Innocence and Racism: A 'To Kill a Mockingbird' Analysis

698 Words2 Pages

In the struggle of good against evil, the quality of innocence is often lost to stronger forces. The novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee demonstrates that innocence is a much weaker quality than in other towns. People in Maycomb will gather for a prosecution of a black man like it is a circus fair. Yet children, such as Jem, can still live in have fantasies that everything is fair. Yet the children’s innocence disappears when something such as racism in court makes itself apparent. The entire Jury voted Tom Robinson guilty when the Jury knew Tom was innocent. The only person who has not lost that innocence is Boo Radley. Boo is a man who has lived his adult years in his house, Having rumors spread about him due to Boo getting in trouble with a gang when he was younger. He hadn’t come out of his house since. Boo Radley is a mockingbird in disguise. Very subtly, he made a relationship with Jem and Scout. Arthur (Boo’s real name) spent time making any gift he could for the Finches. He also risked his own life to save Jem and Scout, and carried Jem home after Jem’s arm was broken. Boo watched Jem and Scout’s …show more content…

Although, Scout soon learned that Boo was extremely shy. As Mr. Tate and Atticus discuss what happened when Bob Ewell attacked Jem and Scout, Boo calmly stands in the corner, listening without objecting or making any assertion about what actually happened. As everyone discusses what happened, they move out onto their deck to accommodate for Boo’s pale skin. Once outside, Scout asks if Boo would like to sit in a, “nice and comfortable” (Lee 364) rocking chair because she knows Boo would be uncomfortable in the light. Boo kindly accepted the offer, sat down, listened to the conversation, and then walked home with Scout. Even after saving their lives, he does not treat her like she’s a ten year old girl and talk down to her. He treats her like an adult and does not act as a superior to

Open Document