionary Russia.
Stalin was ruthless and created a totalitarian state during the 1930s, causing enormous suffering. The result was a form of totalitarianism that was more advanced than that of Hitler's Nazi Germany. Stalin was in control of internal developments and pursued a foreign policy for Russia. These occasionally caused changes in tactics, or a strategy of dividing the Western powers. (Bullock, Allan) Due to these developments, and despite the suffering of Russia's own population, the Soviet Union was able to inflict defeat on Nazi Germany. This followed a disastrous initial response, in which Stalin didn't know what Hitler's intentions were. But Stalin's subsequent recovery interacted with long-term economic and military preparation for the Soviet Union. As a result of eventual victory, Stalin's position was greatly strengthened. He was therefor...
...his audiences’ trust and emotional appeal to the situation. Zakaria states that the people of Russia would rather see Gregiev be their leader, someone who would stand up for human rights and treat everyone equally, not someone who discriminates.
The issues that affected Stalin's rule and decisions are more numerable than simply the welfare of the Soviet people. Undertaking the task of analysing Stalin's regime in this period of 13 years is not an easy feat. There are a broad range of subjects and ideas to comprehend and attempt to convey to begin to understand the overall view of Stalinist Russia. A logical starting point for the consideration of Stalin's actions as he sought to drag the Soviet Unioninto a position where it stood amongst equals on the international stage is the impact of Stalin's rule when compared to the wider history of Russia. In the beginning, five years into the new 20th
Even though the relationship was good, there were still differences in warfare between the countries--such as differing ideological and strategic goals. The alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union during World War II developed out of inevitability. The Soviets had a lot of human and material loss in war. Approximately 20 million people were killed, thousands of towns and cities were annihilated, and on top of that, the Soviet Union’s economic infrastructure was Cremer 2 destroyed. In contempt of the postliminy postwar controversies and the beginning of the
Although homophobia exists in nearly all societies, Russia has recently gained notoriety for its intolerance of homosexual behavior. In a world that is becoming more and more accepting and tolerant of homosexuality, Russia seems to be moving backward when it comes to LGBTQ rights, existing in a tightly conservative macrosystem. Many Russian’s hold a constructionist view of homosexuality, meaning outside forces are responsible for influencing “untraditional” behaviors, rather than the contemporary essentialist view, meaning homosexuality is an inborn trait (Welch, 146). Understandably, Russia’s tumultuous political past must be a strong contributor to today’s attitudes towards homosexuality and other sexual orientations. Under the Tsars, homosexuality was a crime punishable by imprisonment or death, after Lenin came to power after the October Revolution, homosexuality was decriminalized and homosexuals were allowed to hold office in the newly formed Soviet Union. However, as anti-gay laws were enacted by Stalin, homosexuals were seen as a “danger to the state” and sent to prisons and forgot about. After the glasnost, Yeltsin under pressure from the Council of Europe, legalized homosexuality in 1993. But under Putin, homosexuals have been under fire due to a series of anti-gay propaganda laws and an increasingly homophobic Russia society; this is due to the increase of influence of the Russian Orthodox Church, the effect the media has on the populace as controlled by the hegemony, and the use of homosexuality as a scapegoat of Russia’s problems.
Stalin wanted Russia to become a great industrialized nation and pushed through the Five Year Plan, calling for rapid industrialization and an increase in factory...
Russia has also been able to manage many oil revenues under the reign of Putin. He even established the Stabilization Fund in 2004 (Novosti). This proves that Putin was successful in his economic policies because profits from the fund helped to pay off the debt of the Soviet Union. Although it seems that Putin helped the Russian economy, the rate of inflation rose and is continuing to rise during his reign (Boesler). When the rate of inflation increases, more people begin to go hungry and even starve to death when they cant buy food.
Son of a poverty-stricken shoemaker, raised in a backward province, Joseph Stalin had only a minimum of education. However, he had a burning faith in the destiny of social revolution and an iron determination to play a prominent role in it. His rise to power was bloody and bold, yet under his leadership, in an unexplainable twenty-nine years, Russia because a highly industrialized nation. Stalin was a despotic ruler who more than any other individual molded the features that characterized the Soviet regime and shaped the direction of Europe after World War II ended in 1945. From a young revolutionist to an absolute master of Soviet Russia, Joseph Stalin cast his shadow over the entire globe through his provocative affair in Domestic and Foreign policy.
Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges. Lenin made a series of policies throughout the beginning of the Revolution and through his short time in public office that came to be collectively known as ‘Leninism’. There were many things that influenced Leninism, such as Karl Marx.
February 16th, 1993, marked a promising day for gay citizens living in Putin, Russia. Being gay in Russia was finally legalized. They were supposed to be free to roam the streets, holding hands with their loved ones without any fear that they would be arrested for it. At least, that is what they thought. Although being gay was now legal, it did not change the actions of those against them, and Russia remained a dangerous place for homosexuals. On February 4, 2014, journalist Jeff Sharlet published his article Inside the Iron Closet: What It’s like to Be Gay in Putin’s Russia, in which he describes continued terrible treatment of gays in Russia. Sharlet shares this revealing piece in order to inform the reader of the brutal treatment inflicted
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
Joseph Stalin became leader of the USSR after Lenin’s death in 1924. Lenin had a government of abstemious communist government. When Stalin came into government he moved to a radical communist society. He moved away from the somewhat capitalist/communist economy of Lenin time to “modernize” the USSR. He wanted to industrialize and modernize USSR. He had overworked his workers, his people were dying, and most of them in slave labor camps. In fact by doing this Stalin had hindered the USSR and put them even farther back in time.
This war has given rise to a huge influx of racial hatred that has again helped Putin. Because the majority of the Chechen’s are Muslim, and not of the same ethnic background as Russians, racial discrimination has helped to boost the wars popularity and subsequently Putins. The security of oil in the southern Caucasus states and its transportation routes are the main influential factors in the...