Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The trouble with wilderness
Importance of the natural environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The trouble with wilderness
Is the Concept of Wilderness Useful? Does wilderness exist? To many people, this would seem to be a very meaningless question. Of course wilderness exists. But, coming from a student who decided to enroll in a class called Humans and the Natural Environment: Impacts and Moral Obligations, this question has become one that has almost thrown my world upside down. Before we can answer the question, we must first know the definition of wilderness is this, “an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man is a visitor who does not remain.” Because of my recent class periods and readings, I believe that the concept of wilderness does not exist, and that it is not useful. Throughout this essay I will explain why …show more content…
The fact that man can have no touch on wilderness is to say that man cannot be a part of wilderness. Man must be completely absent, only appearing as a visitor. But why can man not be a part of wilderness? Many people believe that man is separate from nature due to religious beliefs. They believe that God created Adam and Eve and then created the rest of Earth specifically for the use of man. But even after Darwin, some people still do not seem to understand. All humans are a product of evolution, as are every other species that inhabits this planet. Our ability to think, reason, and understand does not somehow overshadow that fact that we are still a species of great ape. Ultimately, we are glorified monkeys. Monkeys that have sent themselves to the moon and seen astronomical technological advances but still monkeys nonetheless. To say that the other four species of living great apes can be a part of nature, but the line is drawn when it comes to humans is hypocritical. I believe the idea of wilderness is based on a false definition of the word, and therefore does not …show more content…
One of those faults being that we fail to acknowledge the fact that Indians roamed the Americas long before the Europeans showed up. The Europeans had believed that all of America was untouched by man, therefore making it a wilderness area. But they failed to understand that those lands had already been used for living, farming, hunting, and gathering. The Indians even used fire to manage their lands. Many believe that their use of fire has even shaped our landscape today: making our forests rich and diverse. If not for their fires, America would most likely be overrun by brush. So, when President Obama declared 2 million acres of land “wilderness areas” back in 2009, he did so to land that has been shaped by the hands of man. There for discrediting it from being land that untrammeled by man, the very definition of
From the prologue through chapter one in “Wilderness and the American Mind”, the author emphasizes the affect wilderness had on the Europeans during the colonization of America. In today’s society, we are familiar with the concept of wilderness but few of us have experienced the feeling of being encapsulated in the unfamiliar territory. Today we long for wilderness, crave it even. We use it as an outlet to escape the pace of life. However, we have a sense of safety that the Europeans did not. We are not isolated in the unfamiliar, help is usually a phone call away. Though we now view the wilderness as an oasis because we enter at our own terms, in the early colonial and national periods, the wilderness was an unknown environment that was viewed as evil and dangerous.
Cronon, William “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature” ed., Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1995, 69-90
the idea of the wild and its importance and necessity of human interaction with the wild.
The wild is a place to push yourself to the limit and take a look at who you truly are inside. “Wilderness areas have value as symbols of unselfishness” (Nash). Roderick Nash’s philosophy states that the wilderness gives people an opportunity to learn humility but they fight this because they do not have a true desire to be humble. Human-kind wants to give out the illusion that they are nature lovers when in reality, they are far from it. “When we go to designated wilderness we are, as the 1964 act says, "visitors" in someone else's home” (Nash). People do not like what they cannot control and nature is uncontrollable. Ecocentrism, the belief that nature is the most important element of life, is not widely accepted. The novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer depicts a young boy who goes on an exploration to teach himself the true concept of humility. Chris McCandless, the protagonist, does not place confidence in the universal ideology that human beings are the most significant species on the planet, anthropocentrism.
At one point in our lives as human beings we began to draw mental lines between ourselves and nature. This is something that has gradually been increasing throughout their years. Most people do not seem to notice all of these constant changes simply because we are used to the type of world we live in now. I believe that in order for somebody to understand what's happening these negative changes need to affect us as individuals. For example, many people don't realize cutting down trees to build businesses will eventually cause the world to be unsustainable. Nature is something very necessary. "Wilderness" in old English was something that had its own will, just like you mentioned in paragraph three. The Wild is a place where wild undomesticated animals should be allowed to roam
have both a sense of the importance of the wilderness and space in our culture
Emerson idealizes a wilderness untouched by humans, placing them at opposite poles. In reality, this is not true, for even the national parks and areas set aside to protect nature have been altered by man, whether it be the Native Americans, or the wealthy tourists who sought to "preserve for themselves some remnant of its wild landscape so that they might enjoy the regeneration and renewal that came drone sleeping under the stars...and living off the land" (Cronon 78). Cronon accurately describes the problem with Emerson's belief. If Emerson's "definition" of wilderness were to come true, then humans and nature could not coexist. As expressed by Cronon, in turning the focus outward towards preserving the great mountains and natural areas to fit Emerson's ideal wilderness, people neglect the nature that lies in their own "artificial" community. Instead of eliminating mankind's presence in nature all together, they should strive to create a balanced relationship in which humans and nature can coexist
He believes that the wilderness has helped form us and that if we allow industrialization to push through the people of our nation will have lost part of themselves; they will have lost the part of themselves that was formed by the wilderness “idea.” Once the forests are destroyed they will have nothing to look back at or to remind them of where they came from or what was, and he argues everyone need to preserve all of what we have now.
Muir’s wilderness is rooted in the idea of an aesthetically pleasing natural scape given they fit into certain criteria such as, “ none of Nature’s landscape’s are ugly so long as they are wild” (Muir). The attachment of this emphasis on an aesthetically pleasing landscape was partial truth, which drove people out the national parks. While these places where indeed wild and beautiful, Muir sold the masses on this idea of all nature being pristine and pure, when in reality that was not the
Many years ago, people saw the wilderness as a savage wasteland, but today, it is viewed as “the last remaining place where civilization, that all too human disease, has not fully infected the earth.” (Cronon) He discusses this changed point of view by stating the difficulties that society will have rectifying environmental ailments if it stops viewing wilderness as “a dualistic picture in which the human is completely outside the nature.” (Cronon) This is understandable because humans rely on others to create opinions, and they do not know how to form their own thoughts and solutions to issues such as environmental ones. Therefore, it is with great importance that humans begin to learn how to formulate their own thoughts and share those personal thoughts with others, such as sharing solutions about environmental
Miller makes clear the impact of wilderness on early American life. While the Old World mentality presented wilderness as mysterious and filled with demons, the new American nation viewed it differently. Rather than possessing a sense of fear, their belief in the divine mission to spread democracy and civilization inspired them to journey west. Accordingly, they did so with a sense of excitement and a thirst for discovery. As such, I wholeheartedly agree with Miller’s view that the early romantic images of the American landscape were expressions of a new cultural nationalism. According to Miller, these early countrymen viewed the new nation as “...a place apart, an unpeopled wilderness where history, born in nature rather than in corrupt institutions,
One strength of his article is that it can easily elicit an emotional response from the more sympathetic readers and outdoor enthusiasts. Duane appeals to pathos when first setting the scene of a day in the wilderness. He describes what it would be like if one had the “good fortune” to spot a Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep in the wild. He writes, “You unwrap a chocolate bar amid breathtaking views . . . the sight fills you with awe and also with gratitude for the national parks, forests, and yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive” (Duane 1). For the audience that connects to this emotional appeal, this instantly draws them in to the article and can arouse feelings of amazement and wonder toward the sight described. It can likewise leave readers wondering whether or not this scene is truly so perfect. This statement can also appear too dramatic for those less passionate. When Duane writes, “The sight fills you with . . . gratitude for the . . . yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive,” it seems almost untrue, as most people do not think twice about the environmental regulations that keep animals in their
Past scholars have argued that wilderness preservation arose as a specific environmental cause because wilderness was becoming scarce, because some individuals began to appreciate the ethical components of nature, or because a growing urban and suburban white middle class wanted it for recreational and aesthetic reasons. Sutter concludes that these arguments are "sound but limited". Sutter focuses on the origins of the wilderness movement from the 1910s through 1930s. The author examines the issues that led to the need to formally establish wilderness reserves in the United States. He emphasizes on interests about capitalism and mass consumption, road construction in the National Parks and the role of the consumer capitalization and commercialism in expanding the allowance of building in natural areas. He, therefore, developed arguments about the purpose and definition of "wildness" and "wilderness," which are still discussed even after 100 years later. These critical ideas of Automobiles inventions were associated with problems related to ecology, ethnocentrism, biased-people class, and cultural constructiveness. Complexity, contingency and context were some of the key missing aspects in the
Darwin’s Theory of “Survival of the Fittest” in Jack London 's Call of the Wild
His scent. His clothes. His words. He wasn't what I wanted my big brother, Jack, to be like. With bloodshot eyes, he looked through everyone and everything that surrounded him; he was lost and didn't care what my parents said. He did what he wanted. Coming home late smelling of marijuana and alcohol, he was simply careless. I would lie in bed and listen to the screaming and arguing, while a river of tears would stream down my face.