Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
For this assignment I would like you to discuss the topic of the Feminization of Poverty
Feminization of poverty essays
Feminization of poverty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: For this assignment I would like you to discuss the topic of the Feminization of Poverty
Poverty is defined as a state or condition in which a person has little or no money, goods and/or means of support. No matter how poverty is defined families that have no male figure, single mothers, live mostly in poverty out of all demographic groups. This is often called Feminization of poverty. To better understand the feminization of poverty, it is important to recognize what are the contributions of poverty for women and what factors can decrease the probabilities of occurring. In this paper I will identify the problems that are contributing to feminization of poverty. Also, I will discuss what we need to do in order to improve this issue in America by identifying key agents and their responsibilities.
Feminization of poverty is when there is an increase in the proportion of females that fall into the low income or poverty population. Also, it is the social process in which the proportion of low income females becomes higher than the proportion of low income males. This issue not only important
…show more content…
because it may affect women, but because women are at higher risk of living in poverty than men. In America, 60 percent of women and 50 percent of single mothers live in poverty. Independent women are the most affected in America due to the discrimination women have in jobs or occupations. According to Christine L. Williams, gender roles often reinforces gender inequality due to the different expectations men and women have to fulfill at home and at work. In the family, men are expected to bring home the “bacon”, the income, while women stay home to take care of the children. When it comes to occupational roles, men have to do the heavy work or the independent work such as business. Meanwhile, nearly half of women are in the administrative work, assistants, or the service oriented work, nurses. In the work field, men are most likely to be promoted than women do to the preference men have over women. William wrote, “Many of the men perceive their token status as males in predominantly female occupations as an advantage in hiring and promotions” (Williams: 341). Also the author stated, “... they are constrained by invisible barriers to promotion in their careers, caused mainly by sexist attitudes of men in the highest positions” (Williams: 342). This indicates that women are less likely to get a job or have a higher payment. This can lead women to depend on small part-time jobs and government support, contributing to the Feminization of poverty. Gender inequality in the work place can be resolve in various ways. Firstly, we have to eliminate gender expectations. Meaning that the traditional way of viewing gender roles will have to be eliminated from the work place. Women are viewed as care givers and house wives, while men are viewed as powerful and protectors. This transitions into the work place as men holding the positions of power, while women are the helping hand. To eliminate gender inequality in the work place, by creating anonymous test and qualifications for open positions. This anonymous test will eliminate gender expectations by allowing women to have a higher possibility of been in a position of power. Leading women to move up in the eyes of society. With more women in a position of power, the gender expectation will change. Women will be no longer seen as house wives and the helping hand at the work place. Rather as the producer and authority figure in the work place. Thus, removing the gender expectations on women and men in the work place. Christine L. Williams wrote, “… women report feeling excluded from informal leadership and decision making networks, and they sense hostility from their male coworkers, which makes them feel uncomfortable and unwanted” (William: 344). Meaning that women feel like they have less or no power in their work. In order to make female employees feel comfortable in the job, coworkers and bosses should allow women to participate and share their opinion/ideas more often. With this, females will become more accepted and have more sense of belonging in their work place. This can be done by making mandatory proposals of ideas at the meetings and conferences. Which will allow both women and men to share their ideas and opinions. Single mothers have to work twice as hard as single women. They are not only taking care of themselves but also children with needs. Mothers and their children are vulnerable economically, educationally, and socially. Due to this, they may suffer high rates of poverty as they grow old. Also, the poverty of women frequently mirrors the percent of children in poverty. 73 million children live in poverty and 39 percent live in low income families. One third of those low income families rely on welfare. Welfare is a governmental agency that provides many different forms of assistants. Such as, monetary payments, vouchers and stamps, and/or housing assistance. Welfare is usually provided to the elderly, unemployed, disable, veterans, and those with dependent children. According to Randy Albelda and Chris Tilly, single mothers that depend on welfare are mostly label “lazy,” too “dependent,” and too fertile (Albelda and Tilly: 605). The truth is welfare-reliant mothers cannot survive with the money provided by the government. Kathryn Edin and Laura Lein research, states how mothers spend the income that they receive. They wrote, “… we met no welfare mother who was making ends meet on her government check alone” (Edin and Lein: 326). Government is not too generous with the amount they provide to low income families, especially single mothers. Edin and Lein also wrote “Mothers filled the gap through reported and unreported work and through handouts from family, friends, and agencies…” (Edin and Lein: 326). With these findings, they determined that welfare is not enough for single mothers to get out of poverty. Welfare is not making mothers “lazy” or “dependent,” like Albelda and Tilly stated in their article but is much more than that. They wrote, “The lack of affordable childcare, the large number of jobs that fail to pay living wages and the lack of job flexibility are the real problems that face all mothers” (Albelda and Tilly: 608). With the increase of single mothers and with the increase risk of poverty, this may cause feminization of poverty. According to Katheryn Edin and Laura Lein, many mothers who rely on welfare have to do informal jobs, apart from the money that is provided to them by the government and their jobs, and receive the money in cash, in order to “work” the system.
In their article, they wrote, “If they reported such income, their welfare checks would soon be reduce by almost the full amount of this income, leaving them as poor as before” (Edin and Lein: 324). Government cannot eliminate poverty by reducing their welfare checks. Financial aid should be limited to a certain amount of time and the amount that mothers are provided, should not be lowered depending on the amount of income they receive aside of welfare. Also, they should provide better aiding programs to raise the quality of life for women and mothers living in poor situations. This programs should include aid to find more stable jobs to get them back into the working class or prevent them from becoming part of the
underclass. Feminization of poverty is an important issue in America. Women and single mother struggle to live according to the social expectations of this country. It is important to understand what lead to the risk of poverty in women and the factors that can reduce the probability of it happening. One of the factors that contributes to the feminization of poverty is gender inequality in the work place. This can cause unable women to find stable jobs. Another factor that contributes to it is the way welfare works. By solving this factors, this country can reduce the amount of women living in poverty.
Poverty in America is a very complex issue that can be looked at from many directions. There are a plethora of statistics and theories about poverty in America that can be confusing and at times contradicting. It is important to objectively view statistics to gain a better understanding of poverty and to wade through the stereotypes and the haze of cultural views that can misrepresent the situation.The official poverty line in America begins with a person making at or below $12,060. To calculate the poverty line for a family, an additional $4,180 is added to the base of $12,060 for each additional member(“Federal Poverty Level Guidelines”). According to the last U.S. census, over 45 million or 14.5% of Americans are at or below the poverty line(Worstall). At this level, the U.S. poverty level has not changed much from the 1970s when the government began a “War on Poverty.” However,
Living in poverty as a lower class individual can be very stressful, anxious, and very little to no resources in order to survive for their own needs, as a person and also the needs of their family on a daily basis. Most, individuals who may live in poverty in the U.S. are single mothers who have children to raise on their own. In addition, to all single mothers, who can relate to the needs of working multiple jobs, and occasionally are going to school and getting a higher education; is not an easy job. Single mothers their first priority is to provide the needs of their living conditions and provide all of the needs of their own children. The following article “Angela Whitiker’s Climb” (2005), by Isabel Wilkerson was a case study
Patricia Hyjer Dyk talks about poverty and how it complicates the family life. On the other hand, Stephanie Coontz focuses on how families have changed from the 20th century to the 21st century; focusing on the negative and positive aspects of both. Dyke doesn’t talk much about how the family system and the earning system has changed, while Coontz focuses on that; however, in both the authors’ articles, women and their role in the society are significantly covered.
For example, Newman states, "A distressing trend developing over the last 20 years of the 20th century, the feminization of poverty describes an increase in the number of poor families headed by women as a result of higher divorce rates, more illegitimate births, and the lack of support from male partners (Newman)." Newman's quote explains how in the last 20 years the poverty rate in our country has increased faster than before. The high poverty rate is leading to many negatives for women. Also Hunsaker states "This threshold is adjusted yearly. For example, in 2000 the threshold for a family of four was $17,463, but by 2005 the threshold had risen to $19,806. The threshold for a family of four in 2011 was $22,811 (Hunsaker)." In this quote Hunsaker shows that the poverty rate increases yearly and it’s by over $2,000 a year. Since these statistics are from 6 years ago, imagine how much the rates have gone up since
Undisputedly poverty has been one of the major persistent social problems in the United States for hundreds of years. Poverty does not discriminate against Caucasians, African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, homosexuals, heterosexuals, age, gender, or persons with disabilities. Poverty can strike any population, community, ethnic group, and family. According to the U.S Census Bureau, 43.6 million people were in poverty in 2009 which was an increase from 2008. (Insert citation for website). There are multiple causes of why a family or individual can fall into poverty, which includes but not limited to, disability, unemployment, age, and recessions, as for which we have seen through the 2008 recession and the Great Depression. Throughout this paper I will address poverty as a social problem and its causes. I will also focus on how children and family households headed by single mothers are effected by poverty, and how Temporary Assistance for Needy Families came about to help children and families in poverty.
Poverty is not just an issue reserved for third world countries. Instead, poverty is a multifaceted issue that even the most developed nations must battle
Poverty is a significant threat to women’s equality. In Canada, more women live in poverty than men, and women’s experience of poverty can be harsher, and more prolonged. Women are often left to bear more burden of poverty, leading to ‘Feminization of poverty’. Through government policy women inequality has resulted in more women and children being left in poverty with no means of escaping. This paper will identify some key aspects of poverty for Canadian women. First, by identifying what poverty entails for Canadian women, and who is more likely to feel the brunt of it. Secondly the discussion of why women become more susceptible to poverty through government policy and programs. Followed by the effects that poverty on women plays in society. Lastly, how we can reduce these effects through social development and policy.
Everyone knows what the word poverty means. It means poor, unable to buy the necessities to survive in today's world. We do not realize how easy it is for a person to fall into poverty: A lost job, a sudden illness, a death in the family or the endless cycle of being born into poverty and not knowing how to overcome it. There are so many children in poverty and a family's structure can effect the outcome. Most of the people who are at the poverty level need some type of help to overcome the obstacles. There are mane issues that deal with poverty and many things that can be done to stop it.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2014 African Americans held the highest poverty rate of 26%, with Hispanics holding the second highest rate at 24% (DeNavas-Walt & Proctor, 2015). When comparing this to the poverty rates of Whites at 10% and Asians at 12% in 2014, we see that in America, racial and ethnic minorities are more vulnerable to experiencing poverty (DeNavas-Walt & Proctor, 2015). In addition, discrimination is seen between genders among those living in poverty. Family households of a single adult are more likely to be headed by women and are also at a greater risk for poverty (DeNavas-Walt & Proctor, 2015). In 2014, 30.6% of households headed by a single woman were living below the poverty line compared to 15.7% for households headed by a single male (DeNavas-Walt & Proctor, 2015). Many factors such as poor wages for women, pregnancy associations, and the increase of single-woman parented families have impacted the increase of women in poverty. Children are most harshly affected by poverty because for them the risks are compounded, as they lack the defenses and supports needed to combat the toxicity surrounding them. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 21% of all U.S. children (73.6 million children) under 18 years old lived in poverty in 2014 (DeNavas-Walt & Proctor,
In today 's society, there is 1 in 7 people living in poverty which is costing Canadian citizens’ money as they are paying for taxes. There are many standpoints in which people examine the ways poverty affect society such as Marx’s conflict theory. Marx’s conflict theory goes over how social stratification being inevitable and how there is a class consciousness within people in the working class. Another way that poverty is scrutinized is by feminization. Feminization is the theory that will be explored throughout this essay. Poverty will be analyzed in this essay to determine the significance of poverty on the society and the implications that are produced.
Feminization of poverty refers to the phenomenon in which women experience poverty at rates that are disproportionately high in comparison to men (Abbate). It is important to understand because the female is one of the majorities of billions of people worldwide to live under $1 a day. This also goes beyond income or suffering. This has the ability to destroy generations of poverty, hopelessness, and well-being of families.
One of the Biggest Challenges for Women Today: The Feminization of Poverty The division of labour and education along gender lines, racial inequalities and discrimination, and unpaid domestic labour all contribute to the growing feminization of poverty. Feminists are working to decrease the income gap, to benefit the overall health of women and the population at large. The term feminization of poverty describes the disproportionate number of women who are poor, and its link to the division of labour along gender lines (Calixte, Johnson, & Motapanyane, 2010). The Canadian Labour Congress reported that in 2005, women working full time earned 70.5 cents to the dollar that every male in a comparable job earned ( as cited in Calixte, et al., 2010, p. 17). Across the board, women are more likely to suffer from poverty than men are (Harnan, 2006).
Poverty is “the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions” (Merriam-Webster dictionary, 2015); in other words, struggling to provide a comfortable living style. It is the cause of family stress and many other problems, especially for the children. Millions of people around the world are struggling with poverty; families suffering to provide enough food seem to be growing in numbers. According to the United States Census Bureau, the poverty rate was highest in the 1960s and decreased greatly in the 1970s. However, it is now slowly starting to increase again. Recently released census data by the Bureau showed that one in five people are living in poverty (Census Bureau, 2014). Poverty is even
Poverty is an undeniable problem in America. In 2014, 14.8 percent of the United States was in poverty (“Hunger and Poverty Fact Sheet”). There are more people in the United States than it seems that do not have their basic necessities. In an
... I think this project has affected me in a way that I will remember for the rest of my life. Works Cited American Poverty and Welfare Reform. 2002. The 'Secondary' of the Women's Policy Research - Research. http://www.oycf.org/Perspectives/12_063001/American_poverty_reform.htm>.