Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Centrifugal Force Experiment
Equation for centripetal force essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Centrifugal Force Experiment
Theory Centripetal force is a force that makes and object move in a circular path. When an object moves in a circle it can have a constant speed where the magnitude of the velocity is the same but the direction is always changing so the velocity cannot be considered constant. For the velocity to change there must be an acceleration and from there on we can calculate the centripetal force. There are also instances where we don’t know the velocity but we know the time it takes to so from that we can get the velocity of the object that is traveling in the circle. Then by using the laws of conservation of energy we can figure out the height a ball must be dropped from to over come the force of gravity so it can make it around the loop.
Experimental
…show more content…
First we took the cart off the mass and weighed it obtaining a value of .05kg. Then we attached the cart back to the apparatus and added a 100g mass to it making the total mass of the cart .15kg. Then we adjusted the radius between the cart and center of the apparatus to be .09m. When the cart was finally set up properly we made sure that loggerpro was synched and began to spin the apparatus by hand. The results were recorded in loggerpro over a span of about four seconds and the data was recorded. We then picked three angular velocities off of the plot, and decided to use the values 14.83 rad/s, 15.15 rad/s, and 16.07 rad/s. these values would then be used to calculate the centripetal force by plugging them into the formula F=mV^2/R. After all of the values were plugged in the centripetal force was calculated and those value were 2.94N, 3.10N, and 3.49N. They were then compared with the measured values of centripetal force and those values were 2.47N, 2.65N, and 2.83N. These values do not quite matchup so we also took the percent error for each of the values and obtained errors of -.19, -.17,-.23. One reason why we may not of been able to get the same results as the calculated values is that we did not take into account any kind of friction that the apparatus may have been experiencing while being spun …show more content…
The apparatus was spun around and the angular velocities measured were 10.47rad/s, 14.40 rad/s, and 15.76 rad/s. Then using those values and the equation F=mV^2/R we calculated the centripetal force one more time and the values were 4.39N, 8.29N, and 9.94N. Those results were compared with the measured results, which were 3.44N, 7.15N, and 8.41N. Since these values did not matchup perfectly with the calculated value we found the percent error and those values were -.28, -.16, and -.18. Then we took and average of all nine percent errors that were obtained and a value of -.17. This number wouldn’t be considered the best number but its not too bad. Reasons of what could of caused the error to be a little high can be due to factors such as friction and air
The cup will stay on the plate throughout the entire rotation because it will be moving in a circular motion. We can see that moving in a circular motion will cause it to stay on the plate because of the equation v= ωr. This equation relates the angular velocity (ω) and the linear velocity (v). When the cup is placed at the very center of the plate the radius (r) will equal zero. When zero is put into the equation for r, the right side of the equation will equal zero, leaving us with the equation v=0. Because v is the linear velocity, we can see that the cup will not move in a straight line, rather a circular
There were no significant error factors that may have affected the arrangement of the lab experiment. Everything went smoothly with relative ease.
Vrock= Vcenter of mass + Wrock Where V is the translational velocity, and W is the angular velocity
Possible sources of error in this experiment include the inaccuracy of measurements, as correct measurements are vital for the experiment.
Discussion: The percent of errors is 59.62%. Several errors could have happened during the experiment. Weak techniques may occur.
The use of force is a heated topic among many people. What is the “Use of Force Continuum”? It is the level of force an officer can use when arresting or subduing a suspect. According to Hicks (2004), “It is considered morally reprehensible for an officer or a sovereign agent to use excessive force without due necessity. However, once the need arises for a proper escalation of force, both the doctrinal theses of just war and the use of force continuum provide for a proper and morally principled use of necessary force” (pg. 255). The use of force continuum was created to guide officers so they are less likely to use excessive force. The officer is expected to use more force than the suspect, but no so that it is deemed excessive. According to Lyman
The hypothesis is that the ideal and experimental values for vB should be approximately the same, as the initial velocity of the marble falling off the ramp and off the lab bench should be the same, as long as no additional forces are applied. Although, knowing that experimental error is inevitable, the hypothesis is that the experimental value for vB will deviate slightly from the ideal vB calculated. Furthermore, the hypothesis is that the ideal values for both scenarios 1 and 2 should be the exact same, as they are both calculated using the dimensions and angle
The file labeled “Newton’s 2nd Law” is to be opened. The cart’s mass along with the attachment of the sensor and the accelerometer are to be measured and recorded. Being carefully verified in order, the track is leveled and the Force Sensor is set to 10N and connected to...
Case Study: Force Field Analysis and Strategies for Change In this case study you are a charge nurse on a medical/surgical unit that just implemented a barcode medication administration system (BCMA) that the hospital spent millions of dollars to implement. You have noticed some staff resistance to this change and some nurses overriding the safety features of the system. Proper orientation and training has been provided, yet you have noticed that staff have developed “workarounds” to the system. Some reasons suggested for not following proper procedure include the system delaying medication administration to their patients due to it taking more time to use, not wanting to wake their patients, and the equipment not always working.
This experiment could have been more accurate if the angle of the slope could have been lowered to stop the trolley from accelerating. The experiment could have also been improved by taking greater care in making sure that the weights didn’t fall off of the trolley after they collided with the trolley. Better weights should have been found for the 1.5kg as the ones used had to be tied together to reach the sufficient weight, thus making them more likely to fall off the trolley. Conclusion: The hypothesis was proven correct for the 500g weight, however, the hypothesis was not proven correct for the 1kg and 1.5kg weights as the momentum before the collision did not equal to the momentum after the collision.
This implies that the height at which centripetal acceleration is equal to the gravitational acceleration is ∆h=r/2
In this experiment, the force acting upon the cart was gravitational force.
== 1. The flywheel was set as shown with the axle of the flywheel horizontal. A polystyrene tile was placed on the floor to avoid the impact of the mass on the floor. 2. The vernier caliper was used to measure the diameter d of the axle.
Sir Isaac Newton is the man well known for his discoveries around the term, Motion. He came up with three basic ideas, called Newton’s three laws of motion.
... resultant speed and, by the definition of the tangent, to determine the angle of which the object is launched into the air.