Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Do not resuscitate case scenario
Patient vs physician wishes
Do not resuscitate case scenario
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine a loved one in horrific pain with no medication or procedure to fix the discomfort. After suffering for a months maybe even years the option of a Do Not Resuscitate order arises. This may be difficult to hear and watch as a loved one decides if their heart stops beating they will not be resuscitated. Not being resuscitated will end their pain and relieve them from a life they are not enjoying. A Do Not Resuscitate order is a medical order written by a doctor. A person signs it and it states no health care provider can not cardiopulmonary resuscitate the person ("Understanding Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders”). These means if a person’s heart stops beating or they stop breathing doctors can not attempt to revive them to get their heartbeating again or start breathing again. Even though some people believe Do Not Resuscitate orders should be illegal, nevertheless, DNR’s should be legal because it is the patient's choice, they are not the person they used to be, they do not want to hurt anymore, and the patient …show more content…
Knowing this it only makes sense that the doctors make sure the patients’ requests are held above all. When a patient asks for a Do Not resuscitate order this means they have reason to want to not be revived when their heart stops. In case two, a 70 year old woman had cancer spread throughout her body. She knew she would not get better and it would only get worse. She had a doctor sign a do not resuscitate order to make sure if her heart stopped she would not be resuscitated and would not have to continue life in pain (“Do Not Resuscitate: Case Studies”). This is a great example when DNR’s do the best for the patient who have been suffering and not feel like themselves. The idea that a patient who has fought a long hard struggle or one who is not able to do actions people take for granted everyday they should have the right to get a Do Not Resuscitate
This can be seen in the case study as ethical and legal arise in resuscitation settings, as every situation will have its differences it is essential that the paramedic has knowledge in the areas of health ethics and laws relating to providing health care. The laws can be interpreted differently and direction by state guidelines may be required. Paramedics face ethical decisions that they will be required to interpret themselves and act in a way that they believe is right. Obstacles arise such as families’ wishes for the patients’ outcome, communicating with the key stakeholders is imperative in making informed and good health practice decision. It could be argued that the paramedics in the case study acted in the best interest of the patient as there was no formal directive and they did not have enough information regarding the patients’ wishes in relation to the current situation. More consultation with the key stakeholders may have provided a better approach in reducing the stress and understanding of why the resuscitation was happening. Overall, ethically it could be argued that commencing resuscitation and terminating once appropriate information was available is the right thing to do for the
...o get a do not resuscitate order. That is an order that the families may sign so the hospital does not have to give effort to bring a person back to life anymore once they have stopped breathing.
But the decision isn’t necessarily based on if the doctors want to do so, it’s the law the doctors have to follow if it was up to Keller he wouldn’t put elderly patients on life support. The health care providers fear legal ramifications if they don’t do everything in their power to prolong life. Bill Keller says “I have been criticized by the Catholic Church in the name of life” (Moran n.p) for centuries now the Catholic Church has been on the side that is against prolonging the process of dying. In 1957, Pope Pius XII wrote: “it is unnatural to prevent death in instances where there is no hope of recovery when nature is calling for death, there is no question that one can remove the life support system.” Even with this being said Moran can’t necessarily do anything about it because it’s his job and he has to do what he is told or legal action will be taken. Even though Moran is against prolonging life even when he had to encounter as a child losing his father at a young age he still knew that prolonging life is
In A Tender Hand in the Presence of Death, Heather, the nurse, would put in IVs and feeding tubes in hopes of prolonging hospice care even when they were ineffective in order to give more time to the families who were having trouble letting go (MacFarquhar, 2016). In my personal situation, I can relate, as two of my grandparents have passed away from cancer and suffered for a long time before passing. Although it was incredibly sad and our families bargained for more time, there was some peace in knowing that the suffering had come to an end once they passed. For our own selfish reasons, we want as much time as possible with our loved ones who are suffering and close to death, but in reality, the decision for assisted suicide should only concern the individual whose life it
The do not resuscitate aka DNR is a legal order provided by a patient stating that they are not to be resuscitated via CPR or with advanced cardiac life support. If they stop breathing or their heart stops beating they have the legal right to say no to life saving measures. The patient may have this legal form in advance or they can receive one from the hospital (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2014).
Everyday there are hundreds of ambulances, fire engines and police cars being called to the scene of emergencies. I’m sure you hear the roar of their sirens, but you don’t think twice about them and are able to tune them out. The only time most people even think about the sirens is if they are forced to wait at a light or move over to the right shoulder and let them pass. When you look back and think about those sirens, where do you suppose they are going? Most people probably think that they are going to a car accident with entrapment, or a person with crushing chest pain to try and intervene and get them to the hospital.
It is important that people are in control of what happens to them while under the care of their doctor, especially if they're alert and aware. A provider cannot force treatment; if a patient is unconscious, the situation changes because competency and informed consent are not present.
Terminally ill patients deserve the right to have a dignified death. These patients should not be forced to suffer and be in agony their lasting days. The terminally ill should have this choice, because it is the only way to end their excruciating pain. These patients don’t have
I personally feel that the life of a person is well above all policies and regulations and if an attempt to rescue him or her from death at the right time remains unfulfilled, it is not the failure of a doctor or nurse, it is the failure of the entire medical and health community.
who has not explicitly requested aid in dying. This is most often done to patients who are in a
...t’s family should be able decide for the patient whether or not prolonging their life is moral.
As a result, life-sustaining procedures such as ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments for infectious and terminal diseases are developing. While these life-sustaining methods have positively influenced modern medicine, they also inadvertently cause terminal patients extensive pain and suffering. Previous to the development of life-sustaining procedures, many people died in the care of their own home, however, today the majority of Americans take their last breath lying in a hospital bed. As the advancement of modern medicine continues, physicians and patients are going to encounter life-altering trials and tribulations. Arguably, the most controversial debate in modern medicine is the discussion of the ethical choice for physician-assisted suicide.
Life support is an issue that is very controversial, people on both side have strong opinions. Life support is the treatment and technique that is usually performed in a critical care, in order to support life after a failure of one or more vital organs. Life support is used temporarily until the illness or the disease is stabilized and body can function normally on its own. I strongly disagree the use of life support in brain dead patients. I against life support with brain dead patients, because of the prolonging pain and suffering. I know it is hard to see a love one’s go, but life support is not the right decision. When people talk about life support, they basically mean ventilation.
During the 1960’s, anesthesiologist began the common practice of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on children and adults suffering from cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association in 1974 “advocated that physicians document in the chart when CPR is not indicated after obtaining patient or surrogate consent (ibid). This documentation formally became known as the DNR order” (Braddock 1). Acting as a new standard of action, the DNR order introduced an option to all people permitting them the freedom to choose how they receive treatment in given circumstances. As the DNR order developed after its establishment, statutes introduced over time, such as the following, progressed the regulations and protection for all people’s entitlement to their own
In the example provided, a patient may not have the option of being involved in the decision making process, however, in the case of medically assisted death, in the initial stages at least, a patient would be in charge of their own destiny after careful consideration that this act would not be unreasonable in their situation (McKormick & Min,