Essay On Civic Engagement

731 Words2 Pages

The Greek philosopher Plato once said, "One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors”. His words are as true today as when he spoke them. As problems in society continue to become more complex, the need for quality solutions becomes even more apparent. Investing in civic engagement can improve citizens’ quality of life by expanding government services, improving the decision-making process, and empower citizens to work for the common good.

Since the end of World War II, citizens have demanded far more services from their government. These demands have led to the creation of more administrative agencies, a larger number of civil servants, and higher government spending. Dwight Waldo coined the phrase “administrative state” to describe this need for expanded government services. Many of these agencies were developed to tackle some of the societies largest problems that the private-business world could not. However, due to budget cuts, limited staff members, and inexperienced leadership, organizations often times find themselves unable to find the magic bullet to solve the major problems. With limited resources, the local governments need to shift their focus towards the co-production of a number of its services.

Co-production can improve services to the community without increasing spending or expanding the already large size of the government. This from of civic engagement can allocate scare resources by participating in a volunteer fire department, community watch programs, or even through an “adopt-a-highway” program. Critics worry that moving towards co-production of services will trade one set of problems for another. They worry about the overall accountabili...

... middle of paper ...

...and specific issues and more on the quality of the nation’s public life over the long term”. This train of thought moves away from picturing people as consumers of services and more like proactive citizens. Proactive citizens are more likely to buy into the participative decision-making process stated earlier. With an increased buy-in, citizens can collaborate on the most pressing issues surround their communities and create their own vision for the future. This type of community is better positioned to respond to rapid change and take ownership of the deliberative processes, strengthening local structures for public action, and promoting the legitimacy of the outcomes.

Again, investing in civic engagement can improve citizens’ quality of life by expanding government services, improving the decision-making process, and empower citizens to work for the common good.

Open Document